Vatican Control Though Civil Law

• Report rights infringement
• published: 16 Jan 2007
• views: 8217

The Concordat between the Vatican and the Nazis - (Photo on http://www.nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm ) Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII) signs the Concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican at a formal ceremony in Rome on 20 July 1933. Nazi Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen sits at the left, Pacelli in the middle, and the Rudolf Buttmann sits at the right. The Concordat effectively legitimized Hitler and the Nazi government to the eyes of Catholicism, Christianity, and the world. http://www.nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm Questions for Catholics are: What was the first message preached by Peter that resulted in the conversion of 3000 orthodox Jews in Acts 2 and another 5000 in Acts 4? If the Eucharest teaching was introduced in Acts why weren't the Apostles charged by the rulers for breaking an OT law and what were they charged with? (Leviticus 7:27 Whatsoever soul it be that eateth any manner of blood, even that soul shall be cut off from his people. Leviticus 17:10,11 And whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, that eateth any manner of blood; I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood, and will cut him off from among his people. For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. Leviticus 17:14 For it is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life thereof: therefore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh: for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut off.) What were the apostles arrested for? Since many left Jesus in John 6:66 because of John 6:54, why wasn't there a similar occurrance in Acts 2 and Acts 4 and the rest of the book of Acts? These were instructions given to the converted Gentiles. Why wasn't the Euchariest doctrine included in them? Acts 15:20,29 But that we write unto them [converted Gentiles], that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood. That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well. sacraments Catholic Relief Services Catholic Charities apostolic succession Eucharist Catholic Mass Nicene-Creed liturgy ecumenical councils Filioque Irenaeus Polycarp Catechism of the Catholic Church Sacred-Tradition Magisterium Baptism Confirmation Eucharist Penance Anointing-of-the-Sick Holy Orders Holy Matrimony Apostles' Creed papal infallibility filioque clause immaculate-conception priesthood seven deadly sins Baptism absolution seal of confession excommunication Penance Confirmation apostolic constitution Purgatory Liturgy of the Hours Mass of Paul VI Liturgy of the Word transubstantiation homily Indult Council of Trent Summorum-Pontificum motu-proprio Ecclesia-Dei Advent Lent Ordinary-Time canon-law breviary Stations of the Cross Mother of God College of Cardinals Vatican Vatican City Roman Curia hierarchy bishops priests deacons patriarchs primates archbishops College of Bishops metropolitans Communion and Liberation, Neocatechumenal Way, Regnum Christi, Focolare Movement Charismatic movement Traditionalists Opus Dei Life Teen divorce annulments monks nuns cloistered friars Rule of St Benedict Sisters of Charity Marist Brothers Carmelites Cistercians