This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

Speedy deletion candidates[edit]

The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

Articles[edit]

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< 13 June	15 June >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Ruination (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: "Ruination (Transformers)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Notability is not established, and there appears to be no room for improvement. TTN (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete; no evidence of real-world notability. I'm not opposed to a merge/redirect if an appropriate target can be idenfitied. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Dangwana[edit]

(Find sources: "Dangwana" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There are several Dangwanas in South Africa, but the map doesn't show one 30 km from Mt Frere. Kvng (talk · contribs) supplied coordinates for a Dangwana that is 138 km from Mt Frere. One could argue that 30 was a typo for 138, but that seems unlikely to me, especially since there are cities closer to the Dangwana of the coordinates that would have made better reference points. Without sources, it is impossible to verify or improve this article. ubiquity (talk) 16:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment: I would be happy with a change of wording to "Dangwana is a rural village in South Africa located 36 km west of Port St Johns," which will match the provided coordinates and can be verified on a map, but I am convinced this is not the place originally intended. ubiquity (talk) 16:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I have made this change. Thanks for the suggestion. ~Kvng (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:IINFO. If Wiki had an article for every single village out there in the world, I could see this, but since it doesn't, delete. - SanAnMan (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

~~Keep~~ Wiki does have an article for every single village out there in the world, or it can, per WP:GEOLAND. Sorry folks: if it exists as a distinct village -- i.e. not merely, say, a subdivision of a larger town -- it doesn't have to meet GNG, it is inherently notable. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- I totally agree it doesn't have to be notable, but it has to be accurate and verifiable. The current article says 30km from Mt Frere but supplies coordinates 138km away. My point is not that is is not notable, but that it is not verifiable. ubiquity (talk) 16:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
  - Indeed, and that's why I had phrased my response to SanAnMan the way I did. But you're right: until such time as we can verify that this village exists where it is claimed to exist, there is a valid case for deletion that basis. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
    - Also a bit confused as the Dutch article suggests that it is one of many districts in nl:Port St Johns? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy keep per WP:GEOLAND. AfD is not the place to try and fix errors in articles. ~Kvng (talk) 16:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Romstal[edit]

(Find sources: "Romstal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Has been marked as only primary sources since 2012. A search turns up some listings in directories here and here. There may be Romanian news sources, but the only news item I found was this and it gives a 404. Possibly a notable company in Romania, not clear if it meets notability within English Wikipedia. LaMona (talk) 16:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Some Romanian or other sources: here, here. press release. There are others that are paywalled. LaMona (talk) 16:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sugarboy[edit]

(Find sources: "Sugarboy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

article leans on sources that aren't close to what we recognize as RS. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Stanleytux (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Stanleytux (talk) 15:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Stanleytux (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Mark Litton[edit]

(Find sources: "Mark Litton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Appears to fail WP:NFOOTY. Mdann52 (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: Does not meet either of the two WP:NFOOTBALL criteria -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 20:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ratnam V. Raja Kumar[edit]

(Find sources: "Ratnam V. Raja Kumar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Subject does not appear to meet our notability guidelines. The article has little to no sources outside of his academic profiles. I've searched for additional sources and the results were not fruitful. Mike V • Talk 14:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep. He appears to be head of a new IIT (director, with the chancellor being a more honorary position); that passes WP:PROF#C6. He might also pass it a second time as head (vice chancellor) of Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, but I know less about how significant that school is. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ayisatu Owen International School[edit]

(Find sources: "Ayisatu Owen International School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable primary/secondary school per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Only source is WP:PRIMARY. Drm310 (talk) 14:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

I would like to defend the page in saying that it is difficult to attach online references as Ghanean society is still largely a paper one, making it difficult to acces digital copies of rankings or a creditations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AyiOwenOfficial (talk • contribs) 14:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

— Note to closing admin: AyiOwenOfficial (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD.

@AyiOwenOfficial: Paper sources are acceptable, as long as they have been published by reliable third-party sources. However, this does not negate the fact that the overwhelming majority of primary and middle schools - anywhere - are not considered notable. --Drm310 (talk) 15:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Depoul Militari metro station[edit]

(Find sources: "Depoul Militari metro station" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This looks like a joke to me. I could not find any sources stating that the Depot might become a station. Preciziei metro station is already located next to Petru Poni high school. Strainu (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. This station does not exist, not even as "provisional" metro station (however that may work in an almost all-underground network), as the article claims, and there are no sources about any imminent plans for it to be built.- Andrei (talk) 07:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Carrefour Militari metro station[edit]

(Find sources: "Carrefour Militari metro station" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

per WP:CRYSTAL, this station is planned for 2030 [1] and the name is not used in any references. Strainu (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: 2030 is a little too far in the future, and per WP:CRYSTAL seeing as no significant work has taken place or been referenced, this article should be deleted. Very likely that when it has begun major construction or is complete that an article should exist :) -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 20:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sunny and Inder Bawra[edit]

(Find sources: "Sunny and Inder Bawra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Speedied this as G5 (it was created by User:Nishat Shamsi, a blocked sock of User:Mdhashim24), but User:Biwom unspeedied it, considering their own addition of a source and "removing some unsourced stuff" to be a substantial edit; all other edits are minor tweaks and flags. The article still fails WP:BASIC with only one secondary source and is almost entirely unsourced. McGeddon (talk) 08:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep There's a good source in the article and clicking the blue links above (where it says Find sources) shows that other sources are available, so notability is established. Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 12:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Virdi (Ramgarhia clan)[edit]

(Find sources: "Virdi (Ramgarhia clan)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not Notable. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 08:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete Very little in the way of sources; fails WP:GNG.Awesomewiki64 (talk) 17:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Virdi (Khatri clan)[edit]

(Find sources: "Virdi (Khatri clan)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable to an article. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 08:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Vatula[edit]

(Find sources: "Vatula" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Notability issue. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 08:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Wuxx[edit]

(Find sources: "Wuxx" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Previous discussion ended early as a speedy delete because the creator was a banned user. It was restored by User:Graeme Bartlett at User:Prisencolin's request. Not a notable person, and no outside information. JDDJS (talk) 01:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

I am expecting User:Prisencolin to improve the article to show that it has clear notability, but at this point he has only added a category. I would recommend that there is no speedy delete in this case, let the AFD run for the full period. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 14:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 14:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

DELETE Not Notable. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 03:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Christian Gill[edit]

(Find sources: "Christian Gill" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

An article with a confusing history. I recently restored this article to what I felt was the last good version [2] which was for an actor (with a degree in art). Previous to my reversion it was an unsourced article on an artist [3] with no mention of acting. There does appear to be an artist [4] and there is an IMDB entry [5] but it is unclear whether this is one person or two. However it is clear that one or both are not notable. There are no sources other than the artist's own website and the IMDB entry. The IMDB entry shows a handful of minor roles. Google searches for the artist do not show any suitable sources (especially after removing hits to a comics artist Joel Christian Gill). The article appears to have been heavily edited by the artist himself, per his message at my talk User talk:Tassedethe#Christian Gill, Artist. Delete page as no reliable 3rd party sources to show notability, fails WP:ANYBIO Tassedethe (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as non-notable no matter if this is the actor, the artist or if they're both the same. Christian Gill the actor only had a few bit parts (and so doesn't meet WP:NACTOR), and I can't find any coverage at all of Christian Gill the artist (or his so-called "Illuminism" movement). Kolbasz (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Does not appear to have had a career that would make him worthy of inclusion. --Michig (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

R.J. Manuelian[edit]

(Find sources: "R.J. Manuelian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Promotional biography of a non-notable lawyer. No independent sources; the only references are a link to the guy's law firm and a press release by the same. Google didn't turn up any significant coverage in independent sources either. Kolbasz (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. Poorly-sourced CV, no independent coverage found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michig (talk • contribs) 16:02, 14 June 2016‎
Speedy delete as G11. Blatantly and obviously promotional. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srabonti Narmin Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted A10 by GB fan. (non-admin closure) shoy (reactions) 13:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Shabeehanswar[edit]

(Find sources: "Shabeehanswar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Speedy (A1,G2) was declined by User:GB fan so I am AfDing it. This seems like a test page to me. A google search for the page title brings up nothing (apart from Wikipedia mirrors). The content on the page seems to be a mix of Katokhar and Hanswar as if someone had copied the templates and changed certain values. The title of the page is the same as the username of the page creator (User:Shabeehanswar). In particular, the creator has also done dubious edits like this where the article has replaced the founder's name. I cannot understand the context of the article (is it a place or a person?) and I maintain that this seems like a test page to me. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment More proof that this is indeed a test page by an inexperienced user who is probably using multiple accounts now. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Status Seeker[edit]

(Find sources: "Status Seeker" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable as per WP:NSONGS, empty page except infobox. Permafrost46 (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. I was actually in process of changing to a redirect tot the (probably non notable!) album, but on consideration the article should be retitled "Status Seeker (song)in any case. Whatever. NN song.TheLongTone (talk) 13:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I improved the article. m_bisi (talk) 13:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete even with improvements, still does not meet criteria for WP:NSONGS. - SanAnMan (talk) 14:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete: fails WP:NSONGS. I appreciate the creating editor is trying to build a complete discography of Dream Theater, but as a song that was never released as a single it doesn't really merit a separate article. I'm pretty certain the editor has copied the release data from Discogs, which would be a non-RS anyway, and I don't know where you could get enough reliable sources elsewhere to be able to create a separate article for this song. Richard3120 (talk) 15:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Just an album track with no reason for an article beyond being released as a promo. I could live with a redirect to the album. --Michig (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Facter[edit]

(Find sources: "Facter" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable artist, sources are mainly broken links and self-published. Please discuss Brittabrowsler (talk) 11:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. A lot of the sources used are unsuitable, those that are legit sources barely mention him. No other significant coverage found. --Michig (talk) 16:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Unleashed (Skillet album)[edit]

(Find sources: "Unleashed (Skillet album)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I absolutely have come to hate it when editors add albums that in no way meet WP:NALBUM just because there's a short press release due to a per-release video and a partial track listing. This is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep IMO, Walter is being misleading. We don't have a "partial" track listing, we have a full one. It's available for anyone to see in the press release, and on the pre-order screen on iTunes. We also album cover, news coverage (including, but not limited to, Jesus Freak Hideout), promotion in the way of two official lyric video releases (one has almost 2 million views, the other just under 600,000). The album is even available for pre-ordering in online stores like the aforementioned iTunes, and the two released songs are available to listen to on Spotify. I contend this is not too soon, as Walter proposes. True CRaysball | ^#RaysUp 01:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I am not being misleading in any way. You have a listing of track names, but what are the lengths of those tracks? Who wrote those tracks? Also, what about the genres. Where did you pull them from? The one RS you have doesn't discuss the genre. The one at the iTunes Store is not a RS, but at least they know that "Christian" should be capitalized. I know the JFH press release (not a RS). I have seen all of the releases through the band's Facebook and Twitter feeds. None meet RS. Now, show us the significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. breaking that down: significant coverage means that there is a great deal written about the subject, not a mention of the songs; reliable sources means that the multiple sources are all known for good reporting on the subject; independent of the subject means they're not getting payola for promoting the band and they're not just republishing press releases to fill space. I'm sorry, but when I looked I found that there are none. That's why I initially redirected and then nominated. It will be notable. Possibly as soon as eight weeks from now, but we don't peer into WP:CRYSTAL balls, we only create content for currently notable subjects, and this album, as of the first week of June 2016, is not currently notable which is why I have nominated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:NALBUM. Also, there is hardly any material except for the track listing. The article as currently exists is specifically forbidden by the WP:NALBUM guideline. On a side note, video views is not a basis for notability. LK (talk) 05:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Video views is not a basis for the notability of the album on which it is released, let alone the video's. See WP:NSONG Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete the references on the article say delete NO Evidence of notability Samat lib (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel talked to them about "trying new things" on Unleashed. Billboard magazine found out they "Feel Really Inspired", making their new album Unleashed. New Release Today staff writer Mary Nikkel predicted on how she thinks the new tracks are going to sound. I would say this satisfies general criteria for notability by now.The Cross Bearer (talk | contribs) 22:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the refs, but Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is from October and does not mention the album by name. Nor does the year-old Billboard ref. NRT is speculative, but interesting. Not sure this meets the coverage. However, the previous !vote that focused only on the refs in the article is not appropriate either. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

@Walter Görlitz you have a point i can read the reference article on billboard magazine ^[1] did not mention this very album ,,, so this source is not valid Samat lib (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment. I agree that it is too soon to have an article on the album (and it would be great if people waited before creating such articles), but that doesn't automatically mean it should be deleted. If we have verifiable facts that are not already in the article on the band, the first option should be to merge to the article on the artist. If there's nothing appropriate to merge, then a redirect should be the next option to be considered. I see that this was redirected and reverted. With what we have now, I think a redirect would be appropriate, but with only 7 weeks to its release, it would probably be a waste of effort doing anything but leaving this and seeing what coverage emerges in the coming weeks. --Michig (talk) 06:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Me too. I redirected and based on previous efforts, didn't bother to have an edit war over this. We need to stop allowing creation of album articles until they're notable and have admins lock redirects until they are notable, but they're not willing to do that. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 02:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Abdul Hakim Ansari[edit]

(Find sources: "Abdul Hakim Ansari" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article written most likely by the followers of this little-known religious figure exclusively on the basis of self-published sources. So little known was the person that Google returns virtually zero meaningful hits on his name, except for the homepage of their group - which is surprising for a country with such a large English-speaking population. I suggest deleting the article as no evidence of notability or even significance is presented at the moment. — kashmiri ^TALK 12:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Jass Bajwa[edit]

(Find sources: "Jass Bajwa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication of notability per WP:MUSICBIO. Referenced only by a personal website titled "Jass Bajwa wiki - wikipedia details - Biography - personal info - Chakvi Mandeer album" on groupinfo4u.com. No significant coverage online in English from WP:RS. OnionRing (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 11:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. No coverage found, article doesn't make a convincing case for inclusion. --Michig (talk) 16:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Tauheediyah[edit]

(Find sources: "Tauheediyah" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This lengthy article essentially promotes the teachings of Abdul Hakim Ansari, a little-known 20th century religious teacher from Lahore, Pakistan. The text is based ENTIRELY on self-published sources - Urdu-language booklets published by the person's followers. Google search returns virtually ZERO English-language results for "Tauheediyah", which unfortunately is indicative of lack of notability even in Pakistan, given the country's significant English-speaking population. It seems that "Tauheediyah" is not an "Islamic doctrine" recognised or studied by anyone except Mr Ansari's followers. Virtually all substantial contributions to the article have been made by a single editor, also active in promoting the person on other Wikipedia articles, and a handful of IP editors, all tracing back to University of the Punjab and Quaid-i-Azam University. — kashmiri ^TALK 11:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Kolade Shasi[edit]

(Find sources: "Kolade Shasi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Article fails WP:GNG. This is the only reliable source on the actor. I am very familiar with the Nigerian film industry and the name doesn't ring a bell. I am also particularly irritated that the article is an autobiography. We need to let new editors know that they can't create articles about themselves here. Darreg (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Darreg (talk) 11:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Darreg (talk) 11:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: per nom. Stanleytux (talk) 16:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Tongue Patch Diet[edit]

(Find sources: "Tongue Patch Diet" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Procedural nomination of a declined PROD, I felt it should be discussed prior to deletion. An IP PRODDed the article with a rationale of "This is a promotional article perpetuating dangerous health claims. It consists entirely of content written by an editor blocked for undisclosed paid editing." -- GB fan 11:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sunil Patel[edit]

(Find sources: "Sunil Patel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not clear how he passes the WP:GNG References are all dead links, Google shows this article, Facebook mentions, IMDB and few blogs. Theroadislong (talk) 11:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Kanikasamy[edit]

(Find sources: "Kanikasamy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable, a commissioned officer awarded third highest gallantry award only once. Fails WP:SOLDIER. No references as well to verify the subject's notability, fails WP:BASIC. KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 10:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

N. N. Bheemaiah[edit]

(Find sources: "N. N. Bheemaiah" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable, a non-commissioned officer awarded third highest gallantry award only once. Fails WP:SOLDIER KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 10:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ace engineering college[edit]

(Find sources: "Ace engineering college" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable educational institution Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I know what WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES says, but this article is in A3 speedy delete territory as it stands. shoy (reactions) 13:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

It seems that A3 does not apply here, as the criterion says that "this criterion does not cover a page having only an infobox". Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 14:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Jake El Mir[edit]

(Find sources: "Jake El Mir" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Not notable. No actual interest except for his young age, and wikipedia is not a tabloid. Almost all the refsare self-written or totally trivial--most from YouTube. DGG ( talk ) 00:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 05:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 05:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 05:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment I'm leaning towards deletion per WP:BIO since, as the nominator points out, notability is only being claimed on the basis of his age - the apps he's produced don't seem particularly notable, nor do the awards won, apart from the WWDC scholarship. It's evidently an autobiography: he slips into first-person in this edit with Jake won the "Golden Award" for my app "NoSpeed". On the other hand, there is fairly substantial coverage (again, on the grounds of his age) from WP:RS including Al Jazeera, an 11 minute interview on OTV (Lebanon), and Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation. Even so, this is probably WP:TOOSOON, and possibly WP:BLP1E. OnionRing (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep The Page He is the youngest Arab app developer and the youngest one to have been awarded WWDC Scholarship he has been featured in the in flight magazine of the middle east airlines, on BBC Arabic and Sky News Arabia, France 24 Arabia ^[2]. I think that page should be kept it shows that the Arab world isn’t a place for terrorisme but a place of innovation — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeKh (talk • contribs) 14:45, 6 June 2016 (UTC) — GeorgeKh (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

At best, this is still questionable for anything noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

References

Delete as my searches have found nothing particularly better and the article is still certainly questionable at best with nothing minimally better. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Katherine Connors[edit]

(Find sources: "Katherine Connors" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

2nd nom. Subject was a state-level beauty pageant winner in 2010. The claim for GNG was apparently based solely on the proliferation of a single news item due to a throwaway comment made by Miguel Batista. Other than that, there's literally nothing about her before or since 2010. Therefore, it appears that, in hindsight, while she has BLP1E coverage for the "Batista incident", she doesn't have "significant, non-trivial coverage" per GNG, and does not meet WP:NMODEL, as it does not indicate that a state-level pageant winner is notable for that alone. MSJapan (talk) 02:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete I think it is too much to make all state level beauty pageants even in just the top two pageants default notable, and she really has no other claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete as there's still nothing particularly better convincing about notability and whether this article can be noticeably better which is unlikely so. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep per Miss USA 2010 and more press coverage than usual for an ordinary contestant. The threshold may need to be held in general, but throwing out a pitch and the press coverage gets us there in combination with being a national contestant. GNG met by stacking. Montanabw^(talk) 02:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Reply Except that out of the top 10 finishers in the 2010 competition, 6 of them don't have articles, and the contestants that did not place (who are listed) also generally don't have articles. Therefore, being a contestant alone is clearly not enough (which is similar to what we say about meeting GNG via nominations for offices and participation in competitions - winning is generally the barometer. The subject also can't inherit notability from the competition. Also see WP:NTEMP: "In particular, if reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual." She threw the pitch because she was Miss Iowa, which is also why she was in Miss USA. Coverage outside of that is nil. MSJapan (talk) 17:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 09:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Craig B. Lloyd[edit]

(Find sources: "Craig B. Lloyd" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:SOLDIER. Non notable officer and his post CG doesn't offer any notability either. Prod removed by IP user who made claims that he meets WP:SOLDIER 5&6 but I disagree. Commanding a search and rescue mission is admirable but not what is meant by 5&6. Or does being on TV make it notable? Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Bond Aviation Group[edit]

(Find sources: "Bond Aviation Group" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

A PROD was challenged and re-prodded 3 times. I don't support the PROD, but it looks like the only way to resolve this will involve AfD.

The PROD rationale was this: "this page is no longer valid. Bond Aviation Group no longer exists and all the detail on this page is either incorrect or can be accessed from a better route. It's not correct to say it has become Babcock Mission Critical Services - this is a much larger international group of companies. Bond Aviation Group has been replaced by Babcock Mission Critical Services offshore and Babcock Mission Critical Services Offshore, both of which have their own Wikipedia pages, linked from their old names of bond Air Services and Bond Offshore Helicopters." Andy Dingley (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@Flerg: - please comment

keep - If Bond Aviation Group has ceased or changed, then the article will need updating. That is not reason to delete it though. We still keep articles on historically notable buggy-whip manufacturers. I would also remind Flerg that once a PROD has been challenged, that aticle cannot be re-prodded. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep we don't delete articles just because companies change name or evolve as this is an encyclopedia not a listing of current companies. If it factually wrong then it can be corrected. MilborneOne (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Andy Dingley apologies if I am doing this wrong. I am not very au fait with the editing process. If it is appropriate that the page remains I will make edits to ensure the evolution of the business is clear and that it doesn't mislead any visitors.Flerg Flerg (talk) 08:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete instead perhaps as I'm not seeing anything particularly convincing of the needed substance and my searches have found only a few links, nothing else to suggest the needed improvements. This can be mentioned however amount needed at the Babcock article. SwisterTwister talk 23:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

SolarMobil Manipal[edit]

(Find sources: "SolarMobil Manipal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The organisation SolarMobil has undergone changes and the page shows wrong content. It also puts content as an advertisement. Rashmi Sreekumar (talk) 07:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep This is actually a reason to edit the page and fix it not a reason to delete the current page and start over as the OP stated in the last prod they added to the article, "The creator wishes to take the page down. His account is blocked and he is unable to do so. The reason for taking the page down is because the major changes need to be made so a new page will be made instead." -- GB fan 10:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ahu Yağtu[edit]

(Find sources: "Ahu Yağtu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

What is given as her most important role is very minor, according to the article on the show Paramparça. DGG ( talk ) 00:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as there's simply still nothing for any actual independent notability, no convincing sources and there's nothing else convincing from the listed works. SwisterTwister talk 02:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep. Seems to be notable in Turkey.--Ipigott (talk) 06:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment suject might be notable in Turkish sources. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't know how reliable any of them are, but there seem to be many sources on Turkish Websites (.tr) ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 07:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 07:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

AJ Tesler[edit]

(Find sources: "AJ Tesler" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails the notability guidelines for biographies. The first source is an unreliable IMDb source, while the second one does not mention the name at all. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete He had one recurring role in television that might have been enough to be a role mentioned for the qualification of an actor that requires two such roles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 21:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 21:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep, I just had a look at the work he's done as a producer and director. He's been busy. Enough to make notability. Karl Twist (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Regardless of the CURRENT state of referencing, his filmography and resume seem to meet our notability criteria. He's fairly accomplished, and is pretty prolific. Fieari (talk) 06:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
(Find sources: "A.J. Tesler" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Dave Weasel[edit]

(Find sources: "Dave Weasel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

New article created by SPA. Article is about a little-known comedian with a satire website that has once or twice created a WP:SENSATION as an individual gag is mentioned in the Daily Mail or on Buzzfeed. Notability tag has been repeatedly removed from page during period when I attempted to work with creator by advising him on what reliable sourcing is. Delete as WP:PROMO E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Nominating both comedian and his website. The Valley Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note that a 2nd SPA removed tags for notability, sourcing [6].E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - I disagree. I posted several references (with proper coding, sorry about that before). His allmusic.com page is listed, a credential for musicians, his verified artist profile on Spotify and his verified Facebook comedian page. All show notability. Any further instruction or advice is welcomed. I'm a newbie at Wikipedia editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeahimadethis (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

— Yeahimadethis (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. is the article creator.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Seems sufficiently well documented and notable comedian to me.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Weak Keep - I'm sympathetic to the nominator... I'm finding that the majority of sources provided are not independant of the subject, or are routine coverage. That said, #7 on the billboard chart is nothing to sneer at, and may be a notability claim in and of itself. I'm also not as dismissive of a daily mail article... I understand WP:SENSATION, but on the other hand, individual sensations are what comedians in general tend to be noted for, and in my opinion, can add weight to corroborate (although not completely establish) notability. So the billboard chart, plus the daily mail... it's barely barely enough to nudge past my notability threshold. Neither source alone would do it for me, but the sum total of both looks ok. That said, it's right on the borderline, and I wouldn't object too hard if other wikipedians thought it wasn't enough. Fieari (talk) 07:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Melvin P. McCree[edit]

(Find sources: "Melvin P. McCree" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Biography of a politician, notable only as a non-metropolitan city councillor and registrar of deeds. These are not offices that get a person over WP:NPOL, but the sourcing here -- entirely local, with the exception of a namecheck of his existence in a New York Times article about his father -- is not substantive enough or non-localized enough to claim WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hans Weiss[edit]

(Find sources: "Hans Weiss" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not meet notability guidelines (low-ranking soldier), nor WP:SOLDIER, as no source for the Knight's Cross has been provided. The article has been tagged since 2013. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as I was unable to verify the Knight's Cross, and he fails WP:GNG, regardless. GAB^gab 21:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Nom's comment: Following the suggestion on my Talk page, I'm providing a Oct 2015 version of the article, before I edited it. The article's material was not cited to any sources, and the article has already been tagged "Refimprove" since 2013. The same editor pointed out to me that the names of Knight's Cross recipients are often listed in list articles, which s indeed the case here: List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (W), with a citation for the Knight's Cross.

However, it's unclear to me why a stand-alone article is needed while the same information is provided in the list article. Google book search results produce hits to Willi Fey and a few brief mentions in Waffen-SS Armour in Normandy: The Combat History of SS Panzer Regiment 12 by Norbert Számvéber; a self-published author Florian Berger of Selbstverlag ("self-published") Florian Berger; and Bruce Quarrie, a non RS author. I don't believe this meets GNG.

Also pinging GeneralizationsAreBad to see if they would like to revisit with the new information. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment: I've added a couple of references to the article. I'm not sure if sigcov is met, though, but I do think it needs to be clarified if the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross was the highest award available, per my comments here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Schönberger. Can anyone help in this regard? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Spoetry[edit]

(Find sources: "Spoetry" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I cannot find external evidence of notability. There is a Guardian article written by the author of the Spoetry book. The other links are 404 or blogs. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 16:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam Lit. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep and/or Merge with Spam Lit (suggesting we keep this article only because it's older), and Rename the result to Spam poetry. There's poetry and literary prose in spam email to get around spam filters which has been written about quite a bit, and there are people who create poetry from spam. The former (which right now is called "Spam Lit" but only because of a Guardian article) is the more notable, but there's no reason not to mention both, since they're often covered together and obviously related. "Spam poetry" is mentioned in many places (far more than "spam lit"), but sources call it different things (talking about poetry breeds poetic descriptors like so many roses cut by their owners' diamond shears). "Spam poetry" is both among the most used and the most plainly descriptive. Sources are easy to find. I can link them later if someone wants, but it just took a quick googling. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

I agree a rename to 'Spam poetry' would be appropriate here if the topic is felt to be notable. The term Spoetry is just a plug for one guy's book, really. The page should refer to the phenomenon more generally. But I maintain that Spam Lit doesn't belong here as it is a different phenomenon altogether. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 14:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

@Dubbin: Different altogether? Many of the links in the spoetry article also talk about spam lit, often in ways that overlap. Maybe it would be more accurate to call the joint subject "Spam and poetry" but they're certainly not unrelated. These are articles linked in from Spoetry:

In fact The Guardian seems to define spoetry in the way we define spam lit. It isn't about making poetry from spam, it's the poetry in spam.

BBC and others explain how the of composing poetry based on spam (~"spoetry") seems to have started with the recognition of literary value of spam as spammers tried to get around filters, etc. (~"spam lit"). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Clearly, spammers using literary works to bypass filters feeds into the pre-existing trend of people thinking spam is sometimes poetic. But the two phenomena are still separate. If spammers started using the ingredients from packets of cereal, some of those might end up as 'spam poetry' but it wouldn't mean 'spam ingredients' are synonymous with 'spam poetry'. At best, what unites these topics is that they are connected with spam (one contributing to it, the other being derived from it). The sources are confusing and confused here, but I think we can still be methodical while respecting them. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 12:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Just to clarify, I'm not arguing that the two are synonymous -- just that they can be covered in one article because they're so closely related/overlapping. Many of the sources overlap to cover both and the terms they use are inconsistent and sometimes flipped. The spam poetry article I'm advocating for would talk about both, explaining how they connect and differ. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 12:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

I understand, and I agree they overlap, but I think the relationship is not Spam poetry > Spam lit but rather that they are both (unequal) subordinates of Spam. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 15:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

"Merge" or "Merge and Rename" -- I think the concept behind this article has had it's notability well established, with multiple books and articles being written about the topic. That said, it's ONE concept, and we already have an article on it in Spam Lit, but the name for the concept still seems to be in flux. Spoetry should absolutely NOT be the article name though... it's a term coined by only one book (and multiple books have been written), and as such is basically a neologism without backing. Spam Lit has a bit of support, but I like Spam poetry better, as being purely descriptive. In summary, merge the articles, and then either keep Spam Lit or rename Spam Lit to Spam Poetry (which I would prefer). Fieari (talk) 07:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I think this is probably the closest we'll get to consensus. I'm happier with a move+merge than with the current situation, anyway. Support moving Spoetry to Spam poetry and merging Spam lit into it. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 11:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Inquizzitive[edit]

(Find sources: "Inquizzitive" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Unreferenced advert for an annual alumni quiz with no indication of notability per WP:EVENT. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. OnionRing (talk) 04:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 04:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 04:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete – Source searches are not providing minimal coverage to qualify an article per WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Wicked Weather Watch[edit]

(Find sources: "Wicked Weather Watch" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

no evidence of notability. Speedy removed by inexperienced patroller. DGG ( talk ) 03:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Who's the inexperienced patroller you're referrring to? Adam9007 or me or someone else? ~Kvng (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Notability established by [7] and [8]. ~Kvng (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

mn::neither article is about the organization, but about someone whose adventure they are sponsoring. DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Coverage does not need to be about the topic, just needs to include significant coverage of the topic which, in my estimation they do. ~Kvng (talk) 04:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: Of the sources used as references in the article, one is a generic Met Office page on "What do we mean by climate?" which does not mention the subject of the article and the other is a site of the charity's founder, so WP:PRIMARY. The two additional sources identified above are brief mentions in press coverage of a young sailor who serves as Youth Ambassador for the organisation. These are more substantial, but as per User:DGG above, I would not regard them as providing WP:ORGDEPTH evidence. Nor are my own searches identifying anything which servesas substantial coverage of the organisation. AllyD (talk) 10:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Claude J. Pelletier[edit]

(Find sources: "Claude J. Pelletier" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Created a notable magazine (Protoculture Addicts) and was an editor and contributor to it. Therefore his reviews may be quoted by others, but I'm not sure he is notable by himself. Was a guest at "Otakuthon 2009", but that was all I could find that gave him the focus. Could easily be a redirect to Protoculture Addicts but I don't think he's a likely search term. SephyTheThird (talk) 01:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --SephyTheThird (talk) 01:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - I did have one solid source which I used to create this article, and I will see what I can do to find more sources for him. BOZ (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Redirect per nom. He is synonymous with Protoculture Addicts. He has paneled at multiple conventions because of that magazine, even winning awards in the industry. [9] [10] [11] About Us shows he is still involved as an owner even if he isn't the editor-in-chief [12] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

A Relativistic Trolley Paradox[edit]

(Find sources: "A Relativistic Trolley Paradox" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Entirely based on a recent primary source (written by the author himself (Oleg V. Matvejev, Olgmtv (talk · contribs) and, based on ISP location likely 90.140.224.89 (talk · contribs)), no secondary sources can be found DVdm (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. DVdm (talk) 06:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete - 0 cites on GScholar, probably because it was just published (but that is an argument against keeping). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 09:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete Obviously does not pass WP:GNG.T R 14:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Jeffrey Brohn[edit]

(Find sources: "Jeffrey Brohn" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Inadequately sourced WP:BLP of a politician notable only as a registrar of deeds at the county level. This is not an office that gets a person over WP:NPOL, so it's WP:GNG or bust -- but there are just two exclusively local sources here, both covering him in the context of criminal matters. Embezzling $561, and having to register as a sex offender, are not things that make a person suitable for permanent inclusion in an encyclopedia in and of themselves -- so the grounds for inclusion here remain at "county clerk", which is not grounds for inclusion. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Aam Aadmi Party Kerala[edit]

(Find sources: "Aam Aadmi Party Kerala" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Minor branch party with no elected members. Fails WP:NOTABLE. RaviC (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Neutral. The Aam Aadmi Party is notable as a party in India in general, as they are the majority party in the Delhi Legislative Assembly and also hold a few seats in the national parliament (Lok Sabha). However, I do not know whether that implies that the other state branches of the party are likely to be notable as well. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep As a state branch of a notable party it already has some claim to notability. The coverage at Indian newspapers search confirms that for me. AusLondonder (talk) 22:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

The Electoral Commission of India designate the AAP as a state party in two states, Delhi and Punjab. The party is not designated as a national party and only achieved 5% of votes according to the article in question itself, so fails the notability rationale. The article is almost entirely unreferenced. Furthermore, no other Indian political parties have pages for each state they are present in. --RaviC (talk) 08:21, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Beg to differ with RaviC on that as we do have Category:Indian National Congress by state. Although we should note that INC and AAM's internal structures of state-wise groups are to be studied to gauge this. But just going by GNG, this can simply be merged together. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Ah, I hadn't seen those articles for the INC. Nevertheless, the INC is a national party with elected legislators across India whereas the AAP is only a state party. --RaviC (talk) 16:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete or Move to Draft or Merge to Aam Aadmi Party . The article is a mess and looks more like a propaganda page exercise. No independent notability of Kerela Unit apart from what is inherited from national unit. ChunnuBhai (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Consider Merge and Redirect as my searches have found some links but there is still not the obvious certainty whether this can in fact be independently notable for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment The Aam Aadmi Party Kerala article doesn't assert that it has won a seat from any election, but the Aam Aadmi Party article does: "In May 2015, the AAP won a seat in the municipal bye-election from Cherthalai-Arthungal in Alappuzha district of Kerala. The AAP candidate, Tomi Ellessery, defeated the CPM candidate by 3 votes.^[1]

References

^ "Arvind Kejriwal's AAP enters Kerala, wins ward seat". intoday.in.

So the premise of the deletion nomination (that it has no elected candidates) seems not to be exactly correct. --do ncr am 16:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Creadel "Red" Jones[edit]

(Find sources: "Creadel "Red" Jones" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Lacks in-depth discussion from secondary sources. Laun chba ller 20:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete if needed but certainly consider Redirectingin to the Chi-Lites as my searches have found some links but nothing at all to suggest there's substantially better. SwisterTwister talk 22:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ambassador of Iceland to Venezuela[edit]

(Find sources: "Ambassador of Iceland to Venezuela" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:GNG. Iceland has never had an ambassador to Venezuela and no evidence that the non resident ambassador has actually done anything for Iceland in Venezuela LibStar (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Merge to Foreign relations of Iceland § Bilateral Relations. This source verifies that the subjects have been representatives of Iceland to Venezuela, but it's unclear whether or not they were/are ambassadors. A merge will improve the merge target article, which presently has no content inre Venezuela. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Looking at the Icelandic foreign ministry website neither country have an embassy in the country in question. Iceland does have an consulate in Venezuela, but for me that does not really account for anything.--Snaevar (talk) 22:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Equal consideration of interests[edit]

(Find sources: "Equal consideration of interests" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This is TNT at the very least. Looks like original research. Almost no citations, almost everything refers to Peter Singer. Reads like an essay, not encyclopedic. Lrieber (talk) 03:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:NOTESSAY. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 11:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Redirect to Peter Singer#Applied ethics, where the concept is mentioned. This principle is mentioned in the Encyclopedia Brittanica article on speciesism and is identified with Singer. It is conceivable that this could be a notable topic and it is a plausible search term. This nearly unsourced essay, however, does a worse job of summarizing the principle and placing it in context than does the section Peter Singer#Applied ethics. A redirect there would better serve our readers. --Mark viking (talk) 19:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Fine with me. Lrieber (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep A key concept in contemporary academic ethics, not idiosyncratic to Peter Singer. --Davidcpearce (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- The article currently only cites Peter Singer. It would need significant cleanup if it's to be kept.Lrieber (talk) 17:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Redirect perhaps, as this is acceptable, and as Books noticeably found a few several links but there's nothing currently to suggest the considerable convincing of having its own article at this time. SwisterTwister talk 23:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've added a reference to Guidi's "The Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests from Bentham to Pigou"; but there is a huge scholarly literature if anyone wants to add further.--Davidcpearce (talk) 23:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Taman Jurong Bus Terminal[edit]

(Find sources: "Taman Jurong Bus Terminal" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Merge with List of former bus stations in Singapore. 2679D (talk) 07:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Merge per nom. The bus terminal is not notable enough to have a separate article, but does merit a mention in the List of former bus stations in Singapore. Till recently it was one of the few roadside bus terminals. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2679D, I have gone ahead and merged some of the content (image and reference). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Lemongirl942 Thanks for that. 2679D (talk) 01:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

List of Australian High Commissioners to Jamaica[edit]

(Find sources: "List of Australian High Commissioners to Jamaica" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:GNG. a position that no longer exists. 8 of the 11 sources are actually primarily about another ambassador position. Let's see if the usual suspect turns up with WP:MUSTBESOURCES or "clearly surpasses notability " vague arguments LibStar (talk) 08:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep Notability is not temporary. The Canberra Times articles within the article verify notability. Clare. (talk) 11:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

both those articles are routine coverage that confirm the appointment of ambassador. There is no indepth coverage (in fact most of the coverage in the article isn't even about Jamaica or touches it very lightly) to suggest a list of resident and non resident ambassadors is notable. LibStar (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep as per Clare. No surprises that this article was nominated about two hours after his last AfD on this series of articles was kept, continuing in the series of WP:POINT nominations. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

your WP:ADHOM attacks continue. I'm sure admin @Coffee: has seen your pattern of behaviour. LibStar (talk) 13:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

not to mention this is a WP:PERNOM !vote and another non genuine attempt to demonstrate notability on your part, that seems to be motivated by WP:ADHOM and nothing else. LibStar (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete and merge info. I agree with the nominator. As per the AFD discussion on the Australian Ambassadors to Kazakhstan page, this info could easily be placed on the List of Australian High Commissioners to Trinidad and Tobago page, which will strengthen that page and not lose anything worth saying about this subject, of which there appears to be little. Also a reminder to commenters to keep it CIVIL, we can have a rational discussion without hurling insults, veiled or otherwise, at each other.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 05:38, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

LibStar I would also consider nominating List of Australian High Commissioners to Barbados for deletion on this same basis.Siegfried Nugent (talk) 05:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sam Chew Jr.[edit]

(Find sources: "Sam Chew Jr." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference) Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 11:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

~~::Also, more importantly, just noticed that this is a SPEEDY DELETE as per G4 (see here). Thanks, Quis separabit? 14:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)~~

Sorry nominator, but no. I looked at both versions, and as this newer article is different enough from that which was previously deleted, it does not qualify for a G4 speedy. It has other issues, but that is not one of them. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

OK: FAIR ENOUGH. Quis separabit? 17:41, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

in looking further

(Find sources: "Sam Chew" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

(Find sources: "Samuel Chew" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

(Find sources: "Samuel Chew Jr." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Comment: If his long career and many roles are properly verified, he may be seen as meeting WP:ENT even without being personally the sole topic of sources. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete instead for now at best because his list of works show nothing outstanding to suggest he had any longtime works and there's also nothing else convincing so it's unlikely there's anything to suggest the exact solidity this would need to be acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

@SwisterTwister: Do you believe WP:ENT should be itself deleted from guideline? Or that WP:IMPERFECT and WP:WIP should be deleted because they encourage work? Or do you feel that WP:GNGACTOR is not based upon existing guidelines? And how do you feel about articles being placed in draftspace where they might be improved? What is your opinion about WP:BEFORE? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete lack adequate sources to justify an article, and his roles really were never major.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep borderline, as has a lot of minor roles but he does have some prominent roles , at least one lead and a number of 4th and 5th billings so WP:NACTOR is passed More RS needed, will look..Have added some extra references to the article. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

On the Fence: Character actor with mainly TV guest/bit parts (largest series role -- assuming IMDB is correct -- was eight Bionic Woman episodes), not much else in the way of meeting WP:NACTOR#1, and with no significant coverage of his acting found. What is out there (beside recent interview as an Oscars voter here and passing notice such as Variety's review of 40 Carats), is a little coverage in old Suzy Knickerbocker society pages before his move to Hollywood (eg wedding of the season), something in House and Garden, and some material relating to the transfer of his family's home to the National Trust. There's some level of notability, and no sane redirect/merge (including to Cliveden), so a very marginal WP:NPOINTS keep might be in order, on the presumption that some of his work (particularly Rattlers and Serial) would have RS coverage (possibly offline). ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 15:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

EnlightenNext[edit]

(Find sources: "EnlightenNext" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:NME does not seem to be satisfied here. The secondary sources cited are all trivial or marginal mentions of this magazine and the awards won are not of the significant sort (Webby, Eddie, and Ozzie awards are bottom of the barrel sorts). Since the magazine is no longer in publication, we can safely assume that basically all that will ever be written about this thing has been written and there isn't much left for establishing notability besides. jps (talk) 13:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Virus (British band)[edit]

(Find sources: "Virus (British band)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This band has been tagged for sources (there are none) and notability for seven years. The page is a magnet for BLP violations, as happened with a spate of editing today. I looked for reliable sources to help improve this situation and I could not find any (others may have more success). I don't believe we should continue to have this article in the absence of any sources. Fences&Windows 18:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete - as per nom. I reverted a whole swathe of junk edits but could see nothing of value. Some subsequent editing to shape it up a little has revealed the dearth of any shreds of notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:41, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - I found possible references quite easily; "coke+finlay" my first google. Not a great many, but they do exist and nothing to suggest that more couldn't be found. The band is minor, but passes WP:BAND without difficulty. The article is not disastrously bad, it simply needs improvement and cites. It has attracted vandalism of late, but that is not a reason for deleting articles. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 15:27, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Escape Orbit, I also looked for band members. Difference is, I didn't find reliable sources giving significant coverage. Show them here please or better yet add them to the article. Fences&Windows 00:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as there's nothing else better at all, searches found nothing better and there's simply nothing else convincing. Even if this could actually be improved, it's best restarted....if ever. SwisterTwister talk 07:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Brian Williams Media Award[edit]

(Find sources: "Brian Williams Media Award" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This award does not satisfy WP:GNG in that there is not significant coverage in multiple, reliable and independent sources. The current sourcing is not independent, as it is from the organization that grants the award. The article also appears to raise Wikipedia:Conflict of interest problems. Most of the Ontario Sports Hall of Fame-related articles were created by User:Rajeevanm, an editor whose edits since 2014 relate principally to the OSHOF. Interestingly, the user name is very close to the name of the OSHOF's director of marketing. See here. Cbl62 (talk) 00:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
A related AfD can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Hawley Community Service Award. Cbl62 (talk) 01:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

~~Redirect~~ to Ontario Sports Hall of Fame I Checked by searching awardee in a random year, and it does gets press coverage. Ottawa Citizen [13] The Hamilton Spectator [14]. Just not much coverage. I think redirect to the short page of the Ontario Sports Hall of Fame.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

These are merely passing references in broader articles about the OSHOF. Not enough to warrant a stand-alone article under WP:GNG. That said, no objection to redirect. Cbl62 (talk) 03:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Specifically, media mention tend to be a sentence in an article about an individual winner of an OSHOF prize, or in an article about who won that year's prize. Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto are major cities, so it adds up to quite a lot of big-city daily coverage, although the award is only 3 years old.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

@E.M.Gregory: Hi E.M.Gregory, thanks for your comment. I apologize for the late reply since I'm still learning how to use the "talk" feature. I've added several independent sources to the article, check here: Toronto Star [15], Toronto Sun [16], ArgoAdmirals [17], Toronto Star [18], The Hamilton Spectator [19], Ottawa Citizen Sports Hall of Fame. The award recipients are high-profile members of sports media in Ontario, Canada. I believe there is enough to warrant a stand-alone article under WP:GNG. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks! Rajeevanm (talk) 05:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

The sources you mention may constitute significant coverage of the OSHOF, but they do not constitute significant coverage of the Hawley Award. The references given merely contain passing reference to the Hawley Award. Such passing references are insufficient under GNG to support a stand-alone article. Cbl62 (talk) 05:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

In fact, the sources brought by User:Rajeevanm show that this journalism prize award, the Brian Williams Media Award ( Hawley is something else) is covered extensively in major media when awarded. It is =, in other words, a real if m=minor journalisam prize. Changing my !Vote to Keep.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

@E.M.Gregory: Can you specify which of these articles you believe constitutes "significant" coverage of the Hamilton Award as opposed to a passing reference? Cbl62 (talk) 21:03, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

These newspapers validate this award by covering it. I don't think that in this it is different from other journalism awards, and certainly seems similar to the Casey Award, and others in the category:Sports writing awards, which I just added to the article.E.M.Gregory (talk)

The standard under WP:GNG is that there needs to be "significant" coverage to warrant a stand-alone article. The sources mentioned amount to passing reference in broader discussion of the OSHOF, not "significant" coverage. Cbl62 (talk) 21:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

When a major institution gives a journalism prize, and major newspapers cover it, that's notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:38, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Two points: 1) OSHOF is hardly a "major" institution, it doesn't even have a full-time staff or building; and 2) it's not notable unless it gets significant coverage, not just passing mentions. Cbl62 (talk) 03:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:41, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Merge, to the OSHOF article or more specifically to a new section within it. The award information is short and can easily be included in the OSHOF article, if this is a significant program of the OSHOF. I "voted" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Hawley Community Service Award the same way. --do ncr am 20:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 06:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: The related Afd, Articles for deletion/Sandy Hawley Community Service Award was closed as merge into Ontario Sports Hall of Fame. --J04n(talk page) 12:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

NJWeedman[edit]

(Find sources: "NJWeedman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Problematic WP:BLP, tagged for neutrality issues since 35 minutes after its creation back in January, about a person who was previously deleted at the title Edward Forchion. While this version does bring more reliable sourcing to bear than the last one did, it still leaves a lot of details (some of which are extremely contentious and sensitive) entirely unsourced, and still depends too strongly on lawsuits as a priori evidence of notability (which they aren't). Problematic articles about people have to be sourced extremely carefully because of the reputational harm that a Wikipedia article can cause, but the amount of contentious detail here that remains entirely unsourced is quite simply unacceptable -- especially for a person who doesn't cleanly pass any subject-specific inclusion standard. Even if I can't speedy this G4 due to the differences from the last version, it's still a delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Barbara Franchin[edit]

(Find sources: "Barbara Franchin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I declined an A7 tag for this person in the fashion industry but was reverted, so I'm bringing the discussion here. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 06:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

In case it wasn't obvious, I am voting Keep as a news search reveals many hits, mostly in the Italian press, but a few other places including CNN. Sounds like she's well known in Italy. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Anthem of East Turkestan[edit]

(Find sources: "Anthem of East Turkestan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The source for this article is the website for the "East Turkestan Government-in-Exile" a group that is not recognized to represent any particular group of people. There is an East Turkestan separatist movement, but as no actual nation has yet been formed or recognized, no "national anthem" can yet exist for the group. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 05:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Crowd dialog europe[edit]

(Find sources: "Crowd dialog europe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

no third party reliable sources for notability -- just press releases DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 05:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete and my searches have found only a few links, nothing at all actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Kennebec Regional Development Authority[edit]

(Find sources: "Kennebec Regional Development Authority" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

promotionalism for small business development organization ; no real justification for notability and only very lcoal referneces DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 05:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 05:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as my searches are finding a few several links so far but still nothing actually solidly convincing this isn't anything else than a local group. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ashish Seth[edit]

(Find sources: "Ashish Seth" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

a promotional article for an astrologer with no plausible reason for notability,

The article seems to be mainly composed of his predictions, but it's hard for me to decipher what was actually claimed, and when DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 05:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 05:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 05:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. Lack of RS. Not quite sure why this came to academic Afd. Did the subject predict if his BLP would be deleted or not? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC).
Delete by all means, nothing at all minimally convincing for any notability and the mass of contents are not helping at all. SwisterTwister talk 06:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete A7 and G11. Unsourced bragging by non-notable astrologer, who claims lots of famous people emailed him their birth dates, and that lots of stuff he predicted came true. The only "reference" is a link to his profile on an astrology wiki "Astrodatabank", empty apart from a link to a locked Facebook page. Article was created by account Botme7, then mostly edited by older account Bondme7. This seems to be a pattern: Botme7 attempted several times to create Astrodatabank, first under that spelling and then another after the first was salted. Ashish Seth is the only other article that this WP:SPA account has been used for. I've removed the giant unsourced bragging list, and there's virtually nothing left. OnionRing (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment User Ether7 has a user page which consists of a draft of this article, created April 24 [20]. His other helpful contributions include repeatedly removing the speedy tag from this article: [21], [22], [23], creating Astrodatabank, and writing in a style spookily similar to Bondme7: [24]. SPI, ahoy! OnionRing (talk) 08:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy per A7. I already did this once, but the article's been recreated. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep Has Significant coverage,verifiability,has third-party source,I have added valid reference to this page [25]Bondme7(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sikarwar[edit]

(Find sources: "Sikarwar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY, but always hard with non-English language topics. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep or at least Draft instead as Books actually found a few noticeable links, nothing particularly outstanding to suggest a considerably enhanced article but enough to confirm its existence, and this would of course need any necessary familiar attention. SwisterTwister talk 23:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Art Stewart (producer)[edit]

(Find sources: "Art Stewart (producer)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:GNG; just another backroom boy. TheLongTone (talk) 13:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quote:"just another backroom boy", I suggest you have a look at his credentials my friend. Songwriter, producer, engineer etc. His productions ..... Here. Technical .... Here. Song writing credits .... Here. So much more. Well, if he's a "back room boy", he is certainly not "just another", he's one notable backroom man" who engineered and produced many hits over 3 decades at least Karl Twist (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep as per my comment @ 10:30, 10 June 2016. Stewart may be a "back room" man as most producers and engineers are, but certainly notable. Karl Twist (talk) 11:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment - He's also a composer

References do not back up claim. Any producer will get mentions, eg liner notes or articles about other people. TheLongTone (talk) 14:14, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Some do!. He's notable as a composer, producer and sound engineer. Almost as notable as The Funk Brothers. And just as important in the Motown hit making machine. Art Stewart has legendary status as you will soon discover my amigo. Karl Twist (talk) 06:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Stella Maris Church, Cayman Brac[edit]

(Find sources: "Stella Maris Church, Cayman Brac" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

not notable church. Speedy declined as outsides A7 scope, but a church is an organization. DGG ( talk ) 05:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The article is referenced, it has a neutral wording, and is no different than hundreds of other articles of similar religious buildings such as mosques, synagogues, Buddhist temples, etc. The importance of these buildings varies according to personal opinion. In this case the building stands out because it is the only Catholic church on the island. Religion is part of the culture of a country. And thus it is always relevant. I just participated in wikipedia in English because I want to contribute with specific data that I think are relevant.--Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 13:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep. I edited the article to add the "stand out" assertion that it is the only Catholic church on the island, and to reflect that the church is an organization as well as a building (as articles on churches should, and generally do). I also added other info and an external link. I agree with Guaicaipuro that the article is referenced and is neutrally worded, and also that the dividing line on notability of churches is not black & white. It would be more obviously notable if some horrific news-transfixing event had happened there. If the outcome of this AFD is not to Keep, then the material should be merged to somewhere, perhaps the Archdiocese of Detroit article which mentions the Cayman Islands and includes a table of notable churches. Or is there some Religion in the Cayman Islands article where it could go? In absence of a decent merger target, it may be better to keep it where it is. --do ncr am 17:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Mort Glickman[edit]

(Find sources: "Mort Glickman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This prolific movie music composer is borderline IMO. He gets a couple of pages in The Encyclopedia of Film Composers, but a lot of his work is uncredited,[26] even at the end of his career, and all or nearly all for low-budget B movies. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep as he is included in the Encyclopedia of Film Composers and the written work referenced in the article, seems to pass WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep Has a resume and is credited. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Reply. Everyone on IMDb has a resume and is credited. What has he done to satisfy WP:ARTIST? Clarityfiend (talk) 09:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

You are right that IMDb is not a reliable indicator of notability. Why, then, do you cite it in support of this nomination? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep per nom. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Just in case the point I am making is unclear, I mean that the nominator stated a clear reason for keeping, i.e. that the subject has an entry in a print encyclopedia from a major academic publisher. The point of our notability guidelines is that we follow such reliable sources rather than our personal opinions about importance. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Has a significant number of released works ^[1]. Star Islington (talk) 15:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

^ http://www.soundtrackcollector.com/catalog/composerdiscography.php?composerid=1861

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there are four keeps, much of the justification is very weak. Additional input is needed. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

1000nen, Zutto Soba ni Ite...[edit]

(Find sources: "1000nen, Zutto Soba ni Ite..." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not pass WP:NMG. Please merge or delete. Steve Quinn (talk) 05:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 05:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 05:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 05:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The song appears to pass WP:NSONG for having charted in multiple national sales charts (including a third place on Billboard Japan Hot 100, third on Oricon and first on Taiwanese G-Music Chart). There are obvious language barriers which makes searches very hard, but there is little doubt some coverage exists. At the same time this AfD seems a case of systematic bias, as no one would ever nominate a song ranking third on Billboard US charts for deletion (and even if they would, the discussion would be closed in minutes). I'm going with procedural keep as a song with such a verifiable success should be at least merged and redirected to its parent article (as suggested by the same nominator), but not deleted in any way. Cavarrone 11:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Trackhat[edit]

(Find sources: "Trackhat" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Deprodded by the article creator. The article does not satisfy NCORP and there's a lack of available reliable sources. Maybe somebody in the UK will be able to find sources through the UK google.Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The Fourth Dimension (Hypocrisy album)[edit]

(Find sources: "The Fourth Dimension (Hypocrisy album)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails notability criteria for recordings; see WP:NALBUM. No significant coverage and this album has not made the charts. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Osculum Obscenum[edit]

(Find sources: "Osculum Obscenum" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails notability criteria for recordings; see WP:NALBUM. No significant coverage and this album has not made the charts. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Penetralia[edit]

(Find sources: "Penetralia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails notability criteria for recordings; see WP:NALBUM. No significant coverage and this album has not made the charts. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

10 Years of Chaos and Confusion[edit]

(Find sources: "10 Years of Chaos and Confusion" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails notability criteria for recordings WP:NALBUM. No significant coverage and this album has not made the charts. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Ray Washburne[edit]

(Find sources: "Ray Washburne" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Potential permastub; also a BLP I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 04:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Allard Hall[edit]

(Find sources: "Allard Hall" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails GNG; sources are mostly SPS and was created as part of a promotional campaign around UBC's law school. Merge what is usable here to University of British Columbia Faculty of Law and redirect. Jytdog (talk) 03:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep, tentatively. It was a big deal that the new law school was built, it seems. The building design received a number of awards. Although too-promotional fluff needs to be edited out of the article, it appears to me that there is decent sourcing to cover more about the previous building (a brutalist structure) and the need and the fundraising and this one's design, etc., more than is comfortably contained in the Faculty of Law article. I was not previously familiar with this example, but I know of other similar prominent replacements of older university buildings by LEEDS-certified cool new ones, which rightfully generate a lot of local/regional/state-or-province-level coverage. It remains a subjective call whether to have a long section about the building in the faculty of law article (with a redirect) or have it as a separate article.

By the way, applying the Google Scholar search above (with addition of "-Rokeach"), I find this undergraduate thesis or course paper which is a Life Cycle Analysis (a kind of environmental impact statement) about the building. It might or might not have factual information to add to the article.

This could have been handled by an editor simply editing and choosing to implement a merge, or editing but finding a merge to be awkward, without an AFD beforehand. However, given there is an AFD open, and without editing completed that would have reduced the material somewhat, we should judge what we think would be the right length of coverage as too much or not too much for the Faculty of Law article. --do ncr am 07:23, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for that thoughtful response. I considered just doing the merge and redirect BOLDLY but this is fairly long (mostly puffery) and there has been some fierce conflicted/promotional editing at the main article on the law school, and I didn't want to be accused of gutting or cause drama; this seemed the best process to follow in this instance. I do think it is a no brainer Jytdog (talk) 07:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

List of Nicktoons characters[edit]

(Find sources: "List of Nicktoons characters" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

All content in this article is already covered by the shows' respective articles and contributes nothing that isn't already covered by said articles. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 03:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: No sources and no actual new content... Sro23 (talk) 07:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Blended artists community bangladesh[edit]

(Find sources: "Blended artists community bangladesh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non-notable organisation in Bangladesh. I couldn't find any independent references for it (in English language media). I had a look at the Twitter account (13 followers) and Facebook page (10 likes) which makes me feel this is not notable at all. The article seems to be written by an editor with a conflict of interest. I first thought of tagging it as G11 but then decided to AfD it in case non-English language references exist and the article is improved in the meantime. -- Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

delete of no value in present form — billinghurst sDrewth 14:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete was probably supposed to be "Blender artists community Bangladesh", not "Blended artists community bangladesh". A non-notable user group for users of Blender (software). Mduvekot (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour[edit]

(Find sources: "Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

As I said in the PROD, which seems to have disappeared, this is not a notable tour per WP:NTOUR. There are no discussions of the tour as a whole (or as a tour), only a few links to things that are not secondary sources--besides a mention or two of things that happened at shows. As a tour, this is simply not notable. Drmies (talk) 22:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

This was the first tour with a returning John Frusciante after six years, which is pretty notable considering he is their most recognizable guitarist and their first tour at the time in two years. The 1998 tour is also recognized as an official tour on the band's website. http://redhotchilipeppers.com/tour/past/1998 and it is also mentioned as an important event on the band's official timeline on their website http://redhotchilipeppers.com/timeline It featured the debut of new songs from Californication, songs the band had never played before and songs they would never play again. Removing the article for it would also create a gap in between the band's 96/97 One Hot Minute tour with Navarro and the Californication tour, which begain an entire year after the 1998 tour. If it needed to be merged (the article has been around for four years now so unsure why all of a sudden it needs to be removed) maybe create a section in the Californication tour article even though it had no connection to that tour as the album wasnt even close to completion and the 1998 tour was it's own tour, not in support of the future album. I dont however see a reason to delete it as this tour was important in the band's history with the return of Frusciante. Jason1978 (talk) 22:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

RevTwo[edit]

(Find sources: "RevTwo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Although many refs are provided they are all in a very niche market and most (all?) appear to be press releases. I can see nothing significant and independent that provides notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - The article needs some cleanup but is covered in reliable sources more than just a passing mention. Meatsgains (talk) 23:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete as searches have found nothing noticeably better, it's still newly founded so we should expect the state of sourced and coverage available. This is best deleted and restarted if better is available later. There's nothing else particularly better from the article to suggest saving.

SwisterTwister talk 00:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

List of Australian Ambassadors to Norway[edit]

(Find sources: "List of Australian Ambassadors to Norway" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

fails WP:GNG. Australia has never had a resident ambassador to Norway. Article contains mostly primary sources . The few third party sources like Canberra Times merely contain routine coverage which confirm the role . Arguments like WP:MUSTBESOURCES, WP:ADHOM do not add to notability LibStar (talk) 15:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment So the office was first held concurrently by the ambassadors to Sweden and now the ones to Denmark? Would this merit a merge of some sort? The two separate articles to merge to makes it a lot harder. It seems to be a Wikipedia standard to have an ambassador list of every little country to every little other country: List of ambassadors of Sweden to Ukraine. However I do prefer it this way, as the information is hard to find otherwise. The Wikipedia templates make research of ambassadors a lot easier. They're also simple, clean lists: quickly glanced through. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

David Pakman[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "David Pakman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Certainly time for another AfD since that was hardly a consensus in 2007 and Wikipedia has enormously changed since then, my own searches have found only a few links at News and then one at Highbeam, nothing at all and the current article, I should note, has basically nearly all links to either YouTube or his own website. Only one is independent and it never actually loads apparently thus nothing is solidly convincing of acceptable notability here. This article also seems quite troubled and controversy-oriented as the history shows years and years of vandalism so this is certainly something that is questionable not only to notability but overall; existing since December 2005 when an IP started it and the first few changes were actually both IPs and a "Dpackman" user and I should also note that, with this, there has never been any noticeably consistently beneficial changes to this article to suggest outstanding. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Merge/redirect to The David Pakman Show Certainly this article and the one on The David Pakman Show are over-sourced, over-hyped, blatant WP:PROMO for a self-promoting self-promoter, he may nevertheless might marginally pass WP:CREATIVE because the show is boradcast and does once in a while generate major coverage. I can, however, find little in the way of profile/bio that marks him as independently notable (added a profile article from something called businesswest.com to the article) I think he could be most reasonable merged into his show, since both subjects are marginally notable, at best. Pakman mostly turns up in searches when he scores an unusual interview that goes viral, and even then usually on places like a HuffPost blog [27]. Indeed, his notability largely consists of aiming to go viral on YouTube. and occasionally suceeding. But this gdoes not generate significant coverage in mainstream media. Note also that the more notable David Pakman is a venture capitalist who founded a online music companies emusic and myplay and has been covered quite a lot as a partner in the venture capital firm Venrock. The investor David Pakman could support an article and would probably be the primary if this article is kept.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Passes WP:JOURNALIST via "widely cited by peers or successors". Even a cursory Google hit returns a whole lot of coverage of his work (not just his show, but also his writing e.g. at the Huffington Post). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:07, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Definitively notable, countless proper media appearances. Bigger radio syndication than countless other radio hosts whose pages exist on Wikipedia. Far more television appearances than political commentators and analysts whose pages exist on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:182:C801:5F5:8C10:18A0:D5C4:136 (talk) 22:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep The article seems to have a fair number of sources, so it passes WP:GNG by me. This guy does appear to be referenced a lot. Antrocent (♫♬) 03:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

CloudLMS[edit]

(Find sources: "CloudLMS" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Thrice-recreated article about a software product. Fails WP:GNG for lack of available reliable sources. - Mr X 12:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Comment - You've written that this article has been recreated several times, but I couldn't find old afd's for it. Could you expand on what you found for previously deleted versions? Dialectric (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sure, if you click on the "logs" link above (or here) you will see that it was deleted twice before. The previous version that I reviewed was similar to the current version.- Mr X 15:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better and the article contains nothing else particularly convincing. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Reviewed compositions for guitar[edit]

(Find sources: "Reviewed compositions for guitar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Redundant to List of compositions for guitar, except that it only links articles which have articles. This falls foul of WP:SELFREF, and misses the point of WP:REDYES. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Robert Blake Whitehill[edit]

(Find sources: "Robert Blake Whitehill" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I came across this via his book Deadrise, which was recently created and which I'm also going to include in this AfD.

I searched for coverage, but ultimately I can't find anything to show that Whitehill would pass notability guidelines for authors, actors, or GNG in general. The only coverage I've found are two articles that read suspiciously like they were based on press releases (or are just reprints of press releases). There is also a Kirkus Review, but it was reviewed via Kirkus Indie, its pay review outlet, so it can't be seen as a RS in any form. Ultimately I don't see where Whitehill passes notability guidelines. I also don't see where his work in other avenues (screenwriting) has received any coverage to where they'd be seen as notable. A prior version of the article claims that he's won awards, but I don't see where these awards are major since they don't really come up in a search.

Of note is that I did remove two sources, a blog post and an Amazon link, neither of which would be seen as RS in any form or fashion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Buchter News[edit]

(Find sources: "Buchter News" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Utterly non-notable community newspaper. Entirely unreferenced, as the newspaper web site itself is down, and the only external reference does not mention the topic. This is the only independent coverage I found, it seems to be the classical 'mention in passing'. Pgallert (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a monthly newspaper produced by a charity. The charity site itself has very little on this project [28] and my searches are finding nothing on Highbeam and just a couple of passing mentions via Google ([29],[30]) which is surprising as a long-running project might be expected to have generated some evaluative coverage. In its absence, the coverage under Lüderitz#Media seems sufficient, although itself in need of referencing. AllyD (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Swetank Gupta[edit]

(Find sources: "Swetank gupta" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Delete. Person not notable and fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

CAOS 1O1[edit]

(Find sources: "CAOS 1O1" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No independent, reliable references to be found. Only social media. Bgwhite (talk) 06:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete non-notable hip hopper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Rachel Aaron[edit]

(Find sources: "Rachel Aaron" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The only reference is to her personal website. All her books were vanity publications: http://rachelaaron.net/booksellers.php ("self-published") Lrieber (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 21:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 21:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 21:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete as there's nothing for any applicable notability, the current sources are not solidly convincing and there's nothing else to suggest her career as an author has suggested anything otherwise convincing. SwisterTwister talk 08:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep I don't think WP:BEFORE was done. You also need to look under her pseudonym. I have added reviews and information from The Washington Post, Publishers Weekly, Library Journal and Kirkus to the article. With multiple reviews of her work in RS, she passes WP:CREATIVE #4 for significant critical attention. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Comment I also should point out that her Eli Monpress and Paradox series were published by Orbit books, part of Hachette, not a "vanity press." Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:58, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep - third-party reliable sources confirm notability as well as her listing on the Internet Speculative Fiction Database: Summary Bibliography: Rachel Aaron.--☭🎆🌎🎼🎺🐦 07:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Mai Safoora[edit]

(Find sources: "Mai Safoora" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Borderline WP:A7 if not for the age of this article. There's really no claim of significance here. The closest thing is a claim of inherited notability because her son was a poet, which is where the single source comes in (discusses her as the mother of her son, not an independently noteworthy person). I could find no other sources. Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. ~ Rob^Talk 05:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

CareOnGo[edit]

(Find sources: "CareOnGo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Promotional and non notable. All the refs are either press releases or mere notices of funding. DGG ( talk ) 03:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 15:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as I noticed this earlier, there's loads of news but that's expected for these subjects and my searches have found nothing better, it's newly started and thus is not expected to have anything else particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 00:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

NiKarma[edit]

(Find sources: "NiKarma" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

I would've basically PRODed too since none of this is actually convincing of any applicable notability and my searches have unsurprisingly found nothing at all therefore there's nothing at all to suggest this is salvageable. Notifying 2010 tagger Gilo1969. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:16, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete This is a promotional article for an entertainer who happens to have in the past been an NCAA gymnast, but that is not what is driving her notability here, the article exists to get clients and is written with that goal. Wikipedia is not an advertising service, so we should delete.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep as seems notable for representing the U.S in gymnastics for three years, rather than the entertainment aspect, article can be edited so it is not promotional. Atlantic306 (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Vasilitsa[edit]

(Find sources: "Vasilitsa" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

There are several things to say, one is that the other Wikis show nothing actually convincing to suggest this can be improved because of those, another is that my searches have simply found nothing better than 3 links part of a "travel guide" at News thus not actual solid coverage and also the current article simply suggests it's a local ski resort, nothing particularly outstanding; so unless better Greek sources can be found, which I'm somewhat skeptical, the notability is still currently questionable. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Weak keep. The ski resort does not look notable, at least for a standalone article, but the mountain of the same name that the ski resort is on looks likely to be notable as a natural feature per WP:GEOLAND. The ski resort could probably justify a non-promotional section (of probably only a fairly short paragraph) within an article on the mountain. Though WP:TNT is an option - a straight translation of the Greek article on the mountain would be distinctly better than what we have here at the moment and would probably not reuse any content from the current article. PWilkinson (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

d:Q3659498 d:Q12274909

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Insync[edit]

(Find sources: "Insync" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

My searches have simply found nothing better at all than this so included searches at Books, browsers and WP:INDAFD found nothing better. Also nearly hints at speedy and PROD material since nothing is particularly surprisingly outstanding here including the awards which are simply expected at nearly any other article. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

PHPixie[edit]

(Find sources: "PHPixie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

My searches have simply found nothing better at all including for the applicable notability, there's nothing better convincing here. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

delete fails WP:GNG. Of the few gnews hits they are minor mentions. LibStar (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Everyzing[edit]

(Find sources: "Everyzing" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Longtime advertorial company article for which my searches are not finding better at all and examining these sources found some better sources than others, for example: Fortune, CNET and USA Today, but there's nothing actually convincing as those articles are not actually in-depth and solid, the USA Today in fact only has a few sentences and the other articles said before are also basically only mentioning the company in part alongside with Google, so there's certainly not inheritable notability. What's also is my searches have basically found nothing including recently so it frankly seems they must not be as active, if that ever happened, at this time considering the article's basic floating state since then (July 2007). SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete Per WP:Notability is not inherited.—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 04:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Weak Keep Hmm... there is an article on them on SearchEngine land, which is a highly reputable site for Search engine tech. http://searchengineland.com/a-closer-look-at-everyzing-13849 Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep The company is still in business, but is now known as "Ramp Inc" (www.ramp.com). Their main product is a tool for making video presentations searchable and sharable. The article is badly in need of an update / redirect, but the company seems to be notable on an ongoing basis. JerryRussell (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Kyäni[edit]

(Find sources: "Kyäni" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Non notable pyramid scheme. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sourcing is listing, non reliable sources and PR. Other press releases exist such as this but there is a lack of good independent sourcing. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:29, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep - Company is an international organization with multiple offices in the United States and beyond, has revenue over US$1 billion, and is covered in depth in multiple reliable sources as shown in the article itself. Failing at this, the article can be redirected to List_of_companies_based_in_Idaho. --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete instead as I would've considered keeping but my searches have actually found nothing better so far, and the listed coverage is still questionable for helping the article be better. Notifying DGG for his analysis with these subjects. SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Uncertain Attheir size they are likely to be notable, but the present references are impossibly weak. I would expect there would be some NPOV discussion of their products, not just their own press releases for them. DGG ( talk ) 13:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

John Tiedtke[edit]

(Find sources: "John Tiedtke" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

My searches have simply found nothing better than this and this which suggest there is some local coverage but nothing actually suggesting the article notability needed for Wikipedia. Basically exactly like this since starting in April 2007 and everything suggests there's nothing improvable thus nothing else convincing this could be kept and improved. SwisterTwister talk 07:39, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete pernom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

How Funny[edit]

(Find sources: "How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

The article fails WP:NFILM with the only references provided establish that the film was released not how the film is notable. Dan arndt (talk) 10:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC) Dan arndt (talk) 10:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Comment I am prepared to withdraw my nomination on the basis that MichaelQSchmidt has made a significant number of improvements (including the provision of reliable independent references), which means that I now consider the article satisfies the basic tennents of WP:FILM however as there are a number of delete votes I'd prefer that an Admin closes the debate. Dan arndt (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. What may make a close easy for an admin is that even though their deletes have been addressed though regular editing, relatively new account, Sheepythemouse has limited experience and doesn't add content, and SwisterTwister does not revisit discussions where he has been proven incorrect. Their opinions were toward the unimproved version and thus have far less import. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:19, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NFILM Sheepythemouse (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Nepalese films are sometimes difficult to source, but...

type:(Find sources: "How Funny Movie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

director:(Find sources: "Nilu Doma Sherpa, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

studio:(Find sources: "Eyecore Films, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

studio:(Find sources: "A Tiny but Big, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

lead:(Find sources: "Priyanka Karki, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

lead:(Find sources: "Keki Adhikari, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

star:(Find sources: "Dayahang Rai, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

star:(Find sources: "Nisha Adhikari, How Funny" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:INDAFD: How Funny Nilu Doma Sherpa Priyanka Karki Keki Adhikari Dayahang Rai Nisha Adhikari Eyecore Filmsl Tiny But Big Pictures

Keep per meeting WP:NF as a source that says it has released and speaks (even if briefly) toward a film project directly and in more-than-trivial detail is exactly what criteria requires. In my own looking, I quickly and easily found representative more:[31][32][33][34][35][36][37] And to the nominator and to Sheepythemouse, I politely remind that notability is based upon sources BEING available and not upon their use in an article. I humbly share the fun of diligence and the India media search tools of WP:INDAFD. Better we work to improve this per what is available, than delete it because it is an ugly stub... IMHO, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @MichaelQSchmidt: I am presuming that your comments are reliant on criteria 2 of WP:NFILM, in which a film is considered notable if it is subject of the 'publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release.' Some of the sources you have cited are questionable about whether they are 'reliable' sources however others such as The Kathmandu Post and the onlinekhabar.com review are probably enough to get it over the line. The article itself does need a lot of work to bring it up to acceptable standards. Dan arndt (talk) 05:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
  - Response @Dan arndt: Since it's a 2016 film, anyone's expecting sources "5 years after release" is an incorrect argument under WP:N's "Other evidence of notability". That argument "might" be best used AFTER 2021. For this newer film I am relying simply on WP:N's "General principles". While yes, it does need work, its needing work is also not a proper deletion rational. See WP:IMPERFECT, WP:HANDLE, WP:IMPROVE, etc. Just sayin'. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete at best as the listed news links above are still questionable regarding the, at best, substance at making an convincingly better article, if that's all, then there's nothing else better to suggest accepting. Delete at best. SwisterTwister talk 23:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Pardon SwisterTwister, but I've noted many of your delete opinions elsewhere have been proven incorrect. Did you even perform any research prior to offering your "opinions" here? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment @MichaelQSchmidt: - I see that you have recently tagged the article as being subject of an expansion or major restructuring. In that regard I would suggest that any decision on this AfD should be held off for a few days until those improvements have been completed. Dan arndt (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

What began as a poor stub, has become a decent start class IMHO. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Pascal Trottier[edit]

(Find sources: "Pascal Trottier" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

WP:BLP of a screenwriter with no strong claim to passing WP:CREATIVE. His only named credits are two films where he was one member of a multi-writer team (and none of his other colleagues on either film has a standalone article yet), and one episode of a television series -- and with one primary source and one reference that covers a tangential fact about the film but entirely fails to even mention his name in conjunction with it, this is based on exactly zero reliable source coverage of him. In addition, it warrants note that the article was created by an SPA whose username ("Pasukaru1978") is a Japanification of the article subject's own first name, thus suggesting a probable conflict of interest. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform where anybody is entitled to start an article about themselves the moment any web page at all can be shown to verify their existence -- RS coverage about him in media, supporting a claim of notability that passes a Wikipedia inclusion criterion, must be present for him to become eligible for inclusion here. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when more substance and better sourcing can be shown. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Comment. Besides the award in the article, there's also some critical commentary on his work. For example: [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43]. However, there isn't a lot that's specifically about him, like interviews. I don't know if that's enough to establish notability through WP:CREATIVE criterion #3. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

I am similarly on the fence with this one. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

What I see there is glancing mentions of his name in articles about the film, not all of which are even reliable sources (some are, yes, but a couple of them aren't.) But that's not enough to get a person into Wikipedia in and of itself if genuinely substantive coverage about him is lacking. Bearcat (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as I've found a few several links at News but still nothing actually noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 23:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep. Yes, of those proffered by NinjaRobotPirate, just one is unreliable. Fine. But the authored reviews of Trottier's work in Los Angeles Times, Bloody-Disgusting, Fangoria, Now Toronto, and Hollywood Reporter are in reliable sources. So sorry SwisterTwister and Bearcat, but in the lack of coverage about him personally, guideline tells us to look at WP:CREATIVE #4-C and thanks to those proffered by NinjaRobotPirate and many others, we may accept a notability through Trottier's work undeniably having "won significant critical attention". It's a suitable stub that will benefit Wikipedia through expansion and growth over time, but not through a deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep per Schmidt's accurate analysis and sources. WP:CREATIVE is met. Cavarrone 08:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

California v. Murray[edit]

(Find sources: "California v. Murray" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Previously, the article on Conrad Murray himself was redirected away to this page and Conrad Murray again exists pending Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Robert Murray (I've since swapped the pages so the history is with the regular name), I'm not seeing the indication that this trial was actually a notable trial. It was only notable due to its inherited connection with both Death of Michael Jackson and now with the Murray article and I don't think it's more than just a giant unsourced BLP nightmare about the various living people in the case (attorneys, witnesses, Murray). Ricky81682 (talk) 01:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

1 koruna (World War II Bohemian and Moravian coin)[edit]

(Find sources: "1 koruna (World War II Bohemian and Moravian coin)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No significant coverage in the media per WP:N. No reliable sources cover this topic. Steve Quinn (talk) 01:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Stanisław Krysicki[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: "Stanisław Krysicki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Fails WP:NPERSON - being a military officer during WW2 is laudable but unfortunately is not enough for a Wikipedia article. Nor is being mentioned in a single book about former military officers, as NPERSON requires significant coverage in multiple published sources.

See also here: [44] — kashmiri ^TALK 23:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Comment. 8 years ago I voted weak delete. Reconsidering other keep arguments, and my understanding of the guidelines today, I'd vote delete, but that said he seems to have been subject to relatively in-depth (several pagraphs or more) coverage in one book and one likely reliable trade magazine/journal (of Polish lawyers), through the latter is probably an obituary. Borderline, but now leaning keep. (And I started writing this content as leaning delete). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Of little help in my view: "several paragraphs in one book" falls badly short of significant coverage in multiple published sources required by NPERSON. — kashmiri ^TALK 07:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete at best as there's nothing to suggest there's the availability of substantially better here and my searches have at least found nothing, delete as there's simply nothing minimally convincing and there's certainly not going to be any new information. SwisterTwister talk 23:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

10 Reichspfennig (World War II German coin)[edit]

(Find sources: "10 Reichspfennig (World War II German coin)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No significant coverage of this topic in the media by reliable sources, fails WP:N. There appear to be no reliable sources that cover this topic. Steve Quinn (talk) 01:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Chakraborty (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: "Chakraborty (actor)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No indication about person's notability. Fails WP:DIRECTOR and WP:NACTOR. Also looks more like a promotional article than a biography. Sabbatino (talk) 14:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete at best as my searches have found nothing easily confirmed to be this man and there's nothing else to help insinuate there's the needed substance for the notability. Delete as there's simply nothing else convincing including the needed coverage to suggest at least basically better. SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

European Menopause and Andropause Society[edit]

(Find sources: "European Menopause and Andropause Society" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Does not seem to be notable, sources are entirely self-published. Recreation possible if it is shown as notable in the future. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 21:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete and I would've pursued PROD instead as my searches have simply found nothing better at all, nothing particularly convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep it is the publisher of a monthly medical journal Maturitas which is frequently cited in news reports along with EMAS whenever there is a news report of something first published by EMAS in the journal. Mb66w (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Heartland International[edit]

(Find sources: "Heartland International" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Poorly sourced. Promotional. Doesn't seem to exist any more. Rathfelder (talk) 22:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:N and WP:COMPANY. Arguments for WP:GNG are poor.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 23:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S 23:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep. The promotionalism can be removed; that it ndoes not exist any more is irrelevant if it ever was notable. there do seem to be sources. DGG ( talk ) 01:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Chris Gilmour[edit]

(Find sources: "Chris Gilmour" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Appears to fail WP:NARTIST. Zero sources on page. No establishment of notability. Original creator basically copy-pasted info from the official website (compare [45] to [46]). Suspect WP:SOAP intent for creation, but article was never substantially improved. If subject is notable (which does not seem to be) then WP:NUKEANDPAVE and let it be recreated. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

More specific searches are: Find sources: "Chris Gilmour" cardboard – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete as I'm simply not finding anything else actually better aside from a few unsurprising links, the article also suggests nothing else better for the applicable notability with there simply being nothing outstanding. SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Uvula piercing[edit]

(Find sources: "Uvula piercing" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

This article has been a target of blatantly non-neutral editing, and its subject in general is rather unnotable. I am Quibilia. (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Can you summarize the history of the non-neutral edits? Glowimperial (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

I've found two instances with a quick skim of the page history: 670987270 and 704163467, both under the "History and culture" section. I am Quibilia. (talk) 22:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep, meets WP:GNG, well referenced article. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

WP:GNG specifies that the article should also follow WP:NOT, especially WP:INDISCRIMINATE. I would like to point out a nearby section, WP:NOTNEWS: Half of the sources in this article are news or similar sources, typically considered unreliable (see WP:NEXIST: Simply because an article makes good use of sources does not indicate the notability of those sources). I concede, however, that the article does appear to follow the general guidelines for WP:GNG, and am reconsidering my stance on its deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quibilia (talk • contribs) 16:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Quibilia, I accept what you are saying above, i was going to suggest a redirect/merge but on having a look at other piercing articles was unsure where it could be directed to. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Weak Keep - but only because there's a little bit of content worth saving here and no reasonable target to merge to. If there were a merge target, I would definitely not be arguing to keep. I would recommend someone create Draft:Oral piercing as it looks like we have several articles that could be combined: labret, lip piercing, philtrum piercing, jestrum piercing, lip frenulum piercing, tongue frenulum piercing, tongue piercing, cheek piercing, monroe piercing.... Some, like tongue and lip, can probably sustain their own articles, too, but I note that there are a whole lot of sources which combine these as "oral piercing", including many high quality medical/dental sources. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 12:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Keep not seeing solid grounds for deletion. Artw (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Kirk Minihane[edit]

(Find sources: "Kirk Minihane" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

non notable. The on-air arguments are trivial, and do not give notability DGG ( talk ) 00:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Allegheny Image Factory[edit]

(Find sources: "Allegheny Image Factory" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Producer of a few non notable films -- some of the titles seemed somewhat reminiscent of actual notable films, but checking IMdB,they actually aren't. DGG ( talk ) 00:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as this is another case of speedy material but I was removed and it should have at least been considered as another form of deletion. There's nothing here at all for any basic minimal notability and certainly not inheritly notable. SwisterTwister talk 02:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete for failing WP:CORP. Yes they are associated with a number of films, and some of these films have coverage enough so some new articles on them might be worth consideration... but while some better sources exist for the company, it really has not made a mark worthy of WP:N. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The Global Surgical Consortium[edit]

(Find sources: "The Global Surgical Consortium" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

No evidence that it has ever done anything. Part of an apparent promotional campaign for the various activities of Kelly McQueen DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Delete this article, at least in its current form, per WP:G11. --Dps04 (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

MaestroVision[edit]

(Find sources: "MaestroVision" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Nonnotable and promotional. The only usable reference is the first, and it seems to be in the style of an extended press release DGG ( talk ) 00:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as I myself tagged it for deletion but it was removed with no other attempts of reconsideration, I examined everything before and there was simply nothing for any applicable notability, nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister talk 02:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

When you repeat your boilerplate deletion statement, I know its time to look further. LOL Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete. Insufficient notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC).

Founder::(Find sources: "Claude Turcotte" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Founder::(Find sources: "La compagnie MaestroVision" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Comment French-language sources look available to meet WP:CORP. Le Devoir and Laval cite the article alongside Creative Cow... and the Le Devoir source is quite substantive. Why not simply tag it for tone and let issues be addressed through regular editing? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
The Le Devoir ref is a great find: though small circulation, it's considered Quebec's journal of record (though its politics are a joke, imho). That Laval ref would be primary, though. It's the city of Laval (just north of Montreal) announcing a contract with them. So while it's great for WP:V it wouldn't help with WP:N. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Splore App[edit]

(Find sources: "Splore App" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference)

Noon notable and promotional, with emphasis on the academic record of the founders, as if it were the least relevant. Where such information is relevant is a press release. Trivial refs, most from the alumni magazine of one of the founders. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Files[edit]

Files for discussion[edit]

June 14[edit]

File:Boulton Paul Balliol.jpg[edit]

Unused, low-res software screenshot, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 01:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Front covers of Tales of Eternia[edit]

I uploaded the European PlayStation Portable box art of the video game, Tales of Eternia, to replace the original Japanese cover per WP:VGBOX. Then I uploaded the North American PlayStation One cover because North America had its release under the different title. Also, it was to replace the PSP cover. However, I decided to ignore all rules by reinserting the original Japanese cover into the infobox and then putting the North Amer. cover and the Euro PSP cover into the same section with one in its respective subsection. Because rules normally discourage more than one cover arts, I decide to have a discussion about keeping one or more covers. I don't have much preference on either English cover, but I think that original Japanese cover may be necessary to avoid confusing readers a lot. --George Ho (talk) 08:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

My stance is below:

European Eternia cover in the infobox - the main image should have a cover that matches the article title. If Eternia is the WP:COMMONNAME, (which I believe it is), then as a result, an Eternia box art would probably be the most recognizable, and thus, the best choice.
NA ToD2 image in article body - If we deemed it necessary to have 2 images, then I'd have the second one be the Tales of Destiny 2 image, as at least that would apply to a portion of the naming issues covered in the infobox. It could be useful for the reader, as the renaming of the game in that region is a recurring point of confusion for people generally.
Remove the JP cover - With Wikipedia's image policy, we'll be lucky if we can rationalize using 2 images, let alone three. The European PSP one is probably most recognizable in the English speaking regions, and the Destiny 2 relates to the development section. The JP cover is least useful to the reader. Sergecross73 msg me 12:37, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Myall1.jpg[edit]

I reinserted this image to replace the sockpuppet's PNG version. Come to think of it, this image was used as the U.S. promo single of "My All" but then also used as commercial UK/Euorepan single. There is already the commercial U.S. artwork of the single. Therefore, this alternative cover is no longer necessary as its purpose is the same as the other image. Moreover, the performer is American, and the recording was made in the US. George Ho (talk) 08:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Seminole County Expressway logo.jpg[edit]

This is listed as unfree, but maybe it's a work of the government of Florida and thus eligible for {{PD-FLGov}}? If not, then it fails WP:NFCC#9 in Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Shields task force/Database/toll roads. Stefan2 (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Flood in EDSA.png[edit]

Appears to fail WP:NFCC#8 in Tropical Storm Fung-wong (2014) as there is no need to see a flooded street in order to understand that streets were flooded. Additionally, it probably fails WP:NFCC#1; it's unlikely that there are no freely licensed photos of this event.

Additionally fails WP:NFCC#10c in 2014 in the Philippines and WP:NFCC#9 in User:Hamham31/sandbox. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Osceola Parkway logo.png[edit]

This is listed as unfree, but maybe it's a work of the government of Florida and thus eligible for {{PD-FLGov}}? If not, then it fails WP:NFCC#9 in Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Shields task force/Database/toll roads. Stefan2 (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Screenshot of AOHell.jpg[edit]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Carding (fraud). Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't see how? It was a key piece of software used in the early days of the proliferation of carding. Deku-shrub (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Cleveland Browns Wordmark.svg[edit]

This image has an NFUR for only one out of three articles it's used in. However, the text alone falls under PD-textlogo and the SVG appears to be usermade - or should be replaced with an usermade SVG if it isn't. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:KTCH BigRedCountry104.9 logo.jpg[edit]

Is this logo too complex to qualify for PD-textlogo? File:Subway restaurant.svg was not granted copyright registration but I don't know the details of what does make scripture original or not. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:SugarInstant logo.gif[edit]

Probably not original enough to be copyrightable, it is just slightly modified text. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't pretend to know about the threshold of originality required for copyright protection, but I assume if it's "not copyrightable" we change the license from fair use to free, right? The file won't be deleted, will it? — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Time Town advert.jpg[edit]

In light of the publication date given on the file and source pages (1974) and the lack of a copyright notice, this might fall under {{PD-US-no notice}}. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Central-mumbai-skyline.jpg[edit]

This appears to be a stock image judging from Google Images and I can't find any free license on http://intercongreen.com/2013/12/18/real-estate-booms-ignoring-climate-responsive-buildings/ which is the source site. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Bablake School.svg[edit]

According to the article and this page the badge - which per the site search results appears to be the same thing as the logo - goes back to someone alive in 1563, so it'd be PD now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The badge is old. This specific rendition isn't. --RaphaelQS (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Nikhil Anand.jpg[edit]

Image exif data shows that this is a facebook image, so unless the proof of source/license is established, this should be deleted —SpacemanSpiff 15:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

June 14[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS[edit]

Category:Conformed users[edit]

Propose deleting Category:Conformed users - (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: Category contains only a single user page, and was created by the user whose user page appears in the category. The meaning of the category is unclear. (What is a "conformed" user?) General Ization ^Talk 12:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Narrow gauge railways in the Republic of Macedonia[edit]

Propose merging Category:Narrow gauge railways in the Republic of Macedonia to Category:Rail transport in the Republic of Macedonia

Nominator's rationale: Rail transport in Macedonia is itself a small category, but justified as the top-level topic within a country. The newly created narrow gauge category though fails SMALLCAT. AFAIK, there were only ever two NG lines in the country, one of those is long gone and there is little chance of an article on it. All this can be adequately handled by categorization at Rail transport in the Republic of Macedonia Andy Dingley (talk) 09:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Support only if additionally merged with the other small categories Category:Narrow gauge railways in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Category:Narrow gauge railways in Croatia, Category:Narrow gauge railways in Serbia and Category:Narrow gauge railways in Slovenia to Category:Narrow gauge railways in Yugoslavia, while retaining Category:Metre gauge railways in Croatia as a subcategory. Though preexisting, all of these railway lines were closed or converted to standard gauge in the Yugoslavian era. --PanchoS (talk) 09:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I would keep the cats for the other NG lines in former Yugoslavia. The difference is that the 760mm gauge lines in Northern Yugoslavia (and as far south as Montenegro) were quite extensive, the 600mm lines found only in the South (Macedonia) much rarer.

The question here, and presumably why DePiep created the new cat, is about consistency. There were lots of 760mm, these justify categorization. The 600mm does not justify this. Now does MediaWiki categorization and WP practice require the two branches of the category tree to be the same? I see no reason why. Yugoslavian railway provision was not consistent, our categorization in describing it should not invent additional consistency in order to describe this.

I'd be happy with broader Category:Narrow gauge railways in Yugoslavia or Category:Narrow gauge railways in the Balkans categories. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Except for huge exceptions (like: Russian gauge track in Russia), I don't see a need to combine size and country in one cat name. Looking for, say, NG tracks in Switserland, am I supposed to know beforehand what the size is I'm looking for? (in a list of cat:xxx mm gauges in Switserland)? This specific category is in a tree without such size--country combinations, so keeping it that way is easy. In general, this applies to many more areas in Category:Track gauges. -DePiep (talk) 12:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Oppose merge. As it is, it fits perfectly in the tree: Category:Narrow_gauge_railways_by_country. If small categories in there are to be upmerged or otherwise changed, it should be done by broad sweep covering all. As it is, Category:Track gauges by country is full of such situations. Making another incidental exception does not help ease of navigation. In fact, such deviation is a C2C reason for Speedy cat renaming. We better develop a comprehensive plan eg at WT:TRAINS. -DePiep (talk) 12:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Non-governmental organization stubs[edit]

Propose deleting Category:Non-governmental organization stubs - (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nominator's rationale: The main category has been deleted Rathfelder (talk) 07:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

@Rathfelder: Perhaps you were thinking of the "by country" and "by subject" hierarchies which were deleted at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_5#Category:Non-governmental_organizations_by_country and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_March_14#Category:Non-governmental_organizations_by_subject. However, the parent Category:Non-governmental organizations still exists. – Fayenatic London 15:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The vast majority of those stubs belong in their country category. And if we don't want a vast collection of articles to appear in Category:Non-governmental organizations what are we going to do about it?Rathfelder (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep -- It may well be appropriate to have them in a by county stub-cat as well, but that is no reason for deleting this. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob^Talk 07:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Video game articles needing reassessment[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Video game articles needing reassessment to Category:Video game articles requesting reassessment

Nominator's rationale: The articles in this category do not "need" reassessment, instead they're requesting reassessment of their current rating. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Support Request is the more accurate description. Video game articles for which reassessment is requested might be even more accurate, if a bit stilted. --Mark viking (talk) 10:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I don't see anything wrong with this as it is. They're tagged because someone thinks the article should be reassessed—it doesn't mean others have to agree. (It's the same as articles "needing" cleanup, e.g., Category:Articles needing attention‎, Category:Articles needing expert attention‎, many in Category:Wikipedia cleanup by subject, all of the entries in Category:Wikipedia articles with an infobox request—it's the language that Template:WPBannerMeta uses.) If "need" is deemed inappropriate for maintenance cats, you have a whole lot of maintenance categories to change. With respect to "articles needing reassessment" in specific, see also:

czar 15:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Organizations by structure[edit]

Propose merging Category:Organizations by structure to Category:Organizations by type

Nominator's rationale: merge as a small category, and one of too many categories of the form "Organizations by parameter" (see the tree of Category:Organizations). Presumably the target "by type" fits well; if it wouldn't fit this category should plainly be deleted. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Northern Irish Queen's Counsel[edit]

Propose renaming Category:Northern Irish Queen's Counsel to Category:Queen's Counsel from Northern Ireland

Nominator's rationale: rename, I noticed a lengthy discussion about this at CFD/S. The arguments in a nutshell:

the current name is the one single outlier name of this format in the Northern Ireland tree (= pro rename)
the current name is the usual format in the Queen's Counsel tree (= con rename)
the "from Northern Ireland" format overruled the format of occupational categories in the past with clear consensus (= pro rename)

This nomination does not aim at having a wider discussion about the Northern Ireland categorization, since a wider discussion requires a nomination of a wider tree. Please just concentrate on the harmonization aspect for now. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

speedy discussion

Category:Northern Irish Queen's Counsel to Category:Queen's Counsel from Northern Ireland – C2C: per convention of Category:People from Northern Ireland. Please retain the old title as a {{category redirect}} BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think the more relevant convention is that of Category:Queen's Counsel which use the current style. Number 57 20:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  - @Number 57: the demonym-phrase overrules the occupational category convention, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_7#Category:Northern_Irish_people and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_July_13. – Fayenatic London 20:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
    - @Fayenatic london: I can't really respond in detail right now as don't have laptop access, but in summary I believe the idea that we shouldn't use the phrase Northern Irish is a fringe POV pushed by some Irish nationalists that should not have gained any credence on Wikipedia. Both of the discussions you linked to were proposals from the notorious editor Vintagekits, who was indef blocked years ago due to his unacceptable behaviour (and just to clarify, I am not putting BHG in the same category as Vintagekits et al.). Number 57 23:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
      - @Number 57: well, here's an interesting situation. IMHO C2C still permits speedy renaming, because there is a convention that is well defined and overwhelmingly used within the hierarchy. Only C2D mentions "uncontroversial"; C2C doesn't. But if you still object and would prefer a full CfD, then let's go that way. – Fayenatic London 15:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
        
        Yes please (whilst I appreciate there is a naming convention on the Northern Ireland side, there is also one on the Queen's Counsel side, and I think it might be worth raising the Northern Irish issue again for a more reasoned discussion now that some of the more combative editors in that field are no longer with us). And I'm not sure what you're saying – even if there are objections, the category should still be moved if it's clear there is a well-defined convention? That's not my experience (I recall a couple of C2C nominations I made here that were objected to despite conventions being in place). Cheers, Number 5 7 21:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
        
        Yes, I'm saying that the wording above allows a well-defined convention to be applied speedily even if there are objections. Perhaps the others that you referred to were not processed speedily because there was some ambiguity. In this case, although there is a clash of two conventions, it is clear which one should override the other. However, I'm not going to push it. – Fayenatic London 06:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
        
        A good compromise which I would favour that I wish would get more attention would be "Northern Ireland FOOs". Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
        
        Good Olfactory's proposal seems to be the best solution for the whole category tree, but in that case we'd need to rediscuss Category:Northern Irish people. Should we do so? Absolutely. But is there someone willing to prepare a nomination? --PanchoS (talk) 09:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
        
        Sigh.
        
        Number 57's comments about the January 2009 CFR which created this convention are disappointing. At least 13 editors !voted in that discussion, and its outcome (by a clear margin) has been stable for 7 years .. so whatever anyone's view of the rest of the activities of the long-since-banned Vintagekits, his proposal in this case has been shown to have a durable consensus.
        Similarly, the July 2009 CFR was approved with zero opposes. I find it rather sad to see the concerns of Irish editors being dismissed as "fringe" ... and BTW, AFAICS, only 1 out of 6 editors in the July 2009 discussion was Irish.
        
        If Number 57 objects to the convention applied to dozens of categories, then the way to raise that issue is to open a group CFR to rename all the effected categories, rather than to obstruct the harmomisation of a lone outlier. If and when the convention is changed, then this category can be changed along with it ... but until then, the objection serves no useful purpose. It just maintains an outlier, whose non-std format impedes categorisation.
        
        Same for Good Olfactory's proposal for a "Northern Ireland fooers" format. . Whatever the merits of that idea (I'm not persuaded so far), it would need a group CFR. This isn't the place to pursue it.
        
        In the meantime, please can this speedy just proceed? It won't prejudice any future proposal to change the convention, so I can see no gain to anyone from leaving this outlier uncorrected. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Rename to match the Northern Ireland category tree, without prejudice to a future discussion about the tree format of Category:People from Northern Ireland as a whole. It clearly qualified for speedy. But I do think that maybe the entire tree format could be re-considered. (As I mentioned above, I would prefer "Northern Ireland FOOs", but could also go with "Northern Irish FOOs". "FOOs from Northern Ireland" is somewhat of a backwards anomaly, as far as the entire nationality tree is concerned.) Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 07:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Rename per Good Ol’factory to match the rest of the category tree Category:People from Northern Ireland, without prejudice to any wider discussion about the convention. The "fooers from Northern Ireland" format has been stable for 8 years since agreed by consensus at CFRJanuary 2009 and CFR July 2009. Whatever the merits of any other formats which may be agreed in the future, there is no benefit in keeping this one as an outlier. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Redirects[edit]

June 14[edit]

АА[edit]

АА → AA (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not two capital As, but two A (Cyrillic). Two Cyrillic As is not the same as two Latin As. The only page that links here is Scrabble letter distributions#Tuvan. It appears that the Tuvan language might use two Cyrillic As as a distinct letter from one. Recommend delete. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 13:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as likely to cause confusion. Basically 0 hits. shoy (reactions) 14:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete - unless It's my browser I literally see no difference between the 2 but anyway as noted above it'll only cause confusions, –Davey2010^Talk 14:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect to A (Cyrillic) This is one of those Digraph (orthography) double vowel/double letter cases. So the scrabble one should redirect both uses of A to A (Cyrillic) and add a note that in Tuvan language the A can be doubled as a digraph. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Adding the long vowel case and then adding disambiguation entry. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The other digraphs in the scrabble article ЭЭ, ОО, УУ, ЫЫ, ИИ, ӨӨ, ҮҮ are all redlinked at the moment. Should they redirect to the single letter or should the redlinks be removed as with Welsh and other languages? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Editing... redirects[edit]

Editing Category:Albums produced by Pino Presti → Category:Albums produced by Pino Presti (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Editing Claudio Silva (computer scientist) → Claudio Silva (computer scientist) (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Editing List of number-one albums in 2014 (New Zealand) → List of number-one albums from the 2010s (New Zealand) (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Editing Template:Macclesfield Town F.C. Player of the Year → Template:Macclesfield Town F.C. Player of the Year (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These were all created in error. These should all probably be G6'ed, but I'm listing them here just in case. Steel1943 (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete as unlikely synonyms. I'm also leaning to delete as housekeeping --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete all WP:G6 per above. Unusual but obviously good faith errors. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 12:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete all per nom. Agreed with housekeeping. None of these terms are editing related and were probably created when the editor realized they created that article and had to rename it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:17, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Sesame Open[edit]

Sesame Open → Ali Baba (links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Per the edit history, this redirect targets its current because once upon a time, Open sesame did as well. Either way, this is an unlikely and unnotable transposition of the words. Steel1943 (talk) 02:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Weak Retarget to Open Sesame (phrase) it seems to be one of the original variant of the phrase --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Templates[edit]

June 14[edit]

Italian cruiser navboxes[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Request withdrawn (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 15:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)
Template:Italian cruiser Tripoli (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)
Template:Goito-class cruiser (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)
Template:Folgore-class cruiser (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)
Template:Partenope-class cruiser (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)
Template:Agordat_class cruiser (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

Each navbox has a section that states the previous class and a successive class, which is what {{s-start}}, {{s-bef}}, {{s-ttl}}, {{s-aft}}, ... are used for. The navboxes are sequential, and lists a number of ships that fall into each class, which are minimal. Suggesting merging these navboxes into one. If the user needs help setting up the preceeding/successive cruiser classes, I'd volunteer to help out. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 05:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

To elaborate, I suggest replacing the navboxes with a cumulative one, something like Special:Permalink/725204677. The succession boxes at the bottom is not meant to be part of the template. It's a just a demo. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 06:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Just a heads up for your proposal - you would have to do that for every ship class article. What Parsecboy has done is pretty much standard among ship class articles. If you wish to establish a norm, you may have to go to WP:SHIPS and WP:MILHIST to get more input. Llammakey (talk) 09:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Oppose - per Llammakey, this is standard practice across thousands of articles. Take a glance through Category:Military_ship_templates. Parsecboy (talk) 09:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@Parsecboy and Llammakey: All right, thanks for the heads up. I didn't expect the scope of this change for consistency was much bigger. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 15:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-Ethiopia-Photo[edit]

Template:PD-Ethiopia-Photo (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

Unused/no transclusions, very narrow in scope (photos only?), and potentially even misleading - overly simplifies the relevant Ethiopian laws (see Commons version) FASTILY 01:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:PD-MalaysiaGov[edit]

Template:PD-MalaysiaGov (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

Unused/no transclusions, potentially misleading, redundant to {{PD-Malaysia}}. See also: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-MalaysiaGov FASTILY 01:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:PD-GreekFolklore[edit]

Template:PD-GreekFolklore (edit · talk · history · links · logs · subpages · delete)

Unused/no transclusions, does not exist on Commons, easily replaced by {{PD-simple}} FASTILY 01:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Miscellany[edit]

Deletion review[edit]

14 June 2016[edit]

[1] Billboard magazine

[2] ttp://www.france24.com/ar/20151111-تكنولوجيا-لبنان-الطفل-جايك-المير-الهواتف-الذكية-تطبيقات-آبل-سرعة-سلامة-سيارات?ns_campaign=reseaux_sociaux&ns_source=FB&ns_mchannel=social&ns_linkname=editorial&aef_campaign_ref=partage_user&aef_campaign_date=2015-11-11

[3] "Arvind Kejriwal's AAP enters Kerala, wins ward seat". intoday.in.

[4] ttp://www.soundtrackcollector.com/catalog/composerdiscography.php?composerid=1861

[1]

[2]

[1]

[1]

Centralized discussion

Proposals: policy	other	Discussions	Ideas
There is currently a request for adminship open for discussion. Treat uncontested AfDs as uncontroversial deletions? Should the criteria for "recent deaths" listings on "In the news" be changed? How safe are GMOs? (Note: Active ArbCom remedies) April Fools' Day on Wikipedia Former names in lead of bios of transgender/non-binary people Repeal WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES? Increase throttle limit for page movers? Allow non-admins to close RfDs to "delete"? IP block exemptions to users in good standing? Removing archive.is from the spam blacklist Confirm on save when adding links to disambiguation pages Wikidata in infoboxes, opt-in or opt-out? For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. Note: entries for inactive discussions, closed or not, should be moved to the archive.
archive talk edit history watch purge

Wikipedia:XfD today

Contents

Speedy deletion candidates[edit]

Articles[edit]

Ruination (Transformers)[edit]

Dangwana[edit]

Romstal[edit]

Sugarboy[edit]

Mark Litton[edit]

Ratnam V. Raja Kumar[edit]

Ayisatu Owen International School[edit]

Depoul Militari metro station[edit]

Carrefour Militari metro station[edit]

Sunny and Inder Bawra[edit]

Virdi (Ramgarhia clan)[edit]

Virdi (Khatri clan)[edit]

Vatula[edit]

Wuxx[edit]

Christian Gill[edit]

R.J. Manuelian[edit]

Shabeehanswar[edit]

Status Seeker[edit]

Facter[edit]

Unleashed (Skillet album)[edit]

Abdul Hakim Ansari[edit]

Jass Bajwa[edit]

Tauheediyah[edit]

Kolade Shasi[edit]

Tongue Patch Diet[edit]

Sunil Patel[edit]

Kanikasamy[edit]

N. N. Bheemaiah[edit]

Ace engineering college[edit]

Jake El Mir[edit]

Katherine Connors[edit]

Craig B. Lloyd[edit]

Bond Aviation Group[edit]

SolarMobil Manipal[edit]

Ahu Yağtu[edit]

AJ Tesler[edit]

Dave Weasel[edit]

Melvin P. McCree[edit]

Hans Weiss[edit]

Spoetry[edit]

Inquizzitive[edit]

Wicked Weather Watch[edit]

Claude J. Pelletier[edit]

A Relativistic Trolley Paradox[edit]

Jeffrey Brohn[edit]

Aam Aadmi Party Kerala[edit]

Creadel "Red" Jones[edit]

Ambassador of Iceland to Venezuela[edit]

Equal consideration of interests[edit]

Taman Jurong Bus Terminal[edit]

List of Australian High Commissioners to Jamaica[edit]

Sam Chew Jr.[edit]

EnlightenNext[edit]

Virus (British band)[edit]

Brian Williams Media Award[edit]

NJWeedman[edit]

Barbara Franchin[edit]

Anthem of East Turkestan[edit]

Crowd dialog europe[edit]

Kennebec Regional Development Authority[edit]

Ashish Seth[edit]

Sikarwar[edit]

Art Stewart (producer)[edit]

Stella Maris Church, Cayman Brac[edit]

Mort Glickman[edit]

1000nen, Zutto Soba ni Ite...[edit]

Trackhat[edit]

The Fourth Dimension (Hypocrisy album)[edit]

Osculum Obscenum[edit]

Penetralia[edit]

10 Years of Chaos and Confusion[edit]

Ray Washburne[edit]

Allard Hall[edit]

List of Nicktoons characters[edit]

Blended artists community bangladesh[edit]

Red Hot Chili Peppers 1998 Tour[edit]