Multicultural democracy societies (MDS), like the USA, consist of peoples of different religions, languages, cultures, races, and nationalities. One of these groups dominates the others by naked military and police power. Nations, on the other hand, are dominated by one group that makes up a strong majority of the population. Nations are inherently stable while MDS are always inherently unstable. Nations are naturally stable because a majority of the people mutually recognize each other as co-nationals. MDS countries never achieve true internal stability. They survive only by military and police suppression and break up the minute the dominant group loses the power to shackle the empire together. To understand the future, study the past. Throughout world history, all multi-ethnic democracies have broken up, and almost always in cataclysmic violence. Therefore, the question is not if the multi-ethnic American Empire will shatter, but when and under what circumstances. In the past, we didn't make any special accomodations for immigrants. They came mostly to New York, and figured out right away, that the only way to make it here was to become Americans. I particularly liked the "Latinos for Trump" sign. Despite what the lame news media claims, most immigrants who went through the LEGAL system to obtain work permits, residence cards and citizenship DO not support illegal immigration. My wife spent 13 years navigating the bureaucratic and expensive immigration system to obtain her citizenship. She opposes illegal immigration strongly, as do most Americans. Illegal immigrants lower wages for immigrants with legal work permits. Illegal immigrants are paid in cash and pay no taxes. And illegal immigrants compete for entry level jobs withAmerican citizens and reduce wages in these jobs. In any event, the illegal alien working in the US is probably receving something less than the minimum wage, and he's probably getting paid in cash in many cases. So he doesn't ever pay a lot of sales tax. Not that he would pay much income tax, either, but he wouldn't file an income tax return with his real identification anyway. Regardless, my point is that if we simply get rid of 11 million people who buy good and services in this country, there will be a recession. And it will be that much harder to get ourselves out of it because we will have a dearth of workers and consumers compared to the most recent recession. If we adhere to the law as it presently stands, and deport people who have come here illegally, we will preserve the rule of law. That's important, in and of itself, because that was the law that was put in place by Congress, which represents the people, before Mr Obama became President. The President is required by our Constitution (which is the only protection us little people have) to faithfully execute and carry out the laws that are on the books when he takes office. He does not get to decide which laws he will and will not execute and carry out. Only dictators do that. Even if 11 million are deported, the demand for the work they were doing will remain. Others will be hired to do that work, albeit, at a higher wage. The effect, for those jobs, will be to have raised the minimum wage. That might increase the cost of grapes or cucumbers at my local grocery store, but I would much rather have The Rule of Law than cheap food. We are seeing this problem now, even without mass deportations. Due to the lack of northerly migration over the last 10 years, farmers cannot get people to work in their fields because people simply do not want to do that kind of work. If it were a matter of paying them more to do the work and charging consumers more, I agree the problem would fix itself.

• published: 30 Apr 2016
• views: 4