Governments today in both
Europe and the
United States have succeeded in casting government spending as reckless wastefulness that has made the economy worse. In contrast, they have advanced a policy of draconian budget cuts--austerity--to solve the financial crisis.
We are told that we have all lived beyond our means and now need to tighten our belts. This view conveniently forgets where all that debt came from. Not from an orgy of government spending, but as the direct result of bailing out, recapitalizing, and adding liquidity to the broken banking system. Through these actions private debt was rechristened as government debt while those responsible for generating it walked away scot free, placing the blame on the state, and the burden on the taxpayer.
That burden now takes the form of a global turn to austerity, the policy of reducing domestic wages and prices to restore competitiveness and balance the budget. The problem, according to political economist
Mark Blyth, is that austerity is a very dangerous idea.
First of all, it doesn't work. As the past four years and countless historical examples from the last
100 years show, while it makes sense for any one state to try and cut its way to growth, it simply cannot work when all states try it simultaneously: all we do is shrink the economy
. In the worst case, austerity policies worsened the
Great Depression and created the conditions for seizures of power by the forces responsible for the
Second World War: the Nazis and the
Japanese military establishment. As
Blyth amply demonstrates, the arguments for austerity are tenuous and the evidence thin.
Rather than expanding growth and opportunity, the repeated revival of this dead economic idea has almost always led to low growth along with increases in wealth and income inequality. Austerity demolishes the conventional wisdom, marshaling an army of facts to demand that we recognize austerity for what it is, and what it costs us.
About the
Author: Mark Blyth is a faculty fellow at the
Watson Institute, professor of international political economy in
Brown's Political Science Department, and director of the
University's undergraduate programs in development studies and international relations.
He is the author of
Great Transformations: Economic
Ideas and Institutional
Change in the
Twentieth Century; editor of The Routledge Handbook of
International Political Economy:
IPE as a
Global Conversation, which surveys different schools of IPE around the globe; and co-editor of a volume on constructivist theory and political economy titled Constructing the
International Economy. He is working on a new book that questions the political and economic sustainability of liberal democracies, called
The End of the
Liberal World?
Blyth is a member of the
Warwick Commission on International Financial
Reform. He is a member of the editorial board of the
Review of International Political Economy, and his articles have appeared in journals such as the
American Political Science Review,
Perspectives on Politics,
Comparative Politics, and
World Politics.
He has a PhD in political science from
Columbia University and taught at
Johns Hopkins University from
1997 to 2009.
This talk was hosted by
Boris Debic on behalf of Authors@
Google.
- published: 03 Jun 2013
- views: 97048