So the critique of civilization comes from many directions, but most often the connection to mass and anti-mass practices is stuck in only reactive behaviors. I see a coming future: Aggressive space claims and attempting to create a sustainable infrastructure to ensure to longevity of such an aggressive move. A space claim is a move of action, not reaction in the war for the claims of physical power, for expressing autonomy. The problem is that anti-civilization critique is almost unnecessary to these actions and plays very little role in them. Instead it has been typical anti-capitalism, with anarchists and communists. How can anti-civilization critique be relevant when it is being outpaced by less marginal expressions of anarchy that are more willing to work with others? Should we perhaps turn focus from anti-civ because it has failed to be relevant to what seems to be a better and more interesting approach grounded in the reality of today's radical situations and practices?