Aratus was a
Greek didactic poet. His major extant work is his hexameter poem
Phaenomena , the first half of which is a verse setting of a lost work of the same name by
Eudoxus of Cnidus. It describes the constellations and other celestial phenomena. The second half is called the Diosemeia , and is chiefly about weather lore. Although Aratus was somewhat ignorant of
Greek astronomy, his poem was very popular in the Greek and
Roman world, as is proved by the large number of commentaries and
Latin translations, some of which survive.
Life
There are several accounts of his life by anonymous Greek writers, and the Suda and
Eudocia also mention him. From these it appears that he was a native of
Soli in
Cilicia, (although one authority says
Tarsus). He is known to have studied with
Menecrates in
Ephesus and
Philitas in Cos. As a disciple of the Peripatetic philosopher
Praxiphanes, in
Athens, he met the
Stoic philosopher
Zeno, as well as
Callimachus of
Cyrene and
Menedemus, the founder of the
Eretrian school.
About 276 BC he was invited to the court of the
Macedonian king
Antigonus II Gonatas, whose victory over the Gauls in 277 BC Aratus set to verse. Here he wrote his most famous poem, Phaenomena ("
Appearances"). He then spent some time at the court of
Antiochus I Soter of
Syria, but subsequently returned to
Pella in
Macedon, where he died sometime before 240/239 BC. His chief pursuits were medicine (which is also said to have been his profession), grammar, and philosophy.
Writings
Several poetical works on various subjects, as well as a number of prose epistles, are attributed to Aratus, but none of them have come down to us, except his two astronomical poems in hexameter. These have generally been joined together as if parts of the same work; but they seem to be distinct poems, the first, called Phaenomena ("Appearances"), consists of 732 verses; the second, Diosemeia ("On
Weather Signs"), of 422 verses.
Phaenomena
The Phaenomena appears to be based on two prose works—Phaenomena and Enoptron —by Eudoxus of Cnidus, written about a century earlier.
We are told by the biographers of Aratus that it was the desire of
Antigonus to have them turned into verse, which gave rise to the Phaenomena of Aratus; and it appears from the fragments of them preserved by
Hipparchus, that Aratus has in fact versified, or closely imitated parts of them both, but especially of the first.
The purpose of the Phaenomena is to give an introduction to the constellations, with the rules for their risings and settings; and of the circles of the sphere, amongst which the
Milky Way is reckoned. The positions of the constellations, north of the ecliptic, are described by reference to the principal groups surrounding the north pole (
Ursa Major,
Ursa Minor,
Draco, and Cepheus), whilst
Orion serves as a
point of departure for those to the south. The immobility of the earth, and the revolution of the sky about a fixed axis are maintained; the path of the sun in the zodiac is described; but the planets are introduced merely as bodies having a motion of their own, without any attempt to define their periods; nor is anything said about the moon's orbit. The opening of the poem asserts the dependence of all things upon
Zeus. From the lack of precision in the descriptions, it would seem that Aratus was neither a mathematician nor observer[4] or, at any rate, that in this work he did not aim at scientific accuracy. He not only represents the configurations of particular groups incorrectly, but describes some phenomena which are inconsistent with any one supposed latitude of the spectator, and others which could not coexist at any one epoch. These errors are partly to be attributed to
Eudoxus himself, and partly to the way in which Aratus has used the materials supplied by him. Hipparchus (about a century later), who was a scientific astronomer and observer, has left a commentary upon the Phaenomena of Eudoxus and Aratus, accompanied by the discrepancies which he had noticed between his own observations and their descriptions.
Diosemeia
The Diosemeia consists of forecasts of the weather from astronomical phenomena, with an account of its effects upon animals. It appears to be an imitation of
Hesiod, and to have been imitated by
Virgil in some parts of the Georgics. The materials are said to be taken almost wholly from
Aristotle's Meteorologica, from the work of
Theophrastus, On Weather Signs, and from Hesiod.
Nothing is said in either poem about
Hellenistic astrology.
- published: 06 Mar 2016
- views: 11