Don't hesitate to comment below if you have any questions or additional phrases
Bayesian
Statistics at the
FDA: The Pioneering
Experience with
Medical Devices Greg Campbell,
Ph.D. Director,
Division of
Biostatistics Center for Devices and Radiological
Health Food and Drug Administration Florida State University Dept. of Statistics
50th Anniv. April 17, 2009
,Outline What are devices?
The nature of medical devices and their regulation
Bayesian statistics in medical device trials
Adaptive trials ,
Center for Drug Eval. &
Research Center for Biologic Eval. & Research Center for Devices & Rad. Health
Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety & Nuitrition
Center for Veterinary Medicine Nat’l Center for Toxicol.
Research
,What are Medical Devices?
Definition by exclusion: any medical item for use in humans that is not a drug nor a biological product
PRK lasers pacemakers defibrillators spinal fixation devices glucometers artificial heartshearing aids latex gloves artificial skinsoftware, etc intraocular lenses
MRI machines breast implants surgical instruments thermometers (drug-coated) stents home kit for
AIDS diagnostic test kits bone densitometers artificial hips
,
What is a Drug-Eluting Stent?
Example:
Cordis’
Cypher™ Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent
Components Stent
Platform &
Delivery System
Carrier(s) Drug ,
Meet Yorick ,Devices Not
Drugs -- The
Differences Different Alphabet SoupIDE -- Investigational
Device ExemptionPMA -- PreMarket Approval510(k) --
Substantial Equivalence---not bioequivalence
A Single Confirmatory
Trial (not 2). A ‘
Sham’
Control Trial may not be possible Masking (blinding) may be impossible for patients, health care professionals, investigators Usually don’t use
Phase I,
IIA,
IIB,
III, IV ,Devices Not Drugs -- The Differences (Cont.)
Bench/
Mechanical Testing not PK/PD
Mechanism of Action often well understood Effect tends to be localized rather than systemic, physical not pharmacokinetic
Pre-clinical
Animal Studies (not for toxicity)
Number & Size of Device Companies About 15,
000 registered firms
Median device company size--under 50 employees (Many are new start-up companies.) Implants (skill dependent; learning curve) ,The
Nature of Medical Device Studies Whereas drugs are discovered, devices evolve; they are constantly being “improved”; life length of a device is 1-2 years.
Rapidly changing technology ,Why Did
CDRH Launch the Bayesian Effort? Devices often have a great deal of prior information.
The mechanism of action is physical (not pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic) and local (not systemic)
Devices usually evolve in small steps whereas drugs are discovered. Computationally feasible due to the gigantic progress in computing hardware and algorithms The possibility of bringing good technology to the market in a timely manner by arriving at the same decision sooner or with less current data was of great appeal to the device industry. ,
Early Decisions We Made Restrict to data-based prior information. A subjective approach is fraught with danger.
Companies need access to good prior information to make it worth their risk. FDA needs to work with the companies to reach an agreement on the validity of any prior information.
Need to bring the industry and FDA review staff up to speed New decision-rules for clinical study success ,Important
Lessons Learned Early Bayesian trials need to be prospectively designed. (It is almost never a good idea to switch from frequentist to Bayesian or vice versa.)
Companies need to meet early and often with CDRH. The prior information needs to be identified in advance as well as be agreed upon and legal. The control group cannot be used a source of prior information for the new device, especially if the objective is to show the new device is non-inferior. ,Important Lessons Learned Early (cont.) Both the label and the Summary of
Safety and Effectiveness (SS&E) of the device need to change.
A successful company gen
- published: 21 Jun 2016
- views: 2