Michio Kaku on the moon landing "hoax".

• Report rights infringement
• published: 28 Nov 2011
• views: 1590968

^From "Science Fantastic" -TECHNOLOGY ["Moon Landings Faked?..(using) video technology of the late 1960's...alleged fraud was simply not possible. Vid: http://goo.gl/ClpKUj Article http://goo.gl/Dedco9 GRAVITY[..the precision of motion of all objects in Moon 1/6th gravity environment..is the real nail in the coffin against faked Moon video. It is absolutely impossible to convincingly duplicate motion in the absence of gravity or reduced gravity in any shot using real actors unless it is heavily reprocessed or synthesized digitally http://goo.gl/mwCnqs]Vids: Lunar Gravity http://goo.gl/vPmLZT SEQ Bay Pendulum http://goo.gl/OXpsW2 DUST ["..the lunar dust falls quickly to the ground, tracing a parabolic arc...one of the best pieces of evidence proving that the footage was actually shot in an airless environment." http://goo.gl/efkgtT Vid: http://goo.gl/SxSrk3 RESPONSE:"I'm the caller, Neil Baker, and David R has been kind to invite me to summarize my contention that most the NASA space program is probably a hoax.I say "probably" because I don't know.But neither does anyone else and I think that's unacceptable. A faith-based space program during this great age of the scientific method is unnecessary and absurd. It's way past time for NASA to be scientifically accountable. After my painful 2003 epiphany regarding 9-11, I gained the courage to confront my mythological beliefs about the space program and other things.I was confronted with the difficult question, "How do we PROVE we went to the moon?" Photos? Video? Could be fake.Narrative? Could be lies. Launches? Yes, but what happened after they went into orbit out of sight? Did they really go to the moon? Do they really go to the space station or is just a lighted orbiting umannned prop? Did they really repair a Hubble telescope? What about the flag waving? I don't know and there's nothing we can prove about it on Earth. What about the shadows? I don't know and there's nothing we can prove about them on Earth.What about the Lunar laser reflector? I don't know and who knows how it got there even if it's actually there. But then I stumbled upon the spacesuit ice sublimators.Being in either the vacuum of orbit or the vacuum of the moon, heat transfer is a difficult engineering challenge.There's nothing cool to conduct heat to, there's no atmosphere so there's nothing to convect heat to and a radiator would be huge and ungainly so NASA describes the clever and exotic technique of using nickel porous plate ice sublimators to explain how heat was allegedly transferred from the spacesuits and the Lunar Modules(LM). A primary closed loop of water circulates around the heat source, either a human body or the LM, through a nickel porous plate heat exchanger.The secondary side of the heat exchanger is open to the vacuum of space through many small poresm Water passes into the heat exchanger, receives the heat of the closed primary loop and then, because it's exposed to vacuum, phase changes from liquid to ice and sublimates into space transferring heat with it.Very neat and ingenious.Naturally, I wanted to learn more.What does a spacesuit sublimator look like? Specifications? Procedures? Video of one being tested?Photographs?Technical discussions in heat transfer or thermodynamics books? I searched. Strangely and absurdly, I found almost nothing.I received almost nothing. I got stonewalled when I appealed for information. Absurdly, there were no photographs.Absurdly, there was no video of spacesuits with ice sublimators being tested. Most absurdly, there was no information in any academic-level heat transfer or thermodynamics books. Absurdly, the alleged manufacturer, Hamilton Sunstrand of United Technologies would only release very elementary information.Absurdly, NASA's Johnson Space Center refused to provide video or photos and stonewalled me instead. Absurdly, the Rice University Department of Mechanical Engineering, most closely associated with Houston's Johnson Space Center refused to comment.Absurdly, my Congressional representatives in two states, California's and Washington's Feinstein, Boxer, Cantwell, Murray, Capps and Hastings,stonewalled me also when I requested their assistance acquiring accountability from NASA. But voila!The good news was that I had stumbled upon the way to PROVE whether the NASA space program was a hoax.NASA must publicly demonstrate,before independent witnesses, a spacesuit with ice sublimator cooling system in a high vacuum chamber on Earth duplicating environmental conditions of orbit.NASA refuses to be accountable.It's unacceptable.We can PROVE today on Earth if the NASA space program is a hoax. Please demand NASA accountability from your respective Congressional representatives.As President Ronald Reagan said in his Farewell Address, "We the PEOPLE tell the government what to do; it doesn't tell us."Please tell them that you want to see a spacesuit with ice sublimator work in a vacuum chamber on Earth.Thank you."