East Lansing Copwatch Are there no Civil Rights in America?

• Report rights infringement
• published: 12 Apr 2013
• views: 18228

IT IS MY STRONG BELIEF that there is a common misconception for "Police" "Officers" when it comes to traffic codes. This is what the paper stated that they didn't want to hear: "I hereby invoke and refuse to waive all of the following Rights and privileges afforded to me by the United States Constitution. I invoke and refuse to waive my Fifth Amendment Right, the right to remain silent, do not ask me any questions. I invoke and refuse to waive my Sixth Amendment Right to an attorney of my choice, do not ask me any questions without my attorney present. I hereby invoke and refuse to waive all privileges and Rights pursuant to the case Miranda vs Arizona. Do not ask me any questions or make any comment to me about this decision. I invoke and refuse to waive my Fourth Amendment Right, to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. I do not consent to any search or seizure of myself, my home, or any property in my possession. Do not ask me about my ownership interest in any property. I do not consent to this contact with you. If I am not presently under arrest or under investigatory detention, please allow me to leave. any statement I make or alleged consent I give in response to your questions is hereby made under protest and under duress, and in submission to your claim as lawful authority to force me to provide you with this information." Here are some case law examples that support my challenge "Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2nd 906 at 910. "The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven." Maine v. Thiboutot 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980). "Where there is absence of proof of jurisdiction, all administrative and judicial proceedings are a nullity, and confer no right, offer no protection, and afford no justification, and may be rejected upon direct collateral attack" Thompson v Tolmie, 2 Pet. 157, 7 L. Ed. 381; and Griffith v. Frazier, 8 Cr. 9, 3 L. Ed. 471. "The rights and liberties of the citizens of the United States are not protected by custom and tradition alone, they are preserved from the encroachments of government by express/enumerated provisions of the Federal Constitution." Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 1 L. Ed. 2nd. 1148 (1957). "The Right to Travel is a well established common right that does not owe its existance to the Federal Government. It is recognized as a natural right by the courts." Schactman v. Dulles 96 app DC 287.225. The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago 169 NE 221. "The right to travel is a part of liberty of which a citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law. under the fifth ammendment." Kent v. Dulles 357 US 116, 125. "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by horse drawn carriage or automobile, is not a privilege which a city can prohibit or permit at will, but a common right, which he has under the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith 154. SE. yeah i didn't edit my personal information out because I'm out there for you trying to defend YOUR RIGHTS too, we all have the same rights, regardless of color of skin, religious beliefs, or whatever else you wanna use to separate yourselves from one another to the advantage of our conquerors. Get active, stop trusting your Mainstream Media. We need more Patriots!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmZuGOXnjkI i accidentally turned off my camera, but i didn't miss much, Sgt. James O.Campbell Jr. #121 said to Ofc. Derek J. Rodriguez #105 "you owe me one" off camera.