Anonymous asked:
If we must all agree, all work together, we’re no better than a machine. If an individual can’t work in solidarity with his fellows, it’s his duty to work alone. His duty and his right. We have been denying people that right. We’ve been saying, more and more often, you must work with the others, you must accept the rule of the majority. But any rule is tyranny. The duty of the individual is to accept no rule, to be the initiator of his own acts, to be responsible. Only if he does so will the society live, and change, and adapt, and survive. We are not subjects of a State founded upon law, but members of a society founded upon revolution. Revolution is our obligation: our hope of evolution.
Anonymous asked:
Hey there anon,
I’d recommend the following material:
I hope they help! Take it easy, don’t rush your reading, anarchism and communism can be intimidating subject to tackle given their undeserving historical baggage.
Happy reading!
- J.
Anonymous asked:
Hi anon,
A good question! Alexander Berkman summed this up well in 1929:
“The revolution abolishes private ownership of the means of production and distribution, and with it goes capitalistic business. Personal possession remains only in the things you use. Thus, your watch is your own, but the watch factory belongs to the people.” – What Is Communist Anarchism?
Essentially personal property is your laptop, guitar, book collection, garden shed, motorcycle etc. You can’t exploit people with your personal possessions. They’re just your stuff. Private property, however, is typically property “which can be used only to exploit people – land and buildings, instruments of production and distribution, raw materials and manufactured articles, money and capital.” (Nicholas Walter, About Anarchism). This is property owned by a minority that the majority need access to, and results in a hierarchical relationship such as employer-employee or landlord-tenant. In this respect, as Proudhon famously said, property is theft!
I hope that helps. You can find some reading ideas below.
- J.
Suggested reading:
scottish-socialist asked:
Hi,
No problem at all. In no particular order I’d personally recommend:
That’s all I can think of at the moment. If any followers have any good recommendations (and I’m sure you do) please let @scottish-socialist know!
- J.
When the highwayman holds his gun to your head, you turn your valuables over to him. You ‘consent’ alright, but you do so because you cannot help yourself, because you are compelled by his gun. Are you not compelled to work for an employer? Your need compels you, just as the highwayman’s gun.