Showing newest posts with label England. Show older posts
Showing newest posts with label England. Show older posts

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

THE EDL CHALLENGE TO ANTI-RACISTS AND BLACK COMMUNITIES

EDL, Borne out of Empire pride and New Labour

Lizzie Cocker
26 Oct 2010

Over the past 13 years the relentless promotion of liberal Western
values and multiculturalism in Britain, mirrored by the absence of an
internationalist and civil rights counterweight, has handed a gift to
the far-right which today it is cashing in.

While the values and multiculturalism promoted by the previous Labour
government were always absent of any substance, the English Defence
League (EDL) is joined across the world, including with the US Tea
Party, the Dutch Party for Freedom and the Swedish Sweden Democrats,
in proclaiming that not only has multiculturalism failed but it is a
threat to those values which it is now beginning to define.

Putting discussions about who controls the EDL aside, it stands out
as being the only movement in England that is galvanising young
working-class white people - and fast.

From its beginnings just last year the EDL now claims almost 40,000
members on its Facebook page and has mobilised hundreds of those in
three cities over the past two months.

Not only is this the generation a product of "failed"
multiculturalism, it is the generation of the "war on terror."

Exacerbated by domestic policies which have increased segregation in
communities along ethnic and religious lines, these young people have
rejected the insistence under 13 years of Labour government that
Britain does have its own cultural identity, one which is made up of
many cultures preserving themselves.

But that discourse been accompanied by a whitewash of why those
cultures exist in their various manifestations in Britain in the
first place and so its only success has been in protecting the
sentiment that Britain's imperialist past is glorious.

The flipside of that being that the glory depends on perpetuating a
dehumanised image of those who resisted that imperialism - those
whose cultures, we are assured, are a vital part of Britain's
multicultural identity.

As the war on terror took off, Labour's funding of Muslim pressure
groups in the name of "social cohesion" - vital for the credibility
of multicultural identity - was coupled with its dehumanisation of
Muslims at home and abroad to justify the imperialist pillage of
Middle Eastern and Afghan lands and the oppression of their resisting
peoples.

This created hypocrites out of the Establishment in the eyes of the
white working-class EDL members - the same demographic targeted for
support for the illegal wars and for army recruitment.

After all, for nine years the fear and resentment inducing debate
about an enemy and its drive to Islamify the West has been
relentless.

In reality working-class people in this country, and indeed across
the world, benefit the least from British capitalism and the
US-headed imperialism which since World War II has sustained it.

But in the face of an education system which does little to help
young people understand social problems in their communities,
working-class black, Asian and people from ethnic minorities have
cultures from across the Third World that have and are resisting
imperialism to readily identify with.

This is on top of cultural currents in Britain that have flourished
out of black and Asian resistance to police and far-right brutality.

These cultures open up a range of references for youngsters to
understand the imperialist system in which they live.

Meanwhile the lack of any effective political alternative
historically to that system in the English belly of empire has left
the system able to dictate the culture of white working-class people.

This has left them with little other than cultural references that
make them aspire to a place within that system and does nothing to
help them understand their social conditions.

So the EDL has filled the void. While the media and politicians tell
us extreme Islam is the biggest threat we face, the EDL uses its
criticisms of Islam and the Koran to provide a false understanding of
those social conditions. But just as importantly, it is also using
these criticisms to shape an identity for its members - one which
gives attention to people who have hitherto been ignored.

It is an identity defined by everything the EDL sees as a
contradiction to Islam. This positioning also enables the EDL to
undermine claims that it is a typical, homophobic, neonazi, macho
fascist outfit.

So at a rally of approximately 200 members last Sunday in the heart
of London on Kensington High Street, the pink union jack and rainbow
flag in support of gay rights flew high. And speakers made numerous
references in support of women.

Moreover, in spite of leadership claims to be against the wars in
Iraq and Afghanistan, overwhelmingly EDL members support the fight of
the troops which they see as part of the fight against the spread of
Islamification.

But most significantly, that rally was specifically called near the
Israeli embassy to show solidarity with the zionist mission for a
pure Jewish state free from Islamic influence.

That solidarity was sealed with the invitation of a "distinguished
guest," activist from the far-right US Tea Party movement and
California Senate candidate Rabbi Nachum Shifren.

Before criticising "Hitlerism," EDL Luton division member Kevin
Carroll said: "Israel has a right to defend itself from any
aggressor, Islamist or otherwise. And if those two things make me a
zionist than so be it, I must be a zionist."

Arab and Asian people across the country are already paying the
greatest price for the EDL emerging as the upholder of radical white
working-class identity and are left with no choice but to physically
defend themselves.

And in Harrow, Tower Hamlets and Bradford in particular they have
successfully defended their communities from the physical threat -
albeit with virtually no organisation.

If the EDL would have been similarly embarrassed in Leicester earlier
this month it would have been a potentially fatal setback for them.

Nonetheless the conditions are ripe for working-class young people
from all backgrounds to be galvanised by any movement that
effectively engages with their plight, however shady their
intentions.

But the anger of those young people will only be focused into
changing those conditions when they are part of a movement which both
deals with the deficiencies of an education system that fails to
harbour understanding of social problems in our communities, and
equips them to deal with those problems.

Saturday, 16 October 2010

BRING THE RAGE FOR JIMMY MUBENGA, JOY GARNDER NEVER FORGOTTEN


Jimmy Mubenga death: Witness accounts

Accounts from BA flight 77 where Jimmy Mubenga died after he was
restrained during a deportation

Paul Lewis
Friday 15 October 2010

Witness 1, Kevin Wallis, seated in the back row across the aisle from
Jimmy Mubenga. A mining engineer from Redcar:

"The guy was sitting right next to me on the plane, there was just
the aisle between him and me, so I could see everything … When I got
on the plane, this Angolan guy was already there, with three security
guards holding him tight, one on each side and one on him.

"The Angolan guy was going to be deported, obviously, and he didn't
want to. And he couldn't breathe. He was shouting in English, saying
"I can't breathe, get off me". And the guys were holding him very
strongly … They were saying: "He'll be quiet once we take off. At one
point, they checked on his pulse, and couldn't find anything. Then
some other guy came. An ambulance. I cannot say if he was dead when
they took him out of the plane. We hadn't taken off yet. I cannot say
if the guy was sick before he came inside the plane.

"They were holding him too tight when I arrived, I couldn't see him
well. Then the flight was delayed, and we were all taken to a hotel.
I tried to talk with other passengers about what happened, but I was
the only one who could see him that well. Because I was right next to
him. I asked a policeman at the airport about this Angolan guy. And
the policeman answered 'between you and me: he's dead'."


Witness 2, Ben, was seated in the row 28 middle seat, in the middle
section of seats around ten rows in front of Mubenga. A 29-year-old
engineer

Ben became aware a passenger was in distress after he boarded the
plane and saw a commotion. He said he saw one of three security
guards remove a handcuff from his pocket to restrain Mubenga's arms.
"There were three guys trying to hold him … This led to them pushing
everyone further up the plane, so we were all pushed into first
class."

Allowed back into the main cabin, he said the three guards were
leaning on top of Mubenga. "You could hear the guy screaming at the
back of the plane. He was saying 'they are going to kill me'. That's
what he repeatedly said. He was saying that right from when I got on
the plane. He just kept repeating that all the way through."

Ben said it was not clear whether Mubenga was referring to the guards
or his political adversaries in Angola, and most of the passengers
were not concerned. "He was muffled because they were holding him
down … No-one was that alarmed by what he was saying. He just then
went quiet. We were about take off and there was an announcement
saying that someone on the plane was very ill."

Ben estimated that the total time the security guards were on top of
Mubenga trying to restrain him was "over 45 minutes". "He had been
slumped down on his seat because they were pressing down on him. You
only ever saw the top of his head a little bit or you heard him
muffle, because they were on top of him."

Passengers were kept on the plane until the early hours of this
morning, he said.

Witness 3, Michael, was seated in row 28. A 51-year-old oil worker
and US citizen:

Michael contacted a Guardian reporter via Twitter after reading what
he believed to be misleading accounts of Mubenga's death released by
the Home Office and G4S, a private security firm the government has
contracted to escort deportees.

He said he was haunted by Mubenga's pleas for help: "For the rest of
the my life I'm always going to have that at the back of my mind –
could I have done something? That is going to bother me every time I
go to sleep … I didn't get involved because I was scared I would get
kicked off the flight and lose my job. But that man paid a higher
price than I would have."



Witness 4, Andrew, seated row 23. A 44-year-old Eastern European
passenger:

"At approximately 19:30 I boarded the aircraft. On my way to my seat,
seven to 10 rows in front I noticed that there was something going on
in the last row of seats. I noticed two big guys pushing something
with the weight of their bodies against the seats in the last row. At
that moment I saw only the backs of these men. I heard one voice
screaming and begging for help. I realised that the voice was coming
from the person which two men were pushing down.

"I took my seat in the vicinity of that place, across the aisle. I
could not see from my place what was happening behind me, but every
few minutes after I took my seat I changed my position to look back
and see how the situation developed. The screaming behind me
continued for the whole time. The man's voice was begging for help.
The tone of the voice was anxious and excited but not aggressive in
any way. The man among other words was using the following words
which I can recall: 'somebody help me', 'don't do this', 'they are
trying to kill me', 'I can't breathe', 'I have family', 'why are you
doing this', 'no, no, no, no'.

"He did not swear or use bad language. He constantly continued to
shout. In the beginning his voice was strong and loud but with the
time passing by, the voice was losing its strength. I heard the man
had difficulties breathing. Two men pushing the person down were
silent, at least I did not hear one word said by them. I did not hear
any fight noises – no kicking, no punching, no struggling which I
should have heard if it happened. Every time I looked back, I saw the
same picture – two men sitting on top of somebody. It continued for
approximately 30 minutes until the plane started to move.

"In the meantime cabin crew moved some of the passengers sitting
nearby to the front of the plane. I felt very disturbed by the way
two men were dealing with the situation. But, as I was sure that they
were policemen I expected them to know what they were doing. Also, I
was a foreigner not in my country and the cabin crew were around the
whole time. I was really afraid to intervene. I just said ironically
to my neighbour 'shall we call police?'

"The voice which continued to ask for help suddenly went silent. I
thought he was given some tranquilisers but then I realised that
police has no right to do that. From the moment he went silent, it
took a very long time – 10 minutes maybe? – until an announcement
about a sick person on board was broadcast and even longer – another
10 minutes? – until paramedics arrived. The man was put on the floor,
only then I heard CPR going on, but for a very short time only. Then
I realised the man must have died already. I know from experience,
that when people around the victim are no longer in a rush the person
must be dead.

"Later police officers arrived, he was removed to the galley area and
we were moved to the front of the plane where police took our contact
details. That was horrible, I also feel terrible because I did not do
anything. I would like to make his wife know how very, very deeply
sorry I am about this situation and about the fact I have not helped
her husband. Now, when I know that it was not the police, I am also
deeply shocked that the plane crew did not do anything to help this
man. I did not see them help even with first aid afterwards, when he
became silent. After all, the crew's first most important duty is the
safety of all passengers - including handcuffed, isn't it?

"I have been working for many years as an officer on board of cruise
ships, I have seen similar situations – never ending so dramatically
– and I would never ever imagine the situation like this could happen
in the civilised world. Maybe that is because in the UK the authority
of police and security is so high? I believe in my country, where
police is not so much respected, people would be much more willing to
do something witnessing situation like this."


Witness 5, Makenda Kambana, Mugenba's wife, spoke to him by phone
from her home in Ilford shortly after they boarded plane:

Kambana said she spoke to him as he sat on the plane waiting to be
deported. "He was so sad, he was saying 'I don't know what I am going
to do, I don't know what I am going to do.' Then he said 'OK just
hang up and I will call you back' … but he never did call back … I
never heard from him again."

She said she had spoken to him earlier in the day and he had appeared
to be calm and getting on with his guards. "He was friendly with
them. They did not put him in handcuffs because he was good to them.
I heard them asking him how are the children."

Kambana said the family had been devastated by his death. "I feel so
sad … I don't know, I was thinking if I was there to help him. The
children just can't stop crying and I don't know what to say to
them."

===================================






Remember Joy Gardner

The last person to be killed while being deported by British authorities back in 1993.

Short BBC report here


Tuesday, 12 October 2010

NEW TRACK FROM LOWKEY/AKALA/BLACK THE RIPPER

# .. This is the equality of all,
versus the supremacy of some ..#


Monday, 11 October 2010

PROPORTIONALLY MORE BLACK PEOPLE IN PRISON IN ENGLAND AND WALES THAN IN YANKEELAND

Prison Reform Trust Director:
People will be & should be shocked by this data

New study finds seven times more black people per population are in prison
– in the US number is just four times as many

Mon 11 Oct 2010

The proportion of black people in prison in England and Wales is
higher than in the United States, a landmark report released today by
the Equality and Human Rights Commission reveals.

The commission's first triennial report into the subject, How Fair is
Britain, shows that the proportion of people of African-Caribbean and
African descent incarcerated here is almost seven times greater to
their share of the population. In the United States, the proportion
of black prisoners to population is about four times greater.

The report, which aims to set out how to measure "fairness" in
Britain, says that ethnic minorities are "substantially
over-represented in the custodial system". It suggests many of those
jailed have "mental health issues, learning disabilities, have been
in care or experienced abuse".

Experts and politicians said over-representation of black men was a
result of decades of racial prejudice in the criminal justice system
and an overly punitive approach to penal affairs.

"People will be and should be shocked by this data," said Juliet
Lyon, director of the Prison Reform Trust. "We have a tendency to say
we are better than the US, but we have not got prison right."

Lyon said that although there had been "numerous efforts to address
racism in the prison system … we have yet to get a better
relationship between justice authorities and black communities.
Instead we have ended up with mistrust breeding mistrust."

Evidence of this damaged relationship can be found in the
commission's report. On the streets, black people were subjected to
what the report describes as an "excess" of 145,000 stop and searches
in 2008. It notes that black people constitute less than 3% of the
population, yet made up 15% of people stopped by police.

The commission found that five times more black people than white
people per head of population in England and Wales are imprisoned.
The ethnic minority prison population has doubled in a decade – from
11,332 in 1998 to 22,421 in 2008. Over a similar period, the overall
number of prisoners rose by less than two thirds. The commission says
that the total number of people behind bars accelerated in the last
decade despite "a similar number of crimes being reported to the
police as in the early 1990s … the volume of indictable offences has
fallen over this time".

A quarter of the people in prison are from an ethnic minority.
Muslims now make up 12% of the prison population in England and
Wales.

Some on the left of the Labour party blame its policies while in
power. Diane Abbott, who raised the alarm over the growing numbers of
jailed black men as a backbencher, said she "very much regretted that
the last Labour government swallowed [former home secretary] Michael
Howard's line that 'prison works'."

"There was never a serious examination of the consequences of locking
up a generation of young black men. The result is there are some
prisons in the south east which are now virtually all black. Many are
converting to Islam."

The problems may start at school. The commission points out that
black children are three times as likely to be permanently excluded
from education.

"We are reaping the effects of criminalising a community in the
1970s," says Ben Bowling, professor of criminal justice at Kings
College London and a former adviser to the home affairs select
committee.

"The question is how you break the cycle when young men experience
custody. Three quarters simply re-offend. We have to intervene with
families more effectively to stop kids going to prison. That means
looking at school exclusions. You need to deal with issues like
mental health and substance abuse. It is not enough to throw our
hands in the air."

The policies implemented in the last decade mean incarceration levels
in Britain are now among the highest in western Europe. England and
Wales have an imprisonment rate of 155 per 100,000 and Scotland of
149 per 100,000 of the population. This contrasts with rates of less
than 100 per 100,000 for most of Britain's neighbours.

The commission also warns of the rising numbers of women in jails. It
says that the "number of women prisoners has nearly doubled since
1995 in England and Wales, and since 2000 in Scotland – currently
around 5% of prisoners are women".

The Ministry of Justice said that the government would not comment
on individual portions of the report.

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

REPORT FROM FIRST 10yr ANNIVERSARY INTIFADA EVENT

picture by Henna M, info@hennam.com

300 Overwhelmingly Young People discuss and celebrate

Internationalism with the Intifada

By Frank Natter

The series of events commemorating the Second Intifada put on by Sons of Malcolm is groundbreaking. In a political climate where the vast majority are scared to valorise any form of peoples militant resistance, these meetings see the importance of the such struggle, what it has meant and what its repercussions are. Such a traumatic uprising cannot be understood even 10 years after. It is hard to overstate the importance of the Second Intifada in determining the current alignment of power – to address it is to engage in active revolution.

This is why the subtitle of the meeting was “we are not liberating Palestine, Palestine is liberating us”. That the Palestinians have defined the geo-political landscape we traverse in such a definitive manner is barely acknowledged. A meta-narrative of victimhood has long pervaded the West’s discourse on Palestine leading to paternalistic, detached and quite frankly patronising “solidarity”. Depicting the Palestinians as victims completely misses how much of a step forward the Intifada actually was. The fact remains that solidarity as it exists has emerged in a climate where the Palestinians have not been violent – how supportive and understanding our solidarity movement can be when and if armed struggle erupts again needs to be addressed.

Most importantly, however, recognition is sought. Modern empire stands and falls with Palestine now – due to the Palestinians – whether we acknowledge this and can offer sufficient solidarity was the question behind the first meeting that took place on Saturday 02 October.

The night started with an exhibition of the type of resistance that is required for true internationalism. The Raytheon 9 occupation in Derry is brilliantly explained in the “Not in My Name” documentary – directed by Gabrielle Terney – who took questions in an enthusiastic and respectful exchange. There couldn’t have been a more encouraging start.

The documentary was quickly followed by a discussion between representatives of organisations that advocate or support the Palestinian struggle. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign representative Bellavia Ribeiro-Addy started the discussion off. She was a very competent and engaging speaker, yet what she had to say was somewhat misplaced. It is a shame that she did not take the opportunity to convey a more incisive discourse as opposed to offering the generic account of deaths tolls, recent wars and Zionist brutality.

Next was Arzu Merali of the Islamic Human Rights Commission. She gave a wonderfully personalised account of how she developed her understanding of what solidarity with the Palestinians (and South Lebanese) entails. It was truly refreshing to hear discussion about Hezbollah and Hamas without them being criticised for being “too radical” or “religiously extreme”. There was no representation of groups who seek to pacify the Palestinians, making them conform to liberal sensibilities. The panel after Arzu continued with a revolutionary discussion.

Lizzie Cocker of the Gaza Demonstrators Support Campaign gave a brilliant account of how the state racism led to the persecution of young Muslims protestors. Given what was to follow, it was both inspiring and poignant to have a young, white woman talking about white supremacy and racism. In her own words, “our solidarity with Palestine is weakened if we cannot be there in solidarity with our pro-Palestinian brothers and sisters in this country who suffer racist and political oppression by the same enemy.”

Taher Ghulam-Hussein followed suit offering a tangential, humorous account of his extensive engagements in direct action and how to deal with the law, brilliantly prefiguring the next speaker.

Chris Osmond of the Smash EDO direct action group based in Sussex – who, during Gaza ’09, smashed property and occupied EDO an arms manufacturer for supplying the weaponry for the IOF forces. His critical analysis was extremely impressive. An engaging talk that exhibited that it is possible to partake in internationalist action, risking your political freedoms and get away with it – with the caveat that you are non-Muslim. Chris was truly revolutionary; completely dismissing the need to work with or through the state, going so far as to say the only true act of internationalism is to forego the limitations of our government. If you were unable to attend – I recommend in the highest possible terms watching the debate through.

Jody MacIntyre finished off the talks with an intimate account of his experiences in Palestine and what it has led him to conclude. From both Jody and Chris’s talks it was clear that what was being offered by the panel was a discourse that encouraged people to take actions, to traverse the boundaries of law in the name of a greater morality. Such things are never said.

The overriding message that was brought home by the panellists was that it is possible to engage in a true internationalism, which does liberate us by drawing us to confront our own state. What it requires is the will of more white activists – as the state’s racism affords space for actions organised by whites where Muslims are persecuted. When Sukant Chandan took charge of the Q&A session this was point was met with vehemence from some sections of the audience. The audience had obviously taken a grievance to the forthright racial discourse that poured scorn on the notion that we are a post-racial society. The issue was trivialised; the message of the panel debate was whittled down to being a mere chip on the shoulder of the event’s organiser.

Instead of critical self-reflection, the Q&A was defensive, tense and hostile. Arguments of relativity – comparing Britain to Europe and the States were proffered to mitigate the blatant problems that were brought to the forefront. The stark comparison between the Raytheon and EDO occupations and actions on the one hand with the Gaza Demonstrations in 2009 seemed not to penetrate the audience. Juxtapose the same basic actions and it becomes clear, if you are Muslim and engage in direct political activity – you are in your own special category and will have the full weight of the British state on top of you. The state’s distinctions are real and need to be ingratiated and taken into account for all future actions taken for the cause of Palestine – Chris Osmond communicated this brilliantly after a question from an audience member.

Despite hostility from some in the crowd the discussion was chaired very well and respectfully with the maintenance of humour. Having spent the rest of the evening discussing the matter, what one has to applaud the event for was its ability to engage in such controversial issues and not alienate the youth. Large swathes of the audience were young (below 25). The vibrancy of the event with over 300 attendees I have not experienced before. In view of this, it’s a shame that the voices and experiences of the younger members of the audience were drowned out by the more disrespectful contributions of some in the audience.

However, the large attendance of young people, and the structure of the event indicated that a new age of political organisation is emerging. There is an alternative to dogmatic, placatory meetings with no substance – and it is possible to attract the youth. The voice of the oppressed communities is emerging – it does not speak the language of the conventional left – but it doesn’t intend to. True internationalism and solidarity, by necessity, foregoes appealing to the sensibilities of the West. Keep on!

The next event will take place on the at Bolivar Hall (Warren Street), 17.30pm on the 6th November. With the title – “The Outbreak of the Second Intifada: Turning Back the Empire” – you really don’t want to miss this. I’m sure there is going to be fireworks... facebook event page HERE


[full video of the event will be online within two weeks]

Monday, 27 September 2010

WEST LONDON BLACK POWER COMMUNITY LEADER PASSES - FRANK CRITCHLOW RIP

The Mangrove owners during the 1970 court case: Roy Hemmings (left), Jean Cabussel and Critchlow

Frank Critchlow: Community leader who made the
Mangrove Restaurant the beating heart of
Notting Hill/Ladbroke Grove


For many years Frank Critchlow played a central role in the Notting
Hill's black community. He set up the Mangrove Restaurant, the first
black restaurant in "the Grove". This apparently innocuous activity
set him on a collision course with the local police, who equated
black radicalism with criminality. Police persecution of the Mangrove
became emblematic of the experience of the black community at large,
and Critchlow's struggle brought the British Black Power movement its
first major victory.

Critchlow was born in Trinidad in 1931. He moved to Britain at the
age of 21 and worked for a time maintaining gas lamps for British
Rail. In 1955 he took a new course, becoming band leader with The
Starlight Four. In the late 1950s Critchlow changed direction again,
setting up the El Rio, a small coffee bar in Westbourne Park Road,
Notting Dale, and then in 1968 the Mangrove Restaurant in All Saints
Road.

The Mangrove, which served the cuisine Critchlow had learned from his
mother, soon became the beating heart of Notting Hill's West Indian
community. Black people who wanted advice on housing or legal aid
went there, as did black radicals who wanted to discuss the
revolution in the Caribbean, or the fortunes of the American Black
Power movement, as well as bohemian "whitebeats" looking for an
alternative to square English culture. The community aspect of the
Mangrove was evident in the pages of The Hustler, a small community
newspaper edited by Courtney Tulloch which was produced on the
premises.

The Mangrove, like the Rio before it, gained a reputation for radical
chic. The Rio came to public attention in 1963 when it was referred
to in the Denning Report on the Profumo Affair as one of Christine
Keeler's and Stephen Ward's regular haunts. The Mangrove also saw its
fair share of big names including the black intellectuals CLR James
and Lionel Morrison, celebrities such as Nina Simone, Sammy Davis Jr,
Jimi Hendrix and Vanessa Redgrave, and white radicals like Colin
MacInnes, Richard Neville and Lord Tony Gifford.

But the thriving restaurant soon came under attack. "The heavy mob",
a group of officers who according to The Hustler policed Notting Hill
like a colonial army, raided the Mangrove 12 times between January
1969 and July 1970. They claimed that the Mangrove was a drugs den,
in spite of the fact that their repeated raids never yielded a shred
of evidence. The police pursued Critchlow on a host of petty
licensing charges, including permitting dancing and allowing his
friends to eat sweetcorn and drink tea after 11pm. Critchlow stood
resolutely against this persecution. "Unless you're an Uncle Tom," he
protested in an interview with The Guardian in 1970, "you've got no
chance."

Darcus Howe, who was working at the Mangrove, urged Critchlow to look
to the community for support. Together, Howe, Critchlow and the local
Panthers organised a March. On 9 August 1970, 150 protesters took the
streets, flanked by more than 700 police. Police intervention
resulted in violence and Critchlow, Howe and seven others were
charged with inciting riot.

The march sent shockwaves through the British polity. Special Branch
was called in, and files at the National Archives show that the Home
Office considered trying to deport Critchlow. Meanwhile, the Mangrove
Nine made legal history in demanding an all-black jury, taking
control of the case and emphasising the political nature of police
harassment. Police witnesses described Critchlow's restaurant in
lurid terms, as a hive of "criminals, ponces and prostitutes".
Critchlow fought back with numerous character witnesses who defended
his reputation as a respected community leader.

After 55 days at the Old Bailey Critchlow and his fellow defendants
were acquitted. What is more, 28 years before the Macpherson Report,
the judge publicly acknowledged that there was "evidence of racial
hatred" within the Met. Horrified, the Assistant Commissioner wrote
to the Director of Public Prosecutions seeking a retraction of the
judge's statement. The Home Secretary, Reginald Maudling, arranged a
meeting between the judge and senior civil servants but the statement
was never withdrawn.

The case did not end institutional racism, but, as Critchlow put it,
"It was a turning point for black people. It put on trial the
attitudes of the police, the Home Office, of everyone towards the
black community. We took a stand and I am proud of what we achieved –
we forced them to sit down and rethink harassment."

In the '70s Critchlow founded the Mangrove Community Association,
which continued the work begun by the restaurant, organising
demonstrations against apartheid in South Africa, institutional
racism, and supporting national liberation movements from Africa to
the Middle East. Critchlow was also instrumental in establishing and
running the Notting Hill Carnival. According to Tulloch, while the
Carnival came from the community rather than any individual, there
was a group of Trinidadians with "a tremendous wealth of serious
musical ability", including Critchlow, who set the ball rolling. He
continued to be involved as it grew in scale, defending it for many
years from "McDonaldisation".

Police persecution of the Mangrove never wholly ceased. In 1989
Critchlow was in court once again, this time accused of drug-dealing,
and again, church leaders, magistrates, community leaders black and
white, all spoke out in his defence. Again he was acquitted of all
charges. The final victory was Critchlow's; in 1992 he sued the Met
for false imprisonment, battery and malicious prosecution. The police
refused to admit fabricating evidence but paid him a record £50,000.
Speaking at the time, he said that the money would help "in a small
way. But it is no compensation for what they did. Everybody knows
that I do not have anything to do with drugs. I don't even smoke
cigarettes. I cannot explain the disgust, the ugliness, not just for
me but for all my family, that this whole incident has caused."

Looking back, Lord Gifford commented, "Frank was determined to build
a business in and for the North Kensington Community. He persevered
in the face of adversity and harassment. His restaurant was a place
where all people of good will were welcome. He was a hard-working
pioneer who was not recognised as he should have been." For his
friend Darcus Howe, Frank Critchlow was simply, "a Caribbean man who
did ordinary things in extraordinary ways."

Robin Bunce and Paul Field

Frank Critchlow, community activist: born Trinidad 13 July 1931;
three daughters, one son; died 15 September 2010.

Wednesday, 22 September 2010

Wednesday, 1 September 2010

REFLECTIONS ON EDL IN BRADFORD


EDL’s Summer of Failure Ends with a Bang

Weds 01 Sept, 2010

I’d like to preface this with an apology. I’m sorry that my writing on the EDL thus far has taken them seriously in their claims. Their threatening nature, though significant, has been grossly inflated and exaggerated.

After Bradford (AKA: “the big one”), we have a clearer picture. What they represent is deeply problematic and needs confronting; however, as an entity – they are redundant, vacuous and failing by their own standards.

Aylesbury, Stoke, Dudley, Bolton and Manchester show that the EDL are not toothless; in their optimum conditions they can and will inflict real damage. However, their aim is to pacify the Muslim community through fear.

They cannot do this without taking on the strongest Muslim areas – some of those being Tower Hamlets and Bradford where they’ve categorically and unequivocally failed. Which leads one to question: how much further can they really go? Their aims of escalating to Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales have hit the rocks due to a distinct lack of popular support and an unreceptive police force (unlike in England). In England, they have not stirred up racial tensions in the intended way, despite having no nationally unified resistance to speak of and quite overt support from the police. The fact they have to high-tail out of areas like Bradford, Tower Hamlets, Birmingham and Cardiff says it all. The EDL are provocateurs – nothing more, nothing less.

British cities like Birmingham, London and Bradford have a cohesion that transcends the ideological milieu on which the EDL thrive. Islam, in such areas, far from being a problem to the community is embraced. Throughout the Isles of Britain ties exist that run deeper than the prejudices of the post 9/11 world. In the face of such solidarity the EDL are powerless. The EDL are losing both on the streets and in public relations. Some are even going so far as to label the EDL “cowards”. Based on the numbers who turned up for “the big one” – which was at maximum around 700 – it is clear that there is a lot of fear in their ranks. It may be that like any good ideology, they are forced to believe their own lies; genuinely believing that there are “no go areas” for whites in Britain. Hence, they are too terrified to stand up to these “Muslim ghettoes”.

Anyone who is not a racist or paranoid will realise that such claims lack all validity. The Black and Asian youth of this country have grown up in a climate of harmony compared to their parents and do not indiscrimately attack whites. Most, however, are conscious of recent history and will actively fight to maintain the path of progress when challenged. Hence, within the marginalised communities of our cities, there is a brotherhood that is not tangible – but which manifests in times of crisis. In Birmingham this alliance has actualised numerous times to get the EDL out – in an extremely effective fashion and we saw it materialise to great effect in Bradford.

Now I may as well state the platitude that in the fight against the EDL – all have their roles to play. HOPE not Hate’s statist approach stops marches. Unite Against Fascism’s counter demos get good coverage and offer the chance for solidarity beyond racial lines. However, while their roles are important in their own right – this summer’s defeat of the EDL cannot be ascribed to these leftist groups. Autonomous, well organised and rational youths have been the primary buttress. The EDL are a force mobilised to cause damage and fight. The danger they present is that when the clashes occur and the police get involved – the youths get caught between fighting the police and the EDL. However, wisdom is seemingly omnipresent throughout Britain. The angry youths are not attacking the police despite provocation – instead they are maintaining a discipline and only acting in self-defence. The actions of the youth in Birmingham and Bradford are paradigms for us all.

The UAF’s counter-demo was well monitored by the police. There were police lines that penned protesters in. Understandably among the Muslim youth there was a reluctance to walk into such constraints. The vast majority of those who felt the need to be a presence on the street therefore maintained presence in their local communities where they would only act if the EDL made moves towards their localities. When the EDL were seemingly allowed to break police lines and make such movements, they were confronted by a few hundred predominately local Asian youths who fought off the EDL in a highly restrained and dignified manner – but one that left the EDL bloody, bruised and humiliated. It is a testament to the organisation of local communties that there were no images of youths wrapped in Kefiyyehs rioting on our televisions this weekend.

The role of the left in all of this is minimal. HOPE not Hate are too closely associated with the British state to take any position of radicality to confront the threat posed by the rise of nationalistic sentiments in the UK. Unite Against Fascism are an important organisation who can facilitate important community events that exhibit that there is far more that unites the population of Britain, than what divides them. However, their modus operandi is to get the image of unity across – so essentially are confined to the realm of PR. When rampaging thugs are on the street attempting to beat up Muslim’s and Asians – neither group have the ranks or the philosophy to be a force worth relying upon.

The way to defeat the EDL in urban areas is to look to the street. The “Urban youths” who white lefties tend to avoid are foundational to anti-fascist movement in this country. To put it crudely, due to their emotional and historical connections to the fight against racism they are the foot soldiers of the movement when and if confrontation amounts. Any anti-racist national movement in this country has to support and defend these youths. Attempts should not be made to recruit them into organisations that hope to sever them from their communites, rather organisations should facilitate them and stand with them to ensure all police provocation is monitored and recorded so that Bradford 2001 and Kensington 2009 (the site of the Gaza demonstrations that led to 119 arrests) never happen again. We know the Muslim youth of this country are willing to take steps that “lefties” are not. Therefore, they deserve our full support. Instead, so far in the post-Bradford climate both HNH and UAF are screaming victory for their actions, praising the youths – but not engaging with, let alone facilitating or supporting the philosophy of anti-racism that has emerged through praxis.

Decentralised, wise and aware youths are the future of the movement – we need to harness our institutions so the state cannot vilify them. Without them this summer, this article would have been a completely different tone. Instead, the summer of escalation for the EDL has failed – ending in an almighty bang. POWWW!



Monday, 30 August 2010

'ADAM X' REPORTS ON BRADFORD

Adam X


Yesterday (Saturday 28th of August) seems to have been a huge failure for the EDL.That being said, there still has to be some soul searching done among what is called 'the left': hard questions have to be asked about the modus operandi of setting up counter protests.

Yesterday...

Yesterday, hardly any of the local youths and those embedded with them bothered to come to the UAF's static rally. It's no wonder. Not long after I had arrived to see what they were up to, the police had set themselves up around the square and erected metal detectors by the entrances and the EGT's were harrassing everyone with their cameras staring at people who supposedly 'look radical'.

The UAF rally was half-filled people who can't fight (hippies, old people, and other fragile types) but the UAF wasn't planning to bring people to Bradford for defence purposes - it couldn't. After facing so much trouble from the statist left, and Weyman Bennet being accused of conspiracy to start a riot; UAF felt the need to prove themselves as 'peaceful' - not the source of trouble and rioting.

That being said, UAF's plans for counter demonstration combined with the statist left's ranting about keeping order allowed the police to justify a massive operation, which made the EDL's protests utterly pointless. They were penned in, in a location where they couldn't even be seen by the public.

The result?
The EDL - who in absence of an 'enemy' to 'take liberties' with, started fighting with each other - have appeared in the miniscule mainstream media coverage to be a bunch of stupid drunken hooligans. And the UAF officially cleared their name and 'took the moral high ground'. Example of such coverage: http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid62612474001?bctid=598209585001



The resistance

A few people from the UAF crowd (which was mostly white) did join a large mobile crowd (mostly Asian, and local)

that tried to get close to where the EDL were, without much success. But well done to them. Thankfully, a video of that crowd did come out, and serves as a heartwarming statement of unity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuVxuw5jc1c
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PV-tiVyzv4w

Despite the huge police operation, some EDL did break out of their police kettle. Looking for Asians to start on. Those stray but large groups of EDL were strongly repelled by an organised resistance entirely led by the Muslim youth of Bradford, with a contingent of Birmingham youth embedded within them, and local youth of other religious backgrounds.

These Birmingham lads did not come in 'airlifted' by coach, they came the day before and stayed at people's houses. That modus operandi is exemplary when compared to our 'post-colonial' anti-fascist organisations, if you ask me.

This organised 'task force' dealt the EDL a blow that sent them running back into the kettle they came from.

And then the EDL were bussed out of the city again. Most of the local Asian youths were then only to be seen in their neighbourhoods in the areas surrounding the city centre. They were obviously not looking to hang around, knowing that 600 years worth of sentences were slapped on their brothers back in 2001. Although it is also Ramadan (DON'T FORGET), a time not to go further than you have to with respect to self-defence.

The police brought in from other forces, with nothing to do were sent home early. Only five arrests were made yesterday, are they going to be raiding the homes of all those EDL caught on camera like they did with the Birmingham resistance this month last year, or the Gaza protestors? Or do the police have other plans?



Conclusions and questions?

Our youth in target communities will always be the first, best organised and strongest line of defence (and they are getting better at it). Why don't all the lefties out there work with them as our Birmingham brothers did? Is there much point to clearing the name of an organisation to a public that largely doesn't care? Should we be publicly declaring counter-protests if this inhibits our ability to defend communities and defeat the EDL, and indirectly empowers the state?

The EDL appear to be collapsing in actual (not facebook gauged) popularity, however not everthing is as it seems when state intelligence has its part to play. However, there was a video on youtube (now removed, alternative version) that shows the EDL being utterly defeated in Bradford, I hope it scares them all off. The EDL's Welsh boy has been trying to patch these events up as a victory - they are starting to look genuinely desperate - unless there is something they know that we don't.

I'm looking forward to analysis by 'Malatesta', an anarchist who reports in fine detail on what's going on with the EDL and the far-right in general. Always good reading material!



Bradford: BETWEEN A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE - EXCLUSIVE TO SONS OF MALCOLM

By Frank Natter

Franknatter.wordpress.com

There is a war going on. Its effects are not just manifest in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia – but also in our localities. Police intimidation and racial profiling on the one hand, mixed with a rise of racism and nationalism upon the other. Either can be seen as the domestication of NATO’s logic: pre-emptive action must be taken to stem the tide of (radical) Islam – the enemy at the gates just waiting to kick down the doors. Large swathes of our population are convinced that Muslims aspire to one day reign supreme in Britain; many are fearful that Sharia will be the way of life for all and great ‘English traditions’ will be eradicated with the establishment of the caliphate.


A lack of tolerance within our society is leading many to support the forced assimilation of Muslim communities. The colonially minded within our society are disturbed by the fact that allegiance to God can supersede that the nation-state, and that brotherhood with the Umma means the average Muslim does not support the death of their brethren abroad.


In response to the “impending threat” posed by what Education Minister Michael Gove refers to as Britain’s “sleeper cells” (a euphemistic turn of phrase that denotes to Islam – as all Muslims are, in theory at least, receptive to the call of Jihad), the English Defence League (EDL) have formed. Their key aim is to “get on the streets” and affirm English “resistance” to the incursions of the Islamic world – attack being the best form of ‘defence’.


Their idea of Englishness is manifest in their actions: get up – start drinking – get on a coach (continue drinking) – reach destination – shout racist abuse – break police lines – get into a few scuffles, if not full scale violence – go home brandishing themselves as ‘heroes,’ pissed as newts…‘English liberty’ indeed. They are being met on the streets by the “commies” and the “Mussies” – an alliance hated by both the state and the far-right. Britain’s ever so troubling alliance of the left and Islam is the only bulwark that has come to actuality to confront the imperialism and domestic colonialism we are seeing emerge.


This weekend the EDL intend to travel to Bradford – a city which is 19% South Asian. Provocation is the aim – racial abuse and rioting are the means. The EDL want to provoke the youth of Bradford Moor, Toller and Manningham – areas with high concentrations of South Asian inhabitants – the majority of whom are Pakistani. The attempt is clearly to echo the race riots of July 2001, when the National Front (NF) and affiliate groups protested in the town centre which stirred up tensions within the community – leading the police to attack the Muslim areas. This year, any such provocation is deeply inappropriate. Many in the community are in a sense of trauma due to the events unfolding in Pakistan, on top of that – it is Ramadan; the holy Month – a time of deep spirituality and introspection.


The two predominant leftist groups that have mobilised to address the potential riot are Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and HOPE Not Hate (HNH). The mixed allegiances of our schizophrenic “left wing” have left their mark profoundly on the run up to Bradford. The community has been split by what type of action to take. HNH worked through state channels to ban the march, getting the support of local papers and councillors. The UAF on the other hand have applied the same process that they did in Tower Hamlets – starting the “We Are Bradford” counter rally by appealing for all sections of the community to come out and stand in solidarity with their Muslim neighbours. Months of bickering have ended with the banning of the march, but the allowance of a rally. Therefore, the aim now is to unify the community – which is being plagued by divisions between a vigil, a Manningham ‘multi-cultural event’ and the “We are Bradford”. A far more incendiary situation has been avoided by stopping the March, if and only if the police do their job – and given their history in Bradford, one should be wary of such thinking.


It is clear that some forces are extremely receptive to the EDL’s logic. In Bolton back in March, 74 arrests were made by Greater Manchester Police – around 50 of which were of the anti-fascist protestors and local Muslims – with the organisers being detained under anti-terror legislation. In the run up to Bradford, West Yorkshire Police have threatened Weyman Bennett and Martin Smith (organisers of the Saturday’s “We Are Bradford” event) with police action for ‘conspiracy to incite disorder’. The Police have clearly been against the mobilisation proposed by the UAF claiming it is more likely to induce a riot. Such language has been echoed by HNH, who continue to oppose the tactics of UAF and regurgitate the state’s account of what happened in July 2001. It is an error to rely on the state to tackle the EDL, especially the police who are colloquially dubbed “the real EDL”.


Presence on the streets of Bradford is of absolute necessity. It cannot be forgotten that 2001’s riot was essentially started by the police – who after years of antagonistic relations with the South Asian youth used to pretext of a disturbance outside a pub to invade Muslim communities in force[1]. The blatant scapegoating cannot be allowed to happen again, it is vital that the UAF do not allow the police to separate the Muslim community from the “lefties”.

Saturday will dawn very soon and we cannot HOPE for anything unless unity is maintained. If people manage to transcend their ideological divides, their geographic obstacles and an EDL friendly police force, then the EDL will be swatted away like they were in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Cardiff, Birmingham, Tower Hamlets and Harrow. However, if disunity prevails and the left are split from the local Asian youth – race riots will ensue, of that there can be little doubt. In such an eventuality, the EDL will get bloodied, as will the Police – yet it will be another great excuse for the state to further repress Britain’s Muslim community.



[1] http://www.irr.org.uk/2001/october/ak000003.html


Sunday, 29 August 2010

LEGENDARY PUNCH BY A BROTHER AGAINST EDL MEMBER IN BRADFORD SUMS UP OUR ANTI-EDL STRUGGLE NICELY AND SWEETLY




VIDEO: OUTSTANDING YOUTH-LED DOC-FILM ON FOUNDER OF CARNIVAL - CLAUDIA JONES















GARY YOUNGE'S EXCELLENT HISTORY OF THE NOTTING HILL CARNIVAL


The Politics of Partying

Gary Younge
Guardian

As 1958 drew to a close, a despondent mood drew over the offices of the West Indian Gazette in Brixton, south London. A decade after the Windrush docked, with the symbolic arrival of the postwar generation of black Britons, a series of racist attacks in Nottingham had sparked several nights of rioting in mid-August. By the end of the month, conflict had spread to west London, to Notting Hill, where white youths regularly went "nigger hunting".


The Gazette's founder-editor, Claudia Jones, had had enough. "We need something to get the taste of Notting Hill out of our mouths," she said. "Someone suggested we should hold a carnival," says Donald Hinds, who was in the room at the time. "We all started laughing because it was so cold and carnival is this out-on-the-street thing. It seemed like a ridiculous suggestion." But Jones had other ideas and set about making arrangements.



A few months later, on January 30, 1959, London's first Caribbean carnival was held in St Pancras town hall. Televised by the BBC for Six-Five Special - a forerunner to Top Of The Pops - it was timed to coincide with the Caribbean's largest and most famous carnival in Trinidad. The brief introductory statement to the souvenir brochure came with the title "A people's art is the genesis of their freedom".


More than 40 years on, a bright array of oversized peacock feathers made its way down the Mall towards the royal family. Along with the household cavalry in plumes and gleaming breastplates, and the Red Arrows streaking the sky red, white and blue, Notting Hill carnival took pride of place in the Jubilee celebrations. This was a legacy of Empire with a difference, not an exhibition of how much has been preserved but a demonstration of how much has changed.

"There was more military involvement last time," said Michael Lewington, 62, standing in almost the same spot he took for the Silver Jubilee in 1977. "I certainly don't remember calypso bands." Here was an irrefutable sign of black people's permanent presence and cultural contribution in Britain - a fact as widely conceded today as it was

contested in the 1950s.


Notting Hill carnival's journey from a response to race attacks in 1958 to pride of place on the Mall in 2002, passing revelry, riot and resistance en route, is both powerful and painful. It is the tale of how a marginalised community built, protected and promoted what is now the largest street party in western Europe, using the radical cultural politics of the Caribbean to confront Britain's racist political culture.


Either way, it starts with Claudia Jones, a Trinidadian communist who came to London, via Harlem, courtesy of the red-baiting senator Joseph McCarthy. Jones moved to New York with her parents when she was seven. It was there, during the campaign to defend the Scottsboro boys, a group of young African-Americans framed for rape in the south, that she joined the American Communist party in which she was later to play a leading role. Twice interned for her political beliefs on Ellis Island - ironically, the spiritual home for immigrants fleeing poverty and persecution - she was eventually ordered to leave in 1955 and sent to England.


Jones was a turbulent character, manic in her energy, masterful in her skills as a political organiser and chaotic in her personal life. A lifetime of illness, engendered by poverty and exacerbated by prison, was further compounded by overwork.


"She was so full of energy, she exhausted everyone, including herself," recalls Corinne Skinner-Carter, one of Jones's closest friends. "She used to chain-smoke but I never saw her actually finish a cigarette. And she talked liked she smoked."


Her journey across the Atlantic had brought her to a very different racial and political context. She left America, at the start of the civil rights era, when African-Americans were asserting a new confidence. She arrived in Britain to find asmall Caribbean community more divided by island allegiances they had left behind than united by a racial identity they were coming to share. "It was only in Britain that we became West Indians," says academic Stuart Hall.

In March 1958, Jones launched the West Indian Gazette, attempting in part to cohere these disparate groups around their common experience of racism. In many ways it was a period that echoes our own, with the sparks of popular prejudice fanned by a bigoted press while a complacent and complicit political class allowed the consequent flames to rage.


On August 18, 1958, the Ku Klux Klan sent a letter to the Gazette addressed to "My Dear Mr B Ape". "We, the Aryan Knights, miss nothing," it said. "Close attention has been paid to every issue of this rag and I do sincerely assure you, the information gleaned has proven of great value to the Klan."


A fortnight later, Majbritt Morrison, a Swedish woman, was spotted by a gang of white youths. They had seen her the night before, arguing with her Jamaican husband Raymond outside Latimer Road tube station near Notting Hill, and they had started throwing racial insults at him. She had enraged them by turning on them. When the youths saw her again, they followed her, throwing milk bottles and shouting, "Nigger lover! Kill her." Later that night, the "nigger hunting" started and the area was ablaze.


"1958 was a big moment," Hall recalls. "Before that, individuals had endured discrimination. But in that year racism became a mass, collective experience that went beyond that."


This was the taste Jones wanted to get out of her mouth. Only she, says Marika Sherwood, author of Claudia Jones: A Life In Exile, had the combination of new world confidence and political maturity to launch carnival under those circumstances. "Her experiences of campaigning against racism and McCarthyism in America put her on a different level from other Caribbeans here."


Trevor Carter, Corinne's partner and stage manager of the first carnival, agrees. "Claudia, unlike the rest of us, understood the power of culture as a tool of political resistance. The spirit of the carnival came out of her political knowledge of what to touch at a particular time when we were scared, in disarray."


There had been concerns that the unruliness of carnival would not translate from the outdoors of Port of Spain to indoors in London. Since many did not have cars, they arrived at St Pancras town hall in their costumes via public transport. "The bold ones did," Carter recalls. "It was our way of saying to the dominant culture, 'Here we come - look, we here.' "


The evening itself went excellently. There was calypso singing, dancing and lots of souse, peas and rice and other Caribbean dishes. "We disrobed ourselves of our urban, cosmopolitan, adopted English ways and robed ourselves in our own visible cultural mantle," Carter says.


Thus began London's first annual Caribbean carnival, moving the next year to Seymour Hall, alternating between there and the Lyceum until 1963, growing bigger each year. By the time Jones was found dead on Boxing Day 1964, it was a large, established event. But while it was born out of experiences in Notting Hill, it had yet to return there. For that we must turn to another remarkable woman, Rhaune Laslett. Laslett, who lived in Notting Hill, knew nothing of Jones or the carnivals when she spoke to the local police about organising a carnival early in 1965. With more of an English fete in mind, she invited the various ethnic groups of what was then the poor area of Notting Hill - Ukranians, Spanish, Portuguese, Irish, Caribbeans and Africans - to contribute to a week-long event that would culminate with an August bank holiday parade.


"The histories of these carnivals are both independent and interlinked," says Sue McAlpine of the Kensington & Chelsea Community History Group. "They were linked by their motivation and the constituencies they were seeking to motivate."


Laslett, born in the East End, of Native American parents, was a community activist who had been a nurse and a social worker. She died in April this year, after suffering from multiple sclerosis for 50 years. Her motivation was "to prove that from our ghetto there was a wealth of culture waiting to express itself, that we weren't rubbish people". She borrowed costumes from Madame Tussaud's; a local hairdresser did the hair and make-up for nothing; the gas board and fire brigade had floats; and stallholders in Portobello market donated horses and carts. Around 1,000 people turned up, according to police figures.


Steel band player Russ Henderson was among those roped in. Laslett's partner, Jim O'Brien, knew him from the Colherne pub in Earl's Court - a favoured West Indian hang-out - and Henderson had played at the first event in St Pancras organised by Jones. At the Notting Hill event, he was playing alongside a donkey cart and a clown, and he felt things were getting flat. "I said, 'We got to do something to make this thing come alive.' " Henderson, now 78, decided to walk his steel band to the top of the street and back. When that went down well, he got a little bolder, marching them around the area like so many pied pipers. "People would ask, 'How far are you going?' and we'd say, 'Just back to Acklam Road' and they would come a little way with their shopping, then peel off and someone else would join in. There was no route, really - if you saw a bus coming, you just went another way."


"With the music, people left everything and came to follow the procession," O'Brien says. "By the end of the evening, people were asking the way home."


In the evening, Michael X - radical, hustler and firebrand - turned to Laslett, pointed to the throng and said, "Look, Rhaune, what have you done?"


"I was in a state of shock," Laslett said later. "As I saw the huge crowds, I thought, 'What have I done?' "

During the years Laslett ran the carnival, it was identified more with Notting Hill than with the Caribbean, though as word got round, more and more Caribbean people started coming. The numbers had grown to around 10,000, and O'Brien says a mixture of police interference and the growing assertiveness of black power meant too many different groups had vested interests. "It was something we didn't want to have responsibility for," he adds. "The police didn't want it because they thought they were losing control of the streets for the day, and we'd had enough. So we decided to hand it over to the community."


Carnival, Trinidad-style, with no entry fee, is truly open to everyone. Blurring the lines between participant and spectator, it thrives on impulse as well as organisation. With its emphasis on masquerading and calypso, it takes popular subjects of concern as its raw material for lyrics and costumes. Massive in size, working-class in composition, spontaneous in form, subversive in expression and political in nature - the ingredients for carnival are explosive. Add to the mix the legacy of slavery and it soon becomes clear why so long as there has been carnival, the authorities have sought to contain, control or cancel it.


In 1881, Trinidad's former police chief, Fraser, submitted a report on the carnival riot in Port of Spain. "After the emancipation of the slaves, things were materially altered," he wrote. "The ancient lines of demarcation between classes were obliterated and, as a natural consequence, the carnival degenerated into a noisy and disorderly amusement for the lower classes." He had a point. Trinidad was colonised at various times by both the Spanish and English, with a large number of Frenchsettlers, and after emancipation in 1834, its carnival lost its elitist, European traditions and became a mass popular event.


"Carnival had become a symbol of freedom for the broad mass of the population and not merely a season for frivolous enjoyment," wrote Errol Hill in The Trinidad Carnival. "It had a ritualistic significance, rooted in the experience of slavery and in the celebration of freedom from slavery. The people would not be intimidated; they would observe carnival in the manner they deemed most appropriate."


Similar tensions have emerged here in the UK. The key dynamic within them is ownership. Ask anyone involved who owns carnival and they will say the same thing: the people. The trouble is, which people? Since Rhaune Laslett handed over responsibility for the carnival, the primary body organising the event has split, reinvented itself, then split again several times. It has been called the Carnival Development Committee, the Carnival Arts Committee, the Carnival Enterprise Committee and, at present, the Notting Hill Carnival Trust, which is itself riven by internal rows. Each group has its own version of the carnival's history and development.


As carnival has outgrown its grass-roots origins, it has brought with it a constant process of negotiation and occasional flash points; there have been inevitable conflicts, over both its economic orientation and its political function. Carnival, wrote Kwesi Owusu and Jacob Ross in Behind The Masquerade, is "the most expressive and culturally volatile territory on which the battle of positions between the black community and the state are ritualised".

And so it was that, less than a century after the disturbances at the carnival in Port of Spain, there were riots at the Notting Hill carnival in 1976. By that stage it had become a Caribbean event - the by-product of Jones's racial militancy and Laslett's community activism - complete with bands and costumes. In 1975, according to police figures, carnival was attracting 150,000 people. It was also the first time most remember an imposing police presence.

The carnival's primary constituency had changed radically. In the mid-1970s, 40% of all black people in Britain were born here. Having made the long march through the institutions of education, employment and the criminal justice system, many felt alienated in the land of their birth. It was an experience that found its daily expression in the form of the police, whose racist use of the sus laws made for harassment and indignity. In 1958, the first generation used carnival to protest the racism of the mob, but in the 1970s their children used it to take on the Met. For them, carnival was not a cultural reminder of a distant and different home but a means of asserting their claim to the only home they knew.


It was a claim that, on the one hand, was increasingly under threat, thanks to the rise of the National Front and skinhead culture. But on the other hand, it was a claim constantly being asserted by the powerful role music was playing in shaping British youth culture, through reggae, then ska. Along with Rock Against Racism, culture had become a key battleground for race and there was no bigger racially-connoted event than the Notting Hill carnival.

"Carnival was their day," says one Metropolitan police officer in an off-the-record interview. "For the rest of the year, police would be stopping them in ones and twos in the street, where they would be in a minority. But for one weekend they were in the majority and they took over the streets."


The 1976 riot took most people by surprise. "I just remember seeing these bottles flying," says Michael La Rose, head of the Association for a People's Carnival, which aims to protect and promote carnival's community roots; he describes it as like watching a relentless parade of salmon leaping upstream. The police were ill-equipped and ill-prepared. Defending themselves with dustbin lids and milk crates, they were also outmanoeuvred. "That whole experience made the police very sore," one policeman says. "They had taken a beating and were determined that it would not happen again, so when the next one came about, there was some desire for revenge."



From then on, thanks largely to the press, carnival moved from being a story about culture to one about crime and race. For years after, carnival stories would come with a picture of policemen either in hospital after being attacked or in an awkward embrace with a black, female reveller in full costume. The following year, Corinne Skinner-Carter missed carnival for the first and last time, in anticipation of more trouble. There were indeed smaller skirmishes in 1977. At one stage, late on the Monday night, riot police were briefly deployed. The next day, the Express's front page read: "War Cry! The unprecedented scenes in the darkness of London streets looked and sounded like something out of the film classic Zulu."


Calls for carnival's banning came from all quarters. Tory shadow home secretary Willie Whitelaw said, "The risk in holding it now seems to outweigh the enjoyment it gives." Kensington and Chelsea council suggested holding "the noisy events" in White City Stadium, a mile or more away. "If the West Indians wish to preserve what should be a happy celebration which gives free rein to their natural exuberance, vitality and joy," argued the Mail on August 31, 1977, "then it is up to their leaders to take steps necessary to ensure its survival." The Telegraph blamed black people for being in Britain in the first place, declaring: "Many observers warned from the outset that mass immigration from poor countries of substantially different culture would generate anomie, alienation, delinquency and worse." Prince Charles, meanwhile, backed the carnival. "It's so nice to see so many happy, dancing people with smiles on their faces."


As recently as 1991, following a stabbing, Daily Mail columnist Lynda Lee-Potter described the carnival as "a sordid, sleazy nightmare that has become synonymous with death". By this time, however, its detractors were in the minority. Like the black British community from which it had sprung, there was a common understanding that it was here to stay. Latest police figures suggest attendance of one million; organisers say it is almost double that.


In west London, not far from the carnival route, the Mighty Explorer launches the calypso tent. The first of many older Caribbean men, in pork-pie hats and matching waistcoats and trousers, who hope to become this year's calypso monarch, he sings his home-written lyrics with the help of a small band and some backing singers. Along with women in shiny, sequined dresses, they fill a sweltering night with a medley of topical ballads. Almost all contain a strong moral message about the dangers of drugs, infidelity and prostitution blighting the black community, from people whose stage names include Totally Talibah, Celestial Star and Cleopatra Johnson.


This is the first of the heats running up to the carnival itself. The standard is higher than a karaoke bar, lower than the second round of Popstars. But the evening is more fun than both - accessible, unpretentious, raucous and, above all, entertaining.


Earlier that day, at the Oval House Theatre, south London, the sewing machines ceased humming in anticipation of curried goat and rum punch. It's time to lime (relax) after a day of stitching and cutting to calypso tunes and boisterous banter. South Connections is one of the scores of mas camps around London and beyond, where mostly volunteers come from mid-July to start making the costumes for the bands. Some are in people's living rooms and back gardens, others in community halls and offices. With only a week to go before carnival, a camp like South Connections will be attracting around 100 people a night - a rare focal point for relaxed inter-generational mixing. The youngest person to go masquerading with the band is two, the oldest is 75.


The preparations started the year before. The riots in Bradford and Burnley provided the theme for this year's designs, entitled Massala Dougla: One People, One Race. "In this story, the people travel on this earth searching for a better future and an identity," says Ray Mahabir, the designer. "Red is for the blood flowing in us and gold is for our golden hearts."


On the day of the Golden Jubilee celebrations, designer Clary Salandy had trouble getting to the Mall. The police wouldn't let her and the rest of her mas camp over the bridge, even though they were supposed to be leading the procession. Chipping down the Mall - that slow shuffle-cum-toyi toyi of the masquerader - filled her with pride. "I'm not a monarchist, but this was a recognition by the establishment that we have made an artistic contribution and took carnival to people who would never go to it."


In the Harlesden offices of her company, Mahogany, in north-west London, Salandy explains her craft. "The best costumes," she says, "have to work well from a distance. So they have to be bold and dynamic and have lots of movement. But when you get close up, you have to be able to see the detail. Carnival is a language. Every shape, colour and form is used like words or symbols. And the best costume speaks that language fluently."


Her favourite costume that day spoke the language of defiance: one person armed with several huge, multicoloured shields defending his back. "It's called Protector Of Our Heritage," she says. "It was there to defend carnival."