Wikileaks Revealed! The single biggest reason Trump won? Fox News Will Never Cover This!

• Report rights infringement
• published: 20 Dec 2016
• views: 16343

VLOG NEWS- https://www.youtube.com/CultureShockNews Generate Free Leads & Sales For Your Business-http://bit.ly/2hUKiaS Atlantis by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/...) Artist: http://audionautix.com/ http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=54447 Wikileaks Revealed! The single biggest reason Trump won? Fox News Will Never Cover This! Wikileaks was responsible for publishing most of the DNC emails, but was never contacted by the Obama administration. https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/810819466351300609?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/810859775542095872 The wikileaks.org domain name was registered on 4 October 2006.[5] The website was established and published its first document in December 2006.[24][25] WikiLeaks has been predominantly represented in public since January 2007 by Julian Assange, who is now generally recognised as the "founder of WikiLeaks".[26] According to the magazine Wired, a volunteer said that Assange described himself in a private conversation as "the heart and soul of this organisation, its founder, philosopher, spokesperson, original coder, organiser, financier, and all the rest".[27] WikiLeaks relies to some degree on volunteers and previously described its founders as a mixture of Asian dissidents, journalists, mathematicians, and start-up company technologists from the United States, Taiwan, Europe, Australia, and South Africa,[28] but has progressively adopted a more traditional publication model and no longer accepts either user comments or edits. As of June 2009, the website had more than 1,200 registered volunteers[28] and listed an advisory board comprising Assange, his deputy Jash Vora and seven other people, some of whom denied any association with the organisation. Despite using the name "WikiLeaks", the website has not used the "wiki" publication method since May 2010.[31] Also, despite some popular confusion[32] due to both having "wiki" in their names, WikiLeaks and Wikipedia are not affiliated with each other ("wiki" is not a brand name);[33][34] Wikia, a for-profit corporation affiliated loosely with the Wikimedia Foundation, did purchase several WikiLeaks-related domain names (including wikileaks.com and wikileaks.net) as a "protective brand measure" in 2007 According to the WikiLeaks website, its goal is "to bring important news and information to the public... One of our most important activities is to publish original source material alongside our news stories so readers and historians alike can see evidence of the truth." Another of the organisation's goals is to ensure that journalists and whistleblowers are not prosecuted for emailing sensitive or classified documents. The online "drop box" is described by the WikiLeaks website as "an innovative, secure and anonymous way for sources to leak information to [WikiLeaks] journalists".[36] In an interview as part of the American television program The Colbert Report, Assange discussed the limit to the freedom of speech, saying, "[it is] not an ultimate freedom, however free speech is what regulates government and regulates law. That is why in the US Constitution the Bill of Rights says that Congress is to make no such law abridging the freedom of the press. It is to take the rights of the press outside the rights of the law because those rights are superior to the law because in fact they create the law. Every constitution, every bit of legislation is derived from the flow of information. Similarly every government is elected as a result of people understanding things". Some describe Wikileaks as a media or journalistic organization. For example, in a 2013 resolution, the International Federation of Journalists, a trade union of journalists, called Wikileaks a "new breed of media organisation" that "offers important opportunities for media organisations."[40] Harvard professor Yochai Benkler has praised WikiLeaks as a new form of journalistic enterprise,[41] testifying at the court-martial of Bradley Manning that "WikiLeaks did serve a particular journalistic function" although "It's a hard line to draw."[42] Other do not consider WikiLeaks to be journalistic in nature. Media ethicist Kelly McBride of the Poynter Institute for Media Studies writes that "Wikileaks might grow into a journalist endeavor. But it's not there yet."[43] Bill Keller of the New York Times considers WikiLeaks to be a "complicated source" rather than a journalistic partner.[43] Prominent First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams writes that Wikileaks is not a journalistic group, but instead "an organization of political activists; ... a source for journalists; and ... a conduit of leaked information to the press and the public." [44] Noting Assange's statements that he and his colleagues read only a small fraction of information before deciding to publish it https://youtu.be/oz6kTCahp_I