- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
Create your page here
-
remove the playlistUnited_states_court_of_appeals_for_the_second_circuit
-
remove the playlistAppellate_court
- remove the playlistUnited_states_court_of_appeals_for_the_second_circuit
- remove the playlistAppellate_court
back to playlist
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. All 12 appeals judges sat in an en banc session to hear the appeal to the 2 to 1 ruling in June 2008 by a Second Circuit three-judge panel that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Arar's complaint. Maher Arar is challenging his rendition by the U.S. government to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured and released after one year without being charged. Maher Arar, a Syrian-born, Canadian citizen was detained during a layover at the J.F.K. Airport in New York City in September 2002 on his way home to Canada. He was held in solitary confinement for nearly two weeks. At the time, the U.S. government thought he was a member of al-Qaeda and sent him to Syria, not Canada, the country of his citizenship. Mr. Arar's suit charges that his Fifth Amendment due process rights were violated when he was confined without access to an attorney, both domestically and in Syria. He is seeking civil damages from a number of federal officials including former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Judge Sotomayor participated by remote video. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282779-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 14690
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 10986
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- published: 13 Aug 2012
- views: 805
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. phone calls is not authorized by federal law...
Read More At:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/05/07/3656228/breaking-federal-appeals-court-rules-nsas-massive-surveillance-program-illegal/
Clip from the Thursday, May 7th 2015 edition of The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio monday - friday 4-6pm Eastern.
Check out our website - and become a member - at:
http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com
Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski
Follow on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski
Like on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk
Friends Of SecularTalk:
http://www.facebook.com/beastofreason
AMAZON LINK: (Bookmark this link to support the show for free!!!)
http://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 11652
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
- published: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013.
- published: 04 Jun 2013
- views: 7038
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-phone-records-illegal/
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.pdf @ http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
COG: The Intercept - NSA PSYOP - Computers Are Listening : HOW THE NSA CONVERTS LOCUTIONS INTO TEXT@ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcOQblmMm6M
THE COMPUTERS ARE LISTENING @ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/05/nsa-speech-recognition-snowden-searchable-text/
NEARLY TWO YEARS AFTER SNOWDEN, CONGRESS POISED TO DO SOMETHING — JUST NOT MUCH@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/28/nearly-two-years-snowden-congress-poised-something-just-much/
CitizenofGothamOpines@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/
Prophetic and Subliminal Messaging of the NWO, Satan, and Jesus (The False Savior) in "I, Pet Goat II by Heliofant”@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/03/prophetic-and-subliminal-messaging-of.html
The New Zoo Planet: The Homo-Sapien PSYOP@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-new-zoo-planet-homo-sapien-psyop_28.html
The Economist 2015 Cover: Eyes Wide Shut@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/04/economist-2015-cover-eyes-wide-shut.html
CitzenofGotha1@Twitter https://twitter.com/CitizenofGotha1
CitizenofGotham@Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112143831899532254233/about
CitizenofGotham@YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzoVXmou-37ifkGYxBl9mkQ/playlists
CitizenofGotham@LiveJournal http://citizenofgotham.livejournal.com/
citizenofgotha1@gmail.com
Namaste
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 54
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (in case citations, 2d Cir.) is one of the thirteen United States Courts of Appeals. Its territory comprises the states of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, and the court has appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
The Second Circuit has its clerk's office and hears oral arguments at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse at 40 Foley Square in Lower Manhattan. Due to renovations at that building, from 2006 until early 2013, the court temporarily relocated to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse across Pearl Street from Foley Square, and certain court offices temporarily relocated to the Woolworth Building at 233 Broadway.
Current composition of the court
With 13 active and 9 senior judges, the Second Circuit is midsized among the thirteen United States courts of appeals.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
https://wn.com/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court, court of appeals (American English),appeal court (British English), court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
https://wn.com/Appellate_court
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
62:09Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively. -
146:09Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral ArgumentsArar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. All 12 appeals judges sat in an en banc session to hear the appeal to the 2 to 1 ruling in June 2008 by a Second Circuit three-judge panel that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Arar's complaint. Maher Arar is challenging his rendition by the U.S. government to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured and released after one year without being charged. Maher Arar, a Syrian-born, Canadian citizen was detained during a layover at the J.F.K. Airport in New York City in September 2002 on his way home to Canada. He was held in solitary confinement for nearly two weeks. At the time, the U.S. government thought he was a member of al-Qaeda and sent him to Syria, not Canada, the country of his citizenship. Mr. Arar's suit charges that his Fifth Amendment due process rights were violated when he was confined without access to an attorney, both domestically and in Syria. He is seeking civil damages from a number of federal officials including former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Judge Sotomayor participated by remote video. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282779-1 -
20:15Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
153:18Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral ArgumentsPerry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1 -
55:03Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit -
42:25Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral ArgumentRicci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1 -
7:56Court Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
Court Rules NSA Spying Program IllegalCourt Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. phone calls is not authorized by federal law... Read More At: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/05/07/3656228/breaking-federal-appeals-court-rules-nsas-massive-surveillance-program-illegal/ Clip from the Thursday, May 7th 2015 edition of The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio monday - friday 4-6pm Eastern. Check out our website - and become a member - at: http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski Follow on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski Like on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk Friends Of SecularTalk: http://www.facebook.com/beastofreason AMAZON LINK: (Bookmark this link to support the show for free!!!) http://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20 -
4:57Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. NguyenPathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.” -
13:12President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. CircuitPresident Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013. -
11:07The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYSThe Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-phone-records-illegal/ United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.pdf @ http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf COG: The Intercept - NSA PSYOP - Computers Are Listening : HOW THE NSA CONVERTS LOCUTIONS INTO TEXT@ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcOQblmMm6M THE COMPUTERS ARE LISTENING @ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/05/nsa-speech-recognition-snowden-searchable-text/ NEARLY TWO YEARS AFTER SNOWDEN, CONGRESS POISED TO DO SOMETHING — JUST NOT MUCH@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/28/nearly-two-years-snowden-congress-poised-something-just-much/ CitizenofGothamOpines@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/ Prophetic and Subliminal Messaging of the NWO, Satan, and Jesus (The False Savior) in "I, Pet Goat II by Heliofant”@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/03/prophetic-and-subliminal-messaging-of.html The New Zoo Planet: The Homo-Sapien PSYOP@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-new-zoo-planet-homo-sapien-psyop_28.html The Economist 2015 Cover: Eyes Wide Shut@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/04/economist-2015-cover-eyes-wide-shut.html CitzenofGotha1@Twitter https://twitter.com/CitizenofGotha1 CitizenofGotham@Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112143831899532254233/about CitizenofGotham@YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzoVXmou-37ifkGYxBl9mkQ/playlists CitizenofGotham@LiveJournal http://citizenofgotham.livejournal.com/ citizenofgotha1@gmail.com Namaste
-
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to p... -
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. All 12 appeals judges sat in an en banc session to hear the appeal to the 2 to 1 ruling in June 2008 by a Second Circuit three-judge panel that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Arar's complaint. Maher Arar is challenging his rendition by the U.S. government to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured and released after one year without being charged. Maher Arar, a Syrian-born, Canadian citizen was detained during a layover at the J.F.K. Airport in New York City in September 2002 on his way home to Canada. He was held in solitary confinement for nearly two weeks. At the time, the U.S. government thought he was a membe... -
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/p... -
Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit -
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more ... -
Court Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. phone calls is not authorized by federal law... Read More At: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/05/07/3656228/breaking-federal-appeals-court-rules-nsas-massive-surveillance-program-illegal/ Clip from the Thursday, May 7th 2015 edition of The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio monday - friday 4-6pm Eastern. Check out our website - and become a member - at: http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski Follow on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski Like on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk... -
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.” -
President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013. -
The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-phone-records-illegal/ United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.pdf @ http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf COG: The Intercept - NSA PSYOP - Computers Are Listening : HOW THE NSA CONVERTS LOCUTIONS INTO TEXT@ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcOQblmMm6M THE COMPUTERS ARE LISTENING @ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/05/nsa-speech-recognition-snowden-searchable-text/ NEARLY TWO YEARS AFTER SNOWDEN, CONGRESS POISED TO DO SOMETHING — JUST NOT MUCH@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/28/nearly-two-years-snowden-congress-poised-something-just-much/ CitizenofGothamOpines@ http://citizenofgot...
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 62:09
- Updated: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and ...
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
wn.com/Fox Television V. Federal Communications Commission 2Nd Circuit Court Of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 146:09
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 14690
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. A...
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. All 12 appeals judges sat in an en banc session to hear the appeal to the 2 to 1 ruling in June 2008 by a Second Circuit three-judge panel that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Arar's complaint. Maher Arar is challenging his rendition by the U.S. government to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured and released after one year without being charged. Maher Arar, a Syrian-born, Canadian citizen was detained during a layover at the J.F.K. Airport in New York City in September 2002 on his way home to Canada. He was held in solitary confinement for nearly two weeks. At the time, the U.S. government thought he was a member of al-Qaeda and sent him to Syria, not Canada, the country of his citizenship. Mr. Arar's suit charges that his Fifth Amendment due process rights were violated when he was confined without access to an attorney, both domestically and in Syria. He is seeking civil damages from a number of federal officials including former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Judge Sotomayor participated by remote video. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282779-1
wn.com/Arar V. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in Arar v. Ashcroft. All 12 appeals judges sat in an en banc session to hear the appeal to the 2 to 1 ruling in June 2008 by a Second Circuit three-judge panel that the federal courts lacked jurisdiction to hear Mr. Arar's complaint. Maher Arar is challenging his rendition by the U.S. government to Syria, where he alleges he was tortured and released after one year without being charged. Maher Arar, a Syrian-born, Canadian citizen was detained during a layover at the J.F.K. Airport in New York City in September 2002 on his way home to Canada. He was held in solitary confinement for nearly two weeks. At the time, the U.S. government thought he was a member of al-Qaeda and sent him to Syria, not Canada, the country of his citizenship. Mr. Arar's suit charges that his Fifth Amendment due process rights were violated when he was confined without access to an attorney, both domestically and in Syria. He is seeking civil damages from a number of federal officials including former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Judge Sotomayor participated by remote video. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/282779-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 14690
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:15
- Updated: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
wn.com/Oral Argument Before The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 153:18
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 10986
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three feder...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
wn.com/Perry V. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 10986
Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 55:03
- Updated: 13 Aug 2012
- views: 805
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
wn.com/Summary Judgment And Employment Discrimination Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- published: 13 Aug 2012
- views: 805
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 42:25
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard o...
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
wn.com/Ricci V. Destefano Court Of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
Court Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 7:56
- Updated: 08 May 2015
- views: 11652
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. ph...
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. phone calls is not authorized by federal law...
Read More At:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/05/07/3656228/breaking-federal-appeals-court-rules-nsas-massive-surveillance-program-illegal/
Clip from the Thursday, May 7th 2015 edition of The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio monday - friday 4-6pm Eastern.
Check out our website - and become a member - at:
http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com
Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski
Follow on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski
Like on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk
Friends Of SecularTalk:
http://www.facebook.com/beastofreason
AMAZON LINK: (Bookmark this link to support the show for free!!!)
http://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20
wn.com/Court Rules Nsa Spying Program Illegal
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thursday that the National Security Agency’s sweeping database of U.S. phone calls is not authorized by federal law...
Read More At:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/05/07/3656228/breaking-federal-appeals-court-rules-nsas-massive-surveillance-program-illegal/
Clip from the Thursday, May 7th 2015 edition of The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio monday - friday 4-6pm Eastern.
Check out our website - and become a member - at:
http://www.SecularTalkRadio.com
Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kylekulinski
Follow on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski
Like on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/SecularTalk
Friends Of SecularTalk:
http://www.facebook.com/beastofreason
AMAZON LINK: (Bookmark this link to support the show for free!!!)
http://www.amazon.com/?tag=seculacom-20
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 11652
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:57
- Updated: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline ...
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
wn.com/Pathways To The Bench U.S. Court Of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench in Los Angeles, Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline Nguyen understood hard work. As a child, when her family had to flee their idyllic life in Vietnam, she became an integral part of building her family’s future in California. She had to be willing to step out of her comfort zone in order to serve. What has life taught her? “Have the courage and work ethic to accept opportunities that will shape your life.”
- published: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 13:12
- Updated: 04 Jun 2013
- views: 7038
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013.
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013.
wn.com/President Obama Announces Nominations To The U.S. Court Of Appeals For The D.C. Circuit
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 4, 2013.
- published: 04 Jun 2013
- views: 7038
The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:07
- Updated: 08 May 2015
- views: 54
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-...
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-phone-records-illegal/
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.pdf @ http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
COG: The Intercept - NSA PSYOP - Computers Are Listening : HOW THE NSA CONVERTS LOCUTIONS INTO TEXT@ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcOQblmMm6M
THE COMPUTERS ARE LISTENING @ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/05/nsa-speech-recognition-snowden-searchable-text/
NEARLY TWO YEARS AFTER SNOWDEN, CONGRESS POISED TO DO SOMETHING — JUST NOT MUCH@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/28/nearly-two-years-snowden-congress-poised-something-just-much/
CitizenofGothamOpines@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/
Prophetic and Subliminal Messaging of the NWO, Satan, and Jesus (The False Savior) in "I, Pet Goat II by Heliofant”@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/03/prophetic-and-subliminal-messaging-of.html
The New Zoo Planet: The Homo-Sapien PSYOP@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-new-zoo-planet-homo-sapien-psyop_28.html
The Economist 2015 Cover: Eyes Wide Shut@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/04/economist-2015-cover-eyes-wide-shut.html
CitzenofGotha1@Twitter https://twitter.com/CitizenofGotha1
CitizenofGotham@Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112143831899532254233/about
CitizenofGotham@YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzoVXmou-37ifkGYxBl9mkQ/playlists
CitizenofGotham@LiveJournal http://citizenofgotham.livejournal.com/
citizenofgotha1@gmail.com
Namaste
wn.com/The Intercept Nsa’S Bulk Collection Of Phone Records Is Illegal, Appeals Court Says
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-phone-records-illegal/
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.pdf @ http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
COG: The Intercept - NSA PSYOP - Computers Are Listening : HOW THE NSA CONVERTS LOCUTIONS INTO TEXT@ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcOQblmMm6M
THE COMPUTERS ARE LISTENING @ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/05/05/nsa-speech-recognition-snowden-searchable-text/
NEARLY TWO YEARS AFTER SNOWDEN, CONGRESS POISED TO DO SOMETHING — JUST NOT MUCH@ https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/28/nearly-two-years-snowden-congress-poised-something-just-much/
CitizenofGothamOpines@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/
Prophetic and Subliminal Messaging of the NWO, Satan, and Jesus (The False Savior) in "I, Pet Goat II by Heliofant”@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/03/prophetic-and-subliminal-messaging-of.html
The New Zoo Planet: The Homo-Sapien PSYOP@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-new-zoo-planet-homo-sapien-psyop_28.html
The Economist 2015 Cover: Eyes Wide Shut@ http://citizenofgothamopines.blogspot.com/2015/04/economist-2015-cover-eyes-wide-shut.html
CitzenofGotha1@Twitter https://twitter.com/CitizenofGotha1
CitizenofGotham@Google+ https://plus.google.com/u/0/112143831899532254233/about
CitizenofGotham@YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzoVXmou-37ifkGYxBl9mkQ/playlists
CitizenofGotham@LiveJournal http://citizenofgotham.livejournal.com/
citizenofgotha1@gmail.com
Namaste
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 54
-
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system. -
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered. Colson Hicks Eidson 255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse Coral Gables, FL 33134 (305) 476-7400 Website: http://www.colson.com/ -
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
-
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition. -
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules. The authority of appellate courts t... -
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
Kay Nord Hunt -
Appealing a Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision. Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge. Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law." You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on... -
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court. -
Appellate court ruling
What can I say
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:59
- Updated: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 8459
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
wn.com/10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 8459
What is an Appellate Court?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:23
- Updated: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 953
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the ea...
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
wn.com/What Is An Appellate Court
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 953
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:01
- Updated: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 11470
- published: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 11470
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:52
- Updated: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 161216
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 161216
Appellate court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:33
- Updated: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 1030
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or sec...
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Appellate Court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 1030
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:36
- Updated: 22 Apr 2013
- views: 776
Kay Nord Hunt
Kay Nord Hunt
wn.com/The Difference In How An Appellate Court Views The Case
Appealing a Court Decision
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:15
- Updated: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 3758
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a...
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision.
Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge.
Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law."
You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on the law and application of the law by a judge. an appeal is when you have a situation where you think the judge has ruled incorrectly. If you go to the law library there are literally thousands of books of cases and everyone of those is an appeal.
So there’s plenty of cases being appealed. There’s plenty of cases where someone believes fervently that the judge has made a mistake. And when he has it should be appealed.
What kinds of cases are appealed? All kinds of cases are appealed. There are different types of appeals. If you have questions about your case, call the Lanigans for an appointment 407-733-2292. (Winter Park, Florida)
wn.com/Appealing A Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision.
Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge.
Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law."
You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on the law and application of the law by a judge. an appeal is when you have a situation where you think the judge has ruled incorrectly. If you go to the law library there are literally thousands of books of cases and everyone of those is an appeal.
So there’s plenty of cases being appealed. There’s plenty of cases where someone believes fervently that the judge has made a mistake. And when he has it should be appealed.
What kinds of cases are appealed? All kinds of cases are appealed. There are different types of appeals. If you have questions about your case, call the Lanigans for an appointment 407-733-2292. (Winter Park, Florida)
- published: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 3758
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:17
- Updated: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2779
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
wn.com/Assembling The Clerk's Record For Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2779
Appellate court ruling
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:52
- Updated: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 1095
What can I say
What can I say
wn.com/Appellate Court Ruling
What can I say
- published: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 1095
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
62:09
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the Yo...
published: 30 Jan 2010
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 10560
146:09
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 282779-1-DVD - 2008-12-09 - Seco...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
Arar v. Ashcroft Oral Arguments
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 14690
20:15
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
published: 15 Jul 2014
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 3792
153:18
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 10986
55:03
Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
Lunch with Keynote Speaker The Honorable Denny R. Chin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seco...
published: 13 Aug 2012
Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
Summary Judgment and Employment Discrimination - Keynote Address (April 23, 2012)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Aug 2012
- views: 805
42:25
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD -...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1598
7:56
Court Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Thu...
published: 08 May 2015
Court Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
Court Rules NSA Spying Program Illegal
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 11652
4:57
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Long before she was the first Asian American woman appointed to serve on the federal bench...
published: 22 Jan 2015
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
Pathways to the Bench: U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Jan 2015
- views: 13477
13:12
President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
President Obama announce his nomination of three candidates for the United States Court of...
published: 04 Jun 2013
President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
President Obama Announces Nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Jun 2013
- views: 7038
11:07
The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS@ https://firstlook.o...
published: 08 May 2015
The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
The Intercept - NSA’S BULK COLLECTION OF PHONE RECORDS IS ILLEGAL, APPEALS COURT SAYS
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 54
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
8:59
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
published: 11 Apr 2013
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 8459
1:23
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow...
published: 02 Sep 2014
What is an Appellate Court?
What is an Appellate Court?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 953
15:01
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
published: 25 Feb 2011
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
- Report rights infringement
- published: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 11470
15:52
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
published: 23 Oct 2008
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 161216
4:33
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English...
published: 04 Nov 2014
Appellate court
Appellate court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 1030
1:36
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
Kay Nord Hunt
published: 22 Apr 2013
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Apr 2013
- views: 776
8:15
Appealing a Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals a...
published: 29 Apr 2015
Appealing a Court Decision
Appealing a Court Decision
- Report rights infringement
- published: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 3758
11:17
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how t...
published: 13 Feb 2012
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2779
6:52
Appellate court ruling
What can I say
published: 18 Jun 2015
Appellate court ruling
Appellate court ruling
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 1095
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)...
What is an Appellate Court?...
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Ap...
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument...
Appellate court...
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the...
Appealing a Court Decision...
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court...
Appellate court ruling...
photo: AP / Ilyess Osmane
Georgia Town Sending Sheriff's Deputies To Black Homes To Challenge Voter Eligibility
Edit WorldNews.com 01 Aug 2016
appeals court striking down a North Carolina voter ID law the court said was specifically designed to lower turnout among black voters hasn’t stopped individual states and cities from coming up with new ways to depress minority voter turnout, Raw Story reported Monday. The New York Times reported the Hancock County Board of Elections and ......
photo: NASA / Aqua/MODIS
Typhoon Nida heads for Hong Kong after lashing Philippines
Edit CNN 01 Aug 2016
Hong Kong (CNN)Hundreds of trains and flights have been canceled in cities across southern China as Typhoon Nida barrels toward land after battering the Philippines over the weekend. Nida has generated winds up to 150 kilometers per hour (93 mph) as it moves northwest toward Hong Kong, where the Hong Kong Observatory said it is expected to skirt within 50 kilometers (about 30 miles) of the territory Tuesday morning....
photo: AP / Julie Jacobson
Melania Trump’s Nude Picture Released – Is This How Potential First Lady Will Be?
Edit Inquisitr 31 Jul 2016
If Donald Trump will become the next President of United States, then his third wife and former model Melania Trump is going to be the next First Lady ... “Melania was super-great and a fantastic personality and she was very kind with me, I think it is important to show the beauty and the freedom of the woman, and I am very proud of these pictures because they celebrate Melania’s beauty,” he further added....
photo: US DoD / Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo
Military Stages Silent And Ironic Coup Preferring Libertarian Johnson Over Trump and Clinton
Edit WorldNews.com 01 Aug 2016
Indeed, this is no more truth than when considering how Libertarian Constitutionalists vigorously protested the National Federalists and their potential abuses of powers in the U.S ... At a 39 percent approval rating, Johnson performed much better than his two Republican and Democratic rivals, both of whom trailed far behind with 31 and 14 percent, respectively....
photo: AP / Nati Harnik
Buffet To Trump: 'Have You No Sense Of Decency, Sir'
Edit WorldNews.com 02 Aug 2016
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett invoked a famous phrase from the McCarthy era against Donald Trump Monday, asking “have you no sense of decency, sir,” Bloomberg News reports ... him “any place, any time” with a copy of his tax returns. Buffett said he would bring his returns and the two of them would answer questions from the public....
« back to news headlines
Former Fort Jackson soldier freed on bond in 1961 murder of Columbia cabbie
Edit Stars and Stripes 02 Aug 2016
Court of Appeals last year overturned a guilty verdict that had resulted in a life sentence for the now-73-year-old ... Supreme Court has refused to take up Freiburger’s case on appeal, in effect upholding the Court of Appeals decision to toss out his case ... Freiburger’s lawyer, John Delgado of Columbia, had failed to introduce key evidence, the Court of Appeals ruled, that might have caused the jury to reach a different conclusion....
It's 'Christmas' for challengers to voting restriction laws
Edit CNN 02 Aug 2016
In an 83-page opinion, Judge Diana Gribbon Motz, writing for a three-judge panel of judges on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, referenced the fact that "immediately after" the Supreme Court issued the Shelby County decision, North Carolina's General Assembly "vastly expanded an earlier photo ID bill and and rushed through the legislative ......
AG Schimel Files Emergency Motion Seeking Stay in Voter ID Case (DOJ - Wisconsin Department of Justice)
Edit Public Technologies 02 Aug 2016Federal judge grills GOP lawyers over need for bathroom law
Edit Boston Herald 02 Aug 2016
The state's Republican leaders argue the law is needed to protect privacy and safety by keeping men out of women's restrooms ... The plaintiffs' arguments that HB2 violates the federal education law known as Title IX were bolstered by a recent decision by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Virginia. The appeals court ruled in favor of a transgender teen seeking to use the boys' restrooms at his high school....
Accused collapses in court, declared dead later
Edit The Hindu 02 Aug 2016
... in Guntur district, who was accused of assaulting a constable, collapsed in a city court when the proceedings were going on Monday....
Utah Court of Appeals grant new trial to Katrina evacuee in 2006 arson case
Edit The Salt Lake Tribune 02 Aug 2016
The Utah Court of Appeals has granted Katrina evacuee Herbert Samuel Landry a new trial a decade after he was convicted of setting a fire that burned his apartment and six other units at a Provo complex. In a 3-0 opinion, the court agreed with what it called Landry’s theory of “layered ineffective assistance of counsel.” Landry alleged he received ......
SC seeks Centre's response on denying Cong tax relief in 1994-95
Edit The Times of India 02 Aug 2016
A Supreme Court bench of Justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman on Monday sought answers from the Centre on a petition filed by the Congress through counsel Devadatta Kamat alleging that Delhi high court failed to understand the dynamics of the process and accounting while denying it the benefits legitimately due under law ... Congress appealed against ......
What’s Next in Brazil’s Impeachment Process: A Quick Guide
Edit Bloomberg 02 Aug 2016
It may be the last chapter of a saga that started last year and reached its climax in May when legislators temporarily removed the president from office to try her on allegations of doctoring fiscal accounts.Coming up ... * Rousseff can still make appeals to the Supreme Court at any stage in the process, although the top court has rejected her previous appeals....
9 years, 3 trials later: NYC man pleads guilty to killing
Edit Business Insider 02 Aug 2016
The 33-year-old Vega's brief court appearance caps a nearly decade-long legal saga to resolve Robert Gaston's murder in the Bronx ... The Bronx criminal courts are notoriously slow ... 6. ___. Information from ... Thomas Bach ... US gets 2nd member on IOC executive board. ....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next page »
