Anglican Mainstream’s distortions and dishonesty
Share |
Call to boycott the Greenbelt festival over Tatchell invite
Hosting Tatchell will put children at risk of child sex abuse, claims Anglican activist
London – 24 May 2010
A leading consultant with Anglican Mainstream, the Church of England’s
conservative and traditionalist wing, has called for a boycott of the
UK’s Christian version of Woodstock, the mega Greenbelt arts festival,
which takes place in Cheltenham in August.
Dr Lisa Nolland, apparently speaking on behalf of Anglican Mainstream,
is calling on Christians to stay away in protest at the decision by the
festival organisers to host a speech by gay rights and human rights
campaigner Peter Tatchell.
Last year, Anglican Mainstream demanded a boycott of Greenbelt after it
invited gay US Bishop, Gene Robinson, as a guest speaker.
According to the Church of England Newspaper, Ms Nolland says that
inviting Mr Tatchell will put more children at risk of sexual abuse
(see full text below).
“The suggestion that my guest lecture at Greenbelt will leave children
vulnerable to sexual abuse is a sordid slur, unworthy of a Christian,”
said Mr Tatchell, who has previously spoken at Greenbelt and received
an overwhelmingly warm and positive reception from the packed out
religious audience.
“My Greenbelt talk is not about teen sexuality, sex education or the
age of consent. It is about the persecution of gay people in Africa,
much of which is being orchestrated by Christian evangelicals who share
Anglican Mainstream’s fundamentalist interpretation of scripture.
“I will be highlighting rising homophobic victimisation and praising
the inspiring defence of gay human rights by African Christian leaders
such as Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Bishop Christopher Senyonjo of
Uganda, who has been hounded and cast out by the Anglican Church of
Uganda.
“Dr Nolland is bearing false witness. Her claims are partial, selective
and distorted. Anglican Mainstream is colluding with her
misrepresentations by giving them a platform on its website.
“Does she want me censored and banned by Greenbelt? It seems like an
attack on freedom of speech. I am happy to debate with anyone from
Anglican Mainstream. I await their invitation.
“Her account of my beliefs and campaigns is one-sided, biased and unbalanced.
“She has ignored totally my human rights work on global poverty,
disarmament and anti-racism, and my support for the democratic
struggles in Zimbabwe, Burma, Iran, Russia, Balochistan and Uganda. She
doesn’t mention a word about how I have condemned the persecution of
Christians in countries like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and opposed the
prosecution of homophobic street preachers like Harry Hammond, Shawn
Holes and Dale McApline.
“Lisa Nolland presents a selective and distorted account of my essay on
sex education. She has neglected to mention my advocacy of a sexual
moral framework of mutual consent, respect and fulfilment, and my
proposals to help protect young people against sex abuse.
“I would like to thank Anglican Mainstream for helping stir extra
interest in Greenbelt; resulting in more people now planning to attend
this year’s festival because of the controversy over my invitation,”
said Mr Tatchell.
Dr Nolland's posting on the Anglican Mainstream website (12 May),
reiterates her opposition to Mr Tatchell being an invited speaker at
Greenbelt and concludes with this comment:
"Would a committed racist, pimp or Moslem with four wives and
twenty-one children be put in the 2010 Greenbelt line-up if their
poetry or art was unexcelled or their science was solving the problem
of world hunger?"
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/2010/05/12/greenbelt-and-peter-tatchell-an-update-2/
This is what Ms Nolland claims Peter Tatchell is advocating for sex education in schools:
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/2010/04/29/ii-open-letter-to-greenbelt-on-its-invitations-to-robinson-and-tatchell/
This is the full account, including the moral perspectives, of what he
wrote in his chapter in the book, Teenage Sex – What should schools
teach children?:
http://www.petertatchell.net/sex%20education/schoolsex.htm
This is Dr Nolland’s version of an interview that Peter Tatchell conducted on under-age sex and child sex abuse:
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/2010/04/29/ii-open-letter-to-greenbelt-on-its-invitations-to-robinson-and-tatchell/
This is the full account of Mr Tatchell’s interview with 14 year-old
Lee. It is not an advocacy or approval of his sexual relationships with
older men, but merely a reportage of Lee’s perspective:
http://www.petertatchell.net/age%20of%20consent/14%20gay%20boyfriend.htm
News report Church of England Newspaper
By Toby Cohen, 6 May 2010
BOYCOTT GREENBELT if you want to safeguard vulnerable children, said an
Anglican Mainstream consultant after her concerns over the presence of
Peter Tatchell at this year’s festival were ignored.
Dr Lisa Nolland wrote an open letter to the festival organisers
complaining about “the further gayification of Greenbelt,” following
the invitation of the gay rights campaigner, which she saw as
compounding damage done by inviting the Bishop of New Hampshire, the Rt
Rev Gene Robinson, to speak last year.
Dr Nolland wrote: “We are very concerned and alarmed. We would like to
meet with you because we believe this is damaging to both Christian
witness and the health of the nation. “Both Gene Robinson and Peter
Tatchell are bad news for the church and for Greenbelt. Greenbelt does
much that is good and even excellent. Why spoil it with such as this?
“In the light of the above, I would very much appreciate an explanation
of your invitation to Peter Tatchell for 2010, given your invitation to
Gene Robin- son in 2009. “You will recall the specific concerns we
raised about ensuring that equal airtime was given to orthodox
Christian perspectives. On the face of it seems that our concerns have
fallen on deaf ears.”
Anglican Mainstream has posted a response from the festival on its
website, which reads: “Each year Greenbelt hosts speakers with varying
and sometimes contrasting views on a whole range of subjects. At any
one time, we also ensure there are a range of lineup items that which
they feel comfortable with.”
Dr Nolland told The Church of England Newspaper that this statement was
disingenuous. Not only did she decry the absence of a speaker who could
present “the orthodox Biblical position on sexual ethics,” she also
suspected that the liberal campaigners were denying the voice of less
palatable sexualities who might taint their case.
Dr Nolland said: “If Greenbelt actually wanted to have a really open
honest discussion about all this, I’d have a far easier time with it.
But instead – they talk about how they include and accept all and all
are welcomed etc — that’s rub- bish. There are all sorts of
orientations out there who say ‘look, LGBT people are doing to us what
straight people did to them for centuries’.
Once the campaigners are accepted, they will then start leading
Christians further astray, Dr Nolland fears. Illustrating how far this
could go, she pointed to an interview Mr Tatchell conducted with a 14-
year-old boy, ‘Lee’, who was sexually active with older men from the
age of 12 and suggests that we should rethink our attitudes towards
paedophilia.
Dr Nolland said that attending the festival will leave children more
vulnerable to sexual abuse, because of Mr Tatchell’s erosion of
boundaries, “particularly if they are told we need to question —
explore, try this, try that, try 200 things later on, explore your
sexuality — that’s actually a really bad idea”. Mr Tatchell is
currently in Australia attending a family funeral, and no one from
Greenbelt was available to comment.