Top Story
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Halo decision relaxing the standard for proving willful patent infringement will result in juries deciding that issue more often than they did previously, attorneys say, although judges will still decide whether to award enhanced damages and may wield that power vigorously.
A New York federal judge has rejected Lowe’s Cos. Inc.’s bid to dismiss a suit claiming it sells home security cameras that infringe a patent for recording and indexing images, saying under the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice decision she wasn't ready to declare the patent invalid.
An Illinois federal judge on Friday dismissed a copyright infringement suit accusing Steak ‘n Shake of copying a rival burger chain’s TV commercial, saying the company failed to show that the commercials met the legal threshold of substantial similarity.
A nonpracticing entity sued Apple Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas on Thursday, alleging a sensor in iPhones that notifies the devices when hands are near them infringes several of its patented technologies.
A Texas magistrate judge on Friday moved patent infringement suits against gaming platform companies Blizzard, Riot, Valve and Wargaming out of the state's notorious Eastern District, finding the companies had proven jurisdiction and convenience in California and Washington.
A Delaware federal judge on Friday refused to throw out Amgen’s suit accusing Hospira of improperly failing to provide 180-day notice of sales of a biosimilar version of anti-anemia blockbuster Epogen.
A trophy company urged the Fifth Circuit on Thursday to find that Scottsdale Insurance Co. must fund its defense of a lawsuit alleging that it infringed a competitor's trademarks and trade dress, arguing that a policy exclusion for intentional conduct does not apply to bar coverage.
Animal health company Zoetis LLC filed a patent infringement suit in Arizona federal court on Thursday, accusing AX Pharmaceutical Corp. of selling and importing a patented drug used to treat dogs with skin allergies.
AbbVie Inc. on Thursday told a Delaware federal court that Amgen Inc. has infringed 61 of its patents by attempting to get approval for a biosimilar of AbbVie’s blockbuster immunosuppressant Humira and urged the court to block the copycat drug.
The Federal Circuit on Friday affirmed the dismissal of a suit against PepsiCo Inc. by a former food scientist alleging that his name was wrongly omitted from a patent on an aroma delivery system he said worked on while employed at the company.
An Illinois wireless company accused its onetime Squire Patton Boggs LLP lawyers of using obsolete patent practices, flubbing applications and double-dealing in the formation of other intellectual property companies.
A California judge on Friday rejected Warner Bros.’ bid to evade an artist’s claims that the studio and Legendary Pictures stole ideas he had pitched about King Kong’s origins for the upcoming film “Kong: Skull Island,” saying the complaint properly alleges that the artist and Warner Bros. had an implied contract.
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued America Invents Act inter partes review decisions Thursday invalidating many claims of two patents on eye sensor technology that a Canadian university has accused Samsung smartphones of infringing.
The Federal Circuit on Friday sent two patent cases back to district courts to reconsider whether the prevailing patent owners are entitled to enhanced damages under a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, including the Halo case the justices ruled on.
A dietary supplement maker may have to stop selling or reformulate his product after a Federal Circuit panel on Friday granted a win to his former employer, Mannatech Inc., who accused the product of infringing two of the company’s supplements patents.
Network-1 Technologies Inc. said Friday it has struck a deal with Dell Inc. to settle a lawsuit in Texas federal court alleging infringement of an Ethernet patent, making Dell the latest big-name defendant to bow out of the case.
Intellectual property-focused Merchant & Gould PC launched its first California office, anchored by two former Valorem Law Group partners with experience handling patent, trademark, copyright and other matters at trial, in arbitrations, and at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the firm said Friday.
The Federal Circuit on Friday affirmed a lower court’s ruling that a patent holding company can’t challenge decisions made by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office while re-examination proceedings of two e-commerce patents are pending, because they weren’t final agency decisions.
In Law360's latest roundup of new actions at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, General Mills files an appeal after losing a bid to register the color of its Cheerios boxes, the owner of the World Trade Center picks a fight with a fashion group, and Major League Baseball's Los Angeles Angels square off with the owner of "Halos" brand mandarins.
Home improvement celebrity Bob Vila appears to have settled a lawsuit accusing an Illinois-based public relations specialist of making money off false assertions that Vila was a client by agreeing Thursday to drop the accusations on the caveat that he may refile them at a later date.
The US Olympic Committee has generated controversy in recent weeks with claims that nonsponsors could not even tweet about the upcoming games in Rio, but that kind of highly aggressive trademark enforcement is nothing new for the Olympics.
The U.S. Department of Justice's decision to keep the core of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees intact sidesteps a closely watched, hotly contested issue that has captured the eyes, ears and keyboards of music industry titans and digital music entrepreneurs alike — whether to permit “partial withdrawals,” says Daniel Vitelli of Constantine Cannon LLP.
If you buy the assets of a company, have you also acquired the liabilities for infringement associated with those assets? Sandra Edelman and Kaleb McNeely of Dorsey & Whitney LLP offer takeaways from a New York federal court decision addressing this issue in Energy Intelligence Group v. Cowen.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent Halo decision rejecting the Federal Circuit’s use of a rigid test raises the question of why the court has not accepted any challenge to the two-step analytical approach to structural obviousness of new pharmaceutical compound claims, says Francis C. Lynch, a retired partner in Goodwin Procter LLP’s intellectual property group.
The antitrust laws are intended to encourage greater innovation, but the courts have held that some product redesigns may be anti-competitive. Where’s the line? The courts offer no easy answers, says Sean Gates of Charis Lex PC.
Have you ever been reading your morning paper or watching the nightly news, and found yourself wondering, “How did that lawyer get on TV? I could do that.” If you’ve decided you want to start putting yourself or your law firm in the public light but feel at a loss about how to start, there are several steps you can take to get yourself noticed, says Annie Scranton at Pace Public Relations.
Over the last few weeks, the United States Olympic Committee has sent letters to companies that sponsor athletes, warning them against infringing USOC intellectual property in hashtags such as #Rio2016 or #TeamUSA. The use of trademark law to suppress hashtags about the Olympic Games may be distasteful, but it is legally sound, says Richard Posell of JAMS.
Where the facts surrounding trade secret misappropriation might give rise to a challenge based on federal copyright preemption, a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act — as opposed to a claim under state law exclusively — should ensure that the trade secret claim survives a preemption challenge, says John Williamson of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP.
In a recent survey of 150 legal firms, it was revealed that “careless employees” was the No. 1 cybersecurity concern for firms by a wide margin. Law firms are smart to be worried about the risks their employees — from the interns to the partners — can pose, usually unintentionally, says Tom DeSot, chief information officer of Digital Defense Inc.
There are four basic questions about “plain meaning” patent claim construction on which the Federal Circuit is divided or appears to have diverged from the U.S. Supreme Court. These are not trivial, academic disagreements. How a particular panel answers these questions often will dictate how it will decide a claim construction dispute on appeal, says John Vandenberg of Klarquist Sparkman LLP.
Proper selection, preparation and presentation of corporate witnesses can be critically important to achieving a favorable outcome in court. Brian Bagley and Scott Marrs of Akerman LLP offer a checklist of best practices for selecting and preparing corporate witnesses.