Australia's consumer watchdog has narrowed its focus on the car industry, conducting a study of consumer experiences that could shape future laws.
The ACCC is set to examine a series of issues, and has asked new car customers to contribute to research by sharing their experiences with the government body.
The study is set to examine four areas of concern:
The first surrounds the effectiveness of customer guarantees or warranties, and how problems are rectified by new cars and dealers. Next on the list are claims made by carmakers surrounding the efficiency, economy and performance of models, and whether those numbers stack up in the real world.
Australian Automotive Association chief executive Michael Bradley welcomed the examination of fuel figures.
"The Australian Government currently performs no independent or real-world testing of vehicle manufacturer claims when it comes to the emissions and fuel usage of new cars sold in Australia," he says.
"As a result, fuel consumption labels on vehicle windscreens are based on laboratory tests largely performed overseas, and in some cases by the carmaker. It is critical that we ascertain the degree to which these resemble the actual fuel use and emissions profile of the vehicle when used on Australian roads.
Post-sale arrangements – including servicing, third-party maintenance and parts pricing and availability - will form the third tier of the study, while the fourth element looks at consumer access to repair and service information.
The car industry is responsible for many of the nation's product safety recalls, and some customers have been told to wait for months before vital components can be replaced.
ACCC chair Rod Sims says the body has received a large number of complaints from consumers relating to new cars.
"A new car is one of the most significant purchases that a consumer will make and issues with these purchases can have a significant financial consequence," he says.
"The ACCC and other Australian Consumer Law agencies continue to receive a high volume of complaints from consumers about new cars and this market study will help identify any systemic issues across the sector."
The study will not examine potential issues surrounding used cars, direct or parallel imports, vehicle financing and insurance products, capped price servicing or safety matters.
ANCAP chief executive James Goodwin says it is unfortunate that safety information will not be examined.
"This study is an important step in understanding consumer needs in a changing and competitive marketplace but information about vehicle safety ratings and how safety is presented in showrooms and advertising should be a focus area," he says.
Motorists can make submissions to the ACCC until November 14. A draft report will be released mid-2017 before the consumer body releases its full report in late 2017.
4 Comments
Tangojulietfoxtrot | 2016-10-18 01:52:42
Australian Automotive Association chief executive Michael Bradley welcomed the examination of fuel figures. The Australian Government currently performs no independent or real-world testing of vehicle manufacturer claims when it comes to the emissions and fuel usage of new cars sold in Australia, he says.: Well, duh, the government doesn't perform independent testing of any Australian Design Rule evidence supplied by manufacturers, including safety related items. In this regard it is hardly unique. Instead it relies of desktop audits (usually two ADR approvals per manufacturer per year), Test facility inspections and Conformance of Production audits. As a result, fuel consumption labels on vehicle windscreens are based on laboratory tests largely performed overseas, and in some cases by the carmaker. Yep, they are, either in an ADR registered test facility or in a government witnessed ECE 101 test. So what? It is critical that we ascertain the degree to which these resemble the actual fuel use and emissions profile of the vehicle when used on Australian roads. What's he want, a unique ADR fuel economy test? Is he going to pay for it? The entire point of an ADR 81/02 fuel economy label is for the car buyer to make a vehicle to vehicle comparison. There are some substantial issues with the technical requirements of ECE 101 that ADR 81/02 adopts - the use of a production variation factor of up to 4% no questions asked, gaming the dyno road loads and vehicles used, testing and testing until you get your best number and using that, and more. Tightening up those little tricks of the trade and providing better information to consumers explaining what those numbers actually mean would seem to be the best use of everyone's time and money to me. Read more: http://www.drive.com.au/motor-news/tell-us-your-new-car-horror-stories-accc-20161017-gs4i07.html#ixzz4NOfAGQ93 Follow us: @drivecomau on Twitter | Drive.com.au on Facebook
| 2016-10-18 05:45:11
I think a large part of the problem is customer expectations. I have had nothing but great experiences with car dealers. What ADR fuel consumption figures provide is a comparison. They are all wrong but they absolutely tell you which cars will use more fuel and which cars will use less. Your driving style, however, will have the most impact on economy.
ibast | 2016-10-18 21:26:34
This argument has been around for a while, but the problem is it assumes all manufacturers are bending the truth equally. For a few years there I was driving a lot of rental cars in regional Australia, for work. I got try out all sorts of new cars. It was interesting to compare two similar sedans from Australian manufacturers and find that one was running about 5% about official figures, whilst the other was about 30% above.
ibast | 2016-10-18 21:18:51
It's interesting that they have only decided to look at fuel consumption figures at the imminent closure of the Holden plant in Australia