- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
Create your page here
Wednesday, 28 September 2016
-
remove the playlistCourt Of Appeals
-
remove the playlistLatest Videos
-
remove the playlistLongest Videos
- remove the playlistCourt Of Appeals
- remove the playlistLatest Videos
- remove the playlistLongest Videos
back to playlist
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing.
Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching!
~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
- published: 03 Mar 2016
- views: 720
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
- published: 01 Sep 2015
- views: 173
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presentation by Barrister Mashood Iqbal
- published: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 331
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
- published: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9157
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.
- published: 04 Aug 2016
- views: 39
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006.
Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Michelle.
~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
- published: 12 Dec 2013
- views: 633
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court, court of appeals (American English),appeal court (British English), court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
https://wn.com/Appellate_court
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
62:09Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively. -
65:07MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin -
5:04U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the CourthouseU.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court. -
20:15Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
5:57Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presentation by Barrister Mashood Iqbal -
6:0111th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
-Video Upload powered by https://www.TunesToTube.com -
4:57Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. NguyenPathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.” -
47:15Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract. After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan. The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law. -
20:11Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts AuthoritySecond Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along. -
52:33COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006. Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Michelle. ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
-
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to p...
published: 30 Jan 2010 -
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing. Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching! ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
published: 03 Mar 2016 -
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
published: 01 Sep 2015 -
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
published: 15 Jul 2014 -
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presentation by Barrister Mashood Iqbal
published: 09 Dec 2015 -
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
-Video Upload powered by https://www.TunesToTube.com
published: 21 Sep 2016 -
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
published: 22 Jan 2015 -
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1 From C-SPAN's Description: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract. After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunct...
published: 30 Jan 2010 -
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.
published: 04 Aug 2016 -
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006. Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Michelle. ~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
published: 12 Dec 2013
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 62:09
- Updated: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and ...
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
wn.com/Fox Television V. Federal Communications Commission 2Nd Circuit Court Of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 65:07
- Updated: 03 Mar 2016
- views: 720
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing.
Comme...
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing.
Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching!
~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
wn.com/Maryland Court Of Appeals Hearing Freddie Gray Case Part 1
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled to testify against other officer's in the Freddie Gray killing.
Comment, Rate & Subscribe. Thanks for watching!
~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
- published: 03 Mar 2016
- views: 720
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:04
- Updated: 01 Sep 2015
- views: 173
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
wn.com/U.S. 5Th Circuit Court Of Appeals Walk Through At The Courthouse
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if you will be arguing before the court.
- published: 01 Sep 2015
- views: 173
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:15
- Updated: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
wn.com/Oral Argument Before The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:57
- Updated: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 331
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presentation by Barrister Mashood Iqbal
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presentation by Barrister Mashood Iqbal
wn.com/Immigration Appeals In The Court Of Appeal And In The Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presentation by Barrister Mashood Iqbal
- published: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 331
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:01
- Updated: 21 Sep 2016
- views: 221
-Video Upload powered by https://www.TunesToTube.com
-Video Upload powered by https://www.TunesToTube.com
wn.com/11Th Circuit Court Of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
-Video Upload powered by https://www.TunesToTube.com
- published: 21 Sep 2016
- views: 221
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:57
- Updated: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline ...
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
wn.com/Pathways To The Bench U.S. Court Of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
- published: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 47:15
- Updated: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9157
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.
wn.com/Santiago V. Rumsfeld 9Th Circuit Court Of Appeals 2005
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 186185-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th District heard oral argument in the case of Santiago v. Rumsfeld. Sergeant Emiliano Santiago, a member of the Oregon Army National Guard, had two weeks left of an 8-year agreement to serve in the National Guard when was he ordered to Afghanistan for a year or more. Sergeant Santiago sought an injunction to stop his deployment to Afghanistan while he challenged the "stop loss" order that requires him to remain in the military beyond the term of his enlistment contract.
After hearing oral argument, the Ninth Circuit's three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in favor of the government's argument and denied an injunction to stop Sergeant Santiago's deployment to Afghanistan.
The case was heard in the moot courtroom of the University of Washington School of Law.
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9157
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:11
- Updated: 04 Aug 2016
- views: 39
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Ros...
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.
wn.com/Second Circuit Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments In Domenech V. Parts Authority
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals (Judges Rosemary Pooler, Raymond Lohier, and Susan Carney) unanimously ruled in favor of Mr. Hassan's client, and vacated the summary judgment of the lower court. Follow the yellow arrow in the video for the speaker. Use YouTube's transcript feature to read along.
- published: 04 Aug 2016
- views: 39
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 52:33
- Updated: 12 Dec 2013
- views: 633
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006.
Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of fir...
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006.
Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Michelle.
~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
wn.com/Court Of Appeals Hearing For Jason Young 12 12 2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murdering his wife in 2006.
Jason Young was convicted in March 2012 of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Michelle.
~Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."~ -Benjamin Franklin
- published: 12 Dec 2013
- views: 633
-
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
published: 28 Sep 2016 -
A Judge for the People: Dr. Dudley Flood, Abe Jones for Court of Appeals
Dr. Flood served for twelve years on the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina. He currently serves on the N. C. Minority Cancer Awareness Action Team; the Public School Forum of North Carolina Board; the Wake Education Partnership Leadership Council; the UNC Press Advancement Council and on several other boards and committees.
published: 27 Sep 2016 -
Pennsylvania Hospital Merger Blocked By Federal Appeals Court
on Tuesday a federal appeals court blocked the proposed merger of the two largest hospital systems in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, area. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ordered a preliminary injunction against the combination of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System. It was a unanimous 3-0 vote. The court said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the commonwealth of Pennsylvania were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim. They said the merger would be anti-competitive. Penn State Hershey and PinnacleHealth System signed a letter of intent to merge in June 2014. Their boards approved the combination the following March. http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/domesticNews/~3/P2cLBvskTJI/us-ftc-pennsylvania-hospitals-idUSKCN11X1KC http://www...
published: 27 Sep 2016 -
A Stolen Valor Conviction Is Overturned By A Federal Appeals Court Because It Is 'Free Speech'.
A federal appeals court tossed out a veteran's conviction for wearing military medals he didn't earn, saying it was a form of free speech protected by the Constitution. A specially convened 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the First Amendment allows people to wear unearned military honors. Elven Joe Swisher of Idaho was convicted in 2007 of violating the Stolen Valor Act, which made it a misdemeanor to falsely claim military accomplishments. President George W. Bush signed it into law in 2006, but the U.S. Supreme Court struck it down in 2012 as a violation of free speech protections. Investigators looked into Swisher's military claims after he testified at the 2005 trial of a man charged with soliciting the murder of a federal judge. Swisher wore a Pur...
published: 26 Sep 2016 -
16-1067 In re: White
published: 23 Sep 2016 -
-
Supreme Court of Appeals Holds Court At Marshall
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals returned to Marshall University’s Huntington campus Tuesday, Sept. 20, to conduct a session in which it heard three appeals. The Court’s appearance was its seventh at Marshall in the past 12 years. The docket for the Supreme Court’s visit can be found at http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/calendar/2016/dockets/sept-20-16ad.html. Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II is a former member and chairman of Marshall University’s board of governors. Other justices are Brent D. Benjamin, Robin Davis, Margaret L. Workman and Allen H. Loughry II.
published: 20 Sep 2016 -
Rule 43; "Appeals From the CTA and Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals"
Rule 43 of the Rules Court Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA *** This channel offers free and easy-to-access audio and video materials on Philippine law, Philippine jurisprudence, legal principles, Supreme Court doctrines, and the latest updates and trends in law schools and bar exams. This was specially created for lawyers, law students and bar examinees who wish to review over the Internet and at the comfort of their homes.
published: 19 Sep 2016 -
Rule 42 of the Rules of Court; "Petition for Review From the Regional Trial Courts to the CA"
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA *** This channel offers free and easy-to-access audio and video materials on Philippine law, Philippine jurisprudence, legal principles, Supreme Court doctrines, and the latest updates and trends in law schools and bar exams. This was specially created for lawyers, law students and bar examinees who wish to review over the Internet and at the comfort of their homes.
published: 18 Sep 2016
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:53
- Updated: 28 Sep 2016
- views: 6
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
- published: 28 Sep 2016
- views: 6
A Judge for the People: Dr. Dudley Flood, Abe Jones for Court of Appeals
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:30
- Updated: 27 Sep 2016
- views: 5
Dr. Flood served for twelve years on the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina. He currently serves on the N. C. Minority Cancer Awareness Acti...
Dr. Flood served for twelve years on the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina. He currently serves on the N. C. Minority Cancer Awareness Action Team; the Public School Forum of North Carolina Board; the Wake Education Partnership Leadership Council; the UNC Press Advancement Council and on several other boards and committees.
wn.com/A Judge For The People Dr. Dudley Flood, Abe Jones For Court Of Appeals
Dr. Flood served for twelve years on the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina. He currently serves on the N. C. Minority Cancer Awareness Action Team; the Public School Forum of North Carolina Board; the Wake Education Partnership Leadership Council; the UNC Press Advancement Council and on several other boards and committees.
- published: 27 Sep 2016
- views: 5
Pennsylvania Hospital Merger Blocked By Federal Appeals Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:47
- Updated: 27 Sep 2016
- views: 36
on Tuesday a federal appeals court blocked the proposed merger of the two largest hospital systems in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, area.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit C...
on Tuesday a federal appeals court blocked the proposed merger of the two largest hospital systems in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, area.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ordered a preliminary injunction against the combination of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System. It was a unanimous 3-0 vote.
The court said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the commonwealth of Pennsylvania were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim. They said the merger would be anti-competitive.
Penn State Hershey and PinnacleHealth System signed a letter of intent to merge in June 2014. Their boards approved the combination the following March.
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/domesticNews/~3/P2cLBvskTJI/us-ftc-pennsylvania-hospitals-idUSKCN11X1KC
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
wn.com/Pennsylvania Hospital Merger Blocked By Federal Appeals Court
on Tuesday a federal appeals court blocked the proposed merger of the two largest hospital systems in the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, area.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ordered a preliminary injunction against the combination of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and PinnacleHealth System. It was a unanimous 3-0 vote.
The court said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the commonwealth of Pennsylvania were likely to succeed on the merits of their claim. They said the merger would be anti-competitive.
Penn State Hershey and PinnacleHealth System signed a letter of intent to merge in June 2014. Their boards approved the combination the following March.
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/Reuters/domesticNews/~3/P2cLBvskTJI/us-ftc-pennsylvania-hospitals-idUSKCN11X1KC
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
- published: 27 Sep 2016
- views: 36
A Stolen Valor Conviction Is Overturned By A Federal Appeals Court Because It Is 'Free Speech'.
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:14
- Updated: 26 Sep 2016
- views: 416
A federal appeals court tossed out a veteran's conviction for wearing military medals he didn't earn, saying it was a form of free speech protected by the Const...
A federal appeals court tossed out a veteran's conviction for wearing military medals he didn't earn, saying it was a form of free speech protected by the Constitution.
A specially convened 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the First Amendment allows people to wear unearned military honors.
Elven Joe Swisher of Idaho was convicted in 2007 of violating the Stolen Valor Act, which made it a misdemeanor to falsely claim military accomplishments. President George W. Bush signed it into law in 2006, but the U.S. Supreme Court struck it down in 2012 as a violation of free speech protections.
Investigators looked into Swisher's military claims after he testified at the 2005 trial of a man charged with soliciting the murder of a federal judge. Swisher wore a Purple Heart on the witness stand.
Swisher testified that David Roland Hinkson offered him $10,000 to kill the federal judge presiding over Hinkson's tax-evasion case. Swisher said Hinkson was impressed after Swisher boasted that he killed "many men" during the Korean War.
Prosecutors say Swisher enlisted in the Marine Corps a year after the Korean War ended but was never wounded in the line of duty. Swisher was honorably discharged in 1957, and discharge documents indicate that he didn't receive any medals, according to the 9th Circuit ruling.
During his 2007 trial, prosecutors showed the jury a photograph of Swisher wearing several military medals and awards, including the Silver Star, Navy and Marine Corps Ribbon, Purple Heart, and the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal with a Bronze "V."
Swisher's attorney Joseph Horras of Boise, Idaho, couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
After the Stolen Valor Act was struck down, Congress passed a new law making it a crime to profit financially by lying about military service. President Barack Obama signed it in 2013.
After Swisher's conviction, Congress removed a provision making it illegal to wear unearned medals.
Suggested videos: A Registered Sex Offender Gets Busted For Stolen Valor... For A THIRD Time! -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1KgHOu1214
Police Watch As A Stolen Valor Fake Is Confronted. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waqyv7xMyYs
A Veteran Busts A Vendor For Stolen Valor At A Mall In Delaware. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGXw9zszsp4
Stolen Valor: A Fake Ranger Colonel Gets Confronted By A Vet In A Bar. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtOvVimfv5Q
A Serial Stolen Valor Impostor Gets Called Out By A Vet. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5d-qKES_CE
A Vet Busts A Convicted Felon And Sex Offender For Stolen Valor. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWn3urWz678
A Fake Marine Gets Busted In Front Of His Girlfriend... She Then Dumps Him. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mpHbTBHWBw
Stolen Valor: A Woman Busts A Fake Marine. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaGpjxBjdrw
Stolen Valor: A Special Forces Impostor Gets Busted In Tucson. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiwO4_06J-0
Stolen Valor: A Special Forces Impostor Claims To Have Rescued A Downed Helicopter Pilot. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hR2KMvC5kM
A Stolen Valor Impostor Claims To Be A Member Of A Unit That Only Exists In The Army Wives TV Show. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYAkjezje1I
Stolen Valor: An Army Officers Busts A Fake Marine At Kansas Airport. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2GFELHQWE
Stolen Valor: A Fake Sniper Is Busted Trying To "Recruit" A Veteran... -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLftl-snF4Q
Stolen Valor: A Fake Marine Busted At A Laundromat. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmA5scDaLlA
Stolen Valor: A Vet Confronts A "Special Forces Marine" in New Orleans. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR0Bcwoyjhg
A Veteran Confronts A Fake "Special Forces" Guy At An Airport In A Stolen Valor Case... -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyO_TPixp0s
Police Officers Corner A Veteran For Busting A Fake Soldier, Explain Why They Arrest Him. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxlXF5Dd6Yc
Stolen Valor: A Veteran Confronts A Fake Walking His Dog. A Crazy Exchange Ensues. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_lawX7rrrQ
Stolen Valor In Walmart: A Fake CIA, Airborne And A Navy SEAL... -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6y3uW6XNiY
Stolen Valor: Marines Bust A Fake SGM At A Funeral - Part 1. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PHvDDREJdQ
Stolen Valor: Marines Bust A Fake SGM At A Funeral - Part 2. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-tIxe4klPg
Stolen Valor: A Fake Major Is Called Out At A Home Depot's Parking Lot. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUOPek0pxcY
Stolen Valor: A Fake Ranger Busted In A Mall While Looking For Discounts. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0jSCgGzAng
Stolen Valor: A Veteran Busts A Fake Army Ranger At Staples Center In L.A. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9kcQhRVNMI
Stolen Valor: A Veteran Confronts A Panhandler Claiming To Be A Combat Vet. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omKawYX9c9k
wn.com/A Stolen Valor Conviction Is Overturned By A Federal Appeals Court Because It Is 'Free Speech'.
A federal appeals court tossed out a veteran's conviction for wearing military medals he didn't earn, saying it was a form of free speech protected by the Constitution.
A specially convened 11-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the First Amendment allows people to wear unearned military honors.
Elven Joe Swisher of Idaho was convicted in 2007 of violating the Stolen Valor Act, which made it a misdemeanor to falsely claim military accomplishments. President George W. Bush signed it into law in 2006, but the U.S. Supreme Court struck it down in 2012 as a violation of free speech protections.
Investigators looked into Swisher's military claims after he testified at the 2005 trial of a man charged with soliciting the murder of a federal judge. Swisher wore a Purple Heart on the witness stand.
Swisher testified that David Roland Hinkson offered him $10,000 to kill the federal judge presiding over Hinkson's tax-evasion case. Swisher said Hinkson was impressed after Swisher boasted that he killed "many men" during the Korean War.
Prosecutors say Swisher enlisted in the Marine Corps a year after the Korean War ended but was never wounded in the line of duty. Swisher was honorably discharged in 1957, and discharge documents indicate that he didn't receive any medals, according to the 9th Circuit ruling.
During his 2007 trial, prosecutors showed the jury a photograph of Swisher wearing several military medals and awards, including the Silver Star, Navy and Marine Corps Ribbon, Purple Heart, and the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal with a Bronze "V."
Swisher's attorney Joseph Horras of Boise, Idaho, couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
After the Stolen Valor Act was struck down, Congress passed a new law making it a crime to profit financially by lying about military service. President Barack Obama signed it in 2013.
After Swisher's conviction, Congress removed a provision making it illegal to wear unearned medals.
Suggested videos: A Registered Sex Offender Gets Busted For Stolen Valor... For A THIRD Time! -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1KgHOu1214
Police Watch As A Stolen Valor Fake Is Confronted. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waqyv7xMyYs
A Veteran Busts A Vendor For Stolen Valor At A Mall In Delaware. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGXw9zszsp4
Stolen Valor: A Fake Ranger Colonel Gets Confronted By A Vet In A Bar. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtOvVimfv5Q
A Serial Stolen Valor Impostor Gets Called Out By A Vet. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5d-qKES_CE
A Vet Busts A Convicted Felon And Sex Offender For Stolen Valor. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWn3urWz678
A Fake Marine Gets Busted In Front Of His Girlfriend... She Then Dumps Him. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mpHbTBHWBw
Stolen Valor: A Woman Busts A Fake Marine. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaGpjxBjdrw
Stolen Valor: A Special Forces Impostor Gets Busted In Tucson. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiwO4_06J-0
Stolen Valor: A Special Forces Impostor Claims To Have Rescued A Downed Helicopter Pilot. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hR2KMvC5kM
A Stolen Valor Impostor Claims To Be A Member Of A Unit That Only Exists In The Army Wives TV Show. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYAkjezje1I
Stolen Valor: An Army Officers Busts A Fake Marine At Kansas Airport. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za2GFELHQWE
Stolen Valor: A Fake Sniper Is Busted Trying To "Recruit" A Veteran... -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLftl-snF4Q
Stolen Valor: A Fake Marine Busted At A Laundromat. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmA5scDaLlA
Stolen Valor: A Vet Confronts A "Special Forces Marine" in New Orleans. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gR0Bcwoyjhg
A Veteran Confronts A Fake "Special Forces" Guy At An Airport In A Stolen Valor Case... -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyO_TPixp0s
Police Officers Corner A Veteran For Busting A Fake Soldier, Explain Why They Arrest Him. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxlXF5Dd6Yc
Stolen Valor: A Veteran Confronts A Fake Walking His Dog. A Crazy Exchange Ensues. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_lawX7rrrQ
Stolen Valor In Walmart: A Fake CIA, Airborne And A Navy SEAL... -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6y3uW6XNiY
Stolen Valor: Marines Bust A Fake SGM At A Funeral - Part 1. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PHvDDREJdQ
Stolen Valor: Marines Bust A Fake SGM At A Funeral - Part 2. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-tIxe4klPg
Stolen Valor: A Fake Major Is Called Out At A Home Depot's Parking Lot. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUOPek0pxcY
Stolen Valor: A Fake Ranger Busted In A Mall While Looking For Discounts. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0jSCgGzAng
Stolen Valor: A Veteran Busts A Fake Army Ranger At Staples Center In L.A. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9kcQhRVNMI
Stolen Valor: A Veteran Confronts A Panhandler Claiming To Be A Combat Vet. -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omKawYX9c9k
- published: 26 Sep 2016
- views: 416
16-1067 In re: White
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 35:50
- Updated: 23 Sep 2016
- views: 67
- published: 23 Sep 2016
- views: 67
TUSD1 Arizona Court of Appeals visits RUHS
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:59
- Updated: 22 Sep 2016
- views: 51
RUHS students were able to experience an actual court of appeals trial and ask the judges questions! Check out this video for more.
RUHS students were able to experience an actual court of appeals trial and ask the judges questions! Check out this video for more.
wn.com/Tusd1 Arizona Court Of Appeals Visits Ruhs
Supreme Court of Appeals Holds Court At Marshall
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:14
- Updated: 20 Sep 2016
- views: 9
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals returned to Marshall University’s Huntington campus Tuesday, Sept. 20, to conduct a session in wh...
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals returned to Marshall University’s Huntington campus Tuesday, Sept. 20, to conduct a session in which it heard three appeals.
The Court’s appearance was its seventh at Marshall in the past 12 years. The docket for the Supreme Court’s visit can be found at
http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/calendar/2016/dockets/sept-20-16ad.html.
Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II is a former member and chairman of Marshall University’s board of governors. Other justices are Brent D. Benjamin, Robin Davis, Margaret L. Workman and Allen H. Loughry II.
wn.com/Supreme Court Of Appeals Holds Court At Marshall
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals returned to Marshall University’s Huntington campus Tuesday, Sept. 20, to conduct a session in which it heard three appeals.
The Court’s appearance was its seventh at Marshall in the past 12 years. The docket for the Supreme Court’s visit can be found at
http://www.courtswv.gov/supreme-court/calendar/2016/dockets/sept-20-16ad.html.
Chief Justice Menis E. Ketchum II is a former member and chairman of Marshall University’s board of governors. Other justices are Brent D. Benjamin, Robin Davis, Margaret L. Workman and Allen H. Loughry II.
- published: 20 Sep 2016
- views: 9
Rule 43; "Appeals From the CTA and Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals"
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:31
- Updated: 19 Sep 2016
- views: 4
Rule 43 of the Rules Court
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA
***
This channel off...
Rule 43 of the Rules Court
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA
***
This channel offers free and easy-to-access audio and video materials on Philippine law, Philippine jurisprudence, legal principles, Supreme Court doctrines, and the latest updates and trends in law schools and bar exams. This was specially created for lawyers, law students and bar examinees who wish to review over the Internet and at the comfort of their homes.
wn.com/Rule 43 Appeals From The Cta And Quasi Judicial Agencies To The Court Of Appeals
Rule 43 of the Rules Court
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA
***
This channel offers free and easy-to-access audio and video materials on Philippine law, Philippine jurisprudence, legal principles, Supreme Court doctrines, and the latest updates and trends in law schools and bar exams. This was specially created for lawyers, law students and bar examinees who wish to review over the Internet and at the comfort of their homes.
- published: 19 Sep 2016
- views: 4
Rule 42 of the Rules of Court; "Petition for Review From the Regional Trial Courts to the CA"
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:34
- Updated: 18 Sep 2016
- views: 0
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA
***
This channel offers free and easy-to-access ...
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA
***
This channel offers free and easy-to-access audio and video materials on Philippine law, Philippine jurisprudence, legal principles, Supreme Court doctrines, and the latest updates and trends in law schools and bar exams. This was specially created for lawyers, law students and bar examinees who wish to review over the Internet and at the comfort of their homes.
wn.com/Rule 42 Of The Rules Of Court Petition For Review From The Regional Trial Courts To The Ca
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK7a9MCpNGbBsBDel3alA
***
This channel offers free and easy-to-access audio and video materials on Philippine law, Philippine jurisprudence, legal principles, Supreme Court doctrines, and the latest updates and trends in law schools and bar exams. This was specially created for lawyers, law students and bar examinees who wish to review over the Internet and at the comfort of their homes.
- published: 18 Sep 2016
- views: 0
-
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Court of Appeals hearing on the Pork Lawsuit
published: 20 Oct 2011 -
Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
published: 14 Apr 2015 -
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
published: 21 Apr 2015 -
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more ...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 39:25
- Updated: 20 Oct 2011
- views: 1720
Court of Appeals hearing on the Pork Lawsuit
Court of Appeals hearing on the Pork Lawsuit
wn.com/Pork Lawsuit Nys Court Of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau V Nys
Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 198:48
- Updated: 14 Apr 2015
- views: 49302
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
wn.com/Ombudsman V. Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Court of Appeals (6th Division) and Jejomar Erwin S. Binay, Jr.)
- published: 14 Apr 2015
- views: 49302
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 119:11
- Updated: 21 Apr 2015
- views: 282
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
wn.com/Kansas Court Of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on April 14, 2015
- published: 21 Apr 2015
- views: 282
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 42:25
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard o...
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
wn.com/Ricci V. Destefano Court Of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
back
- Playlist
- Chat
back
- Playlist
- Chat
62:09
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the Yo...
published: 30 Jan 2010
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
65:07
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
Maryland court of appeals will determine whether Officer William Porter can be compelled t...
published: 03 Mar 2016
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FREDDIE GRAY CASE - PART 1
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Mar 2016
- views: 720
5:04
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
A walk-through of procedures at the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals; what to expect if...
published: 01 Sep 2015
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals: Walk-through at the Courthouse
- Report rights infringement
- published: 01 Sep 2015
- views: 173
20:15
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
published: 15 Jul 2014
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
5:57
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)Presen...
published: 09 Dec 2015
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
Immigration Appeals in the Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. (Urdu Version)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Dec 2015
- views: 331
6:01
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
-Video Upload powered by https://www.TunesToTube.com
published: 21 Sep 2016
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
11th Circuit Court of Appeals Says It's Not Discriminatory For Employers To Ban Dreadlocs In The Wor
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Sep 2016
- views: 221
4:57
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench...
published: 22 Jan 2015
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
47:15
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
9th Circuit Court of Appeals
4/06/2005, C-SPAN Product ID: 18...
published: 30 Jan 2010
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
Santiago v. Rumsfeld 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 2005
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9157
20:11
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
Oral arguments by New York labor lawyer Abdul K. Hassan, Esq. before the United States Cou...
published: 04 Aug 2016
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
Second Circuit Court of Appeals - Oral arguments in Domenech v. Parts Authority
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Aug 2016
- views: 39
52:33
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
The North Carolina Court of Appeals is hearing the case of a Raleigh man convicted of murd...
published: 12 Dec 2013
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
COURT OF APPEALS HEARING FOR JASON YOUNG 12/12/2013
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Dec 2013
- views: 633
back
- Playlist
- Chat
1:53
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Am...
published: 28 Sep 2016
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
First Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Filming Cops During Arrests Is Protected by First Amendment!
- Report rights infringement
- published: 28 Sep 2016
- views: 6
0:30
A Judge for the People: Dr. Dudley Flood, Abe Jones for Court of Appeals
Dr. Flood served for twelve years on the Board of Governors of the University of North Car...
published: 27 Sep 2016
A Judge for the People: Dr. Dudley Flood, Abe Jones for Court of Appeals
A Judge for the People: Dr. Dudley Flood, Abe Jones for Court of Appeals
- Report rights infringement
- published: 27 Sep 2016
- views: 5
0:47
Pennsylvania Hospital Merger Blocked By Federal Appeals Court
on Tuesday a federal appeals court blocked the proposed merger of the two largest hospital...
published: 27 Sep 2016
Pennsylvania Hospital Merger Blocked By Federal Appeals Court
Pennsylvania Hospital Merger Blocked By Federal Appeals Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 27 Sep 2016
- views: 36
2:14
A Stolen Valor Conviction Is Overturned By A Federal Appeals Court Because It Is 'Free Speech'.
A federal appeals court tossed out a veteran's conviction for wearing military medals he d...
published: 26 Sep 2016
A Stolen Valor Conviction Is Overturned By A Federal Appeals Court Because It Is 'Free Speech'.
A Stolen Valor Conviction Is Overturned By A Federal Appeals Court Because It Is 'Free Speech'.
- Report rights infringement
- published: 26 Sep 2016
- views: 416
35:50
16-1067 In re: White
published: 23 Sep 2016
16-1067 In re: White
16-1067 In re: White
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Sep 2016
- views: 67
1:59
TUSD1 Arizona Court of Appeals visits RUHS
RUHS students were able to experience an actual court of appeals trial and ask the judges ...
published: 22 Sep 2016
TUSD1 Arizona Court of Appeals visits RUHS
TUSD1 Arizona Court of Appeals visits RUHS
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Sep 2016
- views: 51
1:14
Supreme Court of Appeals Holds Court At Marshall
HUNTINGTON, W.Va. – The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals returned to Marshall Univer...
published: 20 Sep 2016
Supreme Court of Appeals Holds Court At Marshall
Supreme Court of Appeals Holds Court At Marshall
- Report rights infringement
- published: 20 Sep 2016
- views: 9
7:31
Rule 43; "Appeals From the CTA and Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals"
Rule 43 of the Rules Court
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://w...
published: 19 Sep 2016
Rule 43; "Appeals From the CTA and Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals"
Rule 43; "Appeals From the CTA and Quasi-Judicial Agencies to the Court of Appeals"
- Report rights infringement
- published: 19 Sep 2016
- views: 4
6:34
Rule 42 of the Rules of Court; "Petition for Review From the Regional Trial Courts to the CA"
Our other channel, "Philippine Law & Jurisprudence": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQnK...
published: 18 Sep 2016
Rule 42 of the Rules of Court; "Petition for Review From the Regional Trial Courts to the CA"
Rule 42 of the Rules of Court; "Petition for Review From the Regional Trial Courts to the CA"
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Sep 2016
- views: 0
back
- Playlist
- Chat
39:25
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Court of Appeals hearing on the Pork Lawsuit
published: 20 Oct 2011
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordeleau v NYS
- Report rights infringement
- published: 20 Oct 2011
- views: 1720
198:48
Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
G.R. No. 217126-27 (Hon. Conchita Carpio-Morales, in her capacity as the Ombudsman Vs. Cou...
published: 14 Apr 2015
Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments
- Report rights infringement
- published: 14 Apr 2015
- views: 49302
119:11
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket
Oral Arguments before the Kansas Court of Appeals at Johnson County Community College on A...
published: 21 Apr 2015
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2015 – Morning Docket
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Apr 2015
- views: 282
42:25
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD -...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
Pork Lawsuit NYS Court of Appeals No. 190 Bordelea...
Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals Oral Arguments...
Kansas Court of Appeals Oral Arguments April 14, 2...
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument...
photo: Creative Commons / Georges Biard
Did Angelina Jolie Cheat On Brad Pitt?
Edit Opposing Views 28 Sep 2016
The two allegedly "hit it off" on the set in Venice in 2010 and "the two of them have stayed i touch ever since then, and spoke regularly during the storm that surrounded Johnny's break up with Amber," a source told The Sun ... Firstly, many years ago, I met the man of my life, father of our son and of the baby we are expecting....
photo: Creative Commons / lasta29
[UPDATE]: Malaysia Airlines MH17 Downed By Missile From Russian-Backed Rebels: Report
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Sep 2016
... 298 people on board was fired from territory controlled by Russian-backed rebels, international prosecutors investing the incident told BBC News Wednesday.Prosecutors said the missile launcher was brought into Ukraine from Russia and later returned there, the report said.Officials said they were not accusing Russia of involvement, the report said....
photo: US Fema
Congress Overwhelmingly Approves Veto Of Saudi 9/11 Bill
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Sep 2016
“To have members of the ... But now, several lawmakers are echoing the White House argument the legislation could set a dangerous precedent, inviting other nations to respond by suing American diplomats, military personnel and other officials in foreign courts.Critics of the bill are now focusing on how to scale back the measure once it becomes law....
photo:
Missile That Downed Malaysian Airlines Plane Over Ukraine Came From Russia: Report
Edit WorldNews.com 28 Sep 2016
The Washington Post reports Wednesday the missile that downed a Malaysian Airlines plane over Ukraine came from Russia, according to a probe of the incident.The findings could lead to criminal charges over the disaster, which killed all 298 people aboard the flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur. WN.com will update this breaking news story.....
photo: US DoS
Kerry threatens Russia with end to joint Syria diplomacy
Edit The Roanoke Times 28 Sep 2016
WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State John Kerry threatened on Wednesday to end all cooperation between the United States and Russia to stop Syria's civil war, unless Russian and Syrian government attacks on Aleppo end ... would take military action if Syrian President Bashar Assad crossed the "red line" of using chemical weapons ... The group says government forces carried out 293 of the attacks; Russian warplanes conducted 16....
« back to news headlines
Operationalisation of Financial Ombudsman Scheme (Central Bank of Malaysia)
Edit Public Technologies 28 Sep 2016
Central Bank of Malaysia) ... Its services are an alternative to, and not a replacement for legal actions taken in a court of law. The services of the Ombudsman for Financial Services are offered free of charge to financial consumers ... Tan Sri James Foong, a retired Federal Court Judge, who has been appointed the Chairman of the Ombudsman for Financial Services ... enquiry@ofs.org.my....
U.S. Court of Appeals affirms Vivendi class action and GAMCO judgments (Vivendi SA)
Edit Public Technologies 28 Sep 2016
Although Vivendi is gratified that the Court of Appeals properly rejected the class action plaintiffs' cross-appeal, Vivendi strongly disagrees with the Court of Appeals' decision affirming the judgment and continues to assert that it did nothing wrong. Vivendi is analyzing its options, both in seeking further review before the Court of Appeals and in filing a petition for review with the Supreme Court of the United States....
Appeals court orders new trial for Cleveland man convicted of killing his mother
Edit Cleveland 28 Sep 2016
A three-judge panel on the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that Joseph Reddy's publicly appointed defense attorneys erred by not introducing evidence at trial that his client suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder ... After he was sentenced to life in prison, with possibility of parole after 20 years, Reddy appealed his case to the Ohio Eight District Court of Appeals....
Supreme Court ponders NCAA, Redskins sports cases (National Constitution Center)
Edit Public Technologies 28 Sep 2016
Each September, the Supreme Court justices reconvene in private to consider a huge number of new cases for its new term ... NCAA (there are two petitions), the Court will consider appeals of a lower court ruling about the National Collegiate Athletic Association's definition of amateur athletes and if student-athletes can ask for compensation from video game profits ... Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found in Lee v....
Court: Law banning people's ballot photos unconstitutional
Edit Rocky Mount Telegram 28 Sep 2016
(AP) — A federal appeals court in Boston says a New Hampshire law that prohibited voters from ... Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard arguments this month....
Court of Appeals Media Releases - September 28, 2016 (Oregon Judicial Department)
Edit Public Technologies 28 Sep 2016
Oregon Judicial Department) COURT OF APPEALS ... September 28, 2016 The Court of Appeals issued these opinions. ... The Court of Appeals issued these per curiam opinions. ... The Court of Appeals affirmed these cases without opinion. ... PSU also contends that, because petitioner's expulsion process was not a contested case under the APA, the Court of Appeals lacks jurisdiction to review it....
Court of Appeals Most Recent Opinions (Iowa Judicial Branch)
Edit Public Technologies 28 Sep 2016
Opinions of the Iowa Court of Appeals ... Click here for summaries of selected opinions most recently filed by the Iowa Court of Appeals. Opinionsof the Iowa Court of Appeals will be filed at 10.00 a.m ... court of appeals opinions, press releases and orders ... A list of cases on which the Iowa Court of Appeals is expected to rule will be posted at 10.00 a.m....
Chin says Pfizer case injunction set back Lasco’s growth by 500%
Edit Jamaica Observer 28 Sep 2016
Chin was substantiating his company’s claim for US$311 million in compensation for loss of sales of the hypertension generic drug — Las Amlodipine — while the case lasted in the Jamaican court up to 2012, when the appeal court upheld the Supreme Court’s dismissal of Pfizer’s patent claim and removed the injunction....
Prosecutors oppose appeals court deciding private emails issue in Swallow case
Edit Deseret News 28 Sep 2016
SALT LAKE CITY — State prosecutors oppose a Utah appeals court intervening in the ongoing criminal case against former Attorney General John Swallow to decide if they delved into private emails between him and his former lawyer ... Swallow's lawyers filed a petition last month asking the Utah Court of Appeals to reverse a 3rd District judge's decision and dismiss the charges against him....
Homeless advocates appeal judgment on Ohio ballot rules
Edit The Miami Herald 28 Sep 2016
Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati weigh in on their long-running dispute with Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted (HYOO'-sted) over voting-law changes ......
illegal alien who sneaked into U.S. 6 times deserves 18-month jail term, federal court rules
Edit Penn Live 28 Sep 2016
A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit assured that this week when it rejected Edin Noel Velasquez-Flories' appeal of the jail term slapped on him by U.S ... And, despite Velasquez-Flores' claims to the contrary, Diamond didn't exceed his authority in doing so, appeals court Chief Judge Theodore A. McKee wrote in the opinion denying the appeal....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next page »
