A California federal judge will reconsider a dismissed duty to defend claim in Office Depot’s $30 million lawsuit seeking coverage from AIG Specialty Insurance Co. for a whistleblower suit after looking over the filings again and concluding the insurer never actually moved to toss the defend claim.
A New Jersey lawmaker wants to institute a health care program in which the state government, not private insurers, acts as a “single payer” that negotiates and covers the cost of care, cutting expenses for patients and freeing them from traditional insurance network restrictions.
Axis Insurance Co. must cover a television provider's costs to defend a lawsuit alleging it provided unauthorized access to DirecTV programming, a Maryland federal judge ruled Friday, holding that a policy exclusion for unapproved use of data doesn't apply because the programming doesn't fit the policy's definition of data.
A former Squire Patton Boggs LLP attorney is suing the firm and Prudential for allegedly denying her disability coverage for conflicting and untrue reasons, according to a complaint filed in Ohio federal court on Friday.
A church-affiliated hospital in New Jersey has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to rule that employee retirement plans maintained by such organizations are exempt from the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, challenging a circuit ruling that the exemption only applies to plans established by churches.
Hanover Insurance Group was hit with a suit in Florida federal court Friday by another insurer for indemnity of legal costs for famed lawyer Alan Dershowitz stemming from allegations that he defamed two lawyers who represented a woman who accused him of having sex with her when she was underage.
A window and door manufacturer that's suing Liberty Mutual for coverage of product liability claims urged a federal judge on Friday to seek the Iowa Supreme Court's input about whether damages to other property stemming from a policyholder's faulty workmanship can be covered under a commercial general liability insurance policy.
Humana Inc. will be pulling out of “substantially all” state marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act, likely leaving all but 11 states, the insurer said on Thursday in an earnings report.
The Texas Supreme Court on Friday declined to review a lawyer’s argument that the receiver for one of his former clients, an insolvent insurer, must arbitrate an attempt to recoup fees allegedly paid to the attorney to represent the insurer’s management in claims that had nothing to do with the company.
A private equity firm has asked the Eleventh Circuit to seek the Florida Supreme Court's guidance on whether an insurance company accused of its breaching its obligations to a policyholder can be excused from those duties if a third party steps in and pays the insured's losses.
A New York state judge has ruled that Bear Stearns did not necessarily trigger an exclusion to its insurance policy by entering a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2006 without its insurers' permission, as the insurers had already made clear they were denying the claim.
A Pennsylvania federal judge on Thursday slapped down a customer’s attempt to win class certification in her car-rental insurance suit against Budget Rent A Car System Inc. and its debt collector, finding that she failed to prove members had common issues when she had years to perfect the bid.
A former Fox Rothschild LLP attorney was slapped with a six-month prison sentence on Friday following his conviction on charges that he used insider information to trade ahead of a $760 million insurance industry merger his firm was helping to handle.
The Fifth Circuit held in a published decision Thursday that Southern Insurance Co. has to help cover the cost of repairing a University of Southern Mississippi building that was damaged by a tornado, but Affiliated FM Insurance Co. has to chip in as well.
Insurers who already escaped antitrust claims brought by Utah auto body shops in multidistrict litigation accusing them of conspiring to manipulate car repair costs won dismissal Thursday of almost all remaining state law claims, which a Florida federal court found to be insufficiently pled.
Protostorm said on Thursday it intends to appeal to the Fourth Circuit a federal judge's ruling that a Virginia law firm's malpractice insurance policy for $5 million, not $10 million, applies to a verdict for botching a client’s online game patent.
A New York federal judge on Thursday declined to grant the University of Pittsburgh quick judgment in its dispute with Lexington Insurance over coverage of a delayed $40 million campus project, finding that Lexington’s policyholder, the architect in charge, failed to properly notify its insurer of a potential claim.
Travelers Insurance on Thursday opposed a bid by Trelleborg Automotive for a quick decision that coverage was owed for environmental remediation costs at an auto parts manufacturing facility, telling a Michigan federal judge that facts are lacking, while Trelleborg in its own opposition accused the insurer of ignoring the facts.
A Missouri federal judge granted a win to a state lawmaker and his wife suing the government over the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate, finding that the law requiring insurance plans to provide such coverage in their plan violates their rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
The Fifth Circuit on Thursday reversed and remanded a Louisiana federal judge's decision that a pair of insurers owed Solstice Oil & Gas I LLC no coverage for a $12 million loss after a contractor shoddily drilled an oil well.
We in Missouri do not take lightly to new trends or frothy ideas. Yet, the uniform bar exam has allowed us to meet the challenges of an increasingly mobile legal profession and the changing needs of clients, and to ensure that a newly admitted attorney has the knowledge, character and fitness to practice in the Show-Me State, says Jim Nowogrocki, president of the Board of Law Examiners in Missouri — the first state to adopt the UBE.
It makes little sense to apply the doctrine of contra proferentem to insurers where the contract language at issue has been agreed to by sophisticated parties, and it makes no sense at all to apply the doctrine to contract language drafted by a broker working on behalf of an insured, say Paul Sullivan and Jeffrey Gordon at Zelle LLP.
The New York Court of Appeals' recent decision in Ambac Assurance v. Countrywide Home Loans — limiting the common interest privilege — conflicts with the law of many other jurisdictions and creates significant uncertainties for commercial actors in subsequent litigation, say attorneys at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.
Timothy Kevane’s recent Law360 guest article depicting the New York Court of Appeals' decision in Viking Pump as a “break” with an alleged nationwide “trend” toward pro rata allocation is totally at odds with the real trend of decisions finding noncumulation provisions incompatible with pro rata allocation, say John Winsbro and Elizabeth Sherwin at McKool Smith PC.
Law firms today are recognizing that the process of creating a next-generation workplace is far more complex than relocating to a more modern space in a trendier part of town. The challenge is more significant for larger firms with multiple generations represented within their executive teams, says Tere Blanca, founder of Miami-based Blanca Commercial Real Estate Inc.
A Virginia district court recently enforced the validity of prior acts dates in legal malpractice policies by looking to the acts that gave rise to the liability, rather than to acts continuing the attorney-client relationship after the client’s cause of action had already accrued, say Gary Seligman and Laura Lee Miller at Wiley Rein LLP.
In recent years, traditional political risk insurance coverage has proved insufficient to address the increasing needs and specific risk factors of life sciences companies, giving surplus lines insurance markets the opportunity to craft new and unique forms of coverage, says Zachary Lerner at Locke Lord LLP.
The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance recently issued two advisory opinions determining that unauthorized nonlife insurance corporations are subject to insurance franchise tax instead of premium tax, a position that is arguably improper, says Andrew Appleby of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP.
While the statute of limitations has run for policyholders who want to litigate their initial Sandy insurance claim determinations, the unique nature of the failed Sandy claims review process may have reset the clock for legal redress in the courts, says Douglas Pepe at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC.
There is no single, perfect solution for reducing the length and expense of reinsurance arbitration proceedings, but there are a number of ways that parties to an arbitration can save both time and money, while still achieving a thoughtful resolution, says Samantha Krasner at Choate Hall & Stewart LLP.