Talk:Solar cycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Solar System (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Solar System, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Solar System on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
For more information, see the Solar System importance assessment guideline.
WikiProject Astronomy (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Solar cycle is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Astrology (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Meteorology (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meteorology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meteorology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 


Page=211101[edit]

Does this article reference really have a page=211101?[1]

References

  1. ^ Usoskin, Ilya G.; Solanki, Sami K.; Schüssler, Manfred; Mursula, Kalevi; Alanko, Katja (2003). "A Millennium Scale Sunspot Number Reconstruction: Evidence For an Unusually Active Sun Since the 1940's". Physical Review Letters. 91 (21): 211101. arXiv:astro-ph/0310823Freely accessible. Bibcode:2003PhRvL..91u1101U. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.211101. 

Ping me back. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 04:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Need an updated "400 410? years of sunspot observations" graph[edit]

That graph is now ten years old. It's missing Solar Cycle 24, entirely. It really needs to be updated! Does anyone have a newer version? NCdave (talk) 11:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Well, I went ahead and made an updated version of the graph, showing sunspot numbers through Oct., 2015. I.e., I added another decade to the graph.
I started with the previous version which was uploaded in 2006. I pasted a properly-scaled version of http://services.swpc.noaa.gov/images/solar-cycle-sunspot-number.gif (last updated 2015-11-09) onto the end of the graph, to bring it up to date. The colors don't match (the new part is more purple than blue), and I didn't extend the black smoothed trend line, but at least it doesn't omit Solar Cycle 24 anymore.
I didn't bother to change the caption -- it still says "400 years" even though it is obviously slightly longer than that, now.
Strangely, the shrunk version in the article is still the old version. It doesn't show the additional decade. Will it get updated automatically, eventually, or do I need to do something else? NCdave (talk) 16:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I see that the shrunk version in the article eventually updated to show the additional decade. NCdave (talk) 03:48, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Solar cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

{{Sourcecheck}} has been re-purposed and the true or failed checked parameter has been deprecated (Why conflicting instructions?). New instructions follow:

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you need help, or are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:31, 28 February 2016

--- wanted to check you but couldn't find where in the Solar Cyclepage you made these changes. What's the plain-text that these URLs are linked to? Spencer Weart (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)(UTC)

Sure[edit]

"Both long-term and short-term variations in solar activity are hypothesized to affect global climate, but it has proven extremely challenging to quantify the link between solar variation and climate.[67] Early research attempted to correlate weather with limited success,[68]"


Completely ignoring Professor Piers Corbyn's data and work. Nice going shills. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.246.11 (talk) 22:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Current Solar Cycle?[edit]

Solar Cycle's are 11 years in length. Correct? What solar cycle are we in during the year 2016? Thanks. Wingate19 (talk) 20:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Solar cycle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

{{Sourcecheck}} has been re-purposed and the true or failed checked parameter has been deprecated (Why conflicting instructions?). New instructions follow:

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you need help, or are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Solar_cycle&oldid=748532789"