Moscow's candidate
Letter to the Editor
| Sunday, July 31, 2016, 9:00 p.m.
I find Donald Trump's cozying up to Vladimir Putin extremely disturbing. Trump has long expressed admiration for Putin's authoritative style and he certainly matches his hostility to a free press. Recently, Trump indicated a hesitancy to support East European NATO members against Russian aggression and forced the toning down of language in the Republican platform favoring the pro-Western government in Ukraine.
Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort worked for Viktor Yanukovych, Putin's surrogate in Ukraine. Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, a Trump foreign policy adviser, partied with Putin in Moscow in 2015. Now comes word that DNC emails hacked by the Russian government have been released in an attempt to sabotage the Democratic convention. What is going on here? The Trump-Putin connection should be of concern to all voters and particularly to those of East European ancestry.
The Russian hacking also leaves me worried about the vulnerability of our voting systems — especially those computer systems without paper trails. If the election is hacked, will we ever even know?
Richard Krepski
Highland Park
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.