A North Carolina federal court on Friday tossed claims against the NCAA alleging the collegiate sports governing body failed to live up to a duty to ensure that student-athletes receiving scholarships receive a quality education in a lawsuit over sham classes at the University of North Carolina that were disproportionately taken by student-athletes.
A California judge on Friday granted final approval to Anthem Blue Cross’ $15 million-plus deal to end four class actions alleging that the insurer misled more than 700,000 consumers about coverage under Affordable Care Act-compliant health plans, saying that the deal is fair given the complexity of the claims.
An investor in Midcoast Community Bancorp Inc. has filed a derivative action against the bank’s directors alleging they breached their fiduciary duty by allowing misconduct by the bank president that, when revealed, sunk a proposed $33 million merger with Bryn Mawr Bank Corp.
Girardi Keese escaped an ex-client’s suit alleging the firm skimmed millions from a $130 million Lockheed Martin settlement after a California federal judge said the man’s amended complaint still failed to justify why his claims were so late, according to a Friday court filing.
The federal agency that enforces the nation’s wage laws has agreed to pay $7 million to settle longtime claims that it failed to pay overtime to thousands of its own employees, the American Federation of Government Employees Local 12 said Friday.
A California federal judge on Friday cleared the way for Volkswagen AG to study the feasibility and logistics of scrapping certain diesel engine cars that cheat on government-mandated emissions tests and salvaging them for parts, as part of multidistrict litigation over the automaker’s emissions cheating scandal.
Wynn Las Vegas has asked the Supreme Court to review a Ninth Circuit decision that held the U.S. Department of Labor is empowered to restrict employers from tip-pooling, saying the appeals court decision wrongly interprets court precedent and the Fair Labor Standards Act and could lead to expansive federal agency authority.
The collegiate athletic conferences wrapped up in antitrust litigation targeting NCAA caps on athlete compensation and sports broadcasting companies will have to turn over documents on their lucrative media deals, according to an order entered Thursday in California federal court.
Computer maker Dell Inc. asked a California federal court on Friday not to send to arbitration its Sherman Act claim against Toshiba Corp. in multidistrict litigation over an alleged scheme to fix prices on lithium-ion batteries, saying Toshiba is not a party to agreements signed by its alleged co-conspirators.
Twitter users in a putative class claim accusing the online platform of intruding on their privacy through its “Find Friends” feature on Apple’s mobile devices shot back at the social media site’s bid to toss the suit, telling a California federal judge on Thursday that Twitter only began asking for permission to “upload” users’ address books after public backlash, showing it knowingly violated the Apple app store’s guidelines.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a court-appointed receiver on Thursday slammed Jay Peak ski resort owner Ariel Quiros' efforts to unfreeze about $640,000 to pay attorneys defending him for allegedly carrying out a $350 million EB-5 immigrant investor program fraud scheme, urging a Florida federal court to deny the "excessive" fees.
U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl scuttled five months of summary judgment briefings Friday in ABS Entertainment Inc.'s New York suit seeking royalties from CBS Corp. over pre-1972 recordings, saying the network's bid to escape the proposed class action will have to be fully redrawn after two appellate courts weigh in.
AT&T;, Verizon and T-Mobile assailed efforts Thursday to send back to state court a proposed class action, removed to federal jurisdiction by AT&T;, brought by California residents alleging the companies illegally collected hundreds of millions of dollars in cellphone sales taxes on behalf of the state’s tax agency.
Months after reversing her decision to separate claims against Riddell Inc. from multidistrict litigation over head trauma NFL players sustained during their careers, a Pennsylvania federal judge on Friday struck the severed and amended complaints that followed the initial decision, citing concerns about issues with the filings.
Dunkin’ Donuts urged a New York federal judge on Thursday to dismiss a class action over the addition of sales tax to prepackaged coffee, saying tax disputes are for tax court.
Johnson Controls Inc. asked the Third Circuit to uphold its district court win against a class of retirees from Pennsylvania factories who sued the auto parts giant for reducing benefits, arguing there was no language in collective bargaining agreements that said benefits could never be altered.
A California judge on Thursday blocked a bid by a group of prominent Los Angeles restaurants to toss a putative antitrust class action alleging they orchestrated a price-fixing conspiracy to cover the costs of employee health care required under the Affordable Care Act, saying the 3 percent surcharge appeared to be “per se illegal.”
Duke University, the University of Pennsylvania, Johns Hopkins University and Vanderbilt University on Wednesday were each hit with proposed class actions accusing the schools of causing retirement plan participants to pay millions of dollars in excessive fees, just one day after three other prominent schools were similarly sued.
Class attorneys in California can keep calculating their fee requests based on a percentage of the amounts they win for clients, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday in a decision that clarified a 40-year-old precedent that had called for using a more precise accounting.
Ticketholders for Sunday's canceled NFL Hall of Fame Game in Ohio hit the league and the hall with a proposed class action Thursday that seeks reimbursement for travel and other expenses, alleging the contest was called off at the last minute because of stadium mismanagement.
For years, mutual fund shareholders have been limited in their ability to successfully allege securities fraud in class actions. But with a recent New York federal court decision in Youngers v. Virtus Investment, it is likely that mutual fund investors will bring and survive dispositive motions at the pleading stage and attain favorable settlements, say Geoffrey Coll and Marco Molina of BakerHostetler.
As technology in cars continues to evolve, regulatory compliance will become increasingly important, and there will be greater emphasis on accurately disclosing cybersecurity risks to consumers. Those involved in the auto industry, including manufacturers, dealerships and software suppliers, will likely be at an increased risk of regulatory exposure and possibly litigation as well, says Carolyn Theis at Armstrong Teasdale LLP.
In recent years, investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have challenged the federal government in court, following the government's decision to hide thousands of documents in the name of executive privilege. This case has critical implications for the transparency and accountability of the government's actions, says Saikrishna Prakash, the James Monroe Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia Law School.
In only a few short months, the Eleventh Circuit signaled its approach to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo through the treatment of cases under both the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, seemingly limiting the Supreme Court’s decision to its narrow facts, says Matthew Rosenkoff at Taylor English Duma LLP.
Antitrust enforcers and businesses have been waging a slow war against payment card fees, slowly chipping away at the effect of those fees on businesses' bottom lines. But that progress recently took a major step backward when the Second Circuit threw out a watershed settlement between the payment card industry and merchants, say attorneys with Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC.
Although the Ninth Circuit’s statement and application of the law in Fisher v. Monster Beverage are not novel or unexpected, what is novel and potentially of interest are the plaintiffs’ unusual claims and a somewhat rare finding of federal preemption of state consumer deception laws, says Christopher Van Gundy at Keller and Heckman LLP.
Agreeing to arbitration clauses can be complicated because you may risk locking in a factually incorrect judgment. Merril Hirsh and Nicholas Schuchert of Troutman Sanders LLP explain the mechanics of the Federal Arbitration Act and how to ensure you find the right arbitration laws for your case.
Class action defendants that have attempted to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s Campbell-Ewald guidance have been almost uniformly thwarted in their efforts to moot the class actions through tender. All is not lost, however, as a recent decision by the District of Massachusetts suggests another path forward for certain types of class actions, say Colleen Gulliver and Timothy Birnbaum of DLA Piper LLP.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo, some creative defense lawyers are arguing that federal lawsuits based upon state law claims should be dismissed for lack of Article III standing. While clever, this argument is short-sighted, as it undermines the Class Action Fairness Act's intent to protect defendants from the vicissitudes of state courts, say Gregory Frank and Asher Hawkins at Frank LLP.
Have you ever been reading your morning paper or watching the nightly news, and found yourself wondering, “How did that lawyer get on TV? I could do that.” If you’ve decided you want to start putting yourself or your law firm in the public light but feel at a loss about how to start, there are several steps you can take to get noticed, says Annie Scranton at Pace Public Relations.