Maybe you already know about this. But, a couple of weeks ago, “60 Minutes” did a piece about fund-raising in the Republican Party. In the piece, Rep. David Jolly (R-Fla.) told 60 Minutes that in a meeting he was told he needed to raise $18,000 per day in fund-raising.
In a letter to 60 Minutes, the House Republican campaign committee said that Jolly had lied. The letter said the meeting never happened. The letter said:
Simply put, this meeting never happened. It is a work of fiction. Had the reporter or producer of the story bothered to verify this claim, they would have been told as much.
That prompted a response from Jolly’s campaign. Jolly’s communications director, Preston Rudie said in a statement:
In response to the NRCC’s broadside to the credibility of Rep. David Jolly, and in response to the Executive Director’s bold assertion that a meeting with party leadership directing Rep. Jolly to raise $18,000 per day did not occur, we can confirm the date was April 3, 2014, the time was 5:30 p.m., the location was the NRCC’s Political Conference Room on the Second Floor. Rep. Jolly has intentionally left out names of participants since the beginning of this story, but if the NRCC wishes to escalate their denial, we are happy to provide additional information regarding the meeting.
But, the real thing that has The National Republican Congressional Committee up in arms is that 60 Minutes used hidden cameras during their investigation. In the letter to 60 Minutes they said:
Despite being explicitly denied permission to enter our private offices, a CBS producer plainly admits on camera that 60 Minutes intentionally and knowingly trespassed or encouraged another to trespass in our offices to film footage. Not since Watergate has the headquarters of a major political party committee been so violated. CBS conspired with an anonymous staffer to enter our offices and obtain unauthorized footage under false pretenses. This is not journalism. This is trespassing.
Hmmmmm!
I mentioned the “tables being turned” on the Republicans because I remember the “sting videos” about planned Parenthood. In those videos, also using hidden cameras, the makers of the video lied on tape about why they were even there. They used “false identification” to gain access to Planned Parenthood. Using the RNCC’s own words, they “intentionally and knowingly trespassed or encouraged another to trespass in our offices to film footage.”
Yet, when the leader of those videos were indicted for criminal charges, the Republicans called it an infringement on “freedom of the press” and not an effort to “obtain unauthorized footage under false pretenses”. Or, as they said in their letter “this is not journalism. This is trespassing.”
The irony isn’t that the Republicans are complaining about the videos, it is the fact they are not accusing 60 Minutes of “heavily editing” the videos in order to make a point. Which the Planned Parenthood videos have been proven to have been edited. They are only complaining that they were used.
60 Minutes did not show anything that was illegal. Nor did the Planned Parenthood videos, at least when you watch the unedited footage. There is nothing wrong with members of Congress making phone calls to raise money for campaigns. So, why is the RNCC so upset about the hidden camera footage?
Mainly because it doesn’t show anything that they are against, like abortion. It simply shows members of Congress making phone calls trying to raise money. Yet, they find it totally necessary to lambast CBS for using their hidden cameras, while they continue to support the illegal use of hidden cameras in the Planned Parenthood case.
It isn’t that 60 Minutes used hidden cameras. It is that 60 minutes didn’t use the hidden cameras to show something illegal. Rather they showed the RNCC in action. What could possibly be so wrong about that?
As usual, when the “tables are turned” on Republicans, they have another hissy-fit. When their crowd do the same thing, and even worse, that is “freedom of the press.” It is always amazing to me how Republicans are so easily able to “pick and choose” the “freedoms” they want you to enjoy.
But, allowing you the freedoms you deserve means they can’t control your lives. And that is what they are really after. This is just another example of how far they will go to obtain those ends.
And, the “shirts” keep marching along.