JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Hail the fight for workplace safety on the anniversary of the West Gate Bridge collapse

Date

Kim Carr

The decline in workplace deaths would have been unachievable without the vigilance of unions.

A photograph taken from the water shows the area missing from the bridge after the span crash.

A photograph taken from the water shows the area missing from the bridge after the span crash.

For those who were alive at the time, the collapse of a span on the West Gate Bridge, at 11.50am on October 15, 1970, remains seared into their consciousness. It has become like the moon landing or the assassination of president Kennedy. People remember where they were when they heard the news, and what they were doing.

For all Australians, this was a profoundly shocking event. For those who lost loved ones, it was a tragedy the rest of us can barely imagine.

The collapse of the bridge was the worst industrial accident in Australian history. Thirty-five workers were killed on that day, either from the 58-metre fall into the Yarra, or through being struck by fragments, or in the ensuing fire.

Workmen search for survivors in the rubble after the collapse of the West Gate Bridge on October 15, 1970.

Workmen search for survivors in the rubble after the collapse of the West Gate Bridge on October 15, 1970.

The fatal error that led to the collapse happened because a 114-millimetre gap between two half-girders on span 10-11 at the partly constructed bridge's western end had to be closed. It was decided that 10 eight-tonne concrete blocks should be used as ballast, to weigh down the higher of the two girders. That caused the span to buckle.

The horror of these events is vividly recalled in the report of the Royal Commission into the Failure of the West Gate Bridge. On the morning of October 15, 1970, Gerit Hardenberg, an executive with the contractor, World Services and Construction, received a phone call from Jack Hindshaw, a consultant engineer. Hindshaw was inspecting the span with his colleagues, Peter Crossley and William Tracy, and was worried by what he saw:

"The last thing Hardenberg heard on the phone was as if Hindshaw was thinking out aloud: 'Should I get the bods out?' Almost immediately after that conversation, at 11.50am, span 10-11 collapsed. Among those who died were Hindshaw, Crossley and Tracy. The whole 2000-ton mass plummeted into the Yarra with an explosion of gas, dust and mangled metal."

Rescue workers continue to work their way through the twisted metal.

Rescue workers continue to work their way through the twisted metal.

The distinctive curved shape of the completed West Gate Bridge has since become an iconic part of the city's skyline. But the sacrifice of those who died 45 years ago today, and the heroism of their surviving co-workers, is an indelible part of the bridge's history.

After the collapse, those who were able helped emergency services teams to sift through the debris. They recovered the bodies of the dead, rescued other survivors and comforted grieving family members.

Never has the instinctive solidarity of the labour movement been more evident than on that day: touch one, touch all.

Since that terrible time, much has changed in official attitudes to occupational health and safety in Australia. But it is not only because laws have changed.

It is, above all, because Australia's construction workers, acting through their union representatives, are determined that there must never be another disaster of this kind. That is why union representatives claim the right to enter and inspect construction sites, to ensure that there is strict compliance with safety standards.

Some occupations will always be more dangerous than others, and construction work remains one of the most dangerous. Melburnians were reminded of that only two months ago, when a 50-metre crane collapsed on the Crema construction site in Southbank. The collapse could have caused the deaths not only of workers but of people in the street as well. Amazingly, there were no deaths and only two workers were injured. But the incident is a reminder of the risks inherent in construction work.

Measured by fatalities per year, construction ranks as the third most dangerous occupation after transport and agriculture. As of October 12, 126 Australians have been killed at work this year. All except 38 of these were in the three occupational categories I have mentioned, and 16 were construction workers.

The good news is that workplace fatalities are declining – though too slowly. In the 10 years to 2013, 401 Australian construction workers died from injuries sustained at work. The lowest number recorded in that decade was in 2013, when 19 workers died. That is less than half of the highest number recorded in the decade, which was 46 fatalities in 2007.

But the steady decline in the number of workplace deaths would not have been achieved without the vigilance of those who represent Australia's workers. On this anniversary, while acknowledging the sacrifice of those who lost their lives, we should also express our gratitude to all who toil to keep the workplaces of Australia safe.

Victorian Labor Senator Kim Carr is the opposition spokesman for higher education, research, innovation and industry.

7 comments so far

  • And still unions are attacked. I wonder how many venture capitalists died in the same year as 126 workers helping to build Australia? Without unions we would still be serfs and slaves. Unfortunately many workers have fallen for the anti-union rhetoric of the Right. The only answer to the exploitation of big industrialists, moguls, magnates and corporations is the labor collective. Don't be fooled otherwise.

    Commenter
    peter
    Location
    vietnam
    Date and time
    October 14, 2015, 4:11PM
    • The fatal error that led to the collapse was not the 144mm gap it was the events and politics of its construction that caused it.
      These events were :
      the design of the bridge is exemplary, however , inherent in the overall design was an oversight in the bridge's construction. The spans were unassailably strong when assembled but vulnerable when being lifted into position, it was the lifting of the untrussed spans that caused the distortion/gap.
      The east and west sides were constructed by disconnected and competing construction firms, the firm building the east side had encountered the distortion of spans when lifting them in to position and had taken steps to remedy this - pettily without telling the western side of these problems. The western side equally had not bothered to enter into discourse with the east side regarding any issues that they may have encountered.
      This sounds petty and silly because it was.
      The western side then lifted its untrussed centre spans which distorted during the lift, kentledge was then used to try to rectify the distortion along with crucial connecting fasteners having been removed in a makeshift operation.....with catastrophic results.
      Hail the fight for workplace safety.
      Let us involve all parties in this end.
      Weekends,
      brought to you by Unions.

      Commenter
      nkelly
      Date and time
      October 14, 2015, 9:48PM
      • What a curious way to acknowledge the sad loss of life in a construction accident. But from Senator Kim Carr we should not be surprised. Few better epitomise the backward thinking grasping to the past like he.

        Perhaps his time may be better used actually pondering why union membership has declined so much. How so many have become corrupted and led by political careerists. How they are part of the problem rather than part of devising a creative, flourishing future for Australia.

        A heartfelt homage to those who lost their lives in an industrial accident would be appeciated. But not from a throwback whose apparent responsibility to devise policies for innovation, research and higher education for the future seem beyond him. And more concerned with sandbagging his ever dwindling union base.

        Commenter
        Neutral Australian
        Date and time
        October 14, 2015, 10:37PM
        • Kind of reminds me of the jingoism howard subjected us to regarding ANZAC day and Gallipoli etc. Backward thinking to grasp the past - he and his ilk are masters of it,pine for it and want to take us back into it.
          Neutral my foot.

          Commenter
          nkelly
          Date and time
          October 16, 2015, 4:59PM
      • Peter I agree with you,

        Though that is why the LNP want to water down both Labour Laws and Work Health and Safety Laws.

        The power in negotiating a safety issues lay with the employer a site Health and Safety Representative has some sway but the real sway comes from the unions who are at arms length from any disciplinary action for raising Health and Safety issues

        There is too much back slapping and not enough questioning.

        We are currently seeing further attempts to discredit the unions as the TURC is attempting to do.

        The CFMEU / ETU are at the fore front of this attack, they are the ones that are in the most risky occupation and have the most to lose if something should go wrong, and that is the loss of life.

        So strong unions are vitally important to lifting and maintaining WHS standards

        Commenter
        Buffalo Bill
        Location
        Sydneys Northshore
        Date and time
        October 15, 2015, 12:13PM
        • Too much of capitalism's wealth is built on the blood and sweat of the worker. Children should be taught at school that a boss does not exist to protect the employee's interests. In the eyes of the capitalist employees exist only to provide the surplus value of their labour, that is the labour for which they are not paid. In time the surplus unpaid labour by the many provides the obscene profits and excessive salaries and bonuses for the few. This is why unions need to drive the hardest of bargains on behalf of their members. Yes, Peter C is correct: workers have to argue and battle collectively through their union if they are to maximise both their safety and remuneration.

          Commenter
          billt
          Location
          Canberra
          Date and time
          October 15, 2015, 1:34PM
          • I was there, as a member of the Homicide Squad, up to my elbows in blood and guts, retrieving bodies and setting up a temporary mortuary with a young ambulance officer.
            I was there late that night, I was back first thing next morning: I don't remember seeing Senator Kim Carr there though.

            Commenter
            John
            Location
            Ocean Grove
            Date and time
            October 16, 2015, 12:42PM

            Make a comment

            You are logged in as [Logout]

            All information entered below may be published.

            Error: Please enter your screen name.

            Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

            Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

            Error: Please enter your comment.

            Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

            Post to

            You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

            Thank you

            Your comment has been submitted for approval.

            Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

            HuffPost Australia

            Featured advertisers

            Special offers

            Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo