It's time feminists started using the other f-word
Now that it is pretty much de rigeur for everyone to call herself (or himself) a feminist, we should consider what that actually means.
Anne Summers is a Fairfax Media columnist.
Now that it is pretty much de rigeur for everyone to call herself (or himself) a feminist, we should consider what that actually means.
If you think that with his recent attacks on a crying baby and the Muslim parents of a dead soldier or his apparent willingness to use nuclear weapons, or his use of details from a confidential security briefing, or even his outright refusal to endorse leading Republicans, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Arizona Senator John McCain, in their primary races, Donald Trump finally has gone too far and has blown his chances of becoming the next president of the US – think again.
If you thought the shenanigans at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland were the weirdest thing happening in America this week, you would be wrong.
There are plenty examples of women in power, but there's a far newer phenomenon that's starting to change how decisions are made.
Is it coincidence or is it causal? Is there a correlation between the number of women holding seats, or likely to win one next Saturday, and that federal parliamentary party's policy on women? At first glance, it would seem so.
Making history as the first woman to win the presidential nomination of a major US political party will probably be the easiest part of Hillary Clinton's gruelling trek to the White House.
Spoiler alert: this is a very inner-Sydney story about a well-to-do postcode kicked to the kerb.
Save articles for later.
Subscribe for unlimited access to news. Login to save articles.
Return to the homepage by clicking on the site logo.