JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Malcolm Turnbull firms in late counting but faces a Rubik's Cube of complexity

ANALYSIS

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Katter backs Turnbull government

Crossbench MP Bob Katter announces he will give confidence and supply to a returned Coalition government. Vision courtesy ABC News 24.

PT1M21S 620 349

Technically it remains unclear whether the contested premiership of Malcolm Bligh Turnbull will continue into a second term. Practically however, it is now virtually inevitable.

Officially, this declaration awaits the glacial count in half a dozen seats, all of which appear to be leaning towards sitting Coalition candidates. Unfortunately, that's the way it is folks: we might live in the era of email and digital immediacy, but this election has gone postal. Literally.

While Malcolm Turnbull is likely to be returned as Prime Minister, he faces a triple-threat to his leadership.

While Malcolm Turnbull is likely to be returned as Prime Minister, he faces a triple-threat to his leadership. Photo: Robert Shakespeare

If the Coalition picks up all six, it would make for a 79-seat haul and a governing majority of three. By no means a big buffer but a safe-enough win nonetheless. Seventy-seven is more likely because Hindmarsh in South Australia and Cowan in WA are likely Labor gains. 

Advertisement

Even if the Coalition misses out on another two, it picked up the support of Bob Katter on Thursday - announced with all his mercurial flair - making a second term a pretty solid bet. Fellow independents such as Cathy McGowan, Andrew Wilkie, and Rebakah Sharkie might also guarantee supply and confidence in the interests of stability, so a second Coalition term can confidently be forecast.

This will make for uncomfortable reading for those who cannot separate forecasting from barracking, or prediction from wish. Indeed, election 2016, is notable for the self-appointed media experts who, in an ironic example of premature conclusion drawing - their key complaint about professional pundits - have loudly condemned the "MSM" for accurately reporting public surveys, and for suggesting a Turnbull win was the more likely result. It turned out it was.

Fairfax Media's depiction of an election on a knife-edge, or "cliffhanger" as it was headlined the day before, derived exclusively from these surveys, which by-the-way, were bang on. 

To be sure the party spinners had different interpretations and promulgated these furtively in the final weeks and Turnbull himself said publicly he would win.

And there were senior voices even in the Labor camp who thought their side would fall 10 seats short, despite the prevailing view that it would be closer than the general commentary depicted.

The attention now will quickly turn to the complexity of the political equation facing Turnbull after his under achieving on the campaign trail.

Turnbull now faces a triple-threat to his leadership: diminished authority in a fracturing party room; reduced numerical command in the Parliament including a potentially unmanageable Senate; and feeding both of these, the diminished protection of popularity.

And just to add to that, the nation's triple-A credit rating has been put on negative outlook; tax cuts for big business face blockage; so-called retrospective superannuation changes from budget will be subject of an internal revolt; and Katter has warned his support would evaporate at the first hint of union bashing, making Turnbull's pursuit of the supposedly central trigger bills on union control, untenable.

This is not a government, it's a Rubik's Cube.

Follow us on Twitter

58 comments

  • No one will be more disappointed than Tony Abbott if Malcolm can get the required 76 to 77 seats.

    Commenter
    geofff
    Date and time
    July 08, 2016, 8:26AM
    • Sorry, but they (Abbott and the extreme right) always hoped for small win which would give them power and Malcolm no authority to stand up to them. They now have him over a barrel.

      Commenter
      JNM
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 9:09AM
    • Even if they get back with one vote, they remain in government and Malcolm Turnbull remains Prime Minister. If there are people in the Liberal Party so witless and stupid to start making noises about challenges then they will be in opposition before they know it.
      If Abbott had been running the show it would have been all over on Saturday night, a massive loss.
      No matter who won the election the Senate was always going be a difficult logjam.
      The real challenge for Malcolm Turnbull is to prove that this near death experience can turn him around and do better in 3 years time.
      I'm sure that Bill Shorten would rather have the "problems" that Turnbull has than be sitting on the Opposition benches for the next 3 years.

      Commenter
      Gymealad
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 10:02AM
    • How about Mr Albanese?

      Commenter
      Matamoscas
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 10:38AM
  • Fantastic news that a Coalition Government will be returned.
    Yes it seemed that many jumped the gun earlier in the week but are less euphoric now.
    I must admit that i thought the seat count would be higher to the Coalition but i underestimated the amount of conservatives who registered a protest vote and the success of the Medicare lie ( a survey has found over 40% of voters were influenced by the Mediscare).
    I see little difficulties for the Government implementing its agenda in the Senate but it may need to give ground on some issues which are favoured by the right wing parties.

    Commenter
    liklik
    Date and time
    July 08, 2016, 8:26AM
    • Malcolm's aim for the DD was to rid the Senate of Ferals, yet more Ferals have been elected and he could be in a difficult situation in the HoR if the numbers are close, one bi election and it could be curtains for MT.

      Why in the previous parliament did the LNP not give ground what will change now?

      I agree that it seems the LNP will be re-elected, however the numbers are pure speculative ATM.

      Will be very interesting how successful MT is in getting things through the Senate if he cant then will he throw another hissy fit Tanti?

      You suggest that you are a swinging voter, me thinks that your swing has stuck to the right.

      Commenter
      Buffalo Bill
      Location
      Sydneys Northshore
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 8:55AM
    • @ liklik:

      ['I see little difficulties for the Government implementing its agenda in the Senate…']

      That's the understatement of the century.

      Commenter
      Jason of Gold Coast
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 8:59AM
    • Mate, both parties made pretty wild claims that were not substantiated. That's politics. LNP should consider the hubris they displayed and the born to rule attitude when looking at reasons.

      Commenter
      Old 61
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 9:35AM
    • liklik, the result is hardly a success for the LNP. They are currently ahead of Labor by 35 votes on the 2 candidate preferred count.

      The LNP does not have a mandate to implement its most outrageous policies. I can forecast that the company tax cut will be limited to a turnover of $2 million and the 2% budget repair levy will be extended for the term of this parliament. I do hope that some bipartisan cooperation will result in a reduction of superannuation benefits for the top 25%. The LNP won't get their zombie budget spending reductions through. Negative gearing and capital gains tax will continue to reduce budget revenue and increase housing costs.

      Commenter
      Exponential
      Location
      Brisbane
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 9:39AM
    • Medicare lie Liklik? There's no proof it was a lie, and until there is proof it is nothing more than a statement about the intent of the LNP. If there was proof it was a lie, the LNP would have come out with it during the campaign and put those statements to bed. Oh, and since ScoMo has already started posturing for another go at Medicare, it looks more likely than not that the ALP were close to the bone. Enough voters were smart enough to see that and work it out for themselves that it hurt the LNP. Even if the LNP get through their current term with Medicare intact, all that proves is they were scared off by the backlash.

      The LNP, on the other hand, got themselves elected last time around on the back of a 'budget emergency' lie - leaving aside TA's list of no cuts to (pick one) for now. The LNP did this despite having access to the treasury figures that proved the ALP had spending on healthy downward trend and managing an economy ranked first in the world as a result of their GFC management (I can put those figures back up again for you if you like Liklik, just in case you think they have changed). The LNP then went on to up our deficit and foreign repayments knowing they had inherited a strong economy, only to overdo it and now put our rating at risk. The LNP had access to the figures before the last election and they knew they were lying, and the figures prove they were lying.

      So far that's - proven election campaign lies: LNP in the lead with 1, ALP trailing with 0

      Commenter
      Amazed
      Location
      Melbourne
      Date and time
      July 08, 2016, 9:55AM

More comments

Comments are now closed
Advertisement

Related Coverage

HuffPost Australia

Follow Us

Featured advertisers

Special offers

Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo
Advertisement