FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail

Bernie’s Sleepy Giant

by

It is time to make Noam Chomsky happy by proving him wrong. The MIT sage was pleased by Senator Sanders left-wing candidacy, but expected no lasting result. Once the election ended the political effort would fizzle.

New York’s conservative election laws enfranchise longtime voters who enrolled in a party before the start of the campaign. Voters who took notice in the final weeks of campaign — the period of maximum publicity — must wait until November to cast their ballot. Election day registration favors a popular candidate like Bernie. Had independent voters been allowed to participate, it would have been a close election and an accurate measure Bernie’s popularity.

The New York Times election map is a sea of green. Green is Sanders’ color, blue – Hillary’s color is confined to the State’s big cities and their suburbs. Bernie won most of the counties in New York State, but lost the cities. In future elections this should be a fluke with a left candidate winning Black and women votes in urban areas. Bernie’s upstate strength creates openings for left candidates to challenge Republican incumbents. In this way Bernie’s legacy is growing left agitation.

The Vermonter demonstrated strength. His 752,210 votes are almost 4 times greater than Zephyr Teachout’s 192,210 in 2014. The primary is good news for Teachout’s congressional bid, Sanders won the 19th Congressional district where she is a candidate.

Sander’s winning streak was halted “by a daily pummeling that forced him on the defensive and stopped his momentum cold” observed Politico, a webzine for political junkies. Shorn of its fine-tuning, the Clinton camp said Bernie was a demagogue who lured the young with foolish and unrealistic promises. Speaker after speaker mocked Sander’s promise for tuition-free college.

They ignored that his promise applied only to State-run universities and absolutely never mentioned, his tax proposal—a transaction tax on the sale of stocks traded by the billions every day. Sanders they said is peddling a dream rather than public policy. They warned an electorate used to false promises that Bernie isn’t to be trusted.

These attacks cast doubt over the campaign’s feel good advertising strategy that emphasized the buzzwords like billionaires and didn’t provide information on why the Bern was making serious policy proposals. Issue oriented ads might have had a greater impact.

Or could Bernie have done better with a straightforward appeal to African-Americans and Latinos? Debating these issues will promote a critical self-examination that permits the left to expand its electoral strength.

The core of the Senator’s message must be preserved. Breaking up the banks introduces the public to the economy’s domination by finance capital. Ending the drain on the world’s economies posed by debt and the diversion of money into the hands banks and corporations is as important as the struggle against global warming or a healthcare system without premiums and co-pays.

The left must engage expert opinion. A missing link in the campaign is a cadre of experts explaining the commonsense of the Senator’s proposals. Clinton’s Professors led by New York Times columnist Paul Krugman shredded Bernie’s reputation, and their snarky comments too often went unanswered. In fact breaking up the banks is not radical. Dodd-Frank provides for this option, but this truth seldom entered the debate. A public debate requires support from economists and experts.

Belatedly Sanders started talking about the drug war, but his understanding of the issue seems primitive. He shows little understanding of the links to crime and gun control. The bloodbaths in Mexico and neighborhoods frightened by gang warfare have a common theme; the worst harms of prohibition fall on communities who supply illegal drugs. Reform will come as we concede drugs are always used, the question is what policies should surround the use of drugs. A call by the left for passing leadership over drug use from the police to public health officials would open the way for innovation based on evidence.

According to the CDC since 2000 nearly 500,000 persons have died of opioid overdoses. Public Health officials have successfully warned the public about the dangers of smoking, they can do the same for the illegal drugs, but more importantly they have programs like supervised injection facilities that help those who use drugs. Drug reform should receive increasing attention from the left.

Bernie’s campaign will be a success if the left promotes candidates who use his issues to challenge the status quo. Bernie insisted that the Palestinians had rights and New Yorkers cheered. He has awakened a sleeping giant. The public has a chance to learn what the left believes. This is Bernie’s legacy and we shouldn’t drop the ball.

Screen Shot 2016-03-03 at 5.05.31 PM-1

Nathan Riley is a columnist for Gay City News and a veteran of numerous New York State Campaigns. 

Weekend Edition
April 22-24, 2016
Jeffrey St. Clair
Bernie Sanders: the Candidate Who Came in From the Cold
Andrew Levine
One Small Step for Bernie, One Giant Leap for Humankind
Steve Perry
Life and Death in the Purple Box: Prince, What Happened?
Richard Hardigan
Ethnic Cleansing in Palestine: Home Demolitions on the Rise
Horace G. Campbell
New Push for Military Intervention in Libya: Who Will Control the Libyan Central Bank?
Luciana Bohne
The Fire Each Time
Paul Street
Kagame Goes to Harvard
Peter LaVenia
The Twilight of Liberalism: Decline of the Working Families Party
Andrew Smolski
A Note on Clinton’s Faux-Concern
Pete Dolack
Military Spending is the Capitalist World’s Fuel
Lawrence Davidson
Inside the Mind of Netanyahu
Linda Pentz Gunter
How Chernobyl Led to Austria’s Nuclear-Free Utopia
Eric Draitser
Hillary Clinton’s Support Base as Bogus as US Democracy
Sam Husseini
After Sanders — a Path to Electoral Revolution
David Underhill
Church and State in the South Forecast U.S. Future
Andre Vltchek
Defend Brazil!
John McMurtry
Beyond the Empire of Chaos: the Life Capital Solution
Nathan Riley
Bernie’s Sleepy Giant
John Laforge
Chernobyl, and Cesium, at 30
Paul Craig Roberts
Why is the Progressive Left Helping the Elite Elect Hillary?
Ramzy Baroud
Abbas at 80: Probed, Derided and Scapegoated
Robert Fisk
Oil and Amnesia: Obama and Saudi Arabia’s “Forgotten” Ties to 9/11
Dedrick Asante-Muhammad
Faltered Dreams: What the Deaths of Dr. King and Freddie Gray Say About the Nation
Roger Annis
Climate Change Emergency Shakes Canada’s Corporate Establishment
Louisa Willcox
Cattle in Grizzly Country
Colin Todhunter
Journalism, Pro-GMO Triumphalism And Neoliberal Dogma In India
Michael Welton
Is History a Tale Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing?
Gary Corseri
Catching Up with Cynthia McKinney… and Looking (Worriedly) Ahead
Mike Whitney
The Strange Death of Hugo Chavez: an Interview with Eva Golinger
Edwin Nasr
On the Uprisings in France
Peter White
When the Fat Lady Sings
Patrick Young
Getting Serious About Keeping Fossil Fuels in the Ground Means Getting Serious About a Just Transition
Ron Jacobs
Management: Your Friend Until They Aren’t
David Burgis
Dollar Swap: Hamilton v. Jackson
Edward Leer
Goodnight, Sweet Prince
Joseph Natoli
Core Beliefs and the Popular Tide
Robert M. Nelson
Bernie’s Right on Free Tuition — We Had It Once
Nyla Ali Khan
Extremism is the Bane of Our Existence
Jack Rasmus
IMF and TROIKA Contra Greece—Again!
Steve Horn
Introducing IOGCC: The Most Powerful Oil and Gas Lobby You’ve Never Heard Of
Missy Comley Beattie
I’m Not Cheering
Harry Clark
Dying to Forget the Israel Lobby?
Martin Billheimer
Another Witness Against the Beast
Charles R. Larson
Nigerian Literary Renaissance?
David Yearsley
Bad Day at Black Rock: A Savage Score for a Great Film About American Hate
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditEmail