- published: 05 Sep 2012
- views: 9972
Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people's rule is the principle that the authority of a state and its government is created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives (Rule by the People), who are the source of all political power. It is closely associated with social contract philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality. It is usually contrasted with the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, and with individual sovereignty. The people have the final say in government decisions. Benjamin Franklin expressed the concept when he wrote, "In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns".
Americans founded their Revolution and government on popular sovereignty, but the term was also used in the 1850s to describe a highly controversial approach to slavery in the territories as propounded by senator Stephen A. Douglas. It meant that local residents of a territory would be the ones to decide if slavery would be permitted, and it led to bloody warfare in Bleeding Kansas as violent proponents and enemies of slavery flooded Kansas territory in order to decide the elections. An earlier development of popular sovereignty arose from philosopher Francisco Suarez and became the basis for Latin American independence. Popular sovereignty also can be described as the voice of the people.
Video describing the concept of Popular Sovereignty for the interactive DVD Foundations of Freedom which was distributed to every high school in the United States.
A government where the people rule!
55 From The American Civil War Volume 1 hosted by Dale Reed 1793: Invention of the cotton gin. 1808: US abolished the slave trade. The value of slaves increased to $2,000 by 1850. Despite only 25% of South owning slaves the existence of slaves reminded poor whites that there was a class below them in society. Slavery permeated all aspects of Southern life, therefore, an attack on slavery was seen as an attack on the South. 1819: 11 'free' states, 11 'slave' states. The senate was even but the North had begun to dominate the House with its rapidly growing population. 1820: Missouri Compromise. Missouri, a slave state, would join the union with Maine, a free state, to maintain the balance. No slavery was to be subsequently allowed North of the 36'30' parallel. The issue was not res...
Foundations of Modern Social Thought (SOCY 151) Jean-Jacques Rousseau had a colorful early life. Orphaned at ten, he moved in with a woman ten years his senior at sixteen. Their probable love affair is the subject of Stendhal's book Le Rouge et la Noir. Rousseau was friends and sometimes enemies with many major figures in the French Enlightenment. Although he did not live to see the French Revolution, many of Rousseau's path-breaking and controversial ideas about universal suffrage, the general will, consent of the governed, and the need for a popularly elected legislature unquestionably shaped the Revolution. The general will, the idea that the interest of the collective must sometimes have precedence over individual will, is a complex idea in social and political thought; it has prove...
Paul Amar, Associate Professor, Global Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara This paper will aim to articulate subaltern forms of sovereignty -- social banditry, vigilantism, community self-policing, and football-fan militancy -- that have emerged in Egypt following the uprising of 25 January 2011. These forms of autonomous organization have generated novel kinds of political assertion, created a new vocabulary for representing stateness and governmentality, and unleashed a range of forms of political and social violence and resistance. This piece aims to contribute to the political anthropology of the state and the political sociology of revolutions by looking beyond the limits of the optics of civil society and identity politics, beyond the "pragmatism" of Bourdieuvia...
REFERENCE: http://youtu.be/gtDTAv5ETcw BROADCAST YEAR: 2008 ABOUT Michael Mandelbaum: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mandelbaum Michael Mandelbaum Official Website: http://www.sais-jhu.edu/faculty/directory/bios/m/mandelbaum.htm Amazon.com Michael Mandelbaum: http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Mandelbaum/e/B001H6WJSM Michael Mandelbaum (related links): http://youtu.be/BuWtKbbrz2U (2010) http://youtu.be/WzKYVvlwOsA (2011) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwT-2wwPcg4 (2012)
*** Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the history of the idea of Sovereignty, the authority of a state to govern itself and the relationship between the sovereign and the people. These ideas of external and internal sovereignty were imagined in various ways in ancient Greece and Rome, and given a name in 16th Century France by the philosopher and jurist Jean Bodin in his Six Books of the Commonwealth, where he said (in an early English translation) 'Maiestie or Soveraigntie is the most high, absolute, and perpetuall power over the citisens and subiects in a Commonweale: which the Latins cal Maiestatem, the Greeks akra exousia, kurion arche, and kurion politeuma; the Italians Segnoria, and the Hebrewes tomech shévet, that is to say, The greatest power to command.' Shakespeare also explored th...
Eoin Daly, NUI Galway - ‘Popular sovereignty and the growth of judicial review post-1937’
Colm O’Cinneide, University College London - ‘Popular sovereignty post-1916’
Full event here: http://www.cato.org/events/our-republican-constitution-securing-liberty-sovereignty-we-people The Constitution begins with the words “We the People.” But from our earliest days there have been two competing notions of “the People,” leading to two very different constitutional visions. Those who view “We the People” collectively think popular sovereignty resides in the people as a group, which leads them to favor a democratic constitution that allows the will of the people to be expressed by majority rule. In contrast, those who think popular sovereignty resides in the people as individuals contend that a republican constitution is needed to secure the preexisting inalienable rights of “We the People,” each and every one, against abuses by the majority. In his latest book,...
Hawaiian Potpourri - Sovereignty Not a Popular Idea, Challenging Priesthoods & Hawaiian Nationalism
Randy E. Barnett explains why popular sovereignty resides in individuals rather than in any notion of “the will of the people.” If the Constitution were interpreted according to its original meaning, how libertarian would that Constitution be? How do we decide what the original meaning of the Constitution is? What would America look like if judges interpreted the Constitution according to the original intent of the Founders? Show Notes and Further Reading Here is Barnett’s latest book, Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People (2016). https://www.amazon.com/Our-Republican-Constitution-Securing-Sovereignty/dp/0062412280 He also mentions his book Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty (2013). https://www.amazon.com/Restoring-...