- published: 24 Feb 2017
- views: 134
Moral particularism is the view that there are no moral principles and that moral judgement can be found only as one decides particular cases, either real or imagined. This stands in stark contrast to other prominent moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism. In the former, it is asserted that people have a set of duties (that are to be considered or respected); in the latter, people are to respect the happiness or the preferences of others in their actions. Particularism, to the contrary, asserts that there are no overriding principles that are applicable in every case, or that can be abstracted to apply to every case.
According to particularism, most notably defended by Jonathan Dancy, moral knowledge should be understood as knowledge of moral rules of thumb, which are not principles, and of particular solutions, which can be used by analogy in new cases. It ultimately requires that one will be in good faith upon each particular circumstance as opposed to falling under the influence of narcissism.
What is MORAL PARTICULARISM? What does MORAL PARTICULARISM mean? MORAL PARTICULARISM meaning - MORAL PARTICULARISM definition - MORAL PARTICULARISM explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. Moral particularism is the view that there are no moral principles and that moral judgement can be found only as one decides particular cases, either real or imagined. This stands in stark contrast to other prominent moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism. In the former, it is asserted that people have a set of duties (that are to be considered or respected); in the latter, people are to respect the happiness or the preferences of others in their actions. Particularism, to the contrary, asserts that there are no ove...
Subscribe late late show , late show , craig ferguson , craig ferguson interview , craig ferguson ladies , craig ferguson stand up , funny interview , craig ferguson kristen bell , craig ferguson jennifer lawrence , funny video , david letterman , jimmy fallon , jimmy kimmel , jay leno , justin bieber , jimmy fallon show , ellen degeneres , tonight show , frank caliendo , craig ferguson 2011 , craig ferguson 2012 , demi lovato , josh groban , ellen show , nicki minaj , nigahiga, bruno, bloopers, girl talk , doctor who , taylor swift , daniel tosh , Jon Stewart , interview with stars , celebrity interview , craig ferguson joke , interview 2013 , interview 2012 , tv shows , fridays tv show , the tv show , talk show , talk show host ...
Why ethics does not require principles. Moral Particularism: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-particularism/ Ethics Without Principles: http://www.amazon.com/Ethics-without-Principles-ebook/dp/B00260HHQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid;=1382319483&sr;=8-1&keywords;=ethics+without+principles
Moral particularism Moral particularism is the view that there are no moral principles and that moral judgement can be found only as one decides particular cases, either real or imagined.This stands in stark contrast to other prominent moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism. -Video is targeted to blind users Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA image source in video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vfv55-7Xkok
In some cultures the rules apply to everyone regardless, while in other cultures the rules are readily adjusted depending on the circumstances.
Created on October 15, 2012 using FlipShare.
Kerry McCarpet's full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNVJMrMa0 An older post by me going into detail & ultimately scolding all versions of moral egalitarianism and telic equality: http://antibullshitman.blogspot.ca/2015/04/inequality-vs-disutility.html Oft-ignored inegalitarian alternatives to egalitarianism: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#EquDesPerSeAltEga Sufficientarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Suf Prioritarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Pri Desertitarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Des More: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#OthVie
TV's Craig Ferguson is in awe of the brainpower of moral philosophers. (From 2/5/2010 broadcast).
An instructional video for students enrolled in TSE 340, a spring 2017 hybrid course offered at Hood Theological Seminary (Salisbury NC)
What is MORAL PARTICULARISM? What does MORAL PARTICULARISM mean? MORAL PARTICULARISM meaning - MORAL PARTICULARISM definition - MORAL PARTICULARISM explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. Moral particularism is the view that there are no moral principles and that moral judgement can be found only as one decides particular cases, either real or imagined. This stands in stark contrast to other prominent moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism. In the former, it is asserted that people have a set of duties (that are to be considered or respected); in the latter, people are to respect the happiness or the preferences of others in their actions. Particularism, to the contrary, asserts that there are no ove...
Subscribe late late show , late show , craig ferguson , craig ferguson interview , craig ferguson ladies , craig ferguson stand up , funny interview , craig ferguson kristen bell , craig ferguson jennifer lawrence , funny video , david letterman , jimmy fallon , jimmy kimmel , jay leno , justin bieber , jimmy fallon show , ellen degeneres , tonight show , frank caliendo , craig ferguson 2011 , craig ferguson 2012 , demi lovato , josh groban , ellen show , nicki minaj , nigahiga, bruno, bloopers, girl talk , doctor who , taylor swift , daniel tosh , Jon Stewart , interview with stars , celebrity interview , craig ferguson joke , interview 2013 , interview 2012 , tv shows , fridays tv show , the tv show , talk show , talk show host ...
Why ethics does not require principles. Moral Particularism: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-particularism/ Ethics Without Principles: http://www.amazon.com/Ethics-without-Principles-ebook/dp/B00260HHQW/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid;=1382319483&sr;=8-1&keywords;=ethics+without+principles
Moral particularism Moral particularism is the view that there are no moral principles and that moral judgement can be found only as one decides particular cases, either real or imagined.This stands in stark contrast to other prominent moral theories, such as deontology or utilitarianism. -Video is targeted to blind users Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA image source in video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vfv55-7Xkok
In some cultures the rules apply to everyone regardless, while in other cultures the rules are readily adjusted depending on the circumstances.
Created on October 15, 2012 using FlipShare.
Kerry McCarpet's full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNVJMrMa0 An older post by me going into detail & ultimately scolding all versions of moral egalitarianism and telic equality: http://antibullshitman.blogspot.ca/2015/04/inequality-vs-disutility.html Oft-ignored inegalitarian alternatives to egalitarianism: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#EquDesPerSeAltEga Sufficientarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Suf Prioritarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Pri Desertitarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Des More: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#OthVie
TV's Craig Ferguson is in awe of the brainpower of moral philosophers. (From 2/5/2010 broadcast).
An instructional video for students enrolled in TSE 340, a spring 2017 hybrid course offered at Hood Theological Seminary (Salisbury NC)
Kerry McCarpet's full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vupNVJMrMa0 An older post by me going into detail & ultimately scolding all versions of moral egalitarianism and telic equality: http://antibullshitman.blogspot.ca/2015/04/inequality-vs-disutility.html Oft-ignored inegalitarian alternatives to egalitarianism: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#EquDesPerSeAltEga Sufficientarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Suf Prioritarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Pri Desertitarian calculus: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#Des More: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/#OthVie
Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson 4/1/2010 Guests: Robin Williams, Jonathan Dancy
Symposium on Occasion of the Farewell of Paul Hoyningen-Huene from Hannover: Science - Big Questions Revisited. 18th July 2014
Rabbi Hartman was one of the few Orthodox voices that attempted to articulate a Jewish theology that squared a religious particularism to the circle of moral universalism. The personal tragedy of Rabbi Hartman was that he succeeded so profoundly. In South Jerusalem he found a community that would listen, and he transformed it into the humming hub of liberal Judaism that it is today. The trouble is there's no other place like it. - Elisheva Goldberg of The Daily Beast http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/11/the-tragedy-and-success-of-rabbi-david-hartman.html Excerpts from the interview with Leon Charney: ...We use external symbols... the menorah, Hatikvah song, Hebrew. Oh, those are nice things, but they are not depth. They are not things that build character. They are not thing...
Moderator: Timothy Bewes, Department of English, Brown University Toril Moi, Duke University – “Language and Attention: Morality and Literature after Wittgenstein” "Attention to particulars!" could have been Wittgenstein's slogan. The "ordinary language philosophy" that builds on his work has developed a strong understanding of the moral power of attention, not least in the writings of Cora Diamond. For this philosophy, word and world are intertwined. A sharpened attention towards is a sharpened attention to reality. The best writing teaches us to see both language and reality. Nancy Yousef, City University of New York – “Unresolved: Attention and Form in Eliot and Wittgenstein” Isolated moments of attention in Eliot's narratives destabilize the distinction between action and thought...
This paper starts by considering an interesting argument of H.A. Prichard’s against the view that to act is to cause a change; the argument is that causing is not an activity. The argument is important because of the recent emergence of an ‘agent-causation’ view according to which actions are the causing of changes by agents. I suggest a way of responding to Prichard’s argument, and then, profiting from one of his own conclusions, turn to consider the relation between neurophysiological changes and the causation of bodily movement by the agent. I make a suggestion about the proper way to understand the relation between the neurophysiological changes, the bodily movements and the action.
Karl Popper was an Austro-British philosopher regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of science in the 20th century. He is known for his attempt to repudiate the classical observationalist-inductivist form of scientific method in favor of empirical falsification. He is also known for his opposition to the classical justificationist account of knowledge which he replaced with critical rationalism. He vigorously defended liberal democracy and the principles of social criticism that he came to believe made a flourishing "open society" possible. Karl Popper was of great interest to Alan Saunders, the science broadcaster who died in 2012. Alan produced this portrait of Karl Popper first broadcast January 2000 for ABC's National's Science Show by Robyn Williams. Karl Popper himself make...
faith based apologetics, random sports talk, and other Jesus based discussion
The third video in Dr. Richard Brown's online introduction to ethics.
Sinai Indaba is an annual Torah convention of the foremost international Jewish leaders and thinkers. See more at: www.Sinai-Indaba.com Rabbi, Lord, Professor. Universalist, Particularist, Visionary. The United Kingdom's outgoing Chief Rabbi, Lord Jonathan Sacks, is one of the most eloquent and academically decorated Jewish leaders of our time. Educated at Oxford and Cambridge and possessing a consummate mastery of moral philosophy, Lord Sacks holds no less than 15 honorary degrees, and is the prolific author of 24 books, and countless columns and essays. He has addressed wide-ranging audiences through forums as diverse as the European Parliament, the British House of Lords, a nationally televised debate with Richard Dawkins, and Chabad's annual "kinnus" conference in New York, reaching a...