The Obama Foreign Policy Doctrine

• Report rights infringement
• published: 31 Mar 2011
• views: 2988

President Obama unveiled his foreign policy doctrine in the clearest terms yet in a speech outlining his decision to intervene militarily in Libya. Explaining that it was not in the best interests of the United States of America to stand by and watch Muammar al-Gaddafi slaughter his own people, Obama drew a distinct line between Bush's pre-emptive Iraq war - which he views as a mistake - and his own proactive humanitarian intervention in Libya. Here is the full speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVW6jBbD5Q8&feature;=channel_video_title And full text of the speech: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52093.html Much of the debate in Washington has put forward a false choice when it comes to Libya. On the one hand, some question why America should intervene at all --- even in limited ways --- in this distant land. They argue that there are many places in the world where innocent civilians face brutal violence at the hands of their government, and America should not be expected to police the world, particularly when we have so many pressing needs here at home. It's true that America cannot use our military wherever repression occurs. And given the costs and risks of intervention, we must always measure our interests against the need for action. But that cannot be an argument for never acting on behalf of what's right. In this particular country --- Libya — at this particular moment, we were faced with the prospect of violence on a horrific scale. We had a unique ability to stop that violence: an international mandate for action, a broad coalition prepared to join us, the support of Arab countries, and a plea for help from the Libyan people themselves. We also had the ability to stop Qaddafi's forces in their tracks without putting American troops on the ground. To brush aside America's responsibility as a leader and --- more profoundly --- our responsibilities to our fellow human beings under such circumstances would have been a betrayal of who we are. Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as President, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action...