- published: 26 Feb 2016
- views: 58983
Belief is the state of mind in which a person thinks something to be the case, with or without there being empirical evidence to prove that something is the case with factual certainty. In other words, belief is when someone thinks something is reality, true, when they have no absolute verified foundation for their certainty of the truth or realness of something. Another way of defining belief is, it is a mental representation of an attitude positively orientated towards the likelihood of something being true. In the context of Ancient Greek thought, two related concepts were identified with regards to the concept of belief: pistis and doxa. Simplified, we may say that pistis refers to trust and confidence, while doxa refers to opinion and acceptance. The English word doctrine is derived from doxa. Belief's purpose is to guide action and not to indicate truth.
In epistemology, philosophers use the term ‘belief’ to refer to personal attitudes associated with true or false ideas and concepts. However, ‘belief’ does not require active introspection and circumspection. For example, we never ponder whether or not the sun will rise. We simply assume the sun will rise. Since ‘belief’ is an important aspect of mundane life, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the question that must be answered is, “how a physical organism can have beliefs” (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/).
True may refer to:
The Gettier problem is a philosophical question about whether a piece of information that happens to be true but that someone believes for invalid reasons, such as a faulty premise, counts as knowledge. It is named after American philosopher Edmund Gettier, who wrote about the problem in a three-page paper published in 1963, called "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?". The paper refers to the concept of knowledge as justified true belief (JTB), credited to Plato, though Plato argued against this very account of knowledge in the Theaetetus (210a). In the paper, Gettier proposed two scenarios where the three criteria (justification, truth, and belief) seemed to be met, but where the majority of readers would not have felt that the result was knowledge due to the element of luck involved.
The term is sometimes used to cover any one of a category of thought experiments in contemporary epistemology that seem to repudiate a definition of knowledge as justified true belief.
The responses to Gettier's paper have been numerous. While some rejected Gettier's examples, many sought to adjust the JTB account of knowledge to lessen the impact of both Gettier's own problems and other problems (collectively titled "Gettier problems") created in their mould. Since 1963, experiments have also been conducted to determine whether the instinctive reactions of those presented with a Gettier problem are uniform or display language or genetic biases.
Edmund L. Gettier III (born October 31, 1927 in Baltimore, Maryland) is an American philosopher and Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He is best known for his short 1963 paper, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?," which generated an enormous philosophical literature trying to respond to what became known as the Gettier problem.
Gettier was educated at Cornell University, where his mentors included Max Black and Norman Malcolm. Gettier, himself, was originally attracted to the views of the later Ludwig Wittgenstein. His first teaching job was at Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan, where his colleagues included Keith Lehrer, R. C. Sleigh, and Alvin Plantinga. Because he was short on publications, his colleagues urged him to write up any ideas he had just to satisfy the administration. The result was a three-page paper that remains one of the most famous in recent philosophical history. According to anecdotal comments that Plantinga has given in lectures, Gettier was originally so unenthusiastic about the paper that he wrote it, had someone translate it into Spanish, and published in a South American journal. The paper was later published in the United States. Gettier has since published nothing, but he has invented and taught to his graduate students new methods for finding and illustrating countermodels in modal logic, as well as simplified semantics for various modal logics.
Crash Course (also known as Driving Academy) is a 1988 made for television teen film directed by Oz Scott.
Crash Course centers on a group of high schoolers in a driver’s education class; many for the second or third time. The recently divorced teacher, super-passive Larry Pearl, is on thin ice with the football fanatic principal, Principal Paulson, who is being pressured by the district superintendent to raise driver’s education completion rates or lose his coveted football program. With this in mind, Principal Paulson and his assistant, with a secret desire for his job, Abner Frasier, hire an outside driver’s education instructor with a very tough reputation, Edna Savage, aka E.W. Savage, who quickly takes control of the class.
The plot focuses mostly on the students and their interactions with their teachers and each other. In the beginning, Rico is the loner with just a few friends, Chadley is the bookish nerd with few friends who longs to be cool and also longs to be a part of Vanessa’s life who is the young, friendly and attractive girl who had to fake her mother’s signature on her driver’s education permission slip. Kichi is the hip-hop Asian kid who often raps what he has to say and constantly flirts with Maria, the rich foreign girl who thinks that the right-of-way on the roadways always goes to (insert awesomely fake foreign Latino accent) “my father’s limo”. Finally you have stereotypical football meathead J.J., who needs to pass his English exam to keep his eligibility and constantly asks out and gets rejected by Alice, the tomboy whose father owns “Santini & Son” Concrete Company. Alice is portrayed as being the “son” her father wanted.
PHILOSOPHY - Epistemology: Analyzing Knowledge #1 (The Gettier Problem) [HD]
An Introduction to Edmund Gettier's Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?- A Macat Philosophy Analysis
The Meaning of Knowledge: Crash Course Philosophy #7
Justified True Belief and Knowledge
Epistemology | Lecture 2 - Analysis of Justified True Belief and Gettier Problems
The Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier - Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Today In Hearthstone Ep. 655 Justified True Belief
Intro to Epistemology #2a: The Gettier Problem
5.3 Gettier and Other Complications
Is knowledge the same as justified true belief? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) discusses a Gettier case, a scenario in which someone has justified true belief but not knowledge. We’ll look at a Gettier case from Edmund Gettier’s famous 1963 paper on this topic, and a structurally similar case from 8th century Classical Indian philosophy. Subscribe! http://bit.ly/1vz5fK9 More on Jennifer Nagel: http://bit.ly/1PLgDZZ ---- Wi-Phi @ YouTube: http://bit.ly/1PX0hLu Wi-Phi @ Khan Academy: http://bit.ly/1nQJcF7 Twitter: https://twitter.com/wirelessphi Facebook: http://on.fb.me/1XC2tx3 Instagram: @wiphiofficial ---- Help us caption & translate this video! http://amara.org/v/HvQ0/
How do we define knowledge? And how was a definition of knowledge that had lasted for 2000 years successfully challenged? Watch Macat's short video for a great introduction to Edmund Gettier's Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Is one of the most important philosophy papers ever written. Subscribe for weekly videos that are your guide to the world's greatest ideas. Macat's Analyses are definitive studies of the most important books and papers in 14 humanities and social sciences subjects. A powerful resource for students, teachers and lifelong learners everywhere, our analyses do much more than just summarize seminal texts. Using Macat’s videos, audiobooks, and mind maps you can explore and apply the world’s greatest ideas everyday. Proven by the University of Cambridge to improve crit...
On today’s episode...CATS. Also: Hank talks about some philosophy stuff, like a few of the key concepts philosophers use when discussing belief and knowledge, such as what defines an assertion and a proposition, and that belief is a kind of propositional attitude. Hank also discusses forms of justification and the traditional definition of knowledge, which Edmund Gettier just totally messed with, using his Gettier cases. Many thanks to Index the cat for his patience in the filming of this episode. -- PBS Digital Studios wants to get to know you better! If you have 10 minutes, we'd really appreciate it AND you'll be entered for a chance to win a t-shirt! https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/pbsds2016 -- Images and video via VideoBlocks or Wikimedia Commons, licensed under Creative Commons by...
A brief description of the Gettier Problem (the claim that justified true belief is insufficient for knowledge) and one of the thought experiments involved.
Three cases to motivate the question and Gettier's conclusion.
25% off packs on amazon: http://amzn.to/2ia0hhU (sponsored) support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/todayinhearthstone Today In Hearthstone a series about the highlights that happened on all the Hearthstone Streams in the last 24 hours. I will try to get all the funny and lucky moments to compile them all in one video to keep you updated what happened today. All Today In Hearthstone Episodes in one playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKKt02GGwwGHNJLNA06xvXcrJsQSWWA6u In this Episode these players got (un-)lucky (in order of appearance): www.twitch.tv/bmkibler www.twitch.tv/disguisedtoast www.twitch.tv/thijshs www.twitch.tv/disguisedtoast www.twitch.tv/savjz www.twitch.tv/asmodaitv You are a hearthstone player yourself and got extremely lucky or got screwed up by r...
This video presents and explains several versions of the Gettier problem. Furthermore, it explains the failure of one popular response (the "no false belief/grounds" response) to solve the problem. Other responses and their shortcomings are covered in the sequel to this video. Enjoy.
A series of lectures delivered by Peter Millican to first-year philosophy students at the University of Oxford. The lectures comprise the 8-week General Philosophy course and were delivered in late 2009.
Is knowledge the same as justified true belief? In this Wireless Philosophy video, Jennifer Nagel (University of Toronto) discusses a Gettier case, a scenario in which someone has justified true belief but not knowledge. We’ll look at a Gettier case from Edmund Gettier’s famous 1963 paper on this topic, and a structurally similar case from 8th century Classical Indian philosophy. Subscribe! http://bit.ly/1vz5fK9 More on Jennifer Nagel: http://bit.ly/1PLgDZZ ---- Wi-Phi @ YouTube: http://bit.ly/1PX0hLu Wi-Phi @ Khan Academy: http://bit.ly/1nQJcF7 Twitter: https://twitter.com/wirelessphi Facebook: http://on.fb.me/1XC2tx3 Instagram: @wiphiofficial ---- Help us caption & translate this video! http://amara.org/v/HvQ0/
How do we define knowledge? And how was a definition of knowledge that had lasted for 2000 years successfully challenged? Watch Macat's short video for a great introduction to Edmund Gettier's Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Is one of the most important philosophy papers ever written. Subscribe for weekly videos that are your guide to the world's greatest ideas. Macat's Analyses are definitive studies of the most important books and papers in 14 humanities and social sciences subjects. A powerful resource for students, teachers and lifelong learners everywhere, our analyses do much more than just summarize seminal texts. Using Macat’s videos, audiobooks, and mind maps you can explore and apply the world’s greatest ideas everyday. Proven by the University of Cambridge to improve crit...
On today’s episode...CATS. Also: Hank talks about some philosophy stuff, like a few of the key concepts philosophers use when discussing belief and knowledge, such as what defines an assertion and a proposition, and that belief is a kind of propositional attitude. Hank also discusses forms of justification and the traditional definition of knowledge, which Edmund Gettier just totally messed with, using his Gettier cases. Many thanks to Index the cat for his patience in the filming of this episode. -- PBS Digital Studios wants to get to know you better! If you have 10 minutes, we'd really appreciate it AND you'll be entered for a chance to win a t-shirt! https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/pbsds2016 -- Images and video via VideoBlocks or Wikimedia Commons, licensed under Creative Commons by...
A brief description of the Gettier Problem (the claim that justified true belief is insufficient for knowledge) and one of the thought experiments involved.
Three cases to motivate the question and Gettier's conclusion.
25% off packs on amazon: http://amzn.to/2ia0hhU (sponsored) support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/todayinhearthstone Today In Hearthstone a series about the highlights that happened on all the Hearthstone Streams in the last 24 hours. I will try to get all the funny and lucky moments to compile them all in one video to keep you updated what happened today. All Today In Hearthstone Episodes in one playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLKKt02GGwwGHNJLNA06xvXcrJsQSWWA6u In this Episode these players got (un-)lucky (in order of appearance): www.twitch.tv/bmkibler www.twitch.tv/disguisedtoast www.twitch.tv/thijshs www.twitch.tv/disguisedtoast www.twitch.tv/savjz www.twitch.tv/asmodaitv You are a hearthstone player yourself and got extremely lucky or got screwed up by r...
This video presents and explains several versions of the Gettier problem. Furthermore, it explains the failure of one popular response (the "no false belief/grounds" response) to solve the problem. Other responses and their shortcomings are covered in the sequel to this video. Enjoy.
A series of lectures delivered by Peter Millican to first-year philosophy students at the University of Oxford. The lectures comprise the 8-week General Philosophy course and were delivered in late 2009.
Video recordings of Prof. Howard Sankey's PHIL30016 Knowledge and Reality class at UWA. Textbook - Noah Lemos, An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge.
Here I analyze the (bad) idea that knowledge is justified true belief.
Youtube disabled the audio. Go to vimeo.com/henrymoskowitz/jtb for a far superior video streaming service.
This video gives an overview of epistemology and a detailed exposition of knowledge as justified, true belief. Various theories of truth, especially the correspondence theory, are also covered in detail as well as the topic of justification as a normative concept.
This is my favourite Neville Goddard lecture on imagination and manifesting. Neville gives one example after another from his readers. Amazing examples!
This is a discussion of about, like three sentences of the Theaetetus. It demonstrates how philosophy works.
http://www.veritas.org/talks - Two professors engage in a conversation about how beliefs are formed. Full library available AD FREE at http://www.veritas.org/talks. Over the past two decades, The Veritas Forum has been hosting vibrant discussions on life's hardest questions and engaging the world's leading colleges and universities with Christian perspectives and the relevance of Jesus. Learn more at http://www.veritas.org, with upcoming events and over 600 pieces of media on topics including science, philosophy, music, business, medicine, and more!
A lecture on James' lecture.
Bertrand Russell on Belief and Ontology, Philosophy of Logical Atomism, Lectures 4 and 8, The Analytic Tradition, Spring 2017
Wretched will, host of pleasure surreal
Closed the room where the last is buried
Rise or fall at your master's request
You're unable to accept redemption
I don't know about a true belief here
With the "lost" it's the same as always
All I want is the same, a true belief
You can't wait to become a memory
With the "weak" it's the same as always
Stand confused lack of comprehension,
Re-aroused by a thought of madness
And I know that the truth is always right
But it's time to search for lies
You're the one I try to save
But the blood spills from your veins
Call counting time till the end
Death's wicked smile never fails
The curse is cast, you've lost the past
Forevermore, a candle burns here no more
I don't know about a century of life
When the love of generations die
I can see no good in taking your own life
When any moment death calls...