- published: 09 Jan 2013
- views: 1204
Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) is the first and oldest conservative/libertarian public interest law firm in the United States. PLF was established for the purpose of defending and promoting individual and economic freedom in the courts. To that end, PLF attorneys litigate, file amicus curiae briefs, and participate in administrative proceedings with the goal of supporting free enterprise, private property rights, limited & unrestrictive environmental regulation, and the principle of limited government.
PLF is a non-profit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and contributions to the Foundation qualify for a charitable tax deduction. PLF does not charge for legal services, but instead provides representation in cases raising important policy issues that go beyond the narrow interest of the parties before the court.
Incorporated in Sacramento, California, on March 5, 1973, PLF’s staff was originally composed mainly of individuals who had been a part of then-Governor Ronald Reagan’s welfare reform team. Operating on a proposed budget of $117,000 for the first 10 months of operation, PLF attorneys began litigation activities in June 1973 under the direction of Ronald A. Zumbrun, PLF’s first president. Over the four decades of PLF’s existence, its attorneys have obtained favorable decisions from many of the nation’s courts.
A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, instance court, judgment court, apex court, and highest court of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.
However, not all highest courts are named as such. Civil law states do not tend to have singular highest courts. Additionally, the highest court in some jurisdictions is not named the "Supreme Court", for example, the High Court of Australia; this is because decisions by the High Court could formerly be appealed to the Privy Council. On the other hand, in some places the court named the "Supreme Court" is not in fact the highest court; examples include the New York Supreme Court, the Supreme Courts of several Canadian provinces/territories and the former Supreme Court of Judicature of England and Wales, which are all superseded by higher Courts of Appeal.
The Commerce Clause describes an enumerated power listed in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause states that the United States Congress shall have power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes." Courts and commentators have tended to discuss each of these three areas of commerce as a separate power granted to Congress. It is common to see the individual components of the Commerce Clause referred to under specific terms: The Foreign Commerce Clause, the Interstate Commerce Clause, and the Indian Commerce Clause.
Dispute exists within the courts as to the range of powers granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause. As noted below, the clause is often paired with the Necessary and Proper Clause, the combination used to take a broad, expansive perspective of these powers. However, the effect of the Commerce Clause has varied significantly depending on the Supreme Court's interpretation. During the Marshall Court era, Commerce Clause interpretation empowered Congress to gain jurisdiction over numerous aspects of intrastate and interstate commerce as well as non-commerce. During the post-1937 era, the use of the Commerce Clause by Congress to authorize federal control of economic matters became effectively unlimited. Since the latter half of the Rehnquist Court era, Congressional use of the Commerce Clause has become slightly restricted again, being limited only to matters of trade or any other form of restricted area (whether interstate or not) and production (whether commercial or not).
A noun (from Latin nōmen, literally meaning "name") is a word that functions as the name of some specific thing or set of things, such as living creatures, objects, places, actions, qualities, states of existence, or ideas.Linguistically, a noun is a member of a large, open part of speech whose members can occur as the main word in the subject of a clause, the object of a verb, or the object of a preposition.
Lexical categories (parts of speech) are defined in terms of the ways in which their members combine with other kinds of expressions. The syntactic rules for nouns differ from language to language. In English, nouns are those words which can occur with articles and attributive adjectives and can function as the head of a noun phrase.
Word classes (parts of speech) were described by Sanskrit grammarians from at least the 5th century BC. In Yāska's Nirukta, the noun (nāma) is one of the four main categories of words defined.
The Ancient Greek equivalent was ónoma (ὄνομα), referred to by Plato in the Cratylus dialog, and later listed as one of the eight parts of speech in The Art of Grammar, attributed to Dionysius Thrax (2nd century BC). The term used in Latin grammar was nōmen. All of these terms for "noun" were also words meaning "name". The English word noun is derived from the Latin term, through the Anglo-Norman noun.
The Pacific Ocean is the largest of the Earth's oceanic divisions. It extends from the Arctic Ocean in the north to the Southern Ocean (or, depending on definition, to Antarctica) in the south and is bounded by Asia and Australia in the west and the Americas in the east.
At 165.25 million square kilometers (63.8 million square miles) in area, this largest division of the World Ocean—and, in turn, the hydrosphere—covers about 46% of the Earth's water surface and about one-third of its total surface area, making it larger than all of the Earth's land area combined.
The equator subdivides it into the North Pacific Ocean and South Pacific Ocean, with two exceptions: the Galápagos and Gilbert Islands, while straddling the equator, are deemed wholly within the South Pacific. The Mariana Trench in the western North Pacific is the deepest point in the world, reaching a depth of 10,911 metres (35,797 ft).
The eastern Pacific Ocean was first sighted by Europeans in the early 16th century when Spanish explorer Vasco Núñez de Balboa crossed the Isthmus of Panama in 1513 and discovered the great "southern sea" which he named Mar del Sur. The ocean's current name was coined by Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan during the Spanish circumnavigation of the world in 1521, as he encountered favourable winds on reaching the ocean. He called it Mar Pacifico, which in both Portuguese and Spanish means "peaceful sea".
Seeking justice at the Supreme Court
PLF challenges EPA's power grab
Pacific Legal Foundation - 35th Anniversary Video
Pacific Legal Foundation Celebrates Constitution Day
Mr. Tim Sandefur, Pacific Legal Foundation Attorney, Obamacare Re: the Supreme Court Ruling
Michele explains the Pacific Legal Foundation
2016 Pacific Legal Foundation Gala
Pacific Legal Foundation's challenge of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Fighting to keep the Feds from regulating deserts under the Clean Water Act
Is There Still a Legal Case Against Obamacare? Q&A; w Pacific Legal Fdtn's Timothy Sandefur
Seeking to preserve his father's legacy, and the rights of property owners like him, Coy Koontz Jr. goes to the United States Supreme Court with Pacific Legal Foundation's help, to challenge the St. Johns River Water Management District. The U.S. Supreme Court issued a favorable decision on Jun. 25, 2013, holding that the government's demand for property from a land use permit must satisfy the Nolan and Dolan requirements even when it denies the permit.
Pacific Legal Foundation is representing Wyoming rancher Andy Johnson in challenging an EPA compliance order threatening him with $37,500 per day in fines for constructing a stock pond on his property. PLF’s lawsuit, Andy Johnson v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, argues that Johnson’s pond is expressly exempt from the Clean Water Act, and that the stream in which he constructed the pond is not a jurisdictional water because it does not affect a navigable water. EPA’s threats in this case are particularly indefensible. According to a former Corps of Engineers enforcement officer, the pond has many environmental benefits, including fish and wildlife habitat and enhanced water quality.
PLF Principal Attorney Timothy Sandefur, author of the Conscience of the Constitution, notes the significance of the 227th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 17, 1787. Tim salutes PLF donors who make it possible for the foundation’s legal team to fight every day in the nation’s courts to keep the constitutional promise of the 39 delegates who signed the historic document.
Mr. Tim Sandefur, Pacific Legal Foundation Attorney. Mr. Tim Sanderfur is a legal expert on the Supreme Court ruling related to Obamacare. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate and other provisions of the Affordable Care Act, declaring that the mandate is permissible as a form of taxation. However, a majority of the court also specifically recognized that the mandate violates the Constitution's Commerce Clause — a holding that is consistent with arguments submitted by Pacific Legal Foundation, along with other constitutionally based critics of the law. PLF has been the nation's most active public interest organization in litigation over the health care law, filing briefs in cases in Arizona, Florida, Virginia, Michigan, and Washington, D.C., as well as at the U.S. Supreme...
Michele Petty, candidate for Texas Supreme Court, discusses the Pacific Legal Foundation and its impact on Texas beaches.
The 2016 Pacific Legal Foundation Gala at The Olympic Club in San Francisco, California featured several of PLF's clients including Donna Murr, La'Shieka White and Kevin Pierce. The Foundation of Freedom award winners were Pete and Paula Uccelli of Redwood City, California. The evening ends with an introduction by Steven Anderson PLF's new president and CEO
Today the Federal government sets rules on everything from the thickness of ketchup in fast food packages to the design of furniture in your office building. We file our amicus briefs as a way of speaking to the courts on behalf of people who otherwise would have no opportunity to have their voice heard in the most important constitutional case to come along in well over a generation. http://www.pacificlegal.org/healthcare
Pacific Legal Foundation attorney Jennifer Fry visits with Peter and Frankie Smith to discuss their lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. PLF took on the Smith's fight after the Corps designated a dry creek bed or "arroyo" on their property a "water of the United States" subject to federal control. The Smiths caught the Corps' attention when they began to clean up the arroyo by removing dead trees and trash which the prior owner had dumped there. As a result of the Corps' actions, the Smiths cannot continue their maintenance efforts without fear of being prosecuted as "knowing violators" under the Clean Water Act. In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an expansive definition of "waters of the United States." Nonetheless, the Corps continues to flaunt the law by assertin...
"I see what we do as part of an overall movement that has to convince people to find ways to open up consumer power, to open up free markets, and to remedy our medical system in a free-market direction," says Timothy Sandefur of the Pacific Legal Foundation, a Sacramento-based public-interest law firm. PLF brought several challenges against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare) and successfully beat the federal EPA in last year's landmark Supreme Court case, Sackett v. EPA. Reason's Nick Gillespie sat down with Sandefur at Freedom Fest to discuss the constitutional challenges still facing Obamacare and PLF's fight against ridiculous licensing laws. Held each July in Las Vegas, Freedom Fest is attended by around 2,000 limited-government enthusiasts and liberta...
Liberty has a brand new home on the campus of Chapman University in Southern California. PLF has teamed up with the Dale E. Fowler School of Law at Chapman University to train the next generation of lawyers to defend the Constitution.
Pacific Legal Foundation is pleased to announce that our Director of Litigation, Jim Burling, will participate in the Eighth Annual Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference, sponsored by William & Mary Law School, to be held in Beijing, China, October 14-15, 2011.
03/21/2012 Mike and Chantell Sackett and Pacific Legal Foundation's Damien Schiff on the victory in their lawsuit against the EPA. This isn't just about compliance orders, it's smuch more sinister. This is Agenda 21 in action, the total elimination of private property. Socialism/Communism in action. This is an enormous win for freedom. http://LeakSource.wordpress.com
The Things Dr Bright is Not Allowed to Do at the Foundation in its entirety! Read Along with me!: http://www.scp-wiki.net/the-things-dr-bright-is-not-allowed-to-do-at-the-foundation If you loved this reading, check out my reading of the Things Mr. Welch is not allowed to do in a RPG series! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nr7XXVh2Wbg Check out my SCP Playlists! Season 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H0xFp1HRmSQ&list;=PLWbMmdyBjyTxAdPDhu-K3KbOuG-cebCvL Season 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUMD8Jlhk5k&list;=PLWbMmdyBjyTwtSTBO1AuXI0O_BoU1NH-j "Pixel Peeker Polka - slower" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Troy Castillo, a retired police detective, is challenging an anti-competitive law in Nevada that requires licensed private investigators to keep an office in the state. Troy argues that the law harms both consumers and entrepreneurs. It keeps qualified private eyes out of Nevada and forces consumers to pay higher prices for sub-par services.
White House Press Briefings are conducted most weekdays from the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room in the West Wing.
Representing the First Free Will Baptist Church of Bakersfield, Pacific Legal Foundation is opposing the “validation” of the California High Speed Rail bonds, because officials aren’t providing the public with required information about the process and the project.
Watch JUSTIN TRUDEAU before he became Prime Minister of Canada. The debate begins at 0:15:00 The post-show analysis begins at 1:51:13 Federal party leaders Stephen Harper, Thomas Mulcair and Justin Trudeau faced off in The Globe and Mail Leaders' Debate 2015 on Thursday, Sept. 17. The debate was hosted in Calgary by Editor-in-Chief David Walmsley. #GlobeDebate
John from http://www.okraw.com/ shares with you why he is not 100% vegan or 100% raw. You will also learn if anyone is really 100% vegan.. This information will be shocking as it is a reason that many people do not consider. In this episode, John talks with his 25 year vegan friend, JD Mumma, who is a vegan advocate about if anyone is really vegan? This episode will shed some light on John's views about being vegan, doing the least harm, living with compassion and empathy and saving the planet. During this video you will learn how to think independently instead of the "herd" mentality. You will also discover the differences between divergent and convergent thinking and which kind would best serve you as a plant based eater to promote the vegan lifestyle. You will also learn some ...
President Robin L. Rivett from the Pacific Legal Foundation introduces the "ESA at 40" week
Taxpayer Alert #4 With Guest Richard Fields Pacific Legal Foundation
Tax Payer Alert #134 with Host Al Segalla and Guest Jonathan Wood, Pacific Legal Foundation
Michele Petty, candidate for Texas Supreme Court, discusses the Pacific Legal Foundation and its impact on Texas beaches.
PLF attorney Anastasia Boden remarks on some abandoned parts of the Constitution, and what Pacific Legal Foundation is doing to restore them.
Pacific Legal Foundation Rob Rivett discusses his thoughts about the presidential election and the important role that Pacific Legal Foundation will play in the upcoming year.
Lockwood talks to David Breemer of the Pacific Legal Foundation about a property dispute in Emerald Isle on it's way to the State Supreme Court. - "Beach lawsuit heads to supremes" http://www.carolinacoastonline.com/tideland_news/news/article_7838b04e-bf81-11e5-ab7a-031532ce56c4.html
Anastasia Boden, attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation speaks on private property rights and economic liberty to the NorCal Tea Party on Thursday, August 20th 2015 at the Ridge Golf Course in Auburn, CA.
Tim Sandefur (Pacific Legal Foundation), Ben Domenech (The Federalist), Dagen McDowell (Fox Business) and Matt Welch (Reason Magazine) join John to discuss some of the troubling positions held by Donald Trump. http://www.LibertyPen.com
The 2016 Pacific Legal Foundation Gala at The Olympic Club in San Francisco, California featured several of PLF's clients including Donna Murr, La'Shieka White and Kevin Pierce. The Foundation of Freedom award winners were Pete and Paula Uccelli of Redwood City, California. The evening ends with an introduction by Steven Anderson PLF's new president and CEO
Host Keli'i Akina speaks with Robert Thomas (Managing Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation) about the importance of property rights and its relationship to individual liberty.
Paul Beard of Pacific Legal Foundation schools on challenging Obamacare and big SCOTUS property rights win. Attorney Paul J. Beard II of Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) presented the latest on their Constitutional challenge to Obamacare (he is the lead attorney), based upon its illegal passage; and also the firm's big U.S. Supreme Court win on private property rights via the Koontz v. St. Johns River Management District ruling. A resounding victory for property owners, Koontz severely restricts agencies' ability to impose fees, monetary exactions, and other financial obligations on landowners who seek permits to develop their properties. He is traveling widely to build support for PLF and educate people on the new tools to protect property rights. This Citizensjournal.us-sponsored event at ...
This video features a recording from Dawn Bennett's Financial Myth Busting radio show from April 19, 2015. On this episode Dawn J. Bennett interviews Jonathan Hoenig, founding member of the Capitalist Pig hedge fund & regular contributor on Fox News, on how investors should view Rand Paul's entry into the 2016 campaign; also, how can American's responsibly rebel against Tax Day? Dawn also interviews Tony François, senior staff attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, on why California would currently have plenty of water if it weren't for busybody bureaucrats from Washington. http://www.financialmythbusting.com/
Brian Hodges, an attorney with The Pacific Legal Foundation describes recent Supreme Court decisions which now help to protect previously defenseless property owners from coercive acts of blatant and extreme extortion perpetrated against them by their friendly local government bureaucrats.
Which is the Constitution's primary value: liberty or democracy? Is it enough to tell lawmakers to just "go back to the Constitution" when Constitutional interpretation varies so wildly? What does the Constitution have to say about slavery? Individual rights? Voting rights? Timothy Sandefur is the author of the 2014 book The Conscience of the Constitution: The Declaration of Independence and the Right to Liberty. Sandefur is a principal attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, and heads the Foundation's Economic Liberty Project, which protects entrepreneurs against intrusive government regulation. Download the .mp3: http://bit.ly/1kff9pp Subscribe in iTunes: http://bitly.com/18wswtX
Tim Sandefur, Senior Staff Attorney at Pacific Legal Foundation and head of their Economic Liberty Project, spoke about the effects of Kelo V. New London on eminent domain and the property rights. Filmed on May 28, 2008 at the Dole Institute of Politics.
Third Annual Executive Branch Review Conference http://www.fed-soc.org/ebrconference After delegating significant power to the administrative state, is Congress properly discharging its oversight role? Are there tools available to Congress that are underutilized? Would a proper annual budget process help? Are Congress’ oversight hearings meaningful, well-run, and properly focused? Should Congress be requesting more information from agencies through other avenues? Congressional Oversight 2:00 -- 3:30 p.m. --Prof. Jonathan H. Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law --Mr. Michael D. Bopp, Gibson Dunn and Crutcher --Prof. Sally Katzen, New York University School of Law --Mr. Adam J. White, Boyden Gray & Associates --Moderator: Hon. Todd F. Gaziano, Pacific Legal Foundation ...
Policy Orientation 2016 Friday, January 8 • 9:30-10:45 a.m. During a recent congressional hearing, Chairman Lamar Smith challenged EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy to justify her comments that the Clean Power Plan was “enormously beneficial” when it would only avert one one-hundredth of a degree of global warming and cost hundreds of billions of dollars to implement. These kinds of policies raise the question: What benefit should environmental regulations accomplish in order to justify their cost? This panel will discuss ongoing efforts in opposition to the Clean Power Plan, as well as the type and substance of benefits that should result from a proposed environmental regulation. Featuring Theodore Hadzi-Antich, Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation Cyrus Reed, Conservation Director, ...