If freedom of expression is something you value, ditch your current browser and use Brave instead. Ditch Twitter and use Gab instead. Ditch Wikipedia and use Infogalactic instead.
The Cathedral is being shaken to its foundations. The major media walls have already crumbled and dissidents have been running around the gatekeepers for years. Now the same thing is happening with social media.
The Alt Right hasn't peaked--the Alt Right is just beginning its ascent.
Wednesday, October 05, 2016
Monday, October 03, 2016
Virtue-signaling gets personal
As Hillary was going on about the strength and vibrancy of our black communities:
I've started taking a similar approach in realtalk conversations (which are increasingly all I can tolerate having anymore) about politics and specifically about diversity with goodwhites. It's become formulaic--I steer the conversation in this direction as soon as possible because it's so rhetorically easy and it makes them squirm like worms.
I say explicitly or let them insinuate that I'd prefer to live around other white people. I immediately turn it around by saying something to the effect of, "So I assume you live in a neighborhood that is less white than [the relevant metro area] is. That way you're able to get more house for the same amount of money in somewhere like [Sun/Sol neighborhood/city] than you're able to in a white neighborhood like mine, and you get more diversity, too. It's perfect! If you don't--and I know you don't--then you're really just full of shit, aren't you? Or you're slacking, badly. I'd be happy to help you, I'm good with Zillow. Sound good?"
It stultifies them every time. I've had a few people go the bad schools/high crime route, to which I say "that's exactly the point--unless you can name me a diverse area that has great schools and low crime? I'm all ears!"
Then comes the shiv--"Isn't it the height of hypocrisy to condemn other people to live around people you won't live around? You're saying it's great that the country is coming to resemble a neighborhood you'll do anything to avoid living in. And you can't even keep your head down while you're doing it, you have to virtue-signal by attacking other people who can't run away from diversity like you do."
Parenthetically, I suppose I'll eventually stumble into a goodwhite who lives in a Sun/Sol neighborhood and isn't desperately trying to get out, but given how reliably segregated living arrangements are across the country, less-white-than-the-whole-area is close to a sure thing (it has been every time for me so far), especially when we're talking about a metro area that includes black urban areas.
It's really unfortunate that [Trump] paints such a dire negative picture of black communities in our country. You know, the vibrancy of the black church, the black businesses that employ so many people, the opportunities that so many families are working to provide for their kids. There's a lot that we should be proud of and we should be supporting and lifting up.I said to my monitor--hoping to psychically sync up with Trump--"ha, yeah and I'm sure you're moving to one after you lose this election. There aren't any blacks in Chappaqua, folks."
I've started taking a similar approach in realtalk conversations (which are increasingly all I can tolerate having anymore) about politics and specifically about diversity with goodwhites. It's become formulaic--I steer the conversation in this direction as soon as possible because it's so rhetorically easy and it makes them squirm like worms.
I say explicitly or let them insinuate that I'd prefer to live around other white people. I immediately turn it around by saying something to the effect of, "So I assume you live in a neighborhood that is less white than [the relevant metro area] is. That way you're able to get more house for the same amount of money in somewhere like [Sun/Sol neighborhood/city] than you're able to in a white neighborhood like mine, and you get more diversity, too. It's perfect! If you don't--and I know you don't--then you're really just full of shit, aren't you? Or you're slacking, badly. I'd be happy to help you, I'm good with Zillow. Sound good?"
It stultifies them every time. I've had a few people go the bad schools/high crime route, to which I say "that's exactly the point--unless you can name me a diverse area that has great schools and low crime? I'm all ears!"
Then comes the shiv--"Isn't it the height of hypocrisy to condemn other people to live around people you won't live around? You're saying it's great that the country is coming to resemble a neighborhood you'll do anything to avoid living in. And you can't even keep your head down while you're doing it, you have to virtue-signal by attacking other people who can't run away from diversity like you do."
Parenthetically, I suppose I'll eventually stumble into a goodwhite who lives in a Sun/Sol neighborhood and isn't desperately trying to get out, but given how reliably segregated living arrangements are across the country, less-white-than-the-whole-area is close to a sure thing (it has been every time for me so far), especially when we're talking about a metro area that includes black urban areas.
Sunday, October 02, 2016
Alicia Machado
After Hillary mentioned her in the first presidential debate, interest in Alicia Machado exploded:
What those searching on her found--and that Team Hillary apparently, including its lickspittle lapdogs in the media, failed to find--is that she is a living, breathing real-life example of the worst caricature of New America imaginable. Talk about your all time backfires.
As a commenter at Steve Sailer's put it:
Trump is right to hit back on this. He rightly criticized McCain and Romney for failing to go after Obama's exposed jugular and now the Cathedral is trying to portray Trump going for Hillary's here as a mistake. Just like when they offer electorally disastrous advice to their enemies on things like immigration, they're collectively hoping that the perception of this being some kind of electoral 'mistake' will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
It won't. Machado is now off the table. There's no way Hillary will bring her up again. If she's mentioned at a subsequent debate it'll be because Trump elected to drag her carcass back out. We'll see if he has time to squeeze her fat, skanky ass in between grilling Hillary for calling one-quarter of the country she wants to lead "deplorables", using mafia-style tactics to intimidate victims of Bill's rapacity, and selling state secrets to foreign governments while secretary of state.
What those searching on her found--and that Team Hillary apparently, including its lickspittle lapdogs in the media, failed to find--is that she is a living, breathing real-life example of the worst caricature of New America imaginable. Talk about your all time backfires.
As a commenter at Steve Sailer's put it:
Usually the Left shows us outliers, or at least somewhat respectable immigrants with redeeming qualities – hard-working Dreamers – and tries to convince us they’re representative of the broader immigrant population. Now they’ve given us somebody that embodies every negative stereotype Americans have about Hispanics – trashy sexuality, prone to erratic fits of violence, and an anchor baby by a drug lord – and make it abundantly clear that if you want this woman and her family and their car on blocks next door to you, then Hillary is your candidate.Heartiste raised him:
In Post-America, fat-shaming is a mortal sin while cheating on your fianc矇, being filmed on camera having illicit sex, driving your boyfriend’s getaway car from the scene of a murder, threatening the life of a judge, bearing the bastard spawn of a drug lord, and happily lying while under the direction of a presidential candidate and a colluding media about your “20 years of humiliation” from experiencing a gentle and encouraging chiding about your weight are trivial details that should not reflect poorly on an attention whore’s character.Humorously, most of the frantic searching has come from the Imperial City and its surrounds, where trough-feeding eunuchs are realizing in shock and horror just how terrible a poster girl Machado is:
Trump is right to hit back on this. He rightly criticized McCain and Romney for failing to go after Obama's exposed jugular and now the Cathedral is trying to portray Trump going for Hillary's here as a mistake. Just like when they offer electorally disastrous advice to their enemies on things like immigration, they're collectively hoping that the perception of this being some kind of electoral 'mistake' will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
It won't. Machado is now off the table. There's no way Hillary will bring her up again. If she's mentioned at a subsequent debate it'll be because Trump elected to drag her carcass back out. We'll see if he has time to squeeze her fat, skanky ass in between grilling Hillary for calling one-quarter of the country she wants to lead "deplorables", using mafia-style tactics to intimidate victims of Bill's rapacity, and selling state secrets to foreign governments while secretary of state.
Saturday, October 01, 2016
Don't give an inch
 |
| From top left to bottom right: Baltimore, Charlotte, Ferguson, Dallas (dead cops), Milwaukee, NYC (dead cops) |
The police can't--or more precisely, won't--even protect themselves or their stuff. Why the hell would you rely on them to protect you?
If you're a husband and/or a father, it's a dereliction of your duty as provider and protector to outsource the physical safety of your family to an apathetic state that isn't able to protect you and wouldn't care to do so even if it could.
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Debate round out
A few remarks, in no particular order of importance.
- Attacking Trump for working to reduce his income tax bill to the lowest level possible is despicable demagoguery.
Yes, she gave millions to the Clinton Foundation she controls. That is of course a blatant way of reclassifying her income so she doesn't have to pay taxes on it while simultaneously allowing her to claim charitable contributions that she is able to use, akin to me taking income from my career and putting it into the Audacious Epigone Foundation so I don't have to pay taxes on it and then using that foundation to pay my mortgage.
But that's merely an illustration of hypocrisy. The demagoguery comes about because everyone in the country does the exact same thing, from people making $10,000 a year to people making $10,000,000,000 a year. Ever used H&R Block or TurboTax, to pick at random two leading providers of personal income tax filings? Guess what--they, like every other income tax filing provider in existence, market their services by promising to lower their customers' tax bills as much as is legally possible.
- The number of missed opportunities is depressing to think about (Tom Woods and Lew Rockwell do a thorough job going through them point by point if you're interested).
The "basket of deplorables" is the single biggest piece of low-hanging fruit and though a little rotted from time, it will still be hanging there when the next debate takes place.
Hillary's rape-enabling and mafia-style intimidation of Bill's victims for the sake of their mutual political benefit is a close second. In one of the subsequent debates Trump needs to ask it as a "do you still beat your wife?" question. "Hillary, how many of the women Bill has abused have you threatened if they ever said anything publicly about it?"
If that isn't the impetus for a coughing fit or a seizure, Hillary's "I have never done that" response will be futile. Trump can respond with something like, "Sure, Hillary, sure. So you're calling all these women--Paula Jone, Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers--liars? All these cases going on for twenty years, all made up. Sure, Hillary, sure. You defended the most powerful man in the world from the helpless women he victimized."
- Hillary's best moment:
- The Cathedral made some unforced errors. Lester Holt, an affirmative action midwit, favoritism was too over-the-top for Hillary's own good. Until the end of the debate, when both sides began clapping raucously, the audience broke into applause twice for Trump and five times for Hillary. They also laughed at Trump's expense a couple of times. Yet Holt only admonished the crowd for clapping for Trump!
Holt interrupted Trump far more often then he interrupted Hillary.
He grilled Trump about his alleged support for the Iraq war but didn't ask Hillary--who actually voted for it--anything about it at all. Trump was non-committal before the war--certainly no visionary like Pat Buchanan--but he was one of the few prominent 'mainstream' Republican voices to break ranks and turn against it. Crucially, he did so before the 2004 presidential election, which was in large part a referendum on the Iraq invasion before it became universally unpopular.
In fact, Hillary didn't face a single tough question, they were all directed at Trump or were neutral policy questions. Trump had to bring up the email scandal up himself.
I talked to several people today and every single one of them, even Hillary supporters, said Holt's bias was glaring.
Ted Cruz is offering to help Trump with debate prep. Trump could use it.
- Finally, my favorite image to come out of the debate. It's a pathetically self-indulgent one, but it's too fitting to pass up. Intellectually I fall somewhere between these two and I'm a faceless extra who happened to momentarily be caught on screen with two of the leads:
- Attacking Trump for working to reduce his income tax bill to the lowest level possible is despicable demagoguery.
Yes, she gave millions to the Clinton Foundation she controls. That is of course a blatant way of reclassifying her income so she doesn't have to pay taxes on it while simultaneously allowing her to claim charitable contributions that she is able to use, akin to me taking income from my career and putting it into the Audacious Epigone Foundation so I don't have to pay taxes on it and then using that foundation to pay my mortgage.
But that's merely an illustration of hypocrisy. The demagoguery comes about because everyone in the country does the exact same thing, from people making $10,000 a year to people making $10,000,000,000 a year. Ever used H&R Block or TurboTax, to pick at random two leading providers of personal income tax filings? Guess what--they, like every other income tax filing provider in existence, market their services by promising to lower their customers' tax bills as much as is legally possible.
- The number of missed opportunities is depressing to think about (Tom Woods and Lew Rockwell do a thorough job going through them point by point if you're interested).
The "basket of deplorables" is the single biggest piece of low-hanging fruit and though a little rotted from time, it will still be hanging there when the next debate takes place.
Hillary's rape-enabling and mafia-style intimidation of Bill's victims for the sake of their mutual political benefit is a close second. In one of the subsequent debates Trump needs to ask it as a "do you still beat your wife?" question. "Hillary, how many of the women Bill has abused have you threatened if they ever said anything publicly about it?"
If that isn't the impetus for a coughing fit or a seizure, Hillary's "I have never done that" response will be futile. Trump can respond with something like, "Sure, Hillary, sure. So you're calling all these women--Paula Jone, Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers--liars? All these cases going on for twenty years, all made up. Sure, Hillary, sure. You defended the most powerful man in the world from the helpless women he victimized."
- Hillary's best moment:
- The Cathedral made some unforced errors. Lester Holt, an affirmative action midwit, favoritism was too over-the-top for Hillary's own good. Until the end of the debate, when both sides began clapping raucously, the audience broke into applause twice for Trump and five times for Hillary. They also laughed at Trump's expense a couple of times. Yet Holt only admonished the crowd for clapping for Trump!
Holt interrupted Trump far more often then he interrupted Hillary.
He grilled Trump about his alleged support for the Iraq war but didn't ask Hillary--who actually voted for it--anything about it at all. Trump was non-committal before the war--certainly no visionary like Pat Buchanan--but he was one of the few prominent 'mainstream' Republican voices to break ranks and turn against it. Crucially, he did so before the 2004 presidential election, which was in large part a referendum on the Iraq invasion before it became universally unpopular.
In fact, Hillary didn't face a single tough question, they were all directed at Trump or were neutral policy questions. Trump had to bring up the email scandal up himself.
I talked to several people today and every single one of them, even Hillary supporters, said Holt's bias was glaring.
Ted Cruz is offering to help Trump with debate prep. Trump could use it.
- Finally, my favorite image to come out of the debate. It's a pathetically self-indulgent one, but it's too fitting to pass up. Intellectually I fall somewhere between these two and I'm a faceless extra who happened to momentarily be caught on screen with two of the leads:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)