Create your page here

Fullscreen player TV mode CHAT

Tweet this page share on Facebook share in Google+

Monday, 24 October 2016

Videos
Video Details
News
Chat
Wiki
Images
Related
More

Court Of Appeals
Latest Videos
Longest Videos

Court Of Appeals
Latest Videos
Longest Videos

Appellate court

Collage
Shopping

Related News
Top Headlines
French
German
Hindi
Indonesian
Italian
Persian
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish

WN Shopping
Publications

back to playlist

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.

published: 30 Jan 2010
views: 10560

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin

published: 03 Mar 2016
views: 720

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).

published: 15 Jul 2014
views: 3792

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.

published: 01 Sep 2015
views: 173

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”

published: 22 Jan 2015
views: 13477

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

published: 24 Oct 2016
views: 583

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.

published: 18 Oct 2016
views: 380

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.

published: 04 Aug 2016
views: 39

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers Service Commission contesting the ruling by the labour and employment court. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday next week after lawyers representing the teachers unions asked for more time to consider whether to continue participating in the suit which has been consolidated with a counter suit filed by KNUT. Meanwhile, the opposition CORD coalition is gearing up for its rally to be held at the Uhuru park grounds this Wednesday to express solidarity with the teachers and pile pressure on the government to pay the increased salaries.

published: 22 Sep 2015
views: 646

Federal Courts of Appeals

published: 03 Mar 2016
views: 123

Appellate court

An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court, court of appeals (American English),appeal court (British English), court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.

The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".

Read more...

This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia - https://wn.com/Appellate_court

This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.

Loading...

62:09

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
65:07

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
20:15

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
5:04

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
4:57

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
1:01

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate
GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4
4:53

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit
First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.
20:11

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.
3:14

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals
The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers Service Commission contesting the ruling by the labour and employment court. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday next week after lawyers representing the teachers unions asked for more time to consider whether to continue participating in the suit which has been consolidated with a counter suit filed by KNUT. Meanwhile, the opposition CORD coalition is gearing up for its rally to be held at the Uhuru park grounds this Wednesday to express solidarity with the teachers and pile pressure on the government to pay the increased salaries.
8:35

Federal Courts of Appeals

Federal Courts of Appeals

Federal Courts of Appeals

Fullscreen pause

Send this Playlist by SMS Email this Page Play all in Full Screen Show More Related Videos

Send this Playlist by SMS Email this Page Play all in Full Screen Show More Related Videos

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to p...

published: 30 Jan 2010
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin

published: 03 Mar 2016
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).

published: 15 Jul 2014
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.

published: 01 Sep 2015
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”

published: 22 Jan 2015
**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

published: 24 Oct 2016
U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.

published: 18 Oct 2016
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.

published: 04 Aug 2016
Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers Service Commission contesting the ruling by the labour and employment court. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday next week after lawyers representing the teachers unions asked for more time to consider whether to continue participating in the suit which has been consolidated with a counter suit filed by KNUT. Meanwhile, the opposition CORD coalition is gearing up for its rally to be held at the Uhuru park grounds this Wednesday to express solidarity with the teachers and pile pressure on the government to pay the increased salaries.

published: 22 Sep 2015
Federal Courts of Appeals

published: 03 Mar 2016

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

back

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

Order: Reorder
Duration: 62:09
Updated: 30 Jan 2010
views: 10560

videos

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and ...

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.

wn.com/Fox Television V. Federal Communications Commission 2Nd Circuit Court Of Appeals 2006

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.

published: 30 Jan 2010
views: 10560

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

back

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

Order: Reorder
Duration: 65:07
Updated: 03 Mar 2016
views: 720

videos

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comme...

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin

wn.com/Maryland Court Of Appeals Hearing Freddie Gray Case Part 1

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin

published: 03 Mar 2016
views: 720

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

back

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Order: Reorder
Duration: 20:15
Updated: 15 Jul 2014
views: 3792

videos

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).

wn.com/Oral Argument Before The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).

published: 15 Jul 2014
views: 3792

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

back

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

Order: Reorder
Duration: 5:04
Updated: 01 Sep 2015
views: 173

videos

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.

wn.com/U.S. 5Th Circuit Court Of Appeals Walk Through At The Courthouse

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.

published: 01 Sep 2015
views: 173

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

back

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Order: Reorder
Duration: 4:57
Updated: 22 Jan 2015
views: 13477

videos

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline ...

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”

wn.com/Pathways To The Bench U.S. Court Of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”

published: 22 Jan 2015
views: 13477

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

back

Update 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

Order: Reorder
Duration: 1:01
Updated: 24 Oct 2016
views: 583

videos

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

wn.com/Update 5Th Circuit Of Appeals How To Donate

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

published: 24 Oct 2016
views: 583

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

back

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

Order: Reorder
Duration: 4:53
Updated: 18 Oct 2016
views: 380

videos

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.

wn.com/U.S. Court Of Appeals First Amendment Audit

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.

published: 18 Oct 2016
views: 380

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

back

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Order: Reorder
Duration: 20:11
Updated: 04 Aug 2016
views: 39

videos

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Ros ...

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.

wn.com/Second Circuit Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments In Domenech V. Parts Authority

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.

published: 04 Aug 2016
views: 39

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

back

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

Order: Reorder
Duration: 3:14
Updated: 22 Sep 2015
views: 646

videos

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers ...

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers Service Commission contesting the ruling by the labour and employment court. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday next week after lawyers representing the teachers unions asked for more time to consider whether to continue participating in the suit which has been consolidated with a counter suit filed by KNUT. Meanwhile, the opposition CORD coalition is gearing up for its rally to be held at the Uhuru park grounds this Wednesday to express solidarity with the teachers and pile pressure on the government to pay the increased salaries.

wn.com/Court Of Appeal Adjourns Hearing Of Teachers' Pay Dispute Appeals

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers Service Commission contesting the ruling by the labour and employment court. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday next week after lawyers representing the teachers unions asked for more time to consider whether to continue participating in the suit which has been consolidated with a counter suit filed by KNUT. Meanwhile, the opposition CORD coalition is gearing up for its rally to be held at the Uhuru park grounds this Wednesday to express solidarity with the teachers and pile pressure on the government to pay the increased salaries.

published: 22 Sep 2015
views: 646

Federal Courts of Appeals

back

Federal Courts of Appeals

Order: Reorder
Duration: 8:35
Updated: 03 Mar 2016
views: 123

videos

wn.com/Federal Courts Of Appeals

published: 03 Mar 2016
views: 123

Send this Playlist by SMS Email this Page Play all in Full Screen Show More Related Videos

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. ...

published: 12 Oct 2016
US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. h...

published: 11 Oct 2016
Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

A Washington D.C. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, but that it can still continue to operate. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled 2 to 1 that the structure of the agency—created five years ago to protect consumers from abuses by the financial services industry—is unconstitutional. Specifically, the appellate court took issue with the CFPB’s single director, Richard Cordray, who can only be removed by the president for cause.

published: 11 Oct 2016
Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure of CFPB Unconstitutional

US New , new york time ... WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, setting aside a closely watched enforcement action against a mortgage lender and handing a considerable blow to the five-year-old agency.

published: 11 Oct 2016
Criminal Appeals Handbook E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B012G92A4Q/book Criminal Appeals Handbook provides practical assistance to legal representatives of clients who are seeking to challenge convictions or sentences in the Court of Appeal and beyond. This book will also be of interest to those convicted and their families by assisting them to understand the process, their rights and their options.the process of appealing to the criminal court is an area of law where the practitioner and the layman are in need of practical guidance. The changes that the criminal profession is experiencing are likely to result in an increased need for guidance in this area, especially for solicitor advocates who, unlike chambersbased counsel, have not experienced the Court of Appeal as part of their traini...

published: 11 Oct 2016
Construction on North Dakota pipeline allowed to continue, federal court says

A federal appeals court rejected a request from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Sunday, though construction may not start any time soon. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled Sunday that Energy Transfer Partners can move forward on construction of the pipeline, however three federal agencies still need to clear the project before anything can gets built.The $3.7 billion, 1,170-mile pipeline has been highly controversial because it crosses sacred sites of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, drawing thousands who have protested with the Native American tribes near the proposed path of the pipeline. The decision will allow construction to restart on parts of the pipeline located on privately owned land up to the Missouri ...

published: 10 Oct 2016
Scalia: A Court of One E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00GEECHQQ/book [murphys] biography of Justice Scalia is patient and thorough, alive both intellectually and morally.functions as an Mri scan of one of the most influential conservative thinkers of the twentieth century. (the New York Times): An authoritative, incisive and deeply researched book about of the most controversial Supreme Court justice of our time.scalia: A Court of One is the compelling story of one of the most polarizing figures to serve on the nations highest court. Bruce Allen Murphy shows how Scalia changed the legal landscape through his controversial theories of textualism and originalism, interpreting the meaning of the Constitutions words as he claimed they were understood during the nations Founding period. But ...

published: 10 Oct 2016
Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B016IVE8X4/book "invaluable ? to the armoury of all ? a compulsory addition to the library of every immigration judge and practitioner.??the President of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, Mr Justice Mccloskeythe system of appeals and judicial review in immigration has received a radical overhaul in recent years. The Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook is a practical and user-friendly text dealing with all aspects of immigration appeals, and with administrative and judicial review.the book is written in the style of a user-friendly Handbook and features check lists and bullet points for ease of understanding. It covers:-the new appeals system;the Procedure Rules for the First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum ...

published: 10 Oct 2016
A conversation with Judge Linda Stephens, NC Court of Appeals

From her earliest years, Linda Stephens had a passion for learning and a remarkable work ethic. The first in her family to graduate from high school, Linda earned a BA in Journalism, magna cum laude, from the University of South Carolina and her JD from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her legal career has been a string of firsts: the first female law clerk to Judge Fred Hedrick of the NC Court of Appeals; the first woman associate, and then the first female partner with her law firm; and the first woman to serve as President of the NC Association of Defense Attorneys. Linda was named one of the top 50 women lawyers in the state by Super Lawyers Magazine, and was listed among the Best Lawyers in America for her last 11 years in private practice. Since joining the bench, sh...

published: 09 Oct 2016
Injustice On Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00ELK24BS/book The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental institutions in our society. However, because the Supreme Court can hear less than 150 cases per year, the Circuit Courts (with a combined caseload of over 60,000) are, for practical purposes, the courts of last resort for all but a tiny fraction of federal court litigation. Thus, their significance, both for ultimate dispute resolution and for the formation and application of federal law, cannot be overstated.yet, in the last forty years, a dramatic increase in caseload and a systemic resistance to an increased judgeship have led to a crisis. Signed published opinions form only a small percentage of dispositions; judges confer on fif...

published: 09 Oct 2016

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

back

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

Order: Reorder
Duration: 0:53
Updated: 12 Oct 2016
views: 0

videos

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s...

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. ►Circle us on Google + http://goo.gl/TXeBfX ►Subscribe Channel http://goo.gl/mqt0wI ►Don't forget to Like * Comment * Share this video. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay tuned, Stay connected

wn.com/US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. ►Circle us on Google + http://goo.gl/TXeBfX ►Subscribe Channel http://goo.gl/mqt0wI ►Don't forget to Like * Comment * Share this video. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay tuned, Stay connected

published: 12 Oct 2016
views: 0

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

back

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

Order: Reorder
Duration: 0:42
Updated: 11 Oct 2016
views: 844

videos

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s...

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/domesticNews/~3/dq3yxHpk5wA/us-usa-court-cfpb-idUSKCN12B1TN http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com

wn.com/US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/domesticNews/~3/dq3yxHpk5wA/us-usa-court-cfpb-idUSKCN12B1TN http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com

published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 844

Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

back

Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

Order: Reorder
Duration: 3:31
Updated: 11 Oct 2016
views: 3

videos

A Washington D.C. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, but that it can still continue...

A Washington D.C. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, but that it can still continue to operate. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled 2 to 1 that the structure of the agency—created five years ago to protect consumers from abuses by the financial services industry—is unconstitutional. Specifically, the appellate court took issue with the CFPB’s single director, Richard Cordray, who can only be removed by the president for cause.

wn.com/Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’S Structure Is Unconstitutional

A Washington D.C. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, but that it can still continue to operate. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled 2 to 1 that the structure of the agency—created five years ago to protect consumers from abuses by the financial services industry—is unconstitutional. Specifically, the appellate court took issue with the CFPB’s single director, Richard Cordray, who can only be removed by the president for cause.

published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 3

Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure of CFPB Unconstitutional

back

Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure of CFPB Unconstitutional

Order: Reorder
Duration: 2:03
Updated: 11 Oct 2016
views: 6

videos

US New , new york time ... WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, se...

US New , new york time ... WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, setting aside a closely watched enforcement action against a mortgage lender and handing a considerable blow to the five-year-old agency.

wn.com/Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure Of Cfpb Unconstitutional

US New , new york time ... WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, setting aside a closely watched enforcement action against a mortgage lender and handing a considerable blow to the five-year-old agency.

published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 6

Criminal Appeals Handbook E-Book

back

Criminal Appeals Handbook E-Book

Order: Reorder
Duration: 2:38
Updated: 11 Oct 2016
views: 0

videos

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B012G92A4Q/book Criminal Appeals Handbook provides practical assistance to legal representatives of clie...

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B012G92A4Q/book Criminal Appeals Handbook provides practical assistance to legal representatives of clients who are seeking to challenge convictions or sentences in the Court of Appeal and beyond. This book will also be of interest to those convicted and their families by assisting them to understand the process, their rights and their options.the process of appealing to the criminal court is an area of law where the practitioner and the layman are in need of practical guidance. The changes that the criminal profession is experiencing are likely to result in an increased need for guidance in this area, especially for solicitor advocates who, unlike chambersbased counsel, have not experienced the Court of Appeal as part of their training.in order to be of maximum practical assistance, the book takes each topic in the order in which it arises in the appeal process. It begins with how to obtain advice including funding for advice and assistance legal aid, potential grounds of appeal, lodging, etc. and will follow the process through to the conclusion of the case in the Court of Appeal. There is then a short section on Appeal to the Supreme Court followed by reference to the Criminal Case Review Commission, then finally international remedies (ecthr and Unhrc). Criminal Appeals Handbook covers the following topics:appeals against conviction;appeals against sentence;referrals to the Ccrc;pardons;applications to the Ecthr;application to the Un Human Rights Committee.each chapter is divided into small subsections. The sections concerned with the law begin by stating the law, with the authority and a short explanation and conclude by citing the other relevant case law in the area. Chapters concerned with procedural aspects of the process conclude with a checklist of relevant matters. Guidance on funding each aspect of the appeal process is also included. This book brings together and restates the law that has been set out elsewhere in various cases, textbooks, guidelines and practice directions, in a practical, comprehensive and user-friendly style.

wn.com/Criminal Appeals Handbook E Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B012G92A4Q/book Criminal Appeals Handbook provides practical assistance to legal representatives of clients who are seeking to challenge convictions or sentences in the Court of Appeal and beyond. This book will also be of interest to those convicted and their families by assisting them to understand the process, their rights and their options.the process of appealing to the criminal court is an area of law where the practitioner and the layman are in need of practical guidance. The changes that the criminal profession is experiencing are likely to result in an increased need for guidance in this area, especially for solicitor advocates who, unlike chambersbased counsel, have not experienced the Court of Appeal as part of their training.in order to be of maximum practical assistance, the book takes each topic in the order in which it arises in the appeal process. It begins with how to obtain advice including funding for advice and assistance legal aid, potential grounds of appeal, lodging, etc. and will follow the process through to the conclusion of the case in the Court of Appeal. There is then a short section on Appeal to the Supreme Court followed by reference to the Criminal Case Review Commission, then finally international remedies (ecthr and Unhrc). Criminal Appeals Handbook covers the following topics:appeals against conviction;appeals against sentence;referrals to the Ccrc;pardons;applications to the Ecthr;application to the Un Human Rights Committee.each chapter is divided into small subsections. The sections concerned with the law begin by stating the law, with the authority and a short explanation and conclude by citing the other relevant case law in the area. Chapters concerned with procedural aspects of the process conclude with a checklist of relevant matters. Guidance on funding each aspect of the appeal process is also included. This book brings together and restates the law that has been set out elsewhere in various cases, textbooks, guidelines and practice directions, in a practical, comprehensive and user-friendly style.

published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 0

Construction on North Dakota pipeline allowed to continue, federal court says

back

Construction on North Dakota pipeline allowed to continue, federal court says

Order: Reorder
Duration: 1:24
Updated: 10 Oct 2016
views: 8

videos

A federal appeals court rejected a request from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Sunday, though construction ...

A federal appeals court rejected a request from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Sunday, though construction may not start any time soon. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled Sunday that Energy Transfer Partners can move forward on construction of the pipeline, however three federal agencies still need to clear the project before anything can gets built.The $3.7 billion, 1,170-mile pipeline has been highly controversial because it crosses sacred sites of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, drawing thousands who have protested with the Native American tribes near the proposed path of the pipeline. The decision will allow construction to restart on parts of the pipeline located on privately owned land up to the Missouri River. The court has yet to rule on the tribe's appeal of a September ruling not to shut down construction on the entire pipeline. The U.S. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of the Interior also said in September it would not authorize construction of the pipeline on land owned by the Army Corp of Engineers, including near Lake Oahe in North Dakota where the tribe is attempting to prevent construction.

wn.com/Construction On North Dakota Pipeline Allowed To Continue, Federal Court Says

A federal appeals court rejected a request from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Sunday, though construction may not start any time soon. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled Sunday that Energy Transfer Partners can move forward on construction of the pipeline, however three federal agencies still need to clear the project before anything can gets built.The $3.7 billion, 1,170-mile pipeline has been highly controversial because it crosses sacred sites of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, drawing thousands who have protested with the Native American tribes near the proposed path of the pipeline. The decision will allow construction to restart on parts of the pipeline located on privately owned land up to the Missouri River. The court has yet to rule on the tribe's appeal of a September ruling not to shut down construction on the entire pipeline. The U.S. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of the Interior also said in September it would not authorize construction of the pipeline on land owned by the Army Corp of Engineers, including near Lake Oahe in North Dakota where the tribe is attempting to prevent construction.

published: 10 Oct 2016
views: 8

Scalia: A Court of One E-Book

back

Scalia: A Court of One E-Book

Order: Reorder
Duration: 2:49
Updated: 10 Oct 2016
views: 0

videos

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00GEECHQQ/book [murphys] biography of Justice Scalia is patient and thorough, alive both intellectually...

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00GEECHQQ/book [murphys] biography of Justice Scalia is patient and thorough, alive both intellectually and morally.functions as an Mri scan of one of the most influential conservative thinkers of the twentieth century. (the New York Times): An authoritative, incisive and deeply researched book about of the most controversial Supreme Court justice of our time.scalia: A Court of One is the compelling story of one of the most polarizing figures to serve on the nations highest court. Bruce Allen Murphy shows how Scalia changed the legal landscape through his controversial theories of textualism and originalism, interpreting the meaning of the Constitutions words as he claimed they were understood during the nations Founding period. But Scalias judicial conservatism is informed as much by his highly traditional Catholicism and political partisanship as by his reading of the Constitution; his opinionated speeches, contentious public appearances, and newsworthy interviews have made him a lightning rod for controversy. Scalia is an intellectual biography of one of [the Supreme Courts] most colorful members (chicago Tribune), combined with an insightful analysis of the Supreme Court and its influence on American life over the past quarter century. Scalia began his career practicing law in Cleveland, Ohio, and rose to become the presidents lawyer as the head of the Office of Legal Counsel for President Gerald R. Ford. His sterling academic and legal credentials led to his nomination by President Ronald Reagan to the Court of Appeals for the Dc Circuit in 1982. In 1986, he successfully outmaneuvered the more senior Robert Bork to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Scalias evident legal brilliance, ambition and personal magnetism led everyone to predict he would unite a new conservative majority under Chief Justice William Rehnquist and change American law in the process. Instead he became a Court of One. Rather than bringing the conservatives together, Scalia drove them apart. He attacked and alienated his more moderate colleagues Sandra Day Oconnor, David Souter, and Anthony Kennedy. Scalia prevented the conservative majority from coalescing for nearly two decades.

wn.com/Scalia A Court Of One E Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00GEECHQQ/book [murphys] biography of Justice Scalia is patient and thorough, alive both intellectually and morally.functions as an Mri scan of one of the most influential conservative thinkers of the twentieth century. (the New York Times): An authoritative, incisive and deeply researched book about of the most controversial Supreme Court justice of our time.scalia: A Court of One is the compelling story of one of the most polarizing figures to serve on the nations highest court. Bruce Allen Murphy shows how Scalia changed the legal landscape through his controversial theories of textualism and originalism, interpreting the meaning of the Constitutions words as he claimed they were understood during the nations Founding period. But Scalias judicial conservatism is informed as much by his highly traditional Catholicism and political partisanship as by his reading of the Constitution; his opinionated speeches, contentious public appearances, and newsworthy interviews have made him a lightning rod for controversy. Scalia is an intellectual biography of one of [the Supreme Courts] most colorful members (chicago Tribune), combined with an insightful analysis of the Supreme Court and its influence on American life over the past quarter century. Scalia began his career practicing law in Cleveland, Ohio, and rose to become the presidents lawyer as the head of the Office of Legal Counsel for President Gerald R. Ford. His sterling academic and legal credentials led to his nomination by President Ronald Reagan to the Court of Appeals for the Dc Circuit in 1982. In 1986, he successfully outmaneuvered the more senior Robert Bork to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Scalias evident legal brilliance, ambition and personal magnetism led everyone to predict he would unite a new conservative majority under Chief Justice William Rehnquist and change American law in the process. Instead he became a Court of One. Rather than bringing the conservatives together, Scalia drove them apart. He attacked and alienated his more moderate colleagues Sandra Day Oconnor, David Souter, and Anthony Kennedy. Scalia prevented the conservative majority from coalescing for nearly two decades.

published: 10 Oct 2016
views: 0

Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook E-Book

back

Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook E-Book

Order: Reorder
Duration: 1:52
Updated: 10 Oct 2016
views: 0

videos

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B016IVE8X4/book "invaluable ? to the armoury of all ? a compulsory addition to the library of every immi...

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B016IVE8X4/book "invaluable ? to the armoury of all ? a compulsory addition to the library of every immigration judge and practitioner.??the President of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, Mr Justice Mccloskeythe system of appeals and judicial review in immigration has received a radical overhaul in recent years. The Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook is a practical and user-friendly text dealing with all aspects of immigration appeals, and with administrative and judicial review.the book is written in the style of a user-friendly Handbook and features check lists and bullet points for ease of understanding. It covers:-the new appeals system;the Procedure Rules for the First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, with radical new features as to the awarding of costs and featuring judicial limitations on the withdrawing of immigration decisions and varying of the grounds for refusal;the case law on natural justice, rules of evidence, one stop notices, vulnerable witnesses and children;judicial review in the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber;-the new system of Administrative Review under the Immigration Rules;-identifying challenges based on points of law and preparing and presenting appeals in the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber;-appeals under the Eea Regulations and to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission;onwards appeals to the Court of Appeal.

wn.com/Immigration Appeals And Remedies Handbook E Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B016IVE8X4/book "invaluable ? to the armoury of all ? a compulsory addition to the library of every immigration judge and practitioner.??the President of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, Mr Justice Mccloskeythe system of appeals and judicial review in immigration has received a radical overhaul in recent years. The Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook is a practical and user-friendly text dealing with all aspects of immigration appeals, and with administrative and judicial review.the book is written in the style of a user-friendly Handbook and features check lists and bullet points for ease of understanding. It covers:-the new appeals system;the Procedure Rules for the First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, with radical new features as to the awarding of costs and featuring judicial limitations on the withdrawing of immigration decisions and varying of the grounds for refusal;the case law on natural justice, rules of evidence, one stop notices, vulnerable witnesses and children;judicial review in the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber;-the new system of Administrative Review under the Immigration Rules;-identifying challenges based on points of law and preparing and presenting appeals in the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber;-appeals under the Eea Regulations and to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission;onwards appeals to the Court of Appeal.

published: 10 Oct 2016
views: 0

A conversation with Judge Linda Stephens, NC Court of Appeals

back

A conversation with Judge Linda Stephens, NC Court of Appeals

Order: Reorder
Duration: 3:35
Updated: 09 Oct 2016
views: 7

videos

From her earliest years, Linda Stephens had a passion for learning and a remarkable work ethic. The first in her family to graduate from high school, Linda earn...

From her earliest years, Linda Stephens had a passion for learning and a remarkable work ethic. The first in her family to graduate from high school, Linda earned a BA in Journalism, magna cum laude, from the University of South Carolina and her JD from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her legal career has been a string of firsts: the first female law clerk to Judge Fred Hedrick of the NC Court of Appeals; the first woman associate, and then the first female partner with her law firm; and the first woman to serve as President of the NC Association of Defense Attorneys. Linda was named one of the top 50 women lawyers in the state by Super Lawyers Magazine, and was listed among the Best Lawyers in America for her last 11 years in private practice. Since joining the bench, she has earned the J. Robert Elster Award for Professional Excellence, and Lawyers Weekly’s Women of Justice Award, presented for “leadership, integrity, service, sacrifice and accomplishment in improving the quality of justice and exemplifying the highest ideals of the legal profession.” Throughout her career, she has earned respect through her willingness to do what it takes to get the job done right. For over ten years, Linda Stephens has worked hard on the North Carolina Court of Appeals, applying her years of experience and study to complex legal matters. Her deep understanding of the law and her commitment to justice make Judge Linda Stephens a fair and effective judge, who has earned the support of lawyers and former judges from across the political spectrum. Please visit http://www.judgelindastephens.org/ for more information

wn.com/A Conversation With Judge Linda Stephens, Nc Court Of Appeals

From her earliest years, Linda Stephens had a passion for learning and a remarkable work ethic. The first in her family to graduate from high school, Linda earned a BA in Journalism, magna cum laude, from the University of South Carolina and her JD from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her legal career has been a string of firsts: the first female law clerk to Judge Fred Hedrick of the NC Court of Appeals; the first woman associate, and then the first female partner with her law firm; and the first woman to serve as President of the NC Association of Defense Attorneys. Linda was named one of the top 50 women lawyers in the state by Super Lawyers Magazine, and was listed among the Best Lawyers in America for her last 11 years in private practice. Since joining the bench, she has earned the J. Robert Elster Award for Professional Excellence, and Lawyers Weekly’s Women of Justice Award, presented for “leadership, integrity, service, sacrifice and accomplishment in improving the quality of justice and exemplifying the highest ideals of the legal profession.” Throughout her career, she has earned respect through her willingness to do what it takes to get the job done right. For over ten years, Linda Stephens has worked hard on the North Carolina Court of Appeals, applying her years of experience and study to complex legal matters. Her deep understanding of the law and her commitment to justice make Judge Linda Stephens a fair and effective judge, who has earned the support of lawyers and former judges from across the political spectrum. Please visit http://www.judgelindastephens.org/ for more information

published: 09 Oct 2016
views: 7

Injustice On Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis E-Book

back

Injustice On Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis E-Book

Order: Reorder
Duration: 2:03
Updated: 09 Oct 2016
views: 0

videos

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00ELK24BS/book The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental in...

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00ELK24BS/book The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental institutions in our society. However, because the Supreme Court can hear less than 150 cases per year, the Circuit Courts (with a combined caseload of over 60,000) are, for practical purposes, the courts of last resort for all but a tiny fraction of federal court litigation. Thus, their significance, both for ultimate dispute resolution and for the formation and application of federal law, cannot be overstated.yet, in the last forty years, a dramatic increase in caseload and a systemic resistance to an increased judgeship have led to a crisis. Signed published opinions form only a small percentage of dispositions; judges confer on fifty routine cases in an afternoon; and most litigants are denied oral argument completely.in Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds chronicle the transformation of the United States Circuit Courts; consider the merits and dangers of continued truncating procedures; catalogue and respond to the array of specious arguments against increasing the size of the judiciary; and consider several ways of reorganizing the circuit courts so that they can dispense traditional high quality appellate justice even as their caseloads and the number of appellate judgeships increase. The work serves as an analytical capstone to the authors' thirty years of research on the issue and will constitute a powerful piece of advocacy for a more responsible and egalitarian approach to caseload glut facing the circuit courts.

wn.com/Injustice On Appeal The United States Courts Of Appeals In Crisis E Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00ELK24BS/book The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental institutions in our society. However, because the Supreme Court can hear less than 150 cases per year, the Circuit Courts (with a combined caseload of over 60,000) are, for practical purposes, the courts of last resort for all but a tiny fraction of federal court litigation. Thus, their significance, both for ultimate dispute resolution and for the formation and application of federal law, cannot be overstated.yet, in the last forty years, a dramatic increase in caseload and a systemic resistance to an increased judgeship have led to a crisis. Signed published opinions form only a small percentage of dispositions; judges confer on fifty routine cases in an afternoon; and most litigants are denied oral argument completely.in Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds chronicle the transformation of the United States Circuit Courts; consider the merits and dangers of continued truncating procedures; catalogue and respond to the array of specious arguments against increasing the size of the judiciary; and consider several ways of reorganizing the circuit courts so that they can dispense traditional high quality appellate justice even as their caseloads and the number of appellate judgeships increase. The work serves as an analytical capstone to the authors' thirty years of research on the issue and will constitute a powerful piece of advocacy for a more responsible and egalitarian approach to caseload glut facing the circuit courts.

published: 09 Oct 2016
views: 0

Send this Playlist by SMS Email this Page Play all in Full Screen Show More Related Videos

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

published: 14 Apr 2015
2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

published: 21 Apr 2015
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract. After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunct...

published: 30 Jan 2010
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015

published: 21 Apr 2015
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more ...

published: 08 Apr 2011
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html - http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - http://www.BirtherReport.com

published: 04 May 2011

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

back

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

Order: Reorder
Duration: 198:48
Updated: 14 Apr 2015
views: 49302

videos

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

wn.com/Ombudsman V. Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

published: 14 Apr 2015
views: 49302

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

back

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

Order: Reorder
Duration: 246:38
Updated: 21 Apr 2015
views: 47539

videos

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

wn.com/2Nd Ombudsman V. Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

published: 21 Apr 2015
views: 47539

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

back

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

Order: Reorder
Duration: 47:15
Updated: 30 Jan 2010
views: 9157

videos

Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract. After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan. The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.

wn.com/Santiago V. Rumsfeld 9Th Circuit Court Of Appeals 2005

Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract. After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan. The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.

published: 30 Jan 2010
views: 9157

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

back

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

Order: Reorder
Duration: 119:11
Updated: 21 Apr 2015
views: 282

videos

Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015

Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015

wn.com/Kansas Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015

published: 21 Apr 2015
views: 282

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

back

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

Order: Reorder
Duration: 42:25
Updated: 08 Apr 2011
views: 1598

videos

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard o...

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1

wn.com/Ricci V. Destefano Court Of Appeals Oral Argument

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1

published: 08 Apr 2011
views: 1598

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11

back

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11

Order: Reorder
Duration: 51:57
Updated: 04 May 2011
views: 14511

videos

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 1...

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html - http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - http://www.BirtherReport.com

wn.com/Oral Arguments Keyes Vs. Obama 9Th Circuit Court Of Appeals 5 2 11

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html - http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - http://www.BirtherReport.com

published: 04 May 2011
views: 14511

back

Tweet

Playlist
Chat

Most Related
Most Recent
Most Popular
Top Rated

repeat playlist
shuffle
replay video
clear playlist restore
images list

back

Tweet

Playlist
Chat

Most Related
Most Recent
Most Popular
Top Rated

repeat playlist
shuffle
replay video
clear playlist restore
images list

62:09

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the Yo...

published: 30 Jan 2010

Play in Full Screen

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006

Report rights infringement
published: 30 Jan 2010
views: 10560

This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.

65:07

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled t...

published: 03 Mar 2016

Play in Full Screen

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1

Report rights infringement
published: 03 Mar 2016
views: 720

Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin

20:15

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...

published: 15 Jul 2014

Play in Full Screen

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Report rights infringement
published: 15 Jul 2014
views: 3792

Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).

5:04

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if...

published: 01 Sep 2015

Play in Full Screen

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse

Report rights infringement
published: 01 Sep 2015
views: 173

A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.

4:57

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench...

published: 22 Jan 2015

Play in Full Screen

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen

Report rights infringement
published: 22 Jan 2015
views: 13477

Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”

1:01

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

published: 24 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

**Update** 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

Update 5th Circuit of Appeals & How to Donate

Report rights infringement
published: 24 Oct 2016
views: 583

GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/rn2tgep4

4:53

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen...

published: 18 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

U.S. Court of Appeals First Amendment Audit

Report rights infringement
published: 18 Oct 2016
views: 380

First Amendment Audit of the United States Court of Appeals in Pasadena with HDCW and Teen4Justice. Security goes berserk.

20:11

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Cou...

published: 04 Aug 2016

Play in Full Screen

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority

Report rights infringement
published: 04 Aug 2016
views: 39

Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.

3:14

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court...

published: 22 Sep 2015

Play in Full Screen

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

Court of Appeal adjourns hearing of teachers' pay dispute appeals

Report rights infringement
published: 22 Sep 2015
views: 646

The legal battle over the teachers increased pay award continued on Tuesday with the court of appeal adjourning the hearing of a petition filed by the Teachers Service Commission contesting the ruling by the labour and employment court. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday next week after lawyers representing the teachers unions asked for more time to consider whether to continue participating in the suit which has been consolidated with a counter suit filed by KNUT. Meanwhile, the opposition CORD coalition is gearing up for its rally to be held at the Uhuru park grounds this Wednesday to express solidarity with the teachers and pile pressure on the government to pay the increased salaries.

8:35

Federal Courts of Appeals

published: 03 Mar 2016

Play in Full Screen

Federal Courts of Appeals

Federal Courts of Appeals

Report rights infringement
published: 03 Mar 2016
views: 123

back

Tweet

Playlist
Chat

Most Related
Most Recent
Most Popular
Top Rated

repeat playlist
shuffle
replay video
clear playlist restore
images list

0:53

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau i...

published: 12 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

Report rights infringement
published: 12 Oct 2016
views: 0

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. ►Circle us on Google + http://goo.gl/TXeBfX ►Subscribe Channel http://goo.gl/mqt0wI ►Don't forget to Like * Comment * Share this video. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay tuned, Stay connected

0:42

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau i...

published: 11 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

US Consumer Bureau Ruled Unconstitutional By Appeals Court

Report rights infringement
published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 844

ON Tuesday a U.S. appeals court ruled that the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional because too much power is vested in the regulator’s sole director. It ruled, however, that it can continue operating with the director removable by the president. In its challenge to the financial watchdog created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of lender PHH Corp and threw out the $109 million penalty imposed on the company. In 2014, after the agency accused the lender of referring customers to mortgage insurers who in turn bought reinsurance from a PHH unit, PHH objected. The bureau cast the reinsurance payments as improper kickbacks and in June, imposed a $109 million penalty against PHH. http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/domesticNews/~3/dq3yxHpk5wA/us-usa-court-cfpb-idUSKCN12B1TN http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com

3:31

Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

A Washington D.C. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the structure of the Consumer Financial...

published: 11 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

Court Rules Consumer Protection Agency’s Structure Is Unconstitutional

Report rights infringement
published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 3

A Washington D.C. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, but that it can still continue to operate. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled 2 to 1 that the structure of the agency—created five years ago to protect consumers from abuses by the financial services industry—is unconstitutional. Specifically, the appellate court took issue with the CFPB’s single director, Richard Cordray, who can only be removed by the president for cause.

2:03

Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure of CFPB Unconstitutional

US New , new york time ... WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled the structu...

published: 11 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure of CFPB Unconstitutional

Federal Appeals Court Finds Structure of CFPB Unconstitutional

Report rights infringement
published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 6

US New , new york time ... WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutional, setting aside a closely watched enforcement action against a mortgage lender and handing a considerable blow to the five-year-old agency.

2:38

Criminal Appeals Handbook E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B012G92A4Q/book Criminal Appeals H...

published: 11 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Criminal Appeals Handbook E-Book

Criminal Appeals Handbook E-Book

Report rights infringement
published: 11 Oct 2016
views: 0

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B012G92A4Q/book Criminal Appeals Handbook provides practical assistance to legal representatives of clients who are seeking to challenge convictions or sentences in the Court of Appeal and beyond. This book will also be of interest to those convicted and their families by assisting them to understand the process, their rights and their options.the process of appealing to the criminal court is an area of law where the practitioner and the layman are in need of practical guidance. The changes that the criminal profession is experiencing are likely to result in an increased need for guidance in this area, especially for solicitor advocates who, unlike chambersbased counsel, have not experienced the Court of Appeal as part of their training.in order to be of maximum practical assistance, the book takes each topic in the order in which it arises in the appeal process. It begins with how to obtain advice including funding for advice and assistance legal aid, potential grounds of appeal, lodging, etc. and will follow the process through to the conclusion of the case in the Court of Appeal. There is then a short section on Appeal to the Supreme Court followed by reference to the Criminal Case Review Commission, then finally international remedies (ecthr and Unhrc). Criminal Appeals Handbook covers the following topics:appeals against conviction;appeals against sentence;referrals to the Ccrc;pardons;applications to the Ecthr;application to the Un Human Rights Committee.each chapter is divided into small subsections. The sections concerned with the law begin by stating the law, with the authority and a short explanation and conclude by citing the other relevant case law in the area. Chapters concerned with procedural aspects of the process conclude with a checklist of relevant matters. Guidance on funding each aspect of the appeal process is also included. This book brings together and restates the law that has been set out elsewhere in various cases, textbooks, guidelines and practice directions, in a practical, comprehensive and user-friendly style.

1:24

Construction on North Dakota pipeline allowed to continue, federal court says

A federal appeals court rejected a request from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to stop cons...

published: 10 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Construction on North Dakota pipeline allowed to continue, federal court says

Construction on North Dakota pipeline allowed to continue, federal court says

Report rights infringement
published: 10 Oct 2016
views: 8

A federal appeals court rejected a request from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline on Sunday, though construction may not start any time soon. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled Sunday that Energy Transfer Partners can move forward on construction of the pipeline, however three federal agencies still need to clear the project before anything can gets built.The $3.7 billion, 1,170-mile pipeline has been highly controversial because it crosses sacred sites of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, drawing thousands who have protested with the Native American tribes near the proposed path of the pipeline. The decision will allow construction to restart on parts of the pipeline located on privately owned land up to the Missouri River. The court has yet to rule on the tribe's appeal of a September ruling not to shut down construction on the entire pipeline. The U.S. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of the Interior also said in September it would not authorize construction of the pipeline on land owned by the Army Corp of Engineers, including near Lake Oahe in North Dakota where the tribe is attempting to prevent construction.

2:49

Scalia: A Court of One E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00GEECHQQ/book [murphys] biograph...

published: 10 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Scalia: A Court of One E-Book

Scalia: A Court of One E-Book

Report rights infringement
published: 10 Oct 2016
views: 0

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00GEECHQQ/book [murphys] biography of Justice Scalia is patient and thorough, alive both intellectually and morally.functions as an Mri scan of one of the most influential conservative thinkers of the twentieth century. (the New York Times): An authoritative, incisive and deeply researched book about of the most controversial Supreme Court justice of our time.scalia: A Court of One is the compelling story of one of the most polarizing figures to serve on the nations highest court. Bruce Allen Murphy shows how Scalia changed the legal landscape through his controversial theories of textualism and originalism, interpreting the meaning of the Constitutions words as he claimed they were understood during the nations Founding period. But Scalias judicial conservatism is informed as much by his highly traditional Catholicism and political partisanship as by his reading of the Constitution; his opinionated speeches, contentious public appearances, and newsworthy interviews have made him a lightning rod for controversy. Scalia is an intellectual biography of one of [the Supreme Courts] most colorful members (chicago Tribune), combined with an insightful analysis of the Supreme Court and its influence on American life over the past quarter century. Scalia began his career practicing law in Cleveland, Ohio, and rose to become the presidents lawyer as the head of the Office of Legal Counsel for President Gerald R. Ford. His sterling academic and legal credentials led to his nomination by President Ronald Reagan to the Court of Appeals for the Dc Circuit in 1982. In 1986, he successfully outmaneuvered the more senior Robert Bork to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Scalias evident legal brilliance, ambition and personal magnetism led everyone to predict he would unite a new conservative majority under Chief Justice William Rehnquist and change American law in the process. Instead he became a Court of One. Rather than bringing the conservatives together, Scalia drove them apart. He attacked and alienated his more moderate colleagues Sandra Day Oconnor, David Souter, and Anthony Kennedy. Scalia prevented the conservative majority from coalescing for nearly two decades.

1:52

Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B016IVE8X4/book "invaluable ? to t...

published: 10 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook E-Book

Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook E-Book

Report rights infringement
published: 10 Oct 2016
views: 0

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B016IVE8X4/book "invaluable ? to the armoury of all ? a compulsory addition to the library of every immigration judge and practitioner.??the President of the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, Mr Justice Mccloskeythe system of appeals and judicial review in immigration has received a radical overhaul in recent years. The Immigration Appeals and Remedies Handbook is a practical and user-friendly text dealing with all aspects of immigration appeals, and with administrative and judicial review.the book is written in the style of a user-friendly Handbook and features check lists and bullet points for ease of understanding. It covers:-the new appeals system;the Procedure Rules for the First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber, with radical new features as to the awarding of costs and featuring judicial limitations on the withdrawing of immigration decisions and varying of the grounds for refusal;the case law on natural justice, rules of evidence, one stop notices, vulnerable witnesses and children;judicial review in the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber;-the new system of Administrative Review under the Immigration Rules;-identifying challenges based on points of law and preparing and presenting appeals in the Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber;-appeals under the Eea Regulations and to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission;onwards appeals to the Court of Appeal.

3:35

A conversation with Judge Linda Stephens, NC Court of Appeals

From her earliest years, Linda Stephens had a passion for learning and a remarkable work e...

published: 09 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

A conversation with Judge Linda Stephens, NC Court of Appeals

A conversation with Judge Linda Stephens, NC Court of Appeals

Report rights infringement
published: 09 Oct 2016
views: 7

From her earliest years, Linda Stephens had a passion for learning and a remarkable work ethic. The first in her family to graduate from high school, Linda earned a BA in Journalism, magna cum laude, from the University of South Carolina and her JD from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her legal career has been a string of firsts: the first female law clerk to Judge Fred Hedrick of the NC Court of Appeals; the first woman associate, and then the first female partner with her law firm; and the first woman to serve as President of the NC Association of Defense Attorneys. Linda was named one of the top 50 women lawyers in the state by Super Lawyers Magazine, and was listed among the Best Lawyers in America for her last 11 years in private practice. Since joining the bench, she has earned the J. Robert Elster Award for Professional Excellence, and Lawyers Weekly’s Women of Justice Award, presented for “leadership, integrity, service, sacrifice and accomplishment in improving the quality of justice and exemplifying the highest ideals of the legal profession.” Throughout her career, she has earned respect through her willingness to do what it takes to get the job done right. For over ten years, Linda Stephens has worked hard on the North Carolina Court of Appeals, applying her years of experience and study to complex legal matters. Her deep understanding of the law and her commitment to justice make Judge Linda Stephens a fair and effective judge, who has earned the support of lawyers and former judges from across the political spectrum. Please visit http://www.judgelindastephens.org/ for more information

2:03

Injustice On Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis E-Book

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00ELK24BS/book The United States ...

published: 09 Oct 2016

Play in Full Screen

Injustice On Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis E-Book

Injustice On Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis E-Book

Report rights infringement
published: 09 Oct 2016
views: 0

Read your free e-book: http://downloadapp.us/mebk/50/en/B00ELK24BS/book The United States Circuit Courts of Appeals are among the most important governmental institutions in our society. However, because the Supreme Court can hear less than 150 cases per year, the Circuit Courts (with a combined caseload of over 60,000) are, for practical purposes, the courts of last resort for all but a tiny fraction of federal court litigation. Thus, their significance, both for ultimate dispute resolution and for the formation and application of federal law, cannot be overstated.yet, in the last forty years, a dramatic increase in caseload and a systemic resistance to an increased judgeship have led to a crisis. Signed published opinions form only a small percentage of dispositions; judges confer on fifty routine cases in an afternoon; and most litigants are denied oral argument completely.in Injustice on Appeal: The United States Courts of Appeals in Crisis, William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds chronicle the transformation of the United States Circuit Courts; consider the merits and dangers of continued truncating procedures; catalogue and respond to the array of specious arguments against increasing the size of the judiciary; and consider several ways of reorganizing the circuit courts so that they can dispense traditional high quality appellate justice even as their caseloads and the number of appellate judgeships increase. The work serves as an analytical capstone to the authors' thirty years of research on the issue and will constitute a powerful piece of advocacy for a more responsible and egalitarian approach to caseload glut facing the circuit courts.

back

Tweet

Playlist
Chat

Most Related
Most Recent
Most Popular
Top Rated

repeat playlist
shuffle
replay video
clear playlist restore
images list

198:48

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Cou...

published: 14 Apr 2015

Play in Full Screen

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

Report rights infringement
published: 14 Apr 2015
views: 49302

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

246:38

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Cou...

published: 21 Apr 2015

Play in Full Screen

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

Report rights infringement
published: 21 Apr 2015
views: 47539

G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)

47:15

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 18...

published: 30 Jan 2010

Play in Full Screen

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

Report rights infringement
published: 30 Jan 2010
views: 9157

Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract. After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan. The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.

119:11

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on A...

published: 21 Apr 2015

Play in Full Screen

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket

Report rights infringement
published: 21 Apr 2015
views: 282

Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015

42:25

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD -...

published: 08 Apr 2011

Play in Full Screen

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

Report rights infringement
published: 08 Apr 2011
views: 1598

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1

51:57

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake ...

published: 04 May 2011

Play in Full Screen

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11

Report rights infringement
published: 04 May 2011
views: 14511

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html - http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - http://www.BirtherReport.com

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments...

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments

2nd Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments...

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005

Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ...

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morn

Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2...

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument

Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument...

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeal

Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court...

back

photo: AP

Bermuda Triangle

The place that swallowed a 100 ships: The mystery of the Bermuda Triangle has been solved

Edit Indiatoday 24 Oct 2016

Scientists might have unravelled the reason behind mysterious disappearance of ships and planes in Bermuda Triangle ... ....

back

photo: AP / Evan Vucci

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan speaks during a rally to mark the 20th anniversary of the Million Man March, on Capitol Hill, on Saturday, Oct. 10, 2015, in Washington.

Farrakhan Tells Obama: 'You Failed…Give Trump A Chance'

Edit WorldNews.com 24 Oct 2016

Article by WN.com Correspondent Dallas DarlingAlthough Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan is used to stepping into racial and political minefields, the latest explosion nearly caught everyone by surprise ... To reinforce white supremacy and instill the belief blacks were of a lower form of humanity in the chain of evolution ... Indeed, one will find a vibrant black community free of drugs, poverty and crime....

back

photo: White House / Pete Souza

File - US President Barack Obama talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin after a lunch with other foreign leaders to commemorate the 70th anniversary of D-Day in Normandy, France, 6 June, 2014.

Cold war 2.0: how Russia and the west reheated a historic struggle

Edit The Guardian 24 Oct 2016

As chasm grows between a resurgent Russia and a divided US and Europe, diplomats say conflict is now more dangerous, with ‘no clear rules of the road’ ... Shirreff, then deputy supreme allied commander Europe, was at Nato’s military HQ in Mons, Belgium, when an American two-star general came in with the transcript of Putin’s speech justifying the annexation ... The talk is no longer of transition to a liberal democracy, but regression....

back

photo: USAF / Airman Daniel Snider

A special missions aviator from the 41st Rescue Squadron looks out from an HH-60G Pave Hawk over Grand Bay Bombing and Gunnery Range at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia (United States), May 20, 2016

Why is Turkey intervening in northern Iraq?

Edit BBC News 24 Oct 2016

From the outset of the operation, Turkey has been itching to play a role. This has been resolutely opposed by the government in Baghdad, and the Americans have had to mount some nimble diplomacy to try to ensure the differences between Turkey and Iraq do not overshadow the early stages of the Mosul offensive ... It is an amalgam of contemporary strategic concerns, domestic politics, and nostalgia for the Ottoman past....

back

photo: Deutsches Bundesarchiv

File - Adolf Hitler delivers a speech at the Kroll Opera House to the men of the Reichstag on the subject of Roosevelt and the war in the Pacific, declaring war on the United States, 11 December, 1941.

Hitler’s Secret Nazi Base Discovered Seven Decades After Being Abandoned

Edit Inquisitr 23 Oct 2016

Basically, the story suggests that the entire team of scientists got sick after eating polar bear meat in 1944. For a long period of time, a lot of people just assumed the polar bear meat had gone bad ... They just made the mistake of consuming polar bear meat that was infected with a parasitic worm called trichinella ... It is located in one of the least hospital parts of the entire planet....

search tools

You can search using any combination of the items listed below.

Language:

Sort type:

Arrived Within:

Search Type:

OFS Capital Corporation Announces Date for Its Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Release and Conference Call

Edit Stockhouse 24 Oct 2016

OFS Capital Corporation Announces Date for Its Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Release and Conference Call. OFS Capital Corporation (NASDAQ.OFS) (“OFS Capital”), a business development company, announced today that, prior to the opening of the stock market on Friday, November 4, 2016, it will issue a press release announcing its third quarter 2016 earnings results ... ABOUT OFS CAPITAL ... OFS Capital Corporation....

Supreme Court Case Announcement for October 24, 2016 (Supreme Court of Ohio)

Edit Public Technologies 24 Oct 2016

Court of Appeals, 147 Ohio St.3d 25, 2016-Ohio-1601 ... This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals ... This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County ... It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to and filed with the clerk of the Court of Appeals for Franklin County....

'Gay cake' appeal ruling 'surprisingly straightforward'

Edit BBC News 24 Oct 2016

After the Court of Appeal in Belfast upheld a finding over Ashers Baking Company, the company's manager, Daniel McArthur, told reporters the case was was not about the man who placed the order - Gareth Lee ... It is because the district judge had simply posed a series of questions to the appeal court — what lawyers call an "appeal by way of case ......

October 24, 2016 – Canadian Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal by Ecojustice, AquaBounty approval stands (PDF) (Aqua Bounty Technologies Inc)

Edit Public Technologies 24 Oct 2016

XON), is pleased to announce that, on 21 October 2016, the Federal Court of Appeal ("the Court") in Canada has dismissed the appeal brought by Ecojustice ("the appellants") on behalf of the Ecology Action Centre and Living Oceans Society against Canada's Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, Minister of Health and AquaBounty Canada Inc ... "We welcome the decision made by the Court of Appeal....

Christian bakers lose appeal over pro-gay marriage cake discrimination ruling

Edit Belfast Telegraph 24 Oct 2016

Court of Appeal judges in Belfast upheld an original judgment which ruled that Ashers Bakery had discriminated against a gay activist for declining his order for a cake bearing the slogan "Support Gay Marriage" ... "The only thing that I would like to say is I'm relieved and very grateful to the Court of Appeal for the judgment," he said outside the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast city centre....

Ashers Bakery: McArthurs say same-sex cake appeal loss 'undermines free speech' - gay activist Gareth Lee breaks silence

Edit Belfast Telegraph 24 Oct 2016

<< Full court report - Ashers Bakery lose pro-gay marriage cake slogan appeal >> ... However, on Monday morning the Court of Appeal upheld the original decision that Ashers Bakery had "directly discriminated" ... "The only thing that I would like to say is I'm relieved and very grateful to the Court of Appeal for the judgment." ... "Today's decision from the Court of Appeal is welcome and makes sense....

Ashers Bakery same-sex cake appeal loss: McArthurs say case 'undermines free speech' - gay activist Gareth Lee breaks silence

Edit Belfast Telegraph 24 Oct 2016

<< Full court report - Ashers Bakery lose pro-gay marriage cake slogan appeal >> ... However, on Monday morning the Court of Appeal upheld the original decision that Ashers Bakery had "directly discriminated" ... "The only thing that I would like to say is I'm relieved and very grateful to the Court of Appeal for the judgment." ... "Today's decision from the Court of Appeal is welcome and makes sense....

Mark Nash loses appeal for delay in prosecuting him for murder

Edit The Irish Times 24 Oct 2016

Mark Nash has lost a Supreme Court appeal seeking damages for the delay in prosecuting him for murdering two women in Grangegorman, Dublin almost 20 years ago. Nash is serving a life sentence, which is under appeal, for the murders of Sylvia Sheils (59) and Mary Callanan (61) at their sheltered housing in 1997 ... The court also dismissed a cross-appeal by the DPP against a decision to award Nash some of the costs of his action....

Drunk driver jailed for death of boy (4) has jail term cut following appeal

Edit Belfast Telegraph 24 Oct 2016

Share Drunk driver jailed for death of boy (4) has jail term cut following appeal ... http.//www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/drunk-driver-jailed-for-death-of-boy-4-has-jail-term-cut-following-appeal-35156419.html ... O'Rourke brought a sentence appeal last week and in the Court of Appeal on Monday morning....

Live updates: Ashers Bakery lose same-sex cake appeal

Edit Belfast Telegraph 24 Oct 2016

Ashers Bakery lost their court appeal over a ruling that they were found to have discriminated against a gay man ... Daniel McArthur of Ashers bakery outside Belfast Appeal Court ahead of 'gay cake' case appeal judgement ... However, on Monday morning the Court of Appeal upheld the original decision that Ashers Bakery had directly discriminated ... Speaking ahead of the ruling outside the court on Monday morning Daniel McArthur said....

Christian bakers who refused to make 'gay cake' lose discrimination appeal

Edit The Oklahoman 24 Oct 2016

A Northern Ireland appeal court Monday upheld the 2015 ruling against Ashers Baking Company, saying it "had directly discriminated against Gareth Lee on grounds of sexual orientation by refusing to make a cake supporting same-sex marriage." ... After emerging from court on Monday, Lee said he was "relieved but also very grateful to the Court of Appeal for the judgment."....

Reaction to Christian bakers Ashers 'gay cake' appeal defeat

Edit BBC News 24 Oct 2016

Politicians and commentators, as well as those directly involved in the case, have been reacting the Court of Appeal's decision to reject the appeal from Ashers bakery against a ruling that their refusal to make a "gay cake" was discriminatory.Daniel McArthur, owner of Ashers Bakery ... "Today's decision from the Court of Appeal is welcome and makes sense....

Gay cake row: court of appeal in Belfast due to give judgment

Edit The Guardian 24 Oct 2016

Ashers Bakery is appealing against a Belfast county court ruling in 2015 that found it guilty of discriminating against a customer on the grounds of sexual orientation ... During a four-day hearing at the court of appeal in Belfast in May, lawyers for the McArthur family, who own Ashers, said they had challenged the finding because in their eyes it would have been sinful for them to complete the order....

1
2
3
4
5
Next page »

© WN 2016

Help | About WN | Privacy Policy | Contact | Feedback | Jobs | Email this page | Sms this page |

Connect:
CHAT

×

×

×

Share this video with your family and friends

×