- published: 19 Nov 2013
- views: 34578
The EPR paradox of 1935 is an influential thought experiment in quantum mechanics with which Albert Einstein and his colleagues Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen ("EPR") claimed to demonstrate that the wave function does not provide a complete description of physical reality, and hence that the Copenhagen interpretation is unsatisfactory; resolutions of the paradox have important implications for the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The essence of the paradox is that particles can interact in such a way that it is possible to measure both their position and their momentum more accurately than Heisenberg's uncertainty principle allows, unless measuring one particle instantaneously affects the other to prevent it, which would involve information being transmitted faster than light as forbidden by the theory of relativity ("spooky action at a distance").
The EPR paradox tries to prove that quantum mechanics is wrong.
This video responds to a question about the EPR Paradox. It is explained in simple terms (no maths) but requires knowledge of some of the basics of Quantum Mechanics in my other videos. Too simple for experts!
Quantum Entanglement, EPR paradox, Bell Inequality, and the implication for Einstein's Theory of Relativity.
This is a simplification of the EPR experiment. Part of a series illustrating the debate between Einstein and Neils Bohr.
Breakthrough Junior Challenge 2015 submission.
This is a short video that explains the basics of the EPR Paradox.
In this series of physics lectures, Professor J.J. Binney explains how probabilities are obtained from quantum amplitudes, why they give rise to quantum interference, the concept of a complete set of amplitudes and how this defines a "quantum state". Notes and problem sets here http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JamesBinney/lectures.html
It was fun! */ This video is a part of the Breakthrough Junior challenge. /*
Part 5 of a series: responds to key questions I am asked on my Video on the EPR Paradox.
Part 1 of 7 from a seminar given on January 22, 2013 by Professor Bryan Sanctuary at McGill University "A local realistic reconciliation of the EPR paradox." Blog: http://quantummechanics.mchmultimedia.com Physical Chemistry : http://www.mchmultimedia.com/store/Physical-Chemistry-ebooks.html
Physicist Leonard Susskind on ER=EPR and quantum mechanics Thanks For Watching! Please leave a like if you enjoyed and tell me what you think in the comments! Thanks ^.^ If there are any copyright issues with any video posted here I will remove them, please contact my email: naotevol@gmail.com
EPR Paradox and Quantum Entanglement - Helping you to understand what it is. YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWEDoqd0UKUAP_3bXPT9Wsg
The purpose of this experiment to test to see if there is a transferred potential between two humans. This is the EEG we are going to be using for the experiment or electroencephalogram. Unbelievably it costs £15,000. It's untethered / battery operated. The really awesome thing is that Einstein himself hypothesised this in the 30's which is referred to as the EPR Paradox, named after Einstein Podolsky & Rosen scientists he ran the experiment with. But the first experimental test wasn’t carried out until the 80’s by Grinberg Zylberbaum to prove the EPR paradox. And as far as I can see, the tests haven't been successfully carried out since. The experiment was to test to see if there was a quantum non local correlation of transferred potential between two humans,; do humans communicate...
Quantum Entanglement, Bell Inequality, EPR paradox
Quantum mechanics is not really weird. It has a bad reputation, because the interpretation of quantum phenomena is flawed. The main problem is that particle concepts are used to describe wave properties and vice versa. For example, uncertainty applies to particle aspects, and superposition applies to wave aspects. If we avoid conceptual confusion, all the mysteries vanish, one by one. The greatest revelation is that Bell’s Theorem is a test of wave behavior. The EPR paradox (and all the associated debates about hidden variables, non-locality, etc.) turned out to be just an internal problem of the Copenhagen Interpretation. The natural way to describe quantum behavior is in terms of a pilot-wave model. Note to casual viewers: this is not textbook stuff. The explanation is made in plain lan...
From ER = EPR or What's Behind the Horizons of Black Holes 1 of 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBPpRqxY8Uw
A basic introduction to Bell's Inequality which shows that there cannot be hidden variables (a form of inbuilt DNA), as postulated by EPR, to explain how entangled particles behave.
Part 1 of a 2-part mini-lecture series given by Prof. Leonard Susskind, director of the Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics.
MIT 8.04 Quantum Physics I, Spring 2013 View the complete course: http://ocw.mit.edu/8-04S13 Instructor: Allan Adams In this lecture, Prof. Adams discusses the basic principles of quantum computing. No-cloning theorem and Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm are introduced. The last part of the lecture is devoted to the EPR experiment and Bell's inequality. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA More information at http://ocw.mit.edu/terms More courses at http://ocw.mit.edu
Part of Unified field theory lectures 2014