- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
Create your page here
Wednesday, 23 March 2016
-
remove the playlistAppellate Court
-
remove the playlistLatest Videos
-
remove the playlistLongest Videos
- remove the playlistAppellate Court
- remove the playlistLatest Videos
- remove the playlistLongest Videos
back to playlist
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Transcript:
There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify.
After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and basics of the appellate process and Louisiana's appeals courts. Get more helpful law information and watch past episodes of the show at JohnRedmannPOA.com.
- published: 21 Mar 2013
- views: 1662
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English), is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
Many U.S. jurisdictions title their appellate court a court of appeal or court of appeals. Historically, others have titled their appellate court a court of errors (or court of errors and appeals), on the premise that it was intended to correct errors made by lower courts. Examples of such courts include the New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals (which existed from 1844 to 1947), the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors (which has been renamed the Connecticut Supreme Court), the Kentucky Court of Errors (renamed the Kentucky Supreme Court), and the Mississippi High Court of Errors and Appeals (since renamed the Supreme Court of Mississippi). In some jurisdictions, courts able to hear appeals are known as an appellate division.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_court
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
1:23What is an Appellate Court?
What is an Appellate Court?What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered. Transcript: There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify. After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made. Colson Hicks Eidson 255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse Coral Gables, FL 33134 (305) 476-7400 Website: http://www.colson.com/ -
8:5910. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system. -
15:01People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
-
1:36The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case -
20:15Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
4:33Appellate court
Appellate courtAppellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules. The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'". This video is targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video -
15:522008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition. -
6:52Appellate court ruling
Appellate court rulingAppellate court ruling
What can I say -
15:00Appeals
AppealsAppeals
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and basics of the appellate process and Louisiana's appeals courts. Get more helpful law information and watch past episodes of the show at JohnRedmannPOA.com. -
5:11Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot ActAppellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens! The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015. This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America! But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment." Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights. Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic. "The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior. "Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized. "None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American." Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic! Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time! This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act! To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV -
11:17Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate CourtAssembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court. -
0:26Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
Appellate Court upholds Timamy electionAppellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute. For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya -
1:04Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is IllegalAppellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata. Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn See more at http://www.newsy.com Sources: 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/ American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee Script: The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday. A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215." The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection. The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed. This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal. The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey. -
0:40Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
-
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered. Transcript: There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and tes... -
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system. -
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
-
-
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules. The authority of appellate courts t... -
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition. -
Appellate court ruling
What can I say -
Appeals
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and basics of the appellate process and Louisiana's appeals courts. Get more helpful law information and watch past episodes of the show at JohnRedmannPOA.com. -
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens! The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015. This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America! But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pus... -
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court. -
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute. For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya -
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata. Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn See more at http://www.newsy.com Sources: 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/ American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee Script: The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thur... -
-
Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service. -
Aria Jewett - Lawyer John Phillips Argues for Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court
Aria Jewett - Lawyer John Phillips Argues for Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court - Our law firm was started in to be different- personal and compassionate. Since then, we have expanded from personal injury and wrongful death, to criminal defense and family law. We've won awards both in the industry and from local "best of" selections, have gotten multi-million dollar verdicts (while Good Morning America's cameras rolled) and handled many cases which were of far less settlement value but meant just as much or more to our clients and us, as well as helping families through problems and divorce and those who were accused of crimes, like DUI, theft and more. John is board certified as an expert in civil trial law and we are here for you- (904) 444-4444 or by emailing help@floridajustic... -
Allegations of Document Fraud In Foreclosure- Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all. This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state. At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all. Weidner Law Appeal Video This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice on... -
High Court can't rule on conversion cases, Appellate Court finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf -
David Allen - Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was fired and was entitled to unemployment compensation. Her employer argued she quit and was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The case was heard by The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The decision was appealed. Attorney David Allen talks about the evidence the court was able to consider on appeal. David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years. We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims. Visit our offices for a free initial consultation. In California: 5230 Folsom Blvd. Sacramento, CA 9... -
Sonnet 71 - Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT Sonnet #71 Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves Actor: Kristi Dana See more videos at www.SonnetProjectNYC.com -
Order Blocking Mississippi Executions Reversed By Appellate Court
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that an August lower court ruling blocking the state from executing prisoners was incorrect. The opinion, by Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, rejects death row prisoner arguments stating that Mississippi's failure to administer a 3-drug combination previously used for lethal injection violates their rights. Mississippi and other states can no longer attain the drugs because manufacturers have stopped selling them, due to fear of public protest. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/appeals-court-throws-out-order-blocking-mississippi-executions/ http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com -
Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is... -
Appellate Court at EIU
Illinois attorneys came to Eastern Illinois University's campus today to give community members a first hand experience in the courtroom. The Illinois Appellate Court for the Fourth Judicial District held oral arguments in the Doudna Fine Arts Center on campus. The arguments covered a criminal and civil case. Students from EIU and people all over the fourth district were invited to attend these arguments. Doctor Karen Swenson organized the event and says it was she's happy with the way the day turned out. The civil case involved the Illinois Treasurer arguing over paychecks while the criminal case was over an argument about weapon charges. Holder says they have court hearings every year at different colleges in the fourth district and twice a year at the University of Illinois. She ...
What is an Appellate Court?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:23
- Updated: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the ea...
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Transcript:
There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify.
After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
wn.com/What Is An Appellate Court
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Transcript:
There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify.
After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:59
- Updated: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
wn.com/10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:01
- Updated: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 9641
- published: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 9641
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:36
- Updated: 22 Apr 2013
- views: 698
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:15
- Updated: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
wn.com/Oral Argument Before The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
Appellate court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:33
- Updated: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or sec...
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Appellate Court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:52
- Updated: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
Appellate court ruling
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:52
- Updated: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 948
What can I say
What can I say
wn.com/Appellate Court Ruling
What can I say
- published: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 948
Appeals
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:00
- Updated: 21 Mar 2013
- views: 1662
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and basi...
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and basics of the appellate process and Louisiana's appeals courts. Get more helpful law information and watch past episodes of the show at JohnRedmannPOA.com.
wn.com/Appeals
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk show "John Redmann: Power of Attorney" to discuss the history and basics of the appellate process and Louisiana's appeals courts. Get more helpful law information and watch past episodes of the show at JohnRedmannPOA.com.
- published: 21 Mar 2013
- views: 1662
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:11
- Updated: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and sou...
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
wn.com/Appellate Court Nails Nsa Spying And Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:17
- Updated: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
wn.com/Assembling The Clerk's Record For Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:26
- Updated: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the Se...
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
wn.com/Appellate Court Upholds Timamy Election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:04
- Updated: 07 May 2015
- views: 4261
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn:...
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/
American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee
Script:
The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday.
A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215."
The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection.
The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed.
This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal.
The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.
wn.com/Appellate Court Rules Nsa's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/
American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee
Script:
The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday.
A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215."
The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection.
The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed.
This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal.
The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.
- published: 07 May 2015
- views: 4261
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:40
- Updated: 18 Apr 2014
- views: 833
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhelmi...
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhelmingly approved that state's gay marriage ban in 2004.
wn.com/Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:24
- Updated: 05 Nov 2014
- views: 364
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after ...
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service.
wn.com/Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service.
- published: 05 Nov 2014
- views: 364
Aria Jewett - Lawyer John Phillips Argues for Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:53
- Updated: 10 Nov 2013
- views: 89
Aria Jewett - Lawyer John Phillips Argues for Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court -
Our law firm was started in to be different- personal and compassionate....
Aria Jewett - Lawyer John Phillips Argues for Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court -
Our law firm was started in to be different- personal and compassionate. Since then, we have expanded from personal injury and wrongful death, to criminal defense and family law. We've won awards both in the industry and from local "best of" selections, have gotten multi-million dollar verdicts (while Good Morning America's cameras rolled) and handled many cases which were of far less settlement value but meant just as much or more to our clients and us, as well as helping families through problems and divorce and those who were accused of crimes, like DUI, theft and more. John is board certified as an expert in civil trial law and we are here for you- (904) 444-4444 or by emailing help@floridajustice.com or visit our website at http://www.floridajustice.com.
wn.com/Aria Jewett Lawyer John Phillips Argues For Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court
Aria Jewett - Lawyer John Phillips Argues for Bullying Victim Before Appellate Court -
Our law firm was started in to be different- personal and compassionate. Since then, we have expanded from personal injury and wrongful death, to criminal defense and family law. We've won awards both in the industry and from local "best of" selections, have gotten multi-million dollar verdicts (while Good Morning America's cameras rolled) and handled many cases which were of far less settlement value but meant just as much or more to our clients and us, as well as helping families through problems and divorce and those who were accused of crimes, like DUI, theft and more. John is board certified as an expert in civil trial law and we are here for you- (904) 444-4444 or by emailing help@floridajustice.com or visit our website at http://www.floridajustice.com.
- published: 10 Nov 2013
- views: 89
Allegations of Document Fraud In Foreclosure- Will The Appellate Court Speak
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 13:59
- Updated: 11 Jun 2015
- views: 250
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate com...
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
wn.com/Allegations Of Document Fraud In Foreclosure Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
- published: 11 Jun 2015
- views: 250
High Court can't rule on conversion cases, Appellate Court finds
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:19
- Updated: 30 Dec 2015
- views: 796
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to...
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
wn.com/High Court Can't Rule On Conversion Cases, Appellate Court Finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
- published: 30 Dec 2015
- views: 796
David Allen - Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:19
- Updated: 13 Feb 2014
- views: 227
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was f...
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was fired and was entitled to unemployment compensation. Her employer argued she quit and was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The case was heard by The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The decision was appealed. Attorney David Allen talks about the evidence the court was able to consider on appeal.
David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years.
We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims.
Visit our offices for a free initial consultation.
In California:
5230 Folsom Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95819
(916) 455-4800
7400 Shoreline Drive, Ste. 1
Stockton, CA 95219
(916) 473-4800
1300 Clay Street, Ste. 600
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 663-4600
Fremont Office Center
39899 Balentine Drive
Suite 200
Newark, CA 94560
(510) 663-4600
In Nevada:
200 S. Virginia St.
Wells Fargo Building
Reno, NV 89501
(775) 786-1020
Call us Toll Free (877) 876-4800
www.DavidAllenLaw.com
www.legalvideoblog.com
wn.com/David Allen Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was fired and was entitled to unemployment compensation. Her employer argued she quit and was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The case was heard by The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The decision was appealed. Attorney David Allen talks about the evidence the court was able to consider on appeal.
David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years.
We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims.
Visit our offices for a free initial consultation.
In California:
5230 Folsom Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95819
(916) 455-4800
7400 Shoreline Drive, Ste. 1
Stockton, CA 95219
(916) 473-4800
1300 Clay Street, Ste. 600
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 663-4600
Fremont Office Center
39899 Balentine Drive
Suite 200
Newark, CA 94560
(510) 663-4600
In Nevada:
200 S. Virginia St.
Wells Fargo Building
Reno, NV 89501
(775) 786-1020
Call us Toll Free (877) 876-4800
www.DavidAllenLaw.com
www.legalvideoblog.com
- published: 13 Feb 2014
- views: 227
Sonnet 71 - Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:17
- Updated: 12 Jun 2013
- views: 820
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT
Sonnet #71
Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves
Actor: Kristi Da...
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT
Sonnet #71
Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves
Actor: Kristi Dana
See more videos at www.SonnetProjectNYC.com
wn.com/Sonnet 71 Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT
Sonnet #71
Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves
Actor: Kristi Dana
See more videos at www.SonnetProjectNYC.com
- published: 12 Jun 2013
- views: 820
Order Blocking Mississippi Executions Reversed By Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:44
- Updated: 11 Feb 2016
- views: 6
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that...
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that an August lower court ruling blocking the state from executing prisoners was incorrect. The opinion, by Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, rejects death row prisoner arguments stating that Mississippi's failure to administer a 3-drug combination previously used for lethal injection violates their rights. Mississippi and other states can no longer attain the drugs because manufacturers have stopped selling them, due to fear of public protest.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/appeals-court-throws-out-order-blocking-mississippi-executions/
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
wn.com/Order Blocking Mississippi Executions Reversed By Appellate Court
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that an August lower court ruling blocking the state from executing prisoners was incorrect. The opinion, by Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, rejects death row prisoner arguments stating that Mississippi's failure to administer a 3-drug combination previously used for lethal injection violates their rights. Mississippi and other states can no longer attain the drugs because manufacturers have stopped selling them, due to fear of public protest.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/appeals-court-throws-out-order-blocking-mississippi-executions/
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
- published: 11 Feb 2016
- views: 6
Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:59
- Updated: 05 Jun 2015
- views: 131635
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk abo...
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
wn.com/Structure Of The Court System Crash Course Government And Politics 19
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
- published: 05 Jun 2015
- views: 131635
Appellate Court at EIU
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:29
- Updated: 03 Apr 2014
- views: 21
Illinois attorneys came to Eastern Illinois University's campus today to give community members a first hand experience in the courtroom.
The Illinois Appellat...
Illinois attorneys came to Eastern Illinois University's campus today to give community members a first hand experience in the courtroom.
The Illinois Appellate Court for the Fourth Judicial District held oral arguments in the Doudna Fine Arts Center on campus.
The arguments covered a criminal and civil case.
Students from EIU and people all over the fourth district were invited to attend these arguments.
Doctor Karen Swenson organized the event and says it was she's happy with the way the day turned out.
The civil case involved the Illinois Treasurer arguing over paychecks while the criminal case was over an argument about weapon charges.
Holder says they have court hearings every year at different colleges in the fourth district and twice a year at the University of Illinois.
She says this the first time they came to EIU and they hope to be back sometime in the future.
wn.com/Appellate Court At Eiu
Illinois attorneys came to Eastern Illinois University's campus today to give community members a first hand experience in the courtroom.
The Illinois Appellate Court for the Fourth Judicial District held oral arguments in the Doudna Fine Arts Center on campus.
The arguments covered a criminal and civil case.
Students from EIU and people all over the fourth district were invited to attend these arguments.
Doctor Karen Swenson organized the event and says it was she's happy with the way the day turned out.
The civil case involved the Illinois Treasurer arguing over paychecks while the criminal case was over an argument about weapon charges.
Holder says they have court hearings every year at different colleges in the fourth district and twice a year at the University of Illinois.
She says this the first time they came to EIU and they hope to be back sometime in the future.
- published: 03 Apr 2014
- views: 21
-
Dr. Luke Case: Kesha Appeals Injunction Loss
Kesha's legal battle for emancipation from her contract with the record company owned by the man she accuses of raping and abusing her is far from over. The singer's attorney, Mark Geragos, filed an appeal to a New York appellate court Monday appealing a court decision from last month denying her request to be released from her contract with Kemosabe Records, owned by producer Dr. Luke. In response to the appeal, Gottwald's legal team had this to say: "The court repeatedly stated Kesha was already free to record without Dr Luke, and that she had not presented any facts supporting her claims. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kesha-appeals-injunction-loss-in-dr-luke-case/ http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit Entertainment using http://wochit.com -
Gawker Could Still Win Hulk Hogan Case Despite $115 Million Verdict
A Florida jury awarded Hulk Hogan $115 million saying website Gawker violated the retired wrestler's privacy by releasing sex tapes of him. However, the media company could ultimately win the battle if they bring the case before the appellate court. Gawker defended its decision to the sex tape saying it was newsworthy because Hogan has been so open about his sex life in public. Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, countered that he made those comments while in character. The clip shows Hogan having sex with the wife of his former best friend in 2012. Both sides cast the case as a crucial test of the balance between the right to privacy and freedom of the press in the digital age. http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/topNews/~3/VcA70mkshJE/story01.htm http://www.wochit.com This video was... -
Douglas Thames, The Doll Murders : Serial Killer Documentary
man already serving a life sentence for murder is suspected in another decades-old crime. On Wednesday, Douglas Thames lost his chance for an appeal. Thames, 39, claims police conspired with a lab to falsify evidence in his 1995 trial. An appellate court ruled there was no evidence to prove his innocence. Thames was convicted of murdering Susan Doll in Fort Collins. He was arrested for the crime in 1995. Doll had been raped and strangled and was murdered in August of 1989. DNA evidence linked Thames to her murder. Multiple defense sources have told CBS4 that recent DNA testing has linked Thames to another murder. Jacie Taylor, 19, was found dead in 1994 inside her Palisade apartment. She had been strangled with a dog leash, beaten and sexually assaulted. The man who had been convicted and... -
Download Federal Courts - Standards of Review: Appellate Court Review of District Court Decisio PDF
http://j.mp/1WuvAS0 -
SCOTUS War | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama. SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: . Republican strategist John Feehery and the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza joins MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell to discuss how Mitch McConnell is stating that he is . For more Latest and Breaking News Headlines SUBSCRIBE to President Obama on Wednesday . The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur & Ana Kasparian. LIVE weekdays 6-8pm ET. Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or . -
SCOTUS Battle | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama. SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.com/ABCNews/ Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/ LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/abcnews FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/abc GOOD MORNING AMERICA'S HOMEPAGE: https://gma.yahoo.com/ -
Obama has announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court
오바마, 11시 새 대법관 지명 President Barack Obama has just announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court at the Whitehouse on Wednesday. , who is a long-time appellate judge and former prosecutor, has been selected by Obama for the life-long position. , an Indian-born appeals court judge has been selected by Obama, marking the first Asian-American and first Hindi Supreme Court justice. President Obama has been searching for a replacement for long-serving conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last month. The latest decision is expected to set the stage for a potentially ferocious political showdown since Senate Republicans have pledged to bar anyone President Obama selects. Visit ‘Arirang News’ Official Pages Facebook(NEWS): http://www.facebook.com/newsarirang Homepage: http://www.ar... -
Obama nominates Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
US President Barack Obama has nominated Merrick Garland, an appellate court judge and former prosecutor, to the Supreme Court. Al Jazeera's Rosiland Jordan reports from Washington. -
Considered twice before, Garland gets call to top court
Merrick Garland, the federal appeals court judge picked by President Barack Obama for the Supreme Court, was twice before considered as a nominee for the lifetime job as a justice but passed over when Obama chose Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Garland, 63, has been a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit since 1997 and previously served in the Justice Department under Democratic President Bill Clinton. Garland has won praise in the past from Republicans and Democrats and is viewed as a moderate whose legal approach was shaped by his lengthy career as a federal prosecutor. Garland was selected on Wednesday to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died on Feb. 13. On the bench, Garland is polite to lawyers before the court and does not domin... -
Download A Union List of Appellate Court Records and Briefs: Federal and State (Aall Publication PDF
http://j.mp/1QVM5pY -
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Court
-
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
-
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice . Jeffrey Wilens has represented criminal or civil parties in appellate and writ proceedings since 1986. He is one of a handful of California lawyers to have been certified by the California State Board of Legal Specialization in two fields: Appellate Law . Criminal Law . As of December 2002, there were only 201 attorneys in California certified as specialists in appellate law and 356 attorneys certified in criminal law out of more than 100,000 attorneys. Mr. Wilens is licensed to appear before the United States Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, four federal districts courts and all California State courts. He can ably represent plaintiffs or defendants in any court in the country. THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLES OF CONSUMER RECOVERY AR... -
Appellate judges Garland, Srinivasan considered for U.S. top court: NYT
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New York Times reported on Friday. The FBI has been conducting background checks on Garland and Srinivasan, the Times said, citing a person with knowledge of the process. Scalia, a long-serving conservative justice, died on Feb. 13. Srinivasan, 49, has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals since he was confirmed on a 97-0 bipartisan vote in the U.S. Senate in May 2013. As a senior Justice Department lawyer in 2013, he was part of the legal team that successfully urged the high court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, a law that restricted the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples for the purposes of fe... -
Obama Vets Two Appellate Judges for Supreme Court
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court. The New York Times reported that the FBI has been conducting background checks on both judges. Srinivasan has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals since he was confirmed unanimously in the U.S. Senate in May 2013. As a senior Justice Department lawyer in 2013, he was part of the legal team that petitioned the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined legal marriage as between a man and a woman. Garland was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1997 and became the chief judge in 2013. The death of Antonin Scalia left four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nomin... -
Appellate Process at the Supreme Court pt 1
-
Appellate judge Kelly considered for Supreme Court: NYT
The White House is vetting federal appellate Judge Jane Kelly for a possible U.S. Supreme Court nomination to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing a person with knowledge of the process. The FBI has been conducting background interviews on Kelly, the Times said, citing the unnamed source. Scalia, a long-serving conservative justice, died on Feb. 13. The White House declined to comment on the report. Kelly, a white woman and former public defender, has served on the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since April 2013. She was confirmed to the post by the Senate on a 96-0 vote. She had been mentioned by legal experts as a potential nominee in part because her earlier nomination to the appeals court was supported by Iowa ... -
Appellate court Word Pronunciation
Learn every word Pronunciation and improve Vocabulary For Meaning ,Example and Related Images checkout below channel link https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW4mTVXENCIZ6d7ov1VG8Og Just Type in YOUTUBE ["Word" Meaning With Example ] For Example Fabulous Word Meaning With Example Facebook Link : https://www.facebook.com/LEARN-ENG-WORDS-1552403398414120/?ref=hl -
CA teachers want judge's ruling on tenure law overturned
Oral arguments began Thursday in a Southern California appellate court over teacher tenure and a lower court's ruling that the state's laws are failing students. Subscribe to KCRA on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/1kjRAAn Get more Sacramento news: http://kcra.com Like us:http://facebook.com/KCRA3 Follow us: http://twitter.com/kcranews Google+: http://plus.google.com/+kcra -
A Conversation with Judge Steve McGlynn - IL 20th Judicial Circuit 2-23-16
The 20th Judicial Circuit Court in Illinois is a trial court which hears cases from Monroe, Perry, Randolph, St. Clair, and Washington counties. Those who are dissatisfied with the trial court verdict may appeal their case to the Illinois Fifth Appellate Court which sits in Mount Vernon. After that a case may go to the Illinois Supreme Court. Very special cases may go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Our guest today is Steve McGlynn, a St. Clair County Resident Circuit Judge of the 20th Circuit. His Court sits in Belleville. Judge McGlynn has also served as a member of the 5th District Appellate Court. Because of the death of Justice Scalia, Judge McGlynn is here to speak about him and the importance of the High Court to the American system of justice and its place under the U.S. Constitu... -
Overcriminalizing the Land of Lincoln? Part 1
June 18, 2013 | Chicago, IL KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Judge Joseph E. Birkett, Appellate Judge, Illinois's Second District Appellate Court PANEL DISCUSSION: Stephen Baker, Legislative Liaison, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender; Christopher Hage, Kathryn Harry & Associates, PC; Erika Pfleger, Assistant Director, Institute for Justice Clinic on Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago Law School MODERATOR: Paul Larkin, Senior Legal Research Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, Heritage Foundation A national trend extending criminal sanctions to what were conventionally matters left to civil justice or professional norms is increasingly being described as "overcriminalization." Although criminal penalties can be effective, critics of the trend, on both th... -
New Jersey Appellate Division - New Jersey Appeals Lawyers
New Jersey Appellate Division . New Jersey Appeals Lawyers. Appeal your Civil or Criminal case in New Jersey. In New Jersey, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court hears appeals from the final judgments of the Law Division and the Chancery Division of the Superior Court, final judgments of the Tax Court and final decisions of State administrative agencies. The Appellate Division is divided into eight parts of four or five judges each. Judges are rotated among the parts on an annual basis. Unlike the federal and some other state appellate courts, appeals are not allocated among the parts on a territorial basis, and Appellate Division precedent is equally binding statewide. http://www.avvocatidirittointernazionale.com/Areas-of-Practice/Appeals/New-Jersey-Appellate-Division.aspx -
What Are Some Factors Leading To An Appellate Court Reversing A Decision? | (440) 373-7173
http://www.bangerterlaw.com/ Law Office of Matthew C. Bangerter 1360 W 9th St #200, Cleveland, OH 44113 (440) 373-7173 Ohio based criminal defense attorney Matthew Bangerter mentions several reasons for an appellate court reversing a decision. For More Information About Appeal Process, Please Visit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_procedure_in_the_Uni... For More Videos Of Matthew Bangerter, Please Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiz_iQStJhiEZGidG5QVoqA Related Videos: https://youtu.be/3mbTav19eCg https://youtu.be/Q0F5Mc15dFo https://youtu.be/R1GnwKMPRtA https://youtu.be/Bm_lWvDLtqs
Dr. Luke Case: Kesha Appeals Injunction Loss
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:44
- Updated: 22 Mar 2016
- views: 3
Kesha's legal battle for emancipation from her contract with the record company owned by the man she accuses of raping and abusing her is far from over.
The sin...
Kesha's legal battle for emancipation from her contract with the record company owned by the man she accuses of raping and abusing her is far from over.
The singer's attorney, Mark Geragos, filed an appeal to a New York appellate court Monday appealing a court decision from last month denying her request to be released from her contract with Kemosabe Records, owned by producer Dr. Luke.
In response to the appeal, Gottwald's legal team had this to say: "The court repeatedly stated Kesha was already free to record without Dr Luke, and that she had not presented any facts supporting her claims.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kesha-appeals-injunction-loss-in-dr-luke-case/
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit Entertainment using http://wochit.com
wn.com/Dr. Luke Case Kesha Appeals Injunction Loss
Kesha's legal battle for emancipation from her contract with the record company owned by the man she accuses of raping and abusing her is far from over.
The singer's attorney, Mark Geragos, filed an appeal to a New York appellate court Monday appealing a court decision from last month denying her request to be released from her contract with Kemosabe Records, owned by producer Dr. Luke.
In response to the appeal, Gottwald's legal team had this to say: "The court repeatedly stated Kesha was already free to record without Dr Luke, and that she had not presented any facts supporting her claims.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/kesha-appeals-injunction-loss-in-dr-luke-case/
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit Entertainment using http://wochit.com
- published: 22 Mar 2016
- views: 3
Gawker Could Still Win Hulk Hogan Case Despite $115 Million Verdict
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:04
- Updated: 21 Mar 2016
- views: 5
A Florida jury awarded Hulk Hogan $115 million saying website Gawker violated the retired wrestler's privacy by releasing sex tapes of him. However, the media c...
A Florida jury awarded Hulk Hogan $115 million saying website Gawker violated the retired wrestler's privacy by releasing sex tapes of him. However, the media company could ultimately win the battle if they bring the case before the appellate court. Gawker defended its decision to the sex tape saying it was newsworthy because Hogan has been so open about his sex life in public. Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, countered that he made those comments while in character. The clip shows Hogan having sex with the wife of his former best friend in 2012. Both sides cast the case as a crucial test of the balance between the right to privacy and freedom of the press in the digital age.
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/topNews/~3/VcA70mkshJE/story01.htm
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
wn.com/Gawker Could Still Win Hulk Hogan Case Despite 115 Million Verdict
A Florida jury awarded Hulk Hogan $115 million saying website Gawker violated the retired wrestler's privacy by releasing sex tapes of him. However, the media company could ultimately win the battle if they bring the case before the appellate court. Gawker defended its decision to the sex tape saying it was newsworthy because Hogan has been so open about his sex life in public. Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, countered that he made those comments while in character. The clip shows Hogan having sex with the wife of his former best friend in 2012. Both sides cast the case as a crucial test of the balance between the right to privacy and freedom of the press in the digital age.
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/topNews/~3/VcA70mkshJE/story01.htm
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
- published: 21 Mar 2016
- views: 5
Douglas Thames, The Doll Murders : Serial Killer Documentary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 43:17
- Updated: 20 Mar 2016
- views: 2
man already serving a life sentence for murder is suspected in another decades-old crime. On Wednesday, Douglas Thames lost his chance for an appeal.
Thames, 39...
man already serving a life sentence for murder is suspected in another decades-old crime. On Wednesday, Douglas Thames lost his chance for an appeal.
Thames, 39, claims police conspired with a lab to falsify evidence in his 1995 trial. An appellate court ruled there was no evidence to prove his innocence.
Thames was convicted of murdering Susan Doll in Fort Collins. He was arrested for the crime in 1995. Doll had been raped and strangled and was murdered in August of 1989. DNA evidence linked Thames to her murder.
Multiple defense sources have told CBS4 that recent DNA testing has linked Thames to another murder.
Jacie Taylor, 19, was found dead in 1994 inside her Palisade apartment. She had been strangled with a dog leash, beaten and sexually assaulted.
The man who had been convicted and imprisoned for her murder, Robert Dewey, was exonerated and released from prison on Monday after new DNA testing indicated he had been wrongly accused.
wn.com/Douglas Thames, The Doll Murders Serial Killer Documentary
man already serving a life sentence for murder is suspected in another decades-old crime. On Wednesday, Douglas Thames lost his chance for an appeal.
Thames, 39, claims police conspired with a lab to falsify evidence in his 1995 trial. An appellate court ruled there was no evidence to prove his innocence.
Thames was convicted of murdering Susan Doll in Fort Collins. He was arrested for the crime in 1995. Doll had been raped and strangled and was murdered in August of 1989. DNA evidence linked Thames to her murder.
Multiple defense sources have told CBS4 that recent DNA testing has linked Thames to another murder.
Jacie Taylor, 19, was found dead in 1994 inside her Palisade apartment. She had been strangled with a dog leash, beaten and sexually assaulted.
The man who had been convicted and imprisoned for her murder, Robert Dewey, was exonerated and released from prison on Monday after new DNA testing indicated he had been wrongly accused.
- published: 20 Mar 2016
- views: 2
Download Federal Courts - Standards of Review: Appellate Court Review of District Court Decisio PDF
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:32
- Updated: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 0
http://j.mp/1WuvAS0
http://j.mp/1WuvAS0
wn.com/Download Federal Courts Standards Of Review Appellate Court Review Of District Court Decisio Pdf
SCOTUS War | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:08
- Updated: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 2
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama. SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: .
Republican strategis...
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama. SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: .
Republican strategist John Feehery and the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza joins MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell to discuss how Mitch McConnell is stating that he is .
For more Latest and Breaking News Headlines SUBSCRIBE to President Obama on Wednesday .
The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur & Ana Kasparian. LIVE weekdays 6-8pm ET. Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or .
wn.com/Scotus War | Gop Vow To Block Nominee Merrick Garland
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama. SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: .
Republican strategist John Feehery and the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza joins MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell to discuss how Mitch McConnell is stating that he is .
For more Latest and Breaking News Headlines SUBSCRIBE to President Obama on Wednesday .
The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur & Ana Kasparian. LIVE weekdays 6-8pm ET. Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or .
- published: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 2
SCOTUS Battle | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:19
- Updated: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 591
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama.
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.co...
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama.
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.com/ABCNews/
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/abc
GOOD MORNING AMERICA'S HOMEPAGE:
https://gma.yahoo.com/
wn.com/Scotus Battle | Gop Vow To Block Nominee Merrick Garland
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nominated by President Obama.
SUBSCRIBE to ABC NEWS: https://www.youtube.com/ABCNews/
Watch More on http://abcnews.go.com/
LIKE ABC News on FACEBOOK
https://www.facebook.com/abcnews
FOLLOW ABC News on TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/abc
GOOD MORNING AMERICA'S HOMEPAGE:
https://gma.yahoo.com/
- published: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 591
Obama has announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:32
- Updated: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 7
오바마, 11시 새 대법관 지명
President Barack Obama has just announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court at the Whitehouse on Wednesday.
, who is a long-time appellat...
오바마, 11시 새 대법관 지명
President Barack Obama has just announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court at the Whitehouse on Wednesday.
, who is a long-time appellate judge and former prosecutor, has been selected by Obama for the life-long position.
, an Indian-born appeals court judge has been selected by Obama, marking the first Asian-American and first Hindi Supreme Court justice.
President Obama has been searching for a replacement for long-serving conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last month.
The latest decision is expected to set the stage for a potentially ferocious political showdown since Senate Republicans have pledged to bar anyone President Obama selects.
Visit ‘Arirang News’ Official Pages
Facebook(NEWS): http://www.facebook.com/newsarirang
Homepage: http://www.arirang.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/arirangtv
Twitter: http://twitter.com/arirangworld
Instagram: http://instagram.com/arirangworld
wn.com/Obama Has Announced His Nominee For The U.S. Supreme Court
오바마, 11시 새 대법관 지명
President Barack Obama has just announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court at the Whitehouse on Wednesday.
, who is a long-time appellate judge and former prosecutor, has been selected by Obama for the life-long position.
, an Indian-born appeals court judge has been selected by Obama, marking the first Asian-American and first Hindi Supreme Court justice.
President Obama has been searching for a replacement for long-serving conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last month.
The latest decision is expected to set the stage for a potentially ferocious political showdown since Senate Republicans have pledged to bar anyone President Obama selects.
Visit ‘Arirang News’ Official Pages
Facebook(NEWS): http://www.facebook.com/newsarirang
Homepage: http://www.arirang.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/arirangtv
Twitter: http://twitter.com/arirangworld
Instagram: http://instagram.com/arirangworld
- published: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 7
Obama nominates Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:15
- Updated: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 92
US President Barack Obama has nominated Merrick Garland, an appellate court judge and former prosecutor, to the Supreme Court.
Al Jazeera's Rosiland Jordan rep...
US President Barack Obama has nominated Merrick Garland, an appellate court judge and former prosecutor, to the Supreme Court.
Al Jazeera's Rosiland Jordan reports from Washington.
wn.com/Obama Nominates Merrick Garland To Supreme Court
US President Barack Obama has nominated Merrick Garland, an appellate court judge and former prosecutor, to the Supreme Court.
Al Jazeera's Rosiland Jordan reports from Washington.
- published: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 92
Considered twice before, Garland gets call to top court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:57
- Updated: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 12
Merrick Garland, the federal appeals court judge picked by President Barack Obama for the Supreme Court, was twice before considered as a nominee for the lifeti...
Merrick Garland, the federal appeals court judge picked by President Barack Obama for the Supreme Court, was twice before considered as a nominee for the lifetime job as a justice but passed over when Obama chose Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Garland, 63, has been a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit since 1997 and previously served in the Justice Department under Democratic President Bill Clinton.
Garland has won praise in the past from Republicans and Democrats and is viewed as a moderate whose legal approach was shaped by his lengthy career as a federal prosecutor.
Garland was selected on Wednesday to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died on Feb. 13.
On the bench, Garland is polite to lawyers before the court and does not dominate oral arguments, but is known for asking insightful questions. His written opinions are thoughtful and have not attracted controversy. Lawyers who appear before him say he they view him as fair-minded and not ideologically driven.
Garland was appointed to the appellate court by Clinton and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in a 76-23 vote. He has been chief judge of the court since 2013. That court has served as a launching pad to the Supreme Court for several justices including Scalia in recent decades.
Obama considered appointing Garland to the nation's highest court in 2009 and 2010 but he opted instead for two women, Sotomayor and Kagan. Administration lawyers believed during those episodes that Garland might later serve as a compromise choice if a vacancy opened in an election year and Republicans controlled the Senate. That is precisely the current situation.
In 2010, Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hath, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, described him as a "consensus nominee" who would "get a lot of votes."
REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION
But Senate Republicans including Hatch have vowed not to hold confirmation hearings or an up-or-down vote on any Supreme Court nominee put forward by Obama. They want the next president, who takes office in January after the Nov. 8 election, to make the selection.
Before joining the Washington appeals court, Garland served as a senior Justice Department official and, before that, as a prosecutor and a lawyer in private practice with the Arnold & Porter firm.
"When the bomb went off in Oklahoma and we started to see the children being pulled out of the wreckage, Merrick, who had young children at the time, was so moved by this and so angered by it he asked if we could send him out to Oklahoma to help," Gorelick said.
He was there for several months, ensuring the prosecution was done by the book so that the case was "a showcase for the rule of law in the United States," Gorelick said.
Garland showed himself to be a superb lawyer with impeccable judgment and integrity and someone who could work collaboratively, she added.
He was involved in other high-profile cases during his time at the Justice Department, including the prosecution of so-called Unabomber Ted Kaczynski.
His background as a prosecutor has shaped his views as a judge, lawyers who practice before the appeals court said. Garland is viewed as less defendant-friendly than other Democratic appointees.
But Garland is not afraid to rule against the federal government. In 2013 ruling he was part of a three-judge panel that ruled against the Central Intelligence Agency in its bid to keep documents secret concerning the use of armed drones.
In 2008, he wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel when the court ruled in favor of a detainee held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Garland wrote that a U.S. tribunal was wrong to find that detainee Huzaifa Parhat, an ethnic Uighur from China, was an "enemy combatant."
Garland voted in 2014 to uphold an Obama administration air pollution rule that limits emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants. The Supreme Court in June 2015 threw out that decision, although the regulation remains in place.
Originally from Chicago, Garland graduated from Harvard Law School, from which Obama later earned a law degree. He served as a clerk for liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice William Brennan.
He spent most of the 1980s in private practice before joining the U.S. attorney's office in Washington in 1989 as a career prosecutor. He briefly returned to private practice in the early 1990s before taking his first political appointment in the Justice Department in 1993.
Garland is married and has two adult daughters.
wn.com/Considered Twice Before, Garland Gets Call To Top Court
Merrick Garland, the federal appeals court judge picked by President Barack Obama for the Supreme Court, was twice before considered as a nominee for the lifetime job as a justice but passed over when Obama chose Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
Garland, 63, has been a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit since 1997 and previously served in the Justice Department under Democratic President Bill Clinton.
Garland has won praise in the past from Republicans and Democrats and is viewed as a moderate whose legal approach was shaped by his lengthy career as a federal prosecutor.
Garland was selected on Wednesday to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died on Feb. 13.
On the bench, Garland is polite to lawyers before the court and does not dominate oral arguments, but is known for asking insightful questions. His written opinions are thoughtful and have not attracted controversy. Lawyers who appear before him say he they view him as fair-minded and not ideologically driven.
Garland was appointed to the appellate court by Clinton and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in a 76-23 vote. He has been chief judge of the court since 2013. That court has served as a launching pad to the Supreme Court for several justices including Scalia in recent decades.
Obama considered appointing Garland to the nation's highest court in 2009 and 2010 but he opted instead for two women, Sotomayor and Kagan. Administration lawyers believed during those episodes that Garland might later serve as a compromise choice if a vacancy opened in an election year and Republicans controlled the Senate. That is precisely the current situation.
In 2010, Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hath, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, described him as a "consensus nominee" who would "get a lot of votes."
REPUBLICAN OPPOSITION
But Senate Republicans including Hatch have vowed not to hold confirmation hearings or an up-or-down vote on any Supreme Court nominee put forward by Obama. They want the next president, who takes office in January after the Nov. 8 election, to make the selection.
Before joining the Washington appeals court, Garland served as a senior Justice Department official and, before that, as a prosecutor and a lawyer in private practice with the Arnold & Porter firm.
"When the bomb went off in Oklahoma and we started to see the children being pulled out of the wreckage, Merrick, who had young children at the time, was so moved by this and so angered by it he asked if we could send him out to Oklahoma to help," Gorelick said.
He was there for several months, ensuring the prosecution was done by the book so that the case was "a showcase for the rule of law in the United States," Gorelick said.
Garland showed himself to be a superb lawyer with impeccable judgment and integrity and someone who could work collaboratively, she added.
He was involved in other high-profile cases during his time at the Justice Department, including the prosecution of so-called Unabomber Ted Kaczynski.
His background as a prosecutor has shaped his views as a judge, lawyers who practice before the appeals court said. Garland is viewed as less defendant-friendly than other Democratic appointees.
But Garland is not afraid to rule against the federal government. In 2013 ruling he was part of a three-judge panel that ruled against the Central Intelligence Agency in its bid to keep documents secret concerning the use of armed drones.
In 2008, he wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel when the court ruled in favor of a detainee held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Garland wrote that a U.S. tribunal was wrong to find that detainee Huzaifa Parhat, an ethnic Uighur from China, was an "enemy combatant."
Garland voted in 2014 to uphold an Obama administration air pollution rule that limits emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants. The Supreme Court in June 2015 threw out that decision, although the regulation remains in place.
Originally from Chicago, Garland graduated from Harvard Law School, from which Obama later earned a law degree. He served as a clerk for liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice William Brennan.
He spent most of the 1980s in private practice before joining the U.S. attorney's office in Washington in 1989 as a career prosecutor. He briefly returned to private practice in the early 1990s before taking his first political appointment in the Justice Department in 1993.
Garland is married and has two adult daughters.
- published: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 12
Download A Union List of Appellate Court Records and Briefs: Federal and State (Aall Publication PDF
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:31
- Updated: 15 Mar 2016
- views: 0
http://j.mp/1QVM5pY
http://j.mp/1QVM5pY
wn.com/Download A Union List Of Appellate Court Records And Briefs Federal And State (Aall Publication Pdf
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:24
- Updated: 12 Mar 2016
- views: 0
- published: 12 Mar 2016
- views: 0
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:17
- Updated: 12 Mar 2016
- views: 0
- published: 12 Mar 2016
- views: 0
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:42
- Updated: 06 Mar 2016
- views: 2
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice . Jeffrey Wilens has represented criminal or civil parties in appellate and writ proceedings since 1986. He is one of a ha...
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice . Jeffrey Wilens has represented criminal or civil parties in appellate and writ proceedings since 1986. He is one of a handful of California lawyers to have been certified by the California State Board of Legal Specialization in two fields:
Appellate Law .
Criminal Law .
As of December 2002, there were only 201 attorneys in California certified as specialists in appellate law and 356 attorneys certified in criminal law out of more than 100,000 attorneys.
Mr. Wilens is licensed to appear before the United States Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, four federal districts courts and all California State courts. He can ably represent plaintiffs or defendants in any court in the country.
THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLES OF CONSUMER RECOVERY ARE ALL BASED ON ACTUAL CASES HANDLED BY THIS OFFICE JUST IN THE LAST TEN YEARS. Please note the results portrayed below are dependent on the facts of each specific case. Your results will differ if based on different facts.
Class Action settlement for $40 million to Fairbanks Capital customers for improperly handling of mortgage loans (this firm was not lead counsel)
Class action settlement for $13.4 million to users of RealNetworks for Internet privacy violations.
Class action settlement for $10 million to employees of Lenscrafters for meal and rest period violations.
Class action settlement for $10 million to Ralphs Grocery Stores’ customers who were denied vacations promised in a store promotion. (not lead counsel)
Class action settlement for $8.6 million to merchants using Cardservice International for illegal cancellation fees.
Class action settlement for $3 million to employees of EZ-Lube for meal and rest period violations.
Class action settlement for $2.6 million to merchants using A-1 Leasing, Duvera Billing Services and E-Commerce Exchange based on deceptive "virtual terminal" leases.
Class action settlement for $2.5 million to American Express customers for illegal convenience check offers. Other national banks paid $212,500 to four consumers in separate convenience check lawsuits.
Class action settlement for $2.4 million to merchants using Axin Financial Services and E-Commerce Exchange based on deceptive “virtual terminal” leases.
Class action settlement for $2.3 million to tenants of Evergreen Royalle Motel in Anaheim, CA for forcing tenants to move out every 28 days.
Class action settlement for $2 million to Citibank personal bankers deprived of meal and rest breaks.
Class action settlement for $2 million to Ameriquest customers overcharged a prepayment penalty.
Class action settlement for $1.5 million against a prominent law firm for legal malpractice in a former class action. This was a precedent establishing case leading to a published appellate court decision.
Class action settlement for $1.45 million against Vitamin World for violating meal and rest period rights of workers in California.
Class action settlement for $1.355 million against American Laser Clinics for a deceptive refund policy and lack of physician supervision.
Individual settlements for $1,258,900 to numerous consumers who applied to rent apartments and had illegal credit checks done on them. These cases resulted in an appellate court decision of first impression interpreting the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act.
Lakeshore Law Center
18340 Yorba Linda Blvd
Suite 107-610
Yorba Linda, CA 92886-4058
http://www.jeffreywilens.com/
http://www.lakeshorelaw.org/
wn.com/Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice . Jeffrey Wilens has represented criminal or civil parties in appellate and writ proceedings since 1986. He is one of a handful of California lawyers to have been certified by the California State Board of Legal Specialization in two fields:
Appellate Law .
Criminal Law .
As of December 2002, there were only 201 attorneys in California certified as specialists in appellate law and 356 attorneys certified in criminal law out of more than 100,000 attorneys.
Mr. Wilens is licensed to appear before the United States Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, four federal districts courts and all California State courts. He can ably represent plaintiffs or defendants in any court in the country.
THE FOLLOWING EXAMPLES OF CONSUMER RECOVERY ARE ALL BASED ON ACTUAL CASES HANDLED BY THIS OFFICE JUST IN THE LAST TEN YEARS. Please note the results portrayed below are dependent on the facts of each specific case. Your results will differ if based on different facts.
Class Action settlement for $40 million to Fairbanks Capital customers for improperly handling of mortgage loans (this firm was not lead counsel)
Class action settlement for $13.4 million to users of RealNetworks for Internet privacy violations.
Class action settlement for $10 million to employees of Lenscrafters for meal and rest period violations.
Class action settlement for $10 million to Ralphs Grocery Stores’ customers who were denied vacations promised in a store promotion. (not lead counsel)
Class action settlement for $8.6 million to merchants using Cardservice International for illegal cancellation fees.
Class action settlement for $3 million to employees of EZ-Lube for meal and rest period violations.
Class action settlement for $2.6 million to merchants using A-1 Leasing, Duvera Billing Services and E-Commerce Exchange based on deceptive "virtual terminal" leases.
Class action settlement for $2.5 million to American Express customers for illegal convenience check offers. Other national banks paid $212,500 to four consumers in separate convenience check lawsuits.
Class action settlement for $2.4 million to merchants using Axin Financial Services and E-Commerce Exchange based on deceptive “virtual terminal” leases.
Class action settlement for $2.3 million to tenants of Evergreen Royalle Motel in Anaheim, CA for forcing tenants to move out every 28 days.
Class action settlement for $2 million to Citibank personal bankers deprived of meal and rest breaks.
Class action settlement for $2 million to Ameriquest customers overcharged a prepayment penalty.
Class action settlement for $1.5 million against a prominent law firm for legal malpractice in a former class action. This was a precedent establishing case leading to a published appellate court decision.
Class action settlement for $1.45 million against Vitamin World for violating meal and rest period rights of workers in California.
Class action settlement for $1.355 million against American Laser Clinics for a deceptive refund policy and lack of physician supervision.
Individual settlements for $1,258,900 to numerous consumers who applied to rent apartments and had illegal credit checks done on them. These cases resulted in an appellate court decision of first impression interpreting the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act.
Lakeshore Law Center
18340 Yorba Linda Blvd
Suite 107-610
Yorba Linda, CA 92886-4058
http://www.jeffreywilens.com/
http://www.lakeshorelaw.org/
- published: 06 Mar 2016
- views: 2
Appellate judges Garland, Srinivasan considered for U.S. top court: NYT
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:05
- Updated: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 0
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court to replace late Justice Antonin...
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New York Times reported on Friday.
The FBI has been conducting background checks on Garland and Srinivasan, the Times said, citing a person with knowledge of the process. Scalia, a long-serving conservative justice, died on Feb. 13.
Srinivasan, 49, has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals since he was confirmed on a 97-0 bipartisan vote in the U.S. Senate in May 2013. As a senior Justice Department lawyer in 2013, he was part of the legal team that successfully urged the high court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, a law that restricted the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples for the purposes of federal benefits.
Garland, 63, was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1997 and became the chief judge in 2013.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Republicans say the decision on who to nominate to the Supreme Court should be left to the next president, who will be elected on Nov. 8. Under the U.S. Constitution, the president nominates Supreme Court justices and the Senate must confirm them.
Earlier this week, the Times said that federal appellate Judge Jane Kelly was being vetted. Last month the National Law Journal reported that Ketanji Brown Jackson, a federal trial judge in Washington, was also being considered.
Without Scalia, the court has four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nominee could tip the court to the left for the first time in decades.
Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, a moderate Republican, took himself out of consideration for appointment to the Supreme Court recently.
wn.com/Appellate Judges Garland, Srinivasan Considered For U.S. Top Court Nyt
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New York Times reported on Friday.
The FBI has been conducting background checks on Garland and Srinivasan, the Times said, citing a person with knowledge of the process. Scalia, a long-serving conservative justice, died on Feb. 13.
Srinivasan, 49, has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals since he was confirmed on a 97-0 bipartisan vote in the U.S. Senate in May 2013. As a senior Justice Department lawyer in 2013, he was part of the legal team that successfully urged the high court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, a law that restricted the definition of marriage to heterosexual couples for the purposes of federal benefits.
Garland, 63, was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1997 and became the chief judge in 2013.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Republicans say the decision on who to nominate to the Supreme Court should be left to the next president, who will be elected on Nov. 8. Under the U.S. Constitution, the president nominates Supreme Court justices and the Senate must confirm them.
Earlier this week, the Times said that federal appellate Judge Jane Kelly was being vetted. Last month the National Law Journal reported that Ketanji Brown Jackson, a federal trial judge in Washington, was also being considered.
Without Scalia, the court has four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nominee could tip the court to the left for the first time in decades.
Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, a moderate Republican, took himself out of consideration for appointment to the Supreme Court recently.
- published: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 0
Obama Vets Two Appellate Judges for Supreme Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:43
- Updated: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 1
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court. The New York Times reported th...
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court. The New York Times reported that the FBI has been conducting background checks on both judges. Srinivasan has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals since he was confirmed unanimously in the U.S. Senate in May 2013. As a senior Justice Department lawyer in 2013, he was part of the legal team that petitioned the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined legal marriage as between a man and a woman. Garland was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1997 and became the chief judge in 2013. The death of Antonin Scalia left four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nominee could tip the court to the left for the first time in decades.
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/topNews/~3/OwcGWtIa5RQ/story01.htm
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
wn.com/Obama Vets Two Appellate Judges For Supreme Court
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as possible nominees to the Supreme Court. The New York Times reported that the FBI has been conducting background checks on both judges. Srinivasan has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals since he was confirmed unanimously in the U.S. Senate in May 2013. As a senior Justice Department lawyer in 2013, he was part of the legal team that petitioned the Supreme Court to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined legal marriage as between a man and a woman. Garland was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1997 and became the chief judge in 2013. The death of Antonin Scalia left four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nominee could tip the court to the left for the first time in decades.
http://feeds.reuters.com/~r/reuters/topNews/~3/OwcGWtIa5RQ/story01.htm
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
- published: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 1
Appellate Process at the Supreme Court pt 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 9:46
- Updated: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 78
- published: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 78
Appellate judge Kelly considered for Supreme Court: NYT
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:24
- Updated: 03 Mar 2016
- views: 13
The White House is vetting federal appellate Judge Jane Kelly for a possible U.S. Supreme Court nomination to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New Y...
The White House is vetting federal appellate Judge Jane Kelly for a possible U.S. Supreme Court nomination to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing a person with knowledge of the process.
The FBI has been conducting background interviews on Kelly, the Times said, citing the unnamed source. Scalia, a long-serving conservative justice, died on Feb. 13.
The White House declined to comment on the report.
Kelly, a white woman and former public defender, has served on the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since April 2013. She was confirmed to the post by the Senate on a 96-0 vote.
She had been mentioned by legal experts as a potential nominee in part because her earlier nomination to the appeals court was supported by Iowa Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that would review any Supreme Court nomination.
Grassley said at the time that Kelly was "well regarded in my home state of Iowa" and that he was "pleased to support" her nomination.
Kelly, 51, served as a clerk for now-retired Judge David Hansen, a friend of Grassley who served on the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Republican leaders have so far rebuffed President Barack Obama's appeal to hold confirmation hearings and a vote on a nominee, including in a face-to-face meeting on Tuesday at the White House that failed to budge them from their vow to block anyone he offers for the job.
Republicans say the decision on who to nominate should be left to the next president, who takes office next January after the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election. Republicans hope to win back the White House then.
Under the U.S. Constitution, the president nominates Supreme Court justices and the Senate must confirm them. Without Scalia, the court has four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nominee could tip the court to the left for the first time in decades.
Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, a moderate Republican, took himself out of consideration for appointment to the Supreme Court last week, a day after his name surfaced in connection with the Scalia vacancy.
wn.com/Appellate Judge Kelly Considered For Supreme Court Nyt
The White House is vetting federal appellate Judge Jane Kelly for a possible U.S. Supreme Court nomination to replace the late Justice Antonin Scalia, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing a person with knowledge of the process.
The FBI has been conducting background interviews on Kelly, the Times said, citing the unnamed source. Scalia, a long-serving conservative justice, died on Feb. 13.
The White House declined to comment on the report.
Kelly, a white woman and former public defender, has served on the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals since April 2013. She was confirmed to the post by the Senate on a 96-0 vote.
She had been mentioned by legal experts as a potential nominee in part because her earlier nomination to the appeals court was supported by Iowa Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that would review any Supreme Court nomination.
Grassley said at the time that Kelly was "well regarded in my home state of Iowa" and that he was "pleased to support" her nomination.
Kelly, 51, served as a clerk for now-retired Judge David Hansen, a friend of Grassley who served on the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Republican leaders have so far rebuffed President Barack Obama's appeal to hold confirmation hearings and a vote on a nominee, including in a face-to-face meeting on Tuesday at the White House that failed to budge them from their vow to block anyone he offers for the job.
Republicans say the decision on who to nominate should be left to the next president, who takes office next January after the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election. Republicans hope to win back the White House then.
Under the U.S. Constitution, the president nominates Supreme Court justices and the Senate must confirm them. Without Scalia, the court has four conservative and four liberal justices, meaning any potential Obama nominee could tip the court to the left for the first time in decades.
Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval, a moderate Republican, took himself out of consideration for appointment to the Supreme Court last week, a day after his name surfaced in connection with the Scalia vacancy.
- published: 03 Mar 2016
- views: 13
Appellate court Word Pronunciation
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:13
- Updated: 28 Feb 2016
- views: 4
Learn every word Pronunciation and improve Vocabulary
For Meaning ,Example and Related Images checkout below channel link
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC...
Learn every word Pronunciation and improve Vocabulary
For Meaning ,Example and Related Images checkout below channel link
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW4mTVXENCIZ6d7ov1VG8Og
Just Type in YOUTUBE ["Word" Meaning With Example ]
For Example
Fabulous Word Meaning With Example
Facebook Link :
https://www.facebook.com/LEARN-ENG-WORDS-1552403398414120/?ref=hl
wn.com/Appellate Court Word Pronunciation
Learn every word Pronunciation and improve Vocabulary
For Meaning ,Example and Related Images checkout below channel link
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW4mTVXENCIZ6d7ov1VG8Og
Just Type in YOUTUBE ["Word" Meaning With Example ]
For Example
Fabulous Word Meaning With Example
Facebook Link :
https://www.facebook.com/LEARN-ENG-WORDS-1552403398414120/?ref=hl
- published: 28 Feb 2016
- views: 4
CA teachers want judge's ruling on tenure law overturned
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:08
- Updated: 26 Feb 2016
- views: 48
Oral arguments began Thursday in a Southern California appellate court over teacher tenure and a lower court's ruling that the state's laws are failing students...
Oral arguments began Thursday in a Southern California appellate court over teacher tenure and a lower court's ruling that the state's laws are failing students. Subscribe to KCRA on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/1kjRAAn
Get more Sacramento news: http://kcra.com
Like us:http://facebook.com/KCRA3
Follow us: http://twitter.com/kcranews
Google+: http://plus.google.com/+kcra
wn.com/Ca Teachers Want Judge's Ruling On Tenure Law Overturned
Oral arguments began Thursday in a Southern California appellate court over teacher tenure and a lower court's ruling that the state's laws are failing students. Subscribe to KCRA on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/1kjRAAn
Get more Sacramento news: http://kcra.com
Like us:http://facebook.com/KCRA3
Follow us: http://twitter.com/kcranews
Google+: http://plus.google.com/+kcra
- published: 26 Feb 2016
- views: 48
A Conversation with Judge Steve McGlynn - IL 20th Judicial Circuit 2-23-16
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 29:05
- Updated: 25 Feb 2016
- views: 4
The 20th Judicial Circuit Court in Illinois is a trial court which hears cases from Monroe, Perry, Randolph, St. Clair, and Washington counties. Those who are ...
The 20th Judicial Circuit Court in Illinois is a trial court which hears cases from Monroe, Perry, Randolph, St. Clair, and Washington counties. Those who are dissatisfied with the trial court verdict may appeal their case to the Illinois Fifth Appellate Court which sits in Mount Vernon. After that a case may go to the Illinois Supreme Court. Very special cases may go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Our guest today is Steve McGlynn, a St. Clair County Resident Circuit Judge of the 20th Circuit. His Court sits in Belleville. Judge McGlynn has also served as a member of the 5th District Appellate Court. Because of the death of Justice Scalia, Judge McGlynn is here to speak about him and the importance of the High Court to the American system of justice and its place under the U.S. Constitution. Conversation with Lee Presser is a weekly half hour television program seen for more than fifteen years in the St. Louis market on Charter Cable TV.
wn.com/A Conversation With Judge Steve Mcglynn Il 20Th Judicial Circuit 2 23 16
The 20th Judicial Circuit Court in Illinois is a trial court which hears cases from Monroe, Perry, Randolph, St. Clair, and Washington counties. Those who are dissatisfied with the trial court verdict may appeal their case to the Illinois Fifth Appellate Court which sits in Mount Vernon. After that a case may go to the Illinois Supreme Court. Very special cases may go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Our guest today is Steve McGlynn, a St. Clair County Resident Circuit Judge of the 20th Circuit. His Court sits in Belleville. Judge McGlynn has also served as a member of the 5th District Appellate Court. Because of the death of Justice Scalia, Judge McGlynn is here to speak about him and the importance of the High Court to the American system of justice and its place under the U.S. Constitution. Conversation with Lee Presser is a weekly half hour television program seen for more than fifteen years in the St. Louis market on Charter Cable TV.
- published: 25 Feb 2016
- views: 4
Overcriminalizing the Land of Lincoln? Part 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 56:34
- Updated: 22 Feb 2016
- views: 7
June 18, 2013 | Chicago, IL
KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Judge Joseph E. Birkett, Appellate Judge, Illinois's Second District Appellate Court
PANEL DISCUSSION: Stephen Ba...
June 18, 2013 | Chicago, IL
KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Judge Joseph E. Birkett, Appellate Judge, Illinois's Second District Appellate Court
PANEL DISCUSSION: Stephen Baker, Legislative Liaison, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender; Christopher Hage, Kathryn Harry & Associates, PC; Erika Pfleger, Assistant Director, Institute for Justice Clinic on Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago Law School
MODERATOR: Paul Larkin, Senior Legal Research Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, Heritage Foundation
A national trend extending criminal sanctions to what were conventionally matters left to civil justice or professional norms is increasingly being described as "overcriminalization." Although criminal penalties can be effective, critics of the trend, on both the left and right, express concern that criminal codes afford prosecutors broad discretion in enforcement initiatives while making it increasingly difficult for Americans to comply in good faith. Additionally, concern has emerged that valuable state resources necessary to protect state residents from the most serious crimes may be redirected to enforce new laws at odds with traditional common law principles. This forum explored the extent of such "overcriminalization" in Illinois and how it might best be addressed.
wn.com/Overcriminalizing The Land Of Lincoln Part 1
June 18, 2013 | Chicago, IL
KEYNOTE ADDRESS: Judge Joseph E. Birkett, Appellate Judge, Illinois's Second District Appellate Court
PANEL DISCUSSION: Stephen Baker, Legislative Liaison, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender; Christopher Hage, Kathryn Harry & Associates, PC; Erika Pfleger, Assistant Director, Institute for Justice Clinic on Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago Law School
MODERATOR: Paul Larkin, Senior Legal Research Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, Heritage Foundation
A national trend extending criminal sanctions to what were conventionally matters left to civil justice or professional norms is increasingly being described as "overcriminalization." Although criminal penalties can be effective, critics of the trend, on both the left and right, express concern that criminal codes afford prosecutors broad discretion in enforcement initiatives while making it increasingly difficult for Americans to comply in good faith. Additionally, concern has emerged that valuable state resources necessary to protect state residents from the most serious crimes may be redirected to enforce new laws at odds with traditional common law principles. This forum explored the extent of such "overcriminalization" in Illinois and how it might best be addressed.
- published: 22 Feb 2016
- views: 7
New Jersey Appellate Division - New Jersey Appeals Lawyers
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:45
- Updated: 22 Feb 2016
- views: 63
New Jersey Appellate Division . New Jersey Appeals Lawyers. Appeal your Civil or Criminal case in New Jersey.
In New Jersey, the Appellate Division of the Supe...
New Jersey Appellate Division . New Jersey Appeals Lawyers. Appeal your Civil or Criminal case in New Jersey.
In New Jersey, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court hears appeals from the final judgments of the Law Division and the Chancery Division of the Superior Court, final judgments of the Tax Court and final decisions of State administrative agencies.
The Appellate Division is divided into eight parts of four or five judges each. Judges are rotated among the parts on an annual basis. Unlike the federal and some other state appellate courts, appeals are not allocated among the parts on a territorial basis, and Appellate Division precedent is equally binding statewide.
http://www.avvocatidirittointernazionale.com/Areas-of-Practice/Appeals/New-Jersey-Appellate-Division.aspx
wn.com/New Jersey Appellate Division New Jersey Appeals Lawyers
New Jersey Appellate Division . New Jersey Appeals Lawyers. Appeal your Civil or Criminal case in New Jersey.
In New Jersey, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court hears appeals from the final judgments of the Law Division and the Chancery Division of the Superior Court, final judgments of the Tax Court and final decisions of State administrative agencies.
The Appellate Division is divided into eight parts of four or five judges each. Judges are rotated among the parts on an annual basis. Unlike the federal and some other state appellate courts, appeals are not allocated among the parts on a territorial basis, and Appellate Division precedent is equally binding statewide.
http://www.avvocatidirittointernazionale.com/Areas-of-Practice/Appeals/New-Jersey-Appellate-Division.aspx
- published: 22 Feb 2016
- views: 63
What Are Some Factors Leading To An Appellate Court Reversing A Decision? | (440) 373-7173
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:55
- Updated: 18 Feb 2016
- views: 1
http://www.bangerterlaw.com/
Law Office of Matthew C. Bangerter
1360 W 9th St #200,
Cleveland, OH 44113
(440) 373-7173
Ohio based criminal defense attorney ...
http://www.bangerterlaw.com/
Law Office of Matthew C. Bangerter
1360 W 9th St #200,
Cleveland, OH 44113
(440) 373-7173
Ohio based criminal defense attorney Matthew Bangerter mentions several reasons for an appellate court reversing a decision.
For More Information About Appeal Process, Please Visit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_procedure_in_the_Uni...
For More Videos Of Matthew Bangerter, Please Subscribe:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiz_iQStJhiEZGidG5QVoqA
Related Videos:
https://youtu.be/3mbTav19eCg
https://youtu.be/Q0F5Mc15dFo
https://youtu.be/R1GnwKMPRtA
https://youtu.be/Bm_lWvDLtqs
wn.com/What Are Some Factors Leading To An Appellate Court Reversing A Decision | (440) 373 7173
http://www.bangerterlaw.com/
Law Office of Matthew C. Bangerter
1360 W 9th St #200,
Cleveland, OH 44113
(440) 373-7173
Ohio based criminal defense attorney Matthew Bangerter mentions several reasons for an appellate court reversing a decision.
For More Information About Appeal Process, Please Visit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_procedure_in_the_Uni...
For More Videos Of Matthew Bangerter, Please Subscribe:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiz_iQStJhiEZGidG5QVoqA
Related Videos:
https://youtu.be/3mbTav19eCg
https://youtu.be/Q0F5Mc15dFo
https://youtu.be/R1GnwKMPRtA
https://youtu.be/Bm_lWvDLtqs
- published: 18 Feb 2016
- views: 1
-
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia on CAN TV
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy ) Garcia gives a live interview. This is a very informative clip for more insight to Judge Garcia and what he stands for! Remember March 20, 2012 punch 123 democrat Keep a qualified , experienced Appellate Court Judge on the bench ! -
12 Tips for Appellate Advocacy
Michael Tigar, listed among the best oral advocates in American history, will present his 12 Ideas on Appellate Advocacy. A seasoned appellate advocate with 100's of representative experiences, Mr. Tigar's advice and reflections are invaluable to anyone interested in oral advocacy. Hosted by the Moot Court Board. -
Appellate Court Live from RHS
-
Kankakee County Board 5-13-2008, Appellate Court, Fred Barbara & Tom Volini's Landfill
Kankakee County Board Attorneys discuss Appellate Court's reversal of their 2006 decision against the proposed Fred Barbara, Tom Volini, Town & Country Utilities landfill with the City of Kankakee, friends of Mayor Daley and Gov. Blagojevich. This landfill proposal was defeated December, 2009 at the Appellate Court level after the Illinois Supreme Court issued a supervisory order to the Third District Appellate Court to take all the issues argued before them seriously or the Illinois Supreme Court would find three other Appellate Court judges who would. -
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice William Masterson, LLB '58
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice William Masterson, LLB '58, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project. In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution. The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.cour... -
Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate Court, Division Seven
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. -
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project. In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution. The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.g... -
NALC 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round
NALC, is an inter-law school competition presented by the Center for Animal Law Studies at Lewis & Clark. NALC provides law students from across the United States an opportunity to develop knowledge in the field of animal law while honing their written and oral advocacy skills. The event is comprised of three separate competitions: Legislative Drafting & Lobbying Competition; Closing Argument Competition; and Appellate Moot Court Competition. -
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Elwood Lui '69
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Elwood Lui, JD '69, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project. In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution. The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.go... -
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/p... -
35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?
On September 11, 2012, the Miami Lawyers Chapter hosted a debate on "35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?" Featuring: --Prof. Brian Fitzpatrick, Vanderbilt University School of Law --Mr. Scott G. Hawkins, President of The Florida Bar, 2011-2012 --Moderator: Dean R. Alexander Acosta, Florida International University College of Law --Introduction: Mr. Jefferson P. Knight, The Knight Law Firm and President, Miami Lawyers Chapter The Coral Gables Country Club Coral Gables, FL -
Patch Case on Confidential Source: Illinois 3rd District Appellate Court
Reporter Joe Hosey was ordered by a Will County judge to divulge a confidential source for a story involving four people accused of a double murder in Joliet, IL, or face fines and jail time. Patch Media appealed the decision and attorney Ken Schmetterer argued the case before the 3rd District Appellate Court on Dec. 3, 2014. -
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia Speaks at Latino Law Students Forum at DePaul Law School
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia, Appointed by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2003, Passes on his experience for success in the legal profession to high school, college, and law students. Known as dedicated ,hard working, and conscientious, Judge Garcia provides six lessons that can lead to professional success. -
The Appellate Court Scolds, "Show Your Exhibits To Opponent"
Weidner Law Appeals Series This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-4107 Weidner Law represents individuals in legal actions and provides consultations within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents individuals in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida. Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner Weidner Law 250 Mirror Lake North St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 727-954-8752 -
Before I got news from the appellate court that morning
-
ACLU vs NSA BULK DATA COLLECTION (Court Hearing)
May 07, 2015 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City heard oral argument in ACLU v. Clapper, which challenged the National Security Agency’s (NSA) program of bulk data collection of telephone records. Judge Lynch began by explaining the nature of appellate proceedings. -
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html - http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - http://www.BirtherReport.com -
Appellate Courts and Independent Experts
April 4, 2007 Speaker: Douglas H. Ginsburg, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Presented by: the Center for Business Law and Regulation Summary: The Dean Lindsey Cowen Business Law Lecture Douglas H. Ginsburg is Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to which he was appointed by President Reagan in 1986. He is also Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, and Visiting Lecturer and Charles J. Merriam Scholar at the University of Chicago Law School. Judge Ginsburg previously served as a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School; as Director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget; and as Assistant Atto... -
Oral Argument in People v. Barnes, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes. -
Oral Argument in People v Tyrone Watt, Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, in the courtroom at 55 Symphony Way in Elgin. -
Triple Lutz Report --Nanny Bloomberg Gets Slammed In The Appellate Court episode 272
Go to www.FinancialSurvivalNetwork.com for the latest info on the economy and precious metals markets New York City Mayor Michael Nanny Bloomberg's attorneys were arguing to overturn the Big Gulp court decision that stopped him from regulating sugary soft drink sizes. When one of the most liberal courts in the country has the knives out for the uber-Nanny, you know that something is up. He does have one more futile bite of the apple. He must convince the state's highest court to reverse the lower court decisons, good luck on that one. Like we said before, Justice Milton Tingling's decision which stopped the ban dead in its tracks was pretty much bullet-proof. And it appears the Appellate Division will agree. Next we talked about the rising South. Most of the nation's growing cities and sta... -
NJ Appellate Court Rules Against Additional Requirements- Shelly Kennedy on Outreach
This week on Bold Departure, John and Mike discuss the NJ Appellate Court ruling in the case of Jeremy Perez. We posted about this earlier today with an excerpt from the ruling, but we add some additional commentary in the show. We are very excited to be celebrating a Pro-2A victory here in NJ. Congratulations and thanks to Evan Nappen, Louis Nappen, and Jeremy Perez. Next we discuss our appearance on the Politics and Guns Podcast. We were very excited to join the crew over there for a full episode. They are also sponsored by the New Jersey Second Amendment Society and are chock full of news and interviews with really great guests. If you aren't a fan of partisan politics, I wouldn't worry, these guys are coming from a real gun owners point of view. We close the show with anothe...
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia on CAN TV
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 24:36
- Updated: 13 Mar 2012
- views: 195
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy ) Garcia gives a live interview. This is a very informative clip for more insight to Judge Garcia and what he stands for!
R...
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy ) Garcia gives a live interview. This is a very informative clip for more insight to Judge Garcia and what he stands for!
Remember March 20, 2012 punch 123 democrat
Keep a qualified , experienced Appellate Court Judge on the bench !
wn.com/Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia On Can Tv
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy ) Garcia gives a live interview. This is a very informative clip for more insight to Judge Garcia and what he stands for!
Remember March 20, 2012 punch 123 democrat
Keep a qualified , experienced Appellate Court Judge on the bench !
- published: 13 Mar 2012
- views: 195
12 Tips for Appellate Advocacy
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 44:26
- Updated: 27 Oct 2011
- views: 30188
Michael Tigar, listed among the best oral advocates in American history, will present his 12 Ideas on Appellate Advocacy. A seasoned appellate advocate with 100...
Michael Tigar, listed among the best oral advocates in American history, will present his 12 Ideas on Appellate Advocacy. A seasoned appellate advocate with 100's of representative experiences, Mr. Tigar's advice and reflections are invaluable to anyone interested in oral advocacy. Hosted by the Moot Court Board.
wn.com/12 Tips For Appellate Advocacy
Michael Tigar, listed among the best oral advocates in American history, will present his 12 Ideas on Appellate Advocacy. A seasoned appellate advocate with 100's of representative experiences, Mr. Tigar's advice and reflections are invaluable to anyone interested in oral advocacy. Hosted by the Moot Court Board.
- published: 27 Oct 2011
- views: 30188
Appellate Court Live from RHS
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 330:22
- Updated: 30 Sep 2015
- views: 69
- published: 30 Sep 2015
- views: 69
Kankakee County Board 5-13-2008, Appellate Court, Fred Barbara & Tom Volini's Landfill
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 23:59
- Updated: 26 Apr 2011
- views: 208
Kankakee County Board Attorneys discuss Appellate Court's reversal of their 2006 decision against the proposed Fred Barbara, Tom Volini, Town & Country Utilitie...
Kankakee County Board Attorneys discuss Appellate Court's reversal of their 2006 decision against the proposed Fred Barbara, Tom Volini, Town & Country Utilities landfill with the City of Kankakee, friends of Mayor Daley and Gov. Blagojevich.
This landfill proposal was defeated December, 2009 at the Appellate Court level after the Illinois Supreme Court issued a supervisory order to the Third District Appellate Court to take all the issues argued before them seriously or the Illinois Supreme Court would find three other Appellate Court judges who would.
wn.com/Kankakee County Board 5 13 2008, Appellate Court, Fred Barbara Tom Volini's Landfill
Kankakee County Board Attorneys discuss Appellate Court's reversal of their 2006 decision against the proposed Fred Barbara, Tom Volini, Town & Country Utilities landfill with the City of Kankakee, friends of Mayor Daley and Gov. Blagojevich.
This landfill proposal was defeated December, 2009 at the Appellate Court level after the Illinois Supreme Court issued a supervisory order to the Third District Appellate Court to take all the issues argued before them seriously or the Illinois Supreme Court would find three other Appellate Court judges who would.
- published: 26 Apr 2011
- views: 208
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice William Masterson, LLB '58
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 110:12
- Updated: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 288
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice William Masterson, LLB '58, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appell...
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice William Masterson, LLB '58, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution.
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm.
wn.com/Ca Appellate Court Legacy Project Justice William Masterson, Llb '58
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice William Masterson, LLB '58, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution.
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm.
- published: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 288
Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate Court, Division Seven
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 128:04
- Updated: 08 Nov 2014
- views: 90
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who hel...
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century.
wn.com/Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate Court, Division Seven
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century.
- published: 08 Nov 2014
- views: 90
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 121:07
- Updated: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 366
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Co...
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution.
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm.
wn.com/Ca Appellate Court Legacy Project Justice Charles Vogel, Llb '59
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution.
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm.
- published: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 366
NALC 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 63:30
- Updated: 12 Mar 2014
- views: 830
NALC, is an inter-law school competition presented by the Center for Animal Law Studies at Lewis & Clark. NALC provides law students from across the United Stat...
NALC, is an inter-law school competition presented by the Center for Animal Law Studies at Lewis & Clark. NALC provides law students from across the United States an opportunity to develop knowledge in the field of animal law while honing their written and oral advocacy skills. The event is comprised of three separate competitions: Legislative Drafting & Lobbying Competition; Closing Argument Competition; and Appellate Moot Court Competition.
wn.com/Nalc 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round
NALC, is an inter-law school competition presented by the Center for Animal Law Studies at Lewis & Clark. NALC provides law students from across the United States an opportunity to develop knowledge in the field of animal law while honing their written and oral advocacy skills. The event is comprised of three separate competitions: Legislative Drafting & Lobbying Competition; Closing Argument Competition; and Appellate Moot Court Competition.
- published: 12 Mar 2014
- views: 830
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Elwood Lui '69
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 96:18
- Updated: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 373
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Elwood Lui, JD '69, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Cour...
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Elwood Lui, JD '69, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution.
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm.
wn.com/Ca Appellate Court Legacy Project Justice Elwood Lui '69
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Elwood Lui, JD '69, as part of the California Appellate Court Legacy Project.
In 2006, the California Appellate Court Legacy Project was developed as part of statewide efforts undertaken to commemorate the Centennial of the California Courts of Appeal in 2005. Each of the judges interviewed here is a UCLA School of Law alum. Please note that these videos are copyrighted by the Judicial Council of California and are not for copying and/or distribution.
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of California judges, courts and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More information about the Project is available at http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm.
- published: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 373
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 153:18
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 9614
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three feder...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
wn.com/Perry V. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 9614
35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 74:25
- Updated: 10 Oct 2012
- views: 150
On September 11, 2012, the Miami Lawyers Chapter hosted a debate on "35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measur...
On September 11, 2012, the Miami Lawyers Chapter hosted a debate on "35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?"
Featuring:
--Prof. Brian Fitzpatrick, Vanderbilt University School of Law
--Mr. Scott G. Hawkins, President of The Florida Bar, 2011-2012
--Moderator: Dean R. Alexander Acosta, Florida International University College of Law
--Introduction: Mr. Jefferson P. Knight, The Knight Law Firm and President, Miami Lawyers Chapter
The Coral Gables Country Club
Coral Gables, FL
wn.com/35 Years Of Retention Elections Of Appellate Court Judges In Florida Has The System Measured Up
On September 11, 2012, the Miami Lawyers Chapter hosted a debate on "35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?"
Featuring:
--Prof. Brian Fitzpatrick, Vanderbilt University School of Law
--Mr. Scott G. Hawkins, President of The Florida Bar, 2011-2012
--Moderator: Dean R. Alexander Acosta, Florida International University College of Law
--Introduction: Mr. Jefferson P. Knight, The Knight Law Firm and President, Miami Lawyers Chapter
The Coral Gables Country Club
Coral Gables, FL
- published: 10 Oct 2012
- views: 150
Patch Case on Confidential Source: Illinois 3rd District Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 36:52
- Updated: 04 Dec 2014
- views: 45
Reporter Joe Hosey was ordered by a Will County judge to divulge a confidential source for a story involving four people accused of a double murder in Joliet, I...
Reporter Joe Hosey was ordered by a Will County judge to divulge a confidential source for a story involving four people accused of a double murder in Joliet, IL, or face fines and jail time. Patch Media appealed the decision and attorney Ken Schmetterer argued the case before the 3rd District Appellate Court on Dec. 3, 2014.
wn.com/Patch Case On Confidential Source Illinois 3Rd District Appellate Court
Reporter Joe Hosey was ordered by a Will County judge to divulge a confidential source for a story involving four people accused of a double murder in Joliet, IL, or face fines and jail time. Patch Media appealed the decision and attorney Ken Schmetterer argued the case before the 3rd District Appellate Court on Dec. 3, 2014.
- published: 04 Dec 2014
- views: 45
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia Speaks at Latino Law Students Forum at DePaul Law School
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 26:02
- Updated: 06 Mar 2012
- views: 196
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia, Appointed by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2003, Passes on his experience for success in the legal profession to hi...
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia, Appointed by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2003, Passes on his experience for success in the legal profession to high school, college, and law students. Known as dedicated ,hard working, and conscientious, Judge Garcia provides six lessons that can lead to professional success.
wn.com/Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo Rudy Garcia Speaks At Latino Law Students Forum At Depaul Law School
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia, Appointed by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2003, Passes on his experience for success in the legal profession to high school, college, and law students. Known as dedicated ,hard working, and conscientious, Judge Garcia provides six lessons that can lead to professional success.
- published: 06 Mar 2012
- views: 196
The Appellate Court Scolds, "Show Your Exhibits To Opponent"
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 51:06
- Updated: 28 Jun 2015
- views: 20
Weidner Law Appeals Series
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-4107
Weidner Law represents individuals in legal actions and provides consultations w...
Weidner Law Appeals Series
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-4107
Weidner Law represents individuals in legal actions and provides consultations within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents individuals in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
wn.com/The Appellate Court Scolds, Show Your Exhibits To Opponent
Weidner Law Appeals Series
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-4107
Weidner Law represents individuals in legal actions and provides consultations within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents individuals in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
- published: 28 Jun 2015
- views: 20
Before I got news from the appellate court that morning
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:01
- Updated: 11 Dec 2014
- views: 74
- published: 11 Dec 2014
- views: 74
ACLU vs NSA BULK DATA COLLECTION (Court Hearing)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 107:28
- Updated: 08 May 2015
- views: 431
May 07, 2015 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City heard oral argument in ACLU v. Clapper, which challenged the Natio...
May 07, 2015 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City heard oral argument in ACLU v. Clapper, which challenged the National Security Agency’s (NSA) program of bulk data collection of telephone records. Judge Lynch began by explaining the nature of appellate proceedings.
wn.com/Aclu Vs Nsa Bulk Data Collection (Court Hearing)
May 07, 2015 C-SPAN http://MOXNews.com
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City heard oral argument in ACLU v. Clapper, which challenged the National Security Agency’s (NSA) program of bulk data collection of telephone records. Judge Lynch began by explaining the nature of appellate proceedings.
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 431
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - 5/2/11
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 51:57
- Updated: 04 May 2011
- views: 14026
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 1...
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html -
http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com -
http://www.BirtherReport.com
wn.com/Oral Arguments Keyes Vs. Obama 9Th Circuit Court Of Appeals 5 2 11
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pasadena, California; Oral Arguments; Keyes-Barnett-Drake et. al., v. Obama Keyes/Drake et. al., vs. Obama. Plaintiffs include 10 state representatives and 30 members of the U.S. military. - 5/2/2011 - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/oral-arguments-for-keyes-barnett-drake.html -
http://www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com -
http://www.BirtherReport.com
- published: 04 May 2011
- views: 14026
Appellate Courts and Independent Experts
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 65:11
- Updated: 27 Oct 2009
- views: 706
April 4, 2007
Speaker: Douglas H. Ginsburg, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Presented by: the Center f...
April 4, 2007
Speaker: Douglas H. Ginsburg, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Presented by: the Center for Business Law and Regulation
Summary: The Dean Lindsey Cowen Business Law Lecture
Douglas H. Ginsburg is Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to which he was appointed by President Reagan in 1986. He is also Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, and Visiting Lecturer and Charles J. Merriam Scholar at the University of Chicago Law School.
Judge Ginsburg previously served as a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School; as Director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget; and as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice. Judge Ginsburg is a graduate of Cornell University and of the University of Chicago Law School ('73), where he was the Articles Editor of the Law Review. He is a member of the American Economic Association, the American Law and Economics Association, and the Mont Pelerin Society. Judge Ginsburg serves on the Judicial Advisory Board of the Law and Economics Center at George Mason University School of Law.
wn.com/Appellate Courts And Independent Experts
April 4, 2007
Speaker: Douglas H. Ginsburg, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Presented by: the Center for Business Law and Regulation
Summary: The Dean Lindsey Cowen Business Law Lecture
Douglas H. Ginsburg is Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to which he was appointed by President Reagan in 1986. He is also Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law at George Mason University School of Law, and Visiting Lecturer and Charles J. Merriam Scholar at the University of Chicago Law School.
Judge Ginsburg previously served as a Professor of Law at Harvard Law School; as Director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget; and as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice. Judge Ginsburg is a graduate of Cornell University and of the University of Chicago Law School ('73), where he was the Articles Editor of the Law Review. He is a member of the American Economic Association, the American Law and Economics Association, and the Mont Pelerin Society. Judge Ginsburg serves on the Judicial Advisory Board of the Law and Economics Center at George Mason University School of Law.
- published: 27 Oct 2009
- views: 706
Oral Argument in People v. Barnes, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, December 4, 2013
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 48:41
- Updated: 14 Mar 2014
- views: 74
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes.
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes.
wn.com/Oral Argument In People V. Barnes, Illinois Appellate Court, First District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, in which I we won reversal and remand for Mr. Barnes.
- published: 14 Mar 2014
- views: 74
Oral Argument in People v Tyrone Watt, Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, December 4, 2013
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 45:04
- Updated: 14 Mar 2014
- views: 61
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, in the courtroom at 55 Symphony Way in Elgin.
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, in the courtroom at 55 Symphony Way in Elgin.
wn.com/Oral Argument In People V Tyrone Watt, Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, December 4, 2013
This was a case I argued in the Illinois Appellate Court, Second District, in the courtroom at 55 Symphony Way in Elgin.
- published: 14 Mar 2014
- views: 61
Triple Lutz Report --Nanny Bloomberg Gets Slammed In The Appellate Court episode 272
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 23:56
- Updated: 25 Jun 2013
- views: 36
Go to www.FinancialSurvivalNetwork.com for the latest info on the economy and precious metals markets
New York City Mayor Michael Nanny Bloomberg's attorneys we...
Go to www.FinancialSurvivalNetwork.com for the latest info on the economy and precious metals markets
New York City Mayor Michael Nanny Bloomberg's attorneys were arguing to overturn the Big Gulp court decision that stopped him from regulating sugary soft drink sizes. When one of the most liberal courts in the country has the knives out for the uber-Nanny, you know that something is up. He does have one more futile bite of the apple. He must convince the state's highest court to reverse the lower court decisons, good luck on that one. Like we said before, Justice Milton Tingling's decision which stopped the ban dead in its tracks was pretty much bullet-proof. And it appears the Appellate Division will agree.
Next we talked about the rising South. Most of the nation's growing cities and states are located down south. There's no accident here. While the Northeastern elites deride the culture and intellect of the country's southern inhabitants, in the area of economic performance and growth there's no contest; the South has been winning hands down for over a generation.
www.FinancialSurvivalNetwork.com presents
wn.com/Triple Lutz Report Nanny Bloomberg Gets Slammed In The Appellate Court Episode 272
Go to www.FinancialSurvivalNetwork.com for the latest info on the economy and precious metals markets
New York City Mayor Michael Nanny Bloomberg's attorneys were arguing to overturn the Big Gulp court decision that stopped him from regulating sugary soft drink sizes. When one of the most liberal courts in the country has the knives out for the uber-Nanny, you know that something is up. He does have one more futile bite of the apple. He must convince the state's highest court to reverse the lower court decisons, good luck on that one. Like we said before, Justice Milton Tingling's decision which stopped the ban dead in its tracks was pretty much bullet-proof. And it appears the Appellate Division will agree.
Next we talked about the rising South. Most of the nation's growing cities and states are located down south. There's no accident here. While the Northeastern elites deride the culture and intellect of the country's southern inhabitants, in the area of economic performance and growth there's no contest; the South has been winning hands down for over a generation.
www.FinancialSurvivalNetwork.com presents
- published: 25 Jun 2013
- views: 36
NJ Appellate Court Rules Against Additional Requirements- Shelly Kennedy on Outreach
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:49
- Updated: 09 Jan 2014
- views: 46
This week on Bold Departure, John and Mike discuss the NJ Appellate Court ruling in the case of Jeremy Perez. We posted about this earlier today with an excerp...
This week on Bold Departure, John and Mike discuss the NJ Appellate Court ruling in the case of Jeremy Perez. We posted about this earlier today with an excerpt from the ruling, but we add some additional commentary in the show. We are very excited to be celebrating a Pro-2A victory here in NJ. Congratulations and thanks to Evan Nappen, Louis Nappen, and Jeremy Perez.
Next we discuss our appearance on the Politics and Guns Podcast. We were very excited to join the crew over there for a full episode. They are also sponsored by the New Jersey Second Amendment Society and are chock full of news and interviews with really great guests. If you aren't a fan of partisan politics, I wouldn't worry, these guys are coming from a real gun owners point of view.
We close the show with another excerpt from our time with Shelly Kennedy. This time we are focusing on the outreach taking place to women and non-traditional 2A groups. The audio of the interview portion is also available on the website bolddeparture.com
wn.com/Nj Appellate Court Rules Against Additional Requirements Shelly Kennedy On Outreach
This week on Bold Departure, John and Mike discuss the NJ Appellate Court ruling in the case of Jeremy Perez. We posted about this earlier today with an excerpt from the ruling, but we add some additional commentary in the show. We are very excited to be celebrating a Pro-2A victory here in NJ. Congratulations and thanks to Evan Nappen, Louis Nappen, and Jeremy Perez.
Next we discuss our appearance on the Politics and Guns Podcast. We were very excited to join the crew over there for a full episode. They are also sponsored by the New Jersey Second Amendment Society and are chock full of news and interviews with really great guests. If you aren't a fan of partisan politics, I wouldn't worry, these guys are coming from a real gun owners point of view.
We close the show with another excerpt from our time with Shelly Kennedy. This time we are focusing on the outreach taking place to women and non-traditional 2A groups. The audio of the interview portion is also available on the website bolddeparture.com
- published: 09 Jan 2014
- views: 46
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
1:23
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow...
published: 02 Sep 2014
What is an Appellate Court?
What is an Appellate Court?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
8:59
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
published: 11 Apr 2013
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
15:01
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
published: 25 Feb 2011
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
- Report rights infringement
- published: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 9641
1:36
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
Kay Nord Hunt
published: 22 Apr 2013
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Apr 2013
- views: 698
20:15
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
published: 15 Jul 2014
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
4:33
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English...
published: 04 Nov 2014
Appellate court
Appellate court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
15:52
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
published: 23 Oct 2008
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
6:52
Appellate court ruling
What can I say
published: 18 Jun 2015
Appellate court ruling
Appellate court ruling
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 948
15:00
Appeals
Judge Terri F. Love of Louisiana 4th Circuit Court of Appeal joins the Louisiana law talk ...
published: 21 Mar 2013
Appeals
Appeals
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Mar 2013
- views: 1662
5:11
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a...
published: 15 May 2015
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
11:17
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how t...
published: 13 Feb 2012
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
0:26
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's ...
published: 21 Nov 2013
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
1:04
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practic...
published: 07 May 2015
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 May 2015
- views: 4261
0:40
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to ov...
published: 18 Apr 2014
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Apr 2014
- views: 833
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
0:44
Dr. Luke Case: Kesha Appeals Injunction Loss
Kesha's legal battle for emancipation from her contract with the record company owned by t...
published: 22 Mar 2016
Dr. Luke Case: Kesha Appeals Injunction Loss
Dr. Luke Case: Kesha Appeals Injunction Loss
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Mar 2016
- views: 3
1:04
Gawker Could Still Win Hulk Hogan Case Despite $115 Million Verdict
A Florida jury awarded Hulk Hogan $115 million saying website Gawker violated the retired ...
published: 21 Mar 2016
Gawker Could Still Win Hulk Hogan Case Despite $115 Million Verdict
Gawker Could Still Win Hulk Hogan Case Despite $115 Million Verdict
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Mar 2016
- views: 5
43:17
Douglas Thames, The Doll Murders : Serial Killer Documentary
man already serving a life sentence for murder is suspected in another decades-old crime. ...
published: 20 Mar 2016
Douglas Thames, The Doll Murders : Serial Killer Documentary
Douglas Thames, The Doll Murders : Serial Killer Documentary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 20 Mar 2016
- views: 2
0:32
Download Federal Courts - Standards of Review: Appellate Court Review of District Court Decisio PDF
http://j.mp/1WuvAS0
published: 17 Mar 2016
Download Federal Courts - Standards of Review: Appellate Court Review of District Court Decisio PDF
Download Federal Courts - Standards of Review: Appellate Court Review of District Court Decisio PDF
- Report rights infringement
- published: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 0
3:08
SCOTUS War | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nomina...
published: 17 Mar 2016
SCOTUS War | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
SCOTUS War | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
- Report rights infringement
- published: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 2
1:19
SCOTUS Battle | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
Senate Republicans have vowed not to consider the 63-year-old appellate court judge nomina...
published: 17 Mar 2016
SCOTUS Battle | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
SCOTUS Battle | GOP Vow to Block Nominee Merrick Garland
- Report rights infringement
- published: 17 Mar 2016
- views: 591
0:32
Obama has announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court
오바마, 11시 새 대법관 지명
President Barack Obama has just announced his nominee for the U.S. Supre...
published: 16 Mar 2016
Obama has announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court
Obama has announced his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 7
2:15
Obama nominates Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
US President Barack Obama has nominated Merrick Garland, an appellate court judge and form...
published: 16 Mar 2016
Obama nominates Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
Obama nominates Merrick Garland to Supreme Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 92
4:57
Considered twice before, Garland gets call to top court
Merrick Garland, the federal appeals court judge picked by President Barack Obama for the ...
published: 16 Mar 2016
Considered twice before, Garland gets call to top court
Considered twice before, Garland gets call to top court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 16 Mar 2016
- views: 12
0:31
Download A Union List of Appellate Court Records and Briefs: Federal and State (Aall Publication PDF
http://j.mp/1QVM5pY
published: 15 Mar 2016
Download A Union List of Appellate Court Records and Briefs: Federal and State (Aall Publication PDF
Download A Union List of Appellate Court Records and Briefs: Federal and State (Aall Publication PDF
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Mar 2016
- views: 0
1:24
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Court
published: 12 Mar 2016
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Court
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Mar 2016
- views: 0
1:17
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
published: 12 Mar 2016
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
The Winning Brief 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Mar 2016
- views: 0
5:42
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice . Jeffrey Wilens has represented criminal or civil p...
published: 06 Mar 2016
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice
Jeffrey Wilens Appellate Law Practice
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Mar 2016
- views: 2
2:05
Appellate judges Garland, Srinivasan considered for U.S. top court: NYT
The White House is vetting federal appellate judges Merrick Garland and Sri Srinivasan as ...
published: 05 Mar 2016
Appellate judges Garland, Srinivasan considered for U.S. top court: NYT
Appellate judges Garland, Srinivasan considered for U.S. top court: NYT
- Report rights infringement
- published: 05 Mar 2016
- views: 0
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
24:36
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia on CAN TV
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy ) Garcia gives a live interview. This is a very inform...
published: 13 Mar 2012
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia on CAN TV
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia on CAN TV
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Mar 2012
- views: 195
44:26
12 Tips for Appellate Advocacy
Michael Tigar, listed among the best oral advocates in American history, will present his ...
published: 27 Oct 2011
12 Tips for Appellate Advocacy
12 Tips for Appellate Advocacy
- Report rights infringement
- published: 27 Oct 2011
- views: 30188
330:22
Appellate Court Live from RHS
published: 30 Sep 2015
Appellate Court Live from RHS
Appellate Court Live from RHS
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Sep 2015
- views: 69
23:59
Kankakee County Board 5-13-2008, Appellate Court, Fred Barbara & Tom Volini's Landfill
Kankakee County Board Attorneys discuss Appellate Court's reversal of their 2006 decision ...
published: 26 Apr 2011
Kankakee County Board 5-13-2008, Appellate Court, Fred Barbara & Tom Volini's Landfill
Kankakee County Board 5-13-2008, Appellate Court, Fred Barbara & Tom Volini's Landfill
- Report rights infringement
- published: 26 Apr 2011
- views: 208
110:12
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice William Masterson, LLB '58
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice William Masterson, LLB '58, as part of the Califo...
published: 12 Dec 2011
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice William Masterson, LLB '58
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice William Masterson, LLB '58
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 288
128:04
Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate Court, Division Seven
The Legacy Project recounts the stories and preserves the rich judicial history of Califor...
published: 08 Nov 2014
Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate Court, Division Seven
Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate Court, Division Seven
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Nov 2014
- views: 90
121:07
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59, as part of the California...
published: 12 Dec 2011
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Charles Vogel, LLB '59
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 366
63:30
NALC 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round
NALC, is an inter-law school competition presented by the Center for Animal Law Studies at...
published: 12 Mar 2014
NALC 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round
NALC 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Mar 2014
- views: 830
96:18
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Elwood Lui '69
An interview with UCLA Law alum, Justice Elwood Lui, JD '69, as part of the California App...
published: 12 Dec 2011
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Elwood Lui '69
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Elwood Lui '69
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Dec 2011
- views: 373
153:18
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 9614
74:25
35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?
On September 11, 2012, the Miami Lawyers Chapter hosted a debate on "35 Years of Retention...
published: 10 Oct 2012
35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?
35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court Judges in Florida: Has the System Measured Up?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 10 Oct 2012
- views: 150
36:52
Patch Case on Confidential Source: Illinois 3rd District Appellate Court
Reporter Joe Hosey was ordered by a Will County judge to divulge a confidential source for...
published: 04 Dec 2014
Patch Case on Confidential Source: Illinois 3rd District Appellate Court
Patch Case on Confidential Source: Illinois 3rd District Appellate Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Dec 2014
- views: 45
26:02
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia Speaks at Latino Law Students Forum at DePaul Law School
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia, Appointed by the Illinois Supreme Court in 20...
published: 06 Mar 2012
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia Speaks at Latino Law Students Forum at DePaul Law School
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia Speaks at Latino Law Students Forum at DePaul Law School
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Mar 2012
- views: 196
51:06
The Appellate Court Scolds, "Show Your Exhibits To Opponent"
Weidner Law Appeals Series
This oral argument video is on the case: 2D13-4107
Weidner La...
published: 28 Jun 2015
The Appellate Court Scolds, "Show Your Exhibits To Opponent"
The Appellate Court Scolds, "Show Your Exhibits To Opponent"
- Report rights infringement
- published: 28 Jun 2015
- views: 20
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo (Rudy) Garcia on CAN...
12 Tips for Appellate Advocacy...
Appellate Court Live from RHS...
Kankakee County Board 5-13-2008, Appellate Court, ...
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Willi...
Justice Arthur Gilbert, Second District Appellate ...
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Charl...
NALC 2014 Appellate Moot Court Final Round...
CA Appellate Court Legacy Project -- Justice Elwoo...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments...
35 Years of Retention Elections of Appellate Court...
Patch Case on Confidential Source: Illinois 3rd Di...
Appellate Court Judge Rodolfo "Rudy" Garcia Speaks...
The Appellate Court Scolds, "Show Your Exhibits To...
Before I got news from the appellate court that mo...
ACLU vs NSA BULK DATA COLLECTION (Court Hearing)...
Oral Arguments: Keyes vs. Obama; 9th Circuit Court...
Appellate Courts and Independent Experts...
Oral Argument in People v. Barnes, Illinois Appell...
Oral Argument in People v Tyrone Watt, Illinois A...
Triple Lutz Report --Nanny Bloomberg Gets Slammed ...
NJ Appellate Court Rules Against Additional Requir...
photo: WN / smita
Brussels attack: Terror suspects identified as brothers Khalid and Brahim El Bakraoui
Edit DNA India 23 Mar 2016
-->. Belgian state broadcaster RTBF has identified two of the attackers who targeted Brussels as brothers Khalid and Brahim Bakraoui. The report issued on Wednesday says the brothers were known to police for past crimes, but nothing relating to terrorism. REBF says Khalid El Bakraoui had rented an apartment raided by police last week in an operation that led authorities to top Paris attacks suspect Salah Abdeslam ... 13 Paris attacks ... ....
photo: Creative Commons / Brussels Airport
Brussels suicide bombers identified as brothers
Edit New York Post 23 Mar 2016
BRUSSELS — Belgian authorities were searching Wednesday for a top suspect in the country’s deadliest attacks in decades, as the European Union’s capital awoke under guard and with limited public transport after 34 were killed in bombings on the Brussels airport and a subway station ... They are believed to have blown themselves up in the attacks ... ....
photo: Via YouTube
Belgian Police Hunt for Brussels Attack Suspect
Edit Chosun Ilbo 22 Mar 2016
Belgian police issued a wanted notice for a suspect in the Brussels airport bombing, one of three explosions claimed by Islamic State that rocked the capital Tuesday, killing at least 30 people ... Authorities say the wanted man fled the airport. Police also say they found a bomb, chemicals, and an Islamic State flag during a raid on a house in a Brussels neighborhood while searching for the suspect ... ◆ IS Claims Responsibility ... U.S ... ....
photo: AP / Peter Dejong
The Brussels Attacks and the New Normal of Terrorism in Western Europe
Edit Huffington Post 22 Mar 2016
As emergency services are still digging through the rubble of Zaventem Airport and Maelbeek Metro Station in Brussels, it is clear that the full scale of the devastation will take days if not weeks to assess. At this point there are 21 confirmed deaths and many more injured ... In fact, eerily prophetic, the Belgian Minister of Interior, Jan Jambon, had said on Monday. "We know that stopping one cell can... push others into action ... ....
photo: AP / Peter Dejong
European Command: U.S. Air Force Officer, Family Injured in Brussels Explosions
Edit WorldNews.com 22 Mar 2016
A U.S. Air Force officer as well as several family members were among those injured in Tuesday’s Brussels attack, The Associated Press reported.U.S ... U.S ... European Command said it continues to confirm the safety of U.S....
« back to news headlines
Deadline for Porter Ranch residents to return home extended
Edit LA Daily News 23 Mar 2016
An appellate court panel gave Porter Ranch residents who have relocated to hotels two extra days to return home, officials said Tuesday. Southern California Gas Company will be required to pay for about 2,600 residents to stay in hotels until next Tuesday under an order released by an appellate court, according to Supervisor Michael Antonovich ... Antonovich said the appellate court will take up the issue again next Tuesday....
Deadline for Porter Ranch residents to return home extended until next Tuesday
Edit LA Daily News 23 Mar 2016
An appellate court panel gave Porter Ranch residents who have relocated to hotels two extra days to return home, officials said Tuesday. Southern California Gas Company will be required to pay for about 2,600 residents to stay in hotels until next Tuesday under an order released Tuesday by an appellate court, according to Supervisor Michael Antonovich ... Antonovich said the appellate court will take up the issue again next Tuesday....
The U.S. Is Becoming a Terrifying Nation for Women
Edit Alternet 23 Mar 2016
Much is at stake in a Supreme Court case over a Texas abortion law. The nation’s highest court heard oral arguments last week in Whole Woman’s Health v ... According to Pieklo, however, the Supreme Court could rule that the current stay on the law remain in effect while the case works its way back up through the appellate court system, which would be tantamount to only temporary success....
Idaho mom who sued Obama over illegal surveillance loses at appellate court [US]
Edit Ars Technica 22 Mar 2016
The Idaho mother who sued President Barack Obama over alleged unconstitutional telephone metadata collection has lost again in court....
Appeals court rekindles bad blood over 'Pirro & Sons' funeral home name
Edit Syracuse 22 Mar 2016
But the two families ended up in court in 2014 as part of an ongoing dispute over references to the original Pirro & Sons name ... But last week, an appellate court ruled that Pirro & Sons could continue its lawsuit against Thomas J ... "We conclude that plaintiff (Pirro & Sons) alleged a cognizable claim for breach of contract for which it seeks a permanent injunction," the appellate court wrote in its decision....
Prosecutor asks Illinois appeals court to allow late voting
Edit Richmond Times Dispatch 22 Mar 2016
(AP) — The Adams County state's attorney has asked an Illinois appellate court to allow voters ......
State court rejects prosecutor's appeal to allow late voting
Edit Tampa Bay Online 22 Mar 2016
(AP) An Illinois appellate court has ... The Quincy Herald-Whig reports (http.//bit.ly/1WFLARo ) State's Attorney Jon Barnard filed the request Monday with the 4th District Appellate Court....
Two Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Partners Invited to Join Prestigious American Bar Foundation Fellows (Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP)
Edit Public Technologies 22 Mar 2016
Moskal has more than 25 years of experience as a trial and appellate lawyer handling business and commercial disputes. She has a particular focus in state and local tax litigation, appellate litigation, and government contracts and bid protests ... Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and in Tennessee and Kentucky appellate courts ... He currently serves as chair of the Tennessee Bar Association's Appellate Practice Section....
Wisconsin asks US Supreme Court to take abortion case
Edit The Oklahoman 22 Mar 2016
They argued that the appellate court should have upheld the law since most abortion providers were able to obtain admitting privileges and providers who didn't get them didn't ......
With Merrick Garland In The Spotlight, Sri Srinivasan Kept His Court Running
Edit Huffington Post 22 Mar 2016
Circuit, which hears more cases involving government transparency than probably all other federal appellate courts combined ... Circuit in 2013, Srinivasan received effusive support from a bipartisan who's who of former solicitors general spanning several administrations -- advocates who represented the federal government before the Supreme Court and other appellate courts....
Kesha is formally appealing the denial of an injunction against Dr. Luke
Edit The Examiner 22 Mar 2016Child pornographer's extradition challenge put on hold
Edit The Irish Times 22 Mar 2016
Myerscough applied to the High Court in Dublin for an inquiry under Article 40.4 of the Constitution, into the legality of his continued detention in custody in Ireland pending his extradition to the UK ... This, it is claimed, is because the judge who heard his case, rather an appellate court, has a veto over whether or not the judge’s decision may be appealed....
Trust-govt dispute goes back to Satara court
Edit The Times of India 22 Mar 2016
Justice R D Dhanuka of the high court held, "The orders passed by the trial court (CJSD) and the lower appellate court (district judge, Satara) on the issue of limitation in respect of money claim made by the temple trust are ex facie erroneous.". The bench observed that the lower courts could not have dismissed the entire suit in so far as the money claim and the issue of limitation was concerned....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next page »
