- published: 25 Mar 2010
- views: 590602
David M. Glantz (born January 11, 1942 in Port Chester, New York) is an American military historian and the chief editor of the Journal of Slavic Military Studies.
Glantz received degrees in history from the Virginia Military Institute and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Defense Language Institute, Institute for Russian and Eastern European Studies, and U.S. Army War College. He entered active service with the United States Army in 1963.
He began his military career in 1963 as a field artillery officer from 1965 to 1969. He served in various assignments in the United States, and in Vietnam during the Vietnam War with the II Field Force Fire Support Coordination Element (FSCE) at the "Plantation" in Long Binh.
David (/ˈdeɪvɪd/; Hebrew: דָּוִד, Modern David, Tiberian Dāwîḏ;ISO 259-3 Dawid; Arabic: داوُد Dāwūd; Syriac: ܕܘܝܕ Dawid; Ancient Greek: Δαυίδ; Latin: Davidus, David; Strong's: Daveed) was, according to the Books of Samuel, the second king of the United Kingdom of Israel, and according to the New Testament, an ancestor of Jesus. His life is conventionally dated to c. 1040 – 970 BCE, his reign over Judah c. 1010–970 BCE.
The Books of Samuel, 1 Kings, and 1 Chronicles are the only Old Testament sources of information on David, although the Tel Dan Stele (dated c. 850–835 BCE) contains the phrase בית דוד (bytdwd), read as "House of David", which many scholars confirm to be a likely plausible match to the existence in the mid-9th century BCE of a Judean royal dynasty called the House of David.
Depicted as a valorous warrior of great renown, and a poet and musician credited for composing much of the psalms contained in the Book of Psalms, King David is widely viewed as a righteous and effective king in battle and civil justice. He is described as a man after God's own heart in 1 Samuel 13:14 and Acts 13:22.
The Eastern Front of World War II was a theatre of conflict between the European Axis powers and co-belligerent Finland against the Soviet Union, Poland and other allies, which encompassed Northern, Southern and Central and Eastern Europe from 22 June 1941 to 9 May 1945. It has been known as the Great Patriotic War (Russian: Великая Отечественная Война, Velikaya Otechestvennaya Voyna) in the former Soviet Union and in modern Russia, while in Germany it was called the Eastern Front (German: die Ostfront), the Eastern Campaign (der Ostfeldzug) or the Russian Campaign (der Rußlandfeldzug).
The battles on the Eastern Front constituted the largest military confrontation in history. They were characterized by unprecedented ferocity, wholesale destruction, mass deportations, and immense loss of life due to combat, starvation, exposure, disease, and massacres. The Eastern Front, as the site of nearly all extermination camps, death marches, ghettos, and the majority of pogroms, was central to the Holocaust. Of the estimated 70 million deaths attributed to World War II, over 30 million, many of them civilian, occurred on the Eastern Front. The Eastern Front was decisive in determining the outcome of World War II, eventually serving as the main reason for Germany's defeat. It resulted in the destruction of the Third Reich, the partition of Germany for nearly half a century and the rise of the Soviet Union as a military and industrial superpower.
The Battle of Kursk was a Second World War engagement between German and Soviet forces on the Eastern Front near Kursk (450 kilometres or 280 miles south-west of Moscow) in the Soviet Union during July and August 1943. The German offensive was code-named Operation Citadel (German: Unternehmen Zitadelle) and led to one of the largest armoured clashes in history, the Battle of Prokhorovka. The German offensive was countered by two Soviet counter-offensives, Operation Polkovodets Rumyantsev (Russian: Полководец Румянцев) and Operation Kutuzov (Russian: Кутузов). For the Germans, the battle represented the final strategic offensive they were able to mount in the Eastern Front. For the Soviets, the victory gave the Red Army the strategic initiative for the rest of the war.
The Germans hoped to weaken the Soviet offensive potential for the summer of 1943 by cutting off a large number of forces that they anticipated would be in the Kursk salient. The Kursk salient or bulge was 250 kilometres (160 mi) long from north to south and 160 kilometres (99 mi) from east to west. By eliminating the Kursk salient, the Germans would also shorten their lines of defence, nullify Soviet numerical superiority in critical sectors (which would release some of the burden the Germans were forced to take and give them time to regroup and plan another offensive against the Soviets) and regain the initiative from the Soviets. The plan envisioned an envelopment by a pair of pincers breaking through the northern and southern flanks of the salient.German dictator Adolf Hitler believed that a victory here would reassert German strength and improve his prestige with his allies, who were considering withdrawing from the war. It was also hoped that large numbers of Soviet prisoners would be captured to be used as slave labour in the German armaments industry.
Eastern Front may refer to:
The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities
Battle of Kursk
Importance of the Battle of Kursk
"The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities" by COL (Ret) David M. Glantz
The Myth of Soviet Numerical Superiority
David Glantz on soviet contribution in world war 2
David Glantz speaks on soviet war effort
Full Glantz! History Book Unboxing No 1
Your Perception of the WW2 Eastern Front is Wrong
The First Month of Operation Barbarossa - Every 8 hours (22/06/41 - 22/07/41)
COL (Ret) David M. Glantz, Editor, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, presents "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities," as part of the Perspectives in Military History Lecture Series. The U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center sponsors a monthly public lecture series, "Perspectives in Military History," which provides a historical dimension to the exercise of generalship, strategic leadership, and the war fighting institutions of land power. Learn more at http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ahec/index.cfm
Detailed description of the Battle of Kursk - Captured Live on Ustream at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/first-division-museum
http://voiceofrussia.com/us/ Host Marshall Poe talks with eminent miltary historian David Glantz, who analyzes the battle. David M. Glantz (born 11 January 1942 in Port Chester, New York) is an American military historian and the editor of the Journal of Slavic Military Studies. Glantz received degrees in history from the Virginia Military Institute and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Defense Language Institute, Institute for Russian and Eastern European Studies, and U.S. Army War College. He entered active service with the United States Army in 1963.
A staggering forty percent of the historic record about the German eastern front remained shrouded in mystery. Col. (Ret) David Glantz seeks to unearth this information and dispel myths that have perpetuated the Soviet-German War of 1941-1945. This conflict encompassed immense scale, scope and consequence. The cultural and ideological conflict surrounding the German-Soviet clash presented something never witnessed before by an American Army. Length: 80 Minutes Lecture Date: November 14, 2007
Hello everyone. This video analyzes the troop ratios of the Eastern Front during World War 2 and dispels a few misinterpretations of overall Soviet troop strength. I took a while making this, so if you enjoyed it please comment, like, and share. Thanks! Totally forgot to label minor powers like Iran as allies because of the British-Soviet invasion. Sorry! Many people view the Eastern Front as having been won by the Soviet Union from the get go, but this isn't true. Troops ratios were in relative parity up until late 1944 and even then was it not exaggerated. Comments like 'there were 10 Soviets for every German' are simply myths propagated by German archival information like the bundesarchive. After world war 2, Soviet archives were simply inaccessible to Western scholars so as a result...
American retired colonel David Glantz, one of the world's foremost experts on the german-soviet war 1941-45 speaks about the soviet contribution.
Military historian David Glantz speaks on the war on the eastern front and the impact it still has today.
I've now gone full Glantz - nobody goes full Glantz (except me). Two more books arrive today, one is "Stalingrad: The Infernal Cauldron" by Stephen Walsh. It's full of pictures which I may be able to use in my upcoming Stalingrad documentary. The other is the final book in David Glantz' series on Stalingrad - "Companion: Endgame Stalingrad". I was a little concerned it was going to go out of print so I've bought it now. It's basically a giant appendix, but will be super useful. I'm aiming to make this documentary as detailed and as super-accurate as possible. It will take time and a lot of effort, but it will happen. If you'd like to support me in my quest to make my BATTLESTORM documentaries as good as possible, my patreon is here https://www.patreon.com/TIKhistory Thanks everyone :)
The prevalent view is that the German Army wasn’t really beaten by the Red Army on the battlefield, at least not on the tactical or operational level. It's also thought that the German Army was vastly outnumbered. But is this view correct? Perhaps it's time to change your view on the Wehrmacht. GLANTZ VIDEO "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities" by COL (Ret) David M. Glantz https://youtu.be/5qkmO7tm8AU Main source used: Liedtke, G. “Enduring the Whirlwind: The German Army and the Russo-German War 1941-1943.” Helion & Company, 2016. Check out my other History videos here https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNSNgGzaledhMtb3bsJkJmtECxS_mm_QM Support me on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/TIKhistory
This video is meant to portray the Eastern front in a meticulous manner. It is extremely difficult to get the order of battles for every 8 years, so please treat the time cycle with a bit of caution. That being said, I made sure to include the correct time frames for major operations. Since the Soviet Unionw as so big, I had to take liberties in determining the extent of advances. For example, If Axis units took X city which is adjacent to Y city and there are no records of encirclement, then I would simply draw a broad advance along the front line. The reason I chose the 8 hour time frame is because it allows me to portray daily counter-attacks much more clearly, giving a better impression of the Soviet defenses in the first month. I like other vidoes that portray this time period like ...
Most military innovations involve the employment of some technological development. Yet, one of the most influential of such innovations is the development of the General Staff, which one British author referred to as “the Brain of an Army.” First developed in Prussia, this much-imitated organization was essential to success in war since the 1860s. Jonathan House is Professor of Military History at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. A graduate of Hamilton College, he received both his doctorate in French military history and his commission in the U.S. Army at the University of Michigan in 1975. House retired as a colonel of Military Intelligence. He is the author of Combined Arms Warfare in the Twentieth Century (2001), A Military History of the Cold War, 1944-1962 (20...
Interview with Aaron Glantz author of "How America Lost Iraq"
This video is meant to portray the Eastern front in a meticulous manner. It is extremely difficult to get the order of battles for every 8 years, so please treat the time cycle with a bit of caution. That being said, I made sure to include the correct time frames for major operations. Since the Soviet Unionw as so big, I had to take liberties in determining the extent of advances. For example, If Axis units took X city which is adjacent to Y city and there are no records of encirclement, then I would simply draw a broad advance along the front line. The reason I chose the 8 hour time frame is because it allows me to portray daily counter-attacks much more clearly, giving a better impression of the Soviet defenses in the first month. I like other vidoes that portray this time period like ...
David Glantz indicated that four hard-fought battles – collectively known as the Kotluban Operations – north of Stalingrad, that the Soviets made their greatest stand, decided Germany's fate before the Nazis ever set foot in the city itself, and were a turning point in the war. Beginning in late August, continuing in September and into October, the Soviets committed between two and four armies in hastily coordinated and poorly controlled attacks against the German's northern flank. The actions resulted in more than 200,000 Red Army casualties but did slow the German assault. On 23 August the 6th Army reached the outskirts of Stalingrad in pursuit of the 62nd and 64th Armies, which had fallen back into the city. Kleist later said after the war The capture of Stalingrad was subsidiary to t...
Check out my new website for all things poker!! TIMESTAMPS Below! __ ►►►: https://www.onepokerlife.com/ __ TIMESTAMPS _____________ 2:05 Viffer (self)introduction 9:00 Million to broke and back in a week 14:13 "retired" from poker(lifestyle) 26:43 2M2M appearance 33:35 Rehab 40:06 Ladyboy story 48:40 Dan Bilzerian 53:05 Anti-TOS substances GTO 55:55 Durrrr challenge 1:09:47 Ben Lamb 1:15:24 5day straight party 1:44:33 Viffer wisdom _____ || ► Subscribe to My Channel Here http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=joeingram1 || ► Twitter: http//twitter.com/joeingram1 || ► Snapchat: joeingram1 || ► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/PLOPodcast || ► Website: http://www.onepokerlife.com || ► ITunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/my-podcast-site/id982877403 _____
We gave you the chance to ask David Levin anything on Instagram ++/ and asked him some of the most popular / best questions. Unfortunately time was tight and I couldn't ask him every question, but I think we got some great advice for any minor hockey player. For more on David check out my first interview with him here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvoLI4FNZfc JOIN ME ONLINE Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/howtohockey Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/howtohockey/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/howtohockey Website: http://howtohockey.com/ Hit that subscribe button so you don't miss a video Get hockey training aids at HockeyShot: http://hockeyshot.com HOCKEY WEBSITES: How To Hockey - http://howtohockey.com/ New To Hockey - http://newtohockey.com/ HockeyShot - http://hockeyshot.c...
Douglas Polk aka WCGRider recently started a thread on Two Plus Two claiming Brad Booth took money from him and never returned it, to which Brad responded. Doug clarifies the situation in this interview.
COL (Ret) David M. Glantz, Editor, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, presents "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities," as part of the Perspectives in Military History Lecture Series. The U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center sponsors a monthly public lecture series, "Perspectives in Military History," which provides a historical dimension to the exercise of generalship, strategic leadership, and the war fighting institutions of land power. Learn more at http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ahec/index.cfm
Detailed description of the Battle of Kursk - Captured Live on Ustream at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/first-division-museum
http://voiceofrussia.com/us/ Host Marshall Poe talks with eminent miltary historian David Glantz, who analyzes the battle. David M. Glantz (born 11 January 1942 in Port Chester, New York) is an American military historian and the editor of the Journal of Slavic Military Studies. Glantz received degrees in history from the Virginia Military Institute and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Defense Language Institute, Institute for Russian and Eastern European Studies, and U.S. Army War College. He entered active service with the United States Army in 1963.
A staggering forty percent of the historic record about the German eastern front remained shrouded in mystery. Col. (Ret) David Glantz seeks to unearth this information and dispel myths that have perpetuated the Soviet-German War of 1941-1945. This conflict encompassed immense scale, scope and consequence. The cultural and ideological conflict surrounding the German-Soviet clash presented something never witnessed before by an American Army. Length: 80 Minutes Lecture Date: November 14, 2007
Hello everyone. This video analyzes the troop ratios of the Eastern Front during World War 2 and dispels a few misinterpretations of overall Soviet troop strength. I took a while making this, so if you enjoyed it please comment, like, and share. Thanks! Totally forgot to label minor powers like Iran as allies because of the British-Soviet invasion. Sorry! Many people view the Eastern Front as having been won by the Soviet Union from the get go, but this isn't true. Troops ratios were in relative parity up until late 1944 and even then was it not exaggerated. Comments like 'there were 10 Soviets for every German' are simply myths propagated by German archival information like the bundesarchive. After world war 2, Soviet archives were simply inaccessible to Western scholars so as a result...
American retired colonel David Glantz, one of the world's foremost experts on the german-soviet war 1941-45 speaks about the soviet contribution.
Military historian David Glantz speaks on the war on the eastern front and the impact it still has today.
I've now gone full Glantz - nobody goes full Glantz (except me). Two more books arrive today, one is "Stalingrad: The Infernal Cauldron" by Stephen Walsh. It's full of pictures which I may be able to use in my upcoming Stalingrad documentary. The other is the final book in David Glantz' series on Stalingrad - "Companion: Endgame Stalingrad". I was a little concerned it was going to go out of print so I've bought it now. It's basically a giant appendix, but will be super useful. I'm aiming to make this documentary as detailed and as super-accurate as possible. It will take time and a lot of effort, but it will happen. If you'd like to support me in my quest to make my BATTLESTORM documentaries as good as possible, my patreon is here https://www.patreon.com/TIKhistory Thanks everyone :)
The prevalent view is that the German Army wasn’t really beaten by the Red Army on the battlefield, at least not on the tactical or operational level. It's also thought that the German Army was vastly outnumbered. But is this view correct? Perhaps it's time to change your view on the Wehrmacht. GLANTZ VIDEO "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities" by COL (Ret) David M. Glantz https://youtu.be/5qkmO7tm8AU Main source used: Liedtke, G. “Enduring the Whirlwind: The German Army and the Russo-German War 1941-1943.” Helion & Company, 2016. Check out my other History videos here https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLNSNgGzaledhMtb3bsJkJmtECxS_mm_QM Support me on Patreon https://www.patreon.com/TIKhistory
This video is meant to portray the Eastern front in a meticulous manner. It is extremely difficult to get the order of battles for every 8 years, so please treat the time cycle with a bit of caution. That being said, I made sure to include the correct time frames for major operations. Since the Soviet Unionw as so big, I had to take liberties in determining the extent of advances. For example, If Axis units took X city which is adjacent to Y city and there are no records of encirclement, then I would simply draw a broad advance along the front line. The reason I chose the 8 hour time frame is because it allows me to portray daily counter-attacks much more clearly, giving a better impression of the Soviet defenses in the first month. I like other vidoes that portray this time period like ...
COL (Ret) David M. Glantz, Editor, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, presents "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities," as part of the Perspectives in Military History Lecture Series. The U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center sponsors a monthly public lecture series, "Perspectives in Military History," which provides a historical dimension to the exercise of generalship, strategic leadership, and the war fighting institutions of land power. Learn more at http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ahec/index.cfm
Detailed description of the Battle of Kursk - Captured Live on Ustream at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/first-division-museum
http://voiceofrussia.com/us/ Host Marshall Poe talks with eminent miltary historian David Glantz, who analyzes the battle. David M. Glantz (born 11 January 1942 in Port Chester, New York) is an American military historian and the editor of the Journal of Slavic Military Studies. Glantz received degrees in history from the Virginia Military Institute and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Defense Language Institute, Institute for Russian and Eastern European Studies, and U.S. Army War College. He entered active service with the United States Army in 1963.
A staggering forty percent of the historic record about the German eastern front remained shrouded in mystery. Col. (Ret) David Glantz seeks to unearth this information and dispel myths that have perpetuated the Soviet-German War of 1941-1945. This conflict encompassed immense scale, scope and consequence. The cultural and ideological conflict surrounding the German-Soviet clash presented something never witnessed before by an American Army. Length: 80 Minutes Lecture Date: November 14, 2007
We're doing well! So this time we're taking Army Group A towards the Caucasus... Watch David Glantz's lecture "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities" here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Clz27nghIg Buy this game and support this channel! http://astore.amazon.com/t00ec-20/detail/B00C3JHU90 Also, subscribe to Braccada's channel! He's better at this game than me https://www.youtube.com/user/braccada
Most military innovations involve the employment of some technological development. Yet, one of the most influential of such innovations is the development of the General Staff, which one British author referred to as “the Brain of an Army.” First developed in Prussia, this much-imitated organization was essential to success in war since the 1860s. Jonathan House is Professor of Military History at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College. A graduate of Hamilton College, he received both his doctorate in French military history and his commission in the U.S. Army at the University of Michigan in 1975. House retired as a colonel of Military Intelligence. He is the author of Combined Arms Warfare in the Twentieth Century (2001), A Military History of the Cold War, 1944-1962 (20...
"Preparing for Victory: Thomas Holcomb and the Making of the Modern Marine Corps, 1936-1943" Before the attack on Pearl Harbor, numerous challenges confronted the U.S. Marine Corps, including fiscal restraints, manpower shortages, promotion bottlenecks, and isolationist sentiments. An entirely different set of difficulties emerged after Pearl Harbor. Despite these obstacles, Commandant Thomas Holcomb supervised the Marine Corps' mobilization in the Second World War's initial twenty-four months. During his entire commandancy, the Corps grew from 18,000 men in 1936 to 385,000 in 1943. Not only did Holcomb leave the Corps much larger, but he also guided its transition into an armed service capable of making amphibious assaults thousands of miles across the Pacific. Although a visionary lead...