JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Fairfax-Ipsos Poll: Malcolm Turnbull a cautious PM, and voters are punishing him for it

Date

Sydney Morning Herald political and international editor

View more articles from Peter Hartcher

ANALYSIS

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Labor surge suggests cliff-hanger election

Labor and the Coalition are fifty-fifty in the latest Fairfax-Ipsos poll, as Malcolm Turnbull's once-soaring approval rating continues to decline. Mark Kenny explains.

PT2M34S 620 349

Malcolm Turnbull has taken a cautious approach to the prime ministership, and he's being punished for it.

Bill Shorten is taking a riskier line, announcing controversial policies, and it's working for him.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull: When he seized the prime ministership seven months ago, Turnbull was bigger than his party.

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull: When he seized the prime ministership seven months ago, Turnbull was bigger than his party. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

The net result is that the Turnbull government has entirely lost its advantage in the election-deciding two-party share of the vote, the first time in the Fairfax Ipsos poll.

Or, as the pollster, Jess Elgood, put it: "Malcolm Turnbull can lose this election."

Today's poll shows that the people's great disenchantment with Turnbull is continuing to grow. 

The government's share of the vote, Turnbull's personal standing, continue slipping month by month.

When he seized the prime ministership seven months ago, Turnbull was bigger than his party.

His personal appeal was far greater than voter support for the Coalition government.

The electorate looked to him expecting sweeping reforms, and willed him on.

But he sidestepped one reform after another. He deferred major new action on climate change and same-sex marriage, afraid of antagonising his party's conservatives.

He vetoed major economic reforms, afraid of upsetting the public. In trying to hold his popularity, he has lost much of it.

The net result has been a steady, sustained fall-off in polled support. 

The Coalition share of the two-party vote fell from a commanding lead of 56 per cent in November to parity with Labor today.

Turnbull's approval rating in the same time has shrunk dramatically, from 69 per cent to 51, a striking fall of 18 points. He's not much bigger than his party now.  

The Fairfax Ipsos poll periodically asks voters to assess 11 attributes of the party leaders, and today's results are instructive.

The three biggest movements in public opinion all point to disappointment at Turnbull's inaction.

Is Turnbull a strong leader? Six months ago, 75 per cent of respondents said so. Today, 55 per cent say so. A slump of 20 per cent in six months is a dramatic change in the assessment of a leader.

Does he have a clear vision for Australia's future? Again, a sharp fall, down by 19 per cent. 

The biggest letdown is in answer to this question: Is he a leader who has the ability to get things done? The number of those who say so has fallen by 25 per cent in six months.

The results show that the big realignment of public support is all about Turnbull. Bill Shorten's poll figures show only minimal change. 

This isn't a sweet appreciation for the Opposition Leader but a bitter disappointment with the Prime Minister.

Yet Shorten has not been a mere bystander. He has applied pressure to Turnbull with big ideas.

First was Labor's proposal to reform negative gearing. It provoked Turnbull into running his first anti-Labor scare campaign. 

The campaign textbook says this is a good idea. But for Turnbull it was not. It seemed to confirm to the public that he was just another politician. 

Where were Turnbull's big ideas? 

Now Shorten has pitched a royal commission into the banks. It's a populist stunt, but it has 65 per cent public support, according to today's poll. 

The contrast between a bold opposition and a timorous government is working in Labor's favour. 

Follow us on Twitter

19 comments

  • Poor old LNP they just can't do equitable budget repair because their backers and donors won't accept it. Even at State level, the poor old LNP botches reform (e.g. Baird govt's flawed forced council amalgamations).

    Commenter
    PJ
    Date and time
    April 18, 2016, 9:13AM
    • Turnbull is no leader. He is merely man who looks after his kind and his own powerful friends. He does not really want reform. Why would he? His personal wealth is 99% into property. That is why he will not fix negative gearing. The government he runs is highly dependent on revenue from stamp duty and levies concerning sale and development of land / properties. Why would he care when locals like you and me cannot afford property. It's our problem, not Turnbull. He just want the government to make money from rich overseas Chinese, Indians and etc. Why Turnbull no help Victoria with infrastructure? Why Turnbull want to cut public and tertiary education funding? Why Turnbull want to tax individuals more and corporations less? Why not tax mining companies more like they do in Europe and Scandinavia? Turnbull only make decisions and policies if it's help him create more wealth and more powerful connections. He is not interested in helping this country at all. I am very disappointed with Australia, not having strong leadership at top government level. I have seen history repeat itself many times and without fail, countries who tried to avoid a much needed correction in the property market will face severe social issues decades down the line. I kid you not. The three principles for building a country are affordable homes, great education and strong safety / security. Turnbull only want to focus on nuclear submarine and fighter jets. O tempora o mores.

      Commenter
      Giuseppe Montesorre
      Date and time
      April 18, 2016, 9:20AM
      • It's not a case of caution versus risk, it's that voters don't trust the Liberals and Turnbull still has Abbott's policies in his back pocket - $80 billion cuts to education and health, $100 degrees, tax cuts to business to be funded by lower and middle Australia. The LNP needs to tell us what they will do, not what Labor will do, especially given it is demanding control of both houses.

        Commenter
        Lucky
        Date and time
        April 18, 2016, 9:23AM
        • It staggers me that people thought a change in leader and no change in policy would result in meaningful change. The LNP only changed leaders because of polling and the influence of Peter Credlin, not because they liked Turnball's ideas. Yes, Turnbull is a much better option than Tony Abbott, but if half his party don't like him, he won't get anything done.

          Change and Continuity? Try Chained to Continuity.

          Commenter
          WillH
          Location
          Mitcham
          Date and time
          April 18, 2016, 9:48AM
        • @WillH, people were of the impression that the change of leadership was based on the centre-right conservatives within the party achieving a majority and taking the party back from the far right faction, and with it would come a change in policies - still conservative but built around pragmatism as opposed to ideology.

          Now that it is obvious to voters that the far right still hold power within the party, and that Turnbull is just there to divert attention long enough to get the LNP another term and another chance to force through the same damaging policies, their numbers are fading quickly.

          Commenter
          Markus
          Location
          Canberra
          Date and time
          April 18, 2016, 10:04AM
        • Now we have two new duds running Australia, Barnaby Joyce and Malcolm Turnbull.

          Commenter
          Sharron
          Date and time
          April 18, 2016, 10:09AM
      • Finally, the mainstream media is catching up with what the electorate detected months ago – that Malcolm Turnbull is just another politician, and not a very good one either.

        Turnbull's fall in the Ipsos poll, and the drag on the Coalition's vote doesn't surprise me. There was nothing in Turnbull's political past that suggests any successful policy, or sound political management. The NBN is a mess. His political management and strategy as opposition leader in 2008/09 and as Prime Minister has been poor and confused the electorate.

        How many people really care about the ABCC (about 3% according to one poll)? Or the Road Safety Remuneration Tribunal? The strategy over the RSR Tribunal has been confusing to the electorate, as well as it being a low order issue (and promoted by a IPA-supported astroturfing lobby group). Sure, road safety is an issue, but the Coalition attack is all over the place – is it about 'mums and dads', road safety, pay rates, trucking, or something else?

        Why would the Prime Minister of the day appear on stage with a couple of screeching Senators and wannabe candidates, about a low-order issue? A lot of their strategy doesn't make any sense, is all over the place, and the Coalition is being punished in the polls because of this.

        There's also the strong possibility that Malcolm Turnbull just isn't up to the job – can't manage his party, can't manage expectations, can't manage politics. It's a disaster.

        Commenter
        Eddy Jokovich
        Location
        Sydney
        Date and time
        April 18, 2016, 9:28AM
        • Malcolm Turnbull is a confused, dithering, muddle-headed, snob. Not Prime Minister material at all.

          Commenter
          Sharron
          Date and time
          April 18, 2016, 10:12AM
      • The transparency of the tax fiddles at the big end of town is hurting Turnbull and the fact that the Libs aren't going to address it is telling. If small business is going to be assisted in the budget (again) and ordinary workers aren't he is gone for all money

        Commenter
        Global
        Date and time
        April 18, 2016, 9:52AM
        • But, after all us said and done about Turnbull ' s incompetence (perfect example: NBN) and the LNP selfishness and lack of vision, there are still 50% of Australians who would vote then back in.

          We are doomed as a country with so many people who are ok with this mob.

          Commenter
          Sick of politicians
          Date and time
          April 18, 2016, 10:04AM

          More comments

          Comments are now closed

          Related Coverage

          HuffPost Australia

          Follow Us

          Featured advertisers

          Special offers

          Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo