Thomas Robert Malthus

The Acceptable "SUSTAINABLE" Deceit

• Report rights infringement
• published: 12 Aug 2011
• views: 269

T. R. U. T. H (Telling Reality Underneath The Heavens)...Visit: http://www.meechadini.com and support the cause. The United Nations and members of the scientific elite are using the global warming threat to fuel a depopulation agenda based on China's policy of forced sterilizations and abortions. A recent interview with, Chris Rapley, the head of the Science Museum in London highlighted the Malthusian ideology behind the global warming agenda. From the article: "It is Rapley's view that the "jury is still out" on the prediction by Thomas Malthus, the 19th-century demographer, that the human race would exceed its food supply by having too many children. Last year, Rapley wrote an article on the BBC website saying that "if we believe that the size of the human 'footprint' is a serious problem (and there is much evidence for this) then a rational view would be that, along with a raft of measures to reduce the footprint per person, the issue of population management must be addressed". Though he stressed at the time that this was a personal view, his unanimous selection as director of the Science Museum by a board of trustees that included Lord Waldegrave, the chairman, and Lord Rees, the head of the Royal Society, indicates that many in the scientific establishment would agree with him." Thomas Malthus' "An Essay on the Principle of Population" has been widely discredited. However, it appears from the Daily Telegraph article that this news hasn't reached some members of the scientific community.In the essay, Malthus claimed that unless population was curbed, the food resources of the world would run out leading to a decrease in food per person. Malthus stated the only way to keep population levels down was through "vice and misery". This essay by Zvikomborero Chadambuka (PDF file) has many links that debunk Malthus' argument. In the essay, Chadambuka also points out how Malthusian ideology is now being used to further the cause of environmentalism. "The given rationale has been that overpopulation will result in the breaching of the carrying capacity of the earth; the Malthusian dilemma.8 Malthus' elitist theory which focused on reducing populations among the poor has now been rephrased in the language of environmentalism..." It's clear to see the United Nations attempts at "rephrasing" the Malthusian ideology to climate change and population levels in their report, "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change". From the report. The UN assumption here is that climate change will only be stopped once population levels are reduced. But just how does the UN intend to decrease population levels? Well, it seems that the United Nations will fund forced sterilizations and abortions to make sure the world is "safe" from "climate change". UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund provided China with funding to carry out the forced "one child policy" and even gave them awards for their inhumane treatment of women. the environmental agenda is being hijacked by those who continue to subscribe to the Malthusian viewpoint. United Nation initiatives and the scientific elite are duping the honourable members of the environmental movement. The threat of Global warming is now being used to fuel the idea that the world needs a reduction in population in order to survive. Just why has attention now turned to depopulation as being the solution to climate change? An article by Daniel Taylor points out why the Club of Rome, another "thinktank" advocated the idea of a global warming threat. From the article: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself." Why is humanity the ideal enemy? Well, this would mean that governments across the world could then use global warming as a means of implementing even more taxes in the name of "environmental safety". There are already countless plans to introduce a "carbon taxes" for everything from flying to household garbage. The threat of global warming is being used to implement these taxes and also bring back the Malthusian argument that population control is needed in order for the planet to be able to sustain itself. It is notable that population control and carbon taxes don't seem to extend to elite. David de Rothschild wrote the companion guide to the Live Earth concert called "The Global Warming Survival Handbook: 77 Essential Skills to Stop Climate Change- or Live Through It". Rothschild is part of the Rothchild banking empire. He recommended that a global carbon tax be introduced on the Alex Jones show. On the show Rothschild failed to mention any of his own family's ties to the oil industry If Rothschild really wants to save the environment, perhaps it would be better for him to give the book.