Therefore, please provide:
1) Nihil-dicit default judgment signed by the
Federal Judge that I owe $5000 for
2013 1040EZ and 1040X
Returns submitted – if such an
Official declaration exists under 15USC, 1692g
Validation of Debts.
2) An Official VERIFIED ASSESSMENT from Internal
Revenue for the $5000 2013
Frivolous Allegation - if such document exists.
3) Specific reasons for
Carl W. Ochs accusing Frivolous Filing of 2013 1040X
Return or 1040EZ Return – Officially Signed per IRC26, 6065 if the Return is Officially Filed by an Official
Office as such send undersigned a copy of said filing including IR and
IRS escalation procedures – all signed copies of documents in 2013 record, like such higher level processing by said Internal Revenue -
Department of treasury bureau (assesses bills under 26USC) -, and registered for-profit IRS corporation (collects the bills under 15USC).
4) Provide the reason undersigned ordered the “Wage and Income
Transcript” for 2013, 2014and
2015 three times from IRS Employees –
Woman with ID: 1000173278 and
Ronald F. Dierfield,
Operations Manager Input Correction, and never received them.
5)
Authority of Carl W. Ochs to determine 2013 Frivolous without violating 26CFR, 7433(a), as well as any names of
High Authority Public Offices that SIGNED AND AUTHORIZED the Frivolous Filing; including but not limited to Managers, Supervisors,
Officers, Directors, Commissioners, any
Inspector Generals, Tax
Advocate,
TIGTA, the
Department of the Treasury,
Comptroller of the Currency,
Federal Reserve Bank Official, or any other Official Office working as
Trade or
Business.
Undersigned stands by De Jure, and not
De Facto Law. It is disclosed by
Supreme Court Rulings and even IR and IRS have stated that the following is not the Law and “should not be relied upon” as such:
IRS or IR
Judge Bulletins, Publications, Manuals, Forms, etc.
Official Ochs’s silence stands as consent, and tacit approval, for the declarations of facts and conclusions here being established as fact, as a matter of Law and this affidavit absent timely rebuttal, will stand as final judgment in this matter.
This is FINAL NOTICE to
Agent and Principle; If Frivolous Filing Fee is not reduced to zero balance owed, and 2013 1040X is not processed for a full refund of $8876.05, then
Legal Proceedings will commence to file against Carl W. Ochs.
26CFR, 7433
Reckless Intentional
Negligence Disregarding Provisions of the
IRC.
3)
File Employee Complaint against Carl W. Ochs with the
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue and the Comptroller of the Currency for violating several requirements of 15USC: 1692g (a) Validation of Debts (1) amount of debt, (2)
Name of Creditor, (3)
30 days to dispute the validity of the debt, (4) Verification of the
Debt or a copy of
Judgment.
4)
File Official Employee Complaint against Carl W. Ochs with the Internal Revenue Commissioner RE USC15, 1692j
Furnishing Certain Deceptive Forms – Frivolous
Threat Letter LTR 3176C.
5) File Civil Liability Lawsuit against Carl W. Ochs under 15USC, 1692k Civil Liability – Intentional Non-Compliance of the
Debt Collector and failure to comply with provisions - 15USC, 1692j (b). Further: 28
U.S. Code § 2679 and
the Federal Tort Claims Act: 28USC, 2679 – Exclusiveness of remedy (b)(1) “
The remedy against the
United States Employee provided by sections 1346(b) and 2672 of this title for…loss of
Property resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the
Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment
...”.
Failure to reply within thirty days refuting the information from undersigned establishes you are in agreement with the foregoing and are thusly legally estopped pursuant to: Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932,
1906, silence activates estoppel.
NOTICE to Agent is NOTICE to Principle; NOTICE to Principle is NOTICE to Agent.
All rights reserved. Government SS # and forced De Facto
Federal Benefits issued to minor child without full disclosure; undersigned under extreme duress, and refuses all SS Admin benefits that are being forcefully deducted and withheld from non-“wage” remuneration “for service not in the course of the employer’s trade or business” – USC26,
3401(4) and (11).
- published: 17 Apr 2016
- views: 0