- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
Create your page here
Wednesday, 13 April 2016
-
remove the playlistAppellate Court
-
remove the playlistLatest Videos
-
remove the playlistLongest Videos
- remove the playlistAppellate Court
- remove the playlistLatest Videos
- remove the playlistLongest Videos
back to playlist
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Transcript:
There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify.
After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision.
Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge.
Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law."
You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on the law and application of the law by a judge. an appeal is when you have a situation where you think the judge has ruled incorrectly. If you go to the law library there are literally thousands of books of cases and everyone of those is an appeal.
So there’s plenty of cases being appealed. There’s plenty of cases where someone believes fervently that the judge has made a mistake. And when he has it should be appealed.
What kinds of cases are appealed? All kinds of cases are appealed. There are different types of appeals. If you have questions about your case, call the Lanigans for an appointment 407-733-2292. (Winter Park, Florida)
- published: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 2950
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English), is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
Many U.S. jurisdictions title their appellate court a court of appeal or court of appeals. Historically, others have titled their appellate court a court of errors (or court of errors and appeals), on the premise that it was intended to correct errors made by lower courts. Examples of such courts include the New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals (which existed from 1844 to 1947), the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors (which has been renamed the Connecticut Supreme Court), the Kentucky Court of Errors (renamed the Kentucky Supreme Court), and the Mississippi High Court of Errors and Appeals (since renamed the Supreme Court of Mississippi). In some jurisdictions, courts able to hear appeals are known as an appellate division.
This page contains text from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appellate_court
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.
- Loading...
-
8:5910. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system. -
1:23What is an Appellate Court?
What is an Appellate Court?What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered. Transcript: There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify. After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made. Colson Hicks Eidson 255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse Coral Gables, FL 33134 (305) 476-7400 Website: http://www.colson.com/ -
1:36The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case -
20:15Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
15:01People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
-
4:33Appellate court
Appellate courtAppellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules. The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'". This video is targeted to blind users. Attribution: Article text available under CC-BY-SA Creative Commons image source in video -
15:522008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition. -
6:52Appellate court ruling
Appellate court rulingAppellate court ruling
What can I say -
5:11Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot ActAppellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens! The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015. This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America! But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment." Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights. Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic. "The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior. "Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized. "None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American." Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic! Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time! This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act! To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV -
11:17Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate CourtAssembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court. -
8:15Appealing a Court Decision
Appealing a Court DecisionAppealing a Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision. Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge. Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law." You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on the law and application of the law by a judge. an appeal is when you have a situation where you think the judge has ruled incorrectly. If you go to the law library there are literally thousands of books of cases and everyone of those is an appeal. So there’s plenty of cases being appealed. There’s plenty of cases where someone believes fervently that the judge has made a mistake. And when he has it should be appealed. What kinds of cases are appealed? All kinds of cases are appealed. There are different types of appeals. If you have questions about your case, call the Lanigans for an appointment 407-733-2292. (Winter Park, Florida) -
0:26Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
Appellate Court upholds Timamy electionAppellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute. For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya -
1:04Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is IllegalAppellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata. Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn See more at http://www.newsy.com Sources: 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/ American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee Script: The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday. A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215." The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection. The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed. This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal. The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey. -
1:14Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The InternetFlorida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet CHARLOTTE COUNTY ,FLORIDA ,SHERIFF, CORRUPTION http://charlottecountyflcorruption.info www.youtube.com/channel/UCaLx8YHxza3Jfoa-q9HIUZw www.youtube.com/user/LIVEFREEORDIEPEOPLE www.facebook.com/Charlottecountyflcopwatch www.facebook.com/CHARLOTTECOUNTYSHERIFFFREESPEECHPAGE sheriff,corruption,charlotte County, florida,cop,police,pastor,stalking,COPWATCH,COPBLOCK, COP WATCH,COP BLOCK,#COPWATCH,#COPBLOCK, BILL PRUMMELL, KENNETH HILL,ken hill I AM WHITE AND HAVE PERSONALY EXPERIENCED THE CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SHERIFFS, CORRUPTION,IT WOKE ME UP BIG TIME. NOW THAT IM TELING OTHERS ABOUT THE CORUPTION ., SHERIFF KENNETH HILL AND BILL PRUMMELL KNOWS THE SHERIFF THAT COMITED PERJURY IN COURT AND GOT THE CASE THROWN OUT,AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS DID NOTHING.SINCE U R SUCH A SUPORTER CAN YOU HELP ME DEAL WITH THIS SITUATION AND CONTACT THEM AND TELL THEM TO FIRE AREST THIS CORRUPT SHERIFF THAT DID IT,THX
-
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system. -
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered. Transcript: There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and tes... -
-
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014). -
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
-
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules. The authority of appellate courts t... -
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition. -
Appellate court ruling
What can I say -
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens! The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015. This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America! But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pus... -
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court. -
Appealing a Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision. Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge. Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law." You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on... -
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute. For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya -
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata. Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn See more at http://www.newsy.com Sources: 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/ American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee Script: The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thur... -
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet CHARLOTTE COUNTY ,FLORIDA ,SHERIFF, CORRUPTION http://charlottecountyflcorruption.info www.youtube.com/channel/UCaLx8YHxza3Jfoa-q9HIUZw www.youtube.com/user/LIVEFREEORDIEPEOPLE www.facebook.com/Charlottecountyflcopwatch www.facebook.com/CHARLOTTECOUNTYSHERIFFFREESPEECHPAGE sheriff,corruption,charlotte County, florida,cop,police,pastor,stalking,COPWATCH,COPBLOCK, COP WATCH,COP BLOCK,#COPWATCH,#COPBLOCK, BILL PRUMMELL, KENNETH HILL,ken hill I AM WHITE AND HAVE PERSONALY EXPERIENCED THE CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SHERIFFS, CORRUPTION,IT WOKE ME UP BIG TIME. NOW THAT IM TELING OTHERS ABOUT THE CORUPTION ., SHERIFF KENNETH HILL AND BILL PRUMMELL KNOWS THE SHERIFF THAT COMITED PERJURY IN COU... -
Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service. -
-
Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is... -
Allegations of Document Fraud In Foreclosure- Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all. This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state. At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all. Weidner Law Appeal Video This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice on... -
David Allen - Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was fired and was entitled to unemployment compensation. Her employer argued she quit and was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The case was heard by The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The decision was appealed. Attorney David Allen talks about the evidence the court was able to consider on appeal. David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years. We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims. Visit our offices for a free initial consultation. In California: 5230 Folsom Blvd. Sacramento, CA 9... -
Sonnet 71 - Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT Sonnet #71 Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves Actor: Kristi Dana See more videos at www.SonnetProjectNYC.com -
High Court can't rule on conversion cases, Appellate Court finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf -
Not Yet Teachers! TSC to challenge award to teachers in Appellate court
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists that the pay increase can only be awarded after a job evaluation, remember Justice Ndumba Nderi in his ruling stated that the evaluation falls under the TSC and not SRC….Take a look.... For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya -
Order Blocking Mississippi Executions Reversed By Appellate Court
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that an August lower court ruling blocking the state from executing prisoners was incorrect. The opinion, by Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, rejects death row prisoner arguments stating that Mississippi's failure to administer a 3-drug combination previously used for lethal injection violates their rights. Mississippi and other states can no longer attain the drugs because manufacturers have stopped selling them, due to fear of public protest. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/appeals-court-throws-out-order-blocking-mississippi-executions/ http://www.wochit.com This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:59
- Updated: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
wn.com/10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
What is an Appellate Court?
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:23
- Updated: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the ea...
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Transcript:
There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify.
After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
wn.com/What Is An Appellate Court
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow the losing side to appeal the decision and if it believes that the earlier court made a mistake. In this video, appellate attorney Maureen Lefebvre explains the types of courts and what can happen to a case after a verdict is rendered.
Transcript:
There are two court systems. There's the federal court system and there's the Florida state courts. Florida, generally there's the trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and then there's the supreme courts, either the U.S. Supreme Court, or the Florida Supreme Court. The trial court is what most people are familiar with. That's where trials occur, that's if there's going to be a jury, that's where the jury sits, that's where witnesses come and testify.
After there's a trial, generally somebody is unhappy because one side wins and one side loses. So, frequently one side will decide if there was some mistake made at trial, and they will take what is called an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, and at that point, you would file a brief, you would file notices of appeal and you would file briefs with the appellate court, and you would explain your position—what are the legal arguments that support what mistake was made.
Colson Hicks Eidson
255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse
Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 476-7400
Website: http://www.colson.com/
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:36
- Updated: 22 Apr 2013
- views: 698
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:15
- Updated: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
wn.com/Oral Argument Before The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Constitutional Law Question (July 11, 2014).
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:01
- Updated: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 9641
- published: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 9641
Appellate court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:33
- Updated: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or sec...
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Appellate Court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English) or appeal court (British English) or court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In most jurisdictions, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme court (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. Appellate courts nationwide can operate by varying rules.
The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. "Generally speaking, an appellate court's judgment provides 'the final directive of the appeals courts as to the matter appealed, setting out with specificity the court's determination that the action appealed from should be affirmed, reversed, remanded or modified'".
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 15:52
- Updated: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
Appellate court ruling
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:52
- Updated: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 994
What can I say
What can I say
wn.com/Appellate Court Ruling
What can I say
- published: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 994
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 5:11
- Updated: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and sou...
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
wn.com/Appellate Court Nails Nsa Spying And Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a 97-page ruling, the Second Circuit Court ruled that the heart and soul of the so-called Patriot Act, known as Section 215, is constitutionally flawed and it cannot be legally interpreted as allowing mass snooping on the phone calls of U.S. citizens!
The timing of this May 2015 ruling is extremely significant since the Patriot Act is set to expire on June 1, 2015.
This is causing power craving, ultra controlling politicians to have outright panic attacks. Unless they do something very quickly, they will be forced to honor constitutional rule of law. And, gasp, people can have private conversations again in America!
But don't jump for joy yet. The political scoundrels have regrouped and are now pushing for a so-called reform measure called the Freedom Act. Only one problem. It's worse than the Patriot Act. The so-called Freedom Act, if implemented, would, as Judge Napolitano put it, "legitimize all spying all the time on all of us in ways that the Patriot Act fails to do. It is no protection of privacy; it is no protection of constitutional liberty. It unleashes American spies on innocent Americans in utter disregard of the Fourth Amendment."
Ironically, the NSA's data collection center is located in the town of Bluffdale, Utah. So what do you say it's time to call everyone's bluff. Let' s make it an acid test of who to support this election season. Even if a professing conservative supports either renewing the Patriot Act or the new phony Freedom Act, show him the Right Foot of Fellowship--and that includes Ted Cruz. Et Tu, Ted? Et Tu Ted. As admirable as Senator Cruz is on many issues, if he is on the wrong side of this issue, he can't be trusted on lesser issues. Hopefully the unwavering stand of Ted's buddy Rand Paul will motivate Cruz to abandon his current inexplicable support for the Freedom Act, and to once again stand firm in supporting our Fourth Amendment rights.
Judge Andrew Napolitano's repudiation of the Patriot Act in his May 14 column is constitutionally unassailable. He wrote, "The Patriot Act is the centerpiece of the federal government’s false claims that by surrendering our personal liberties to it, it can somehow keep us safe. The liberty-for-safety offer has been around for millennia and was poignant at the time of the founding of the American republic.
"The Framers addressed it in the Constitution itself, where they recognized the primacy of the right to privacy and insured against its violation by the government by intentionally forcing it to jump through some difficult hoops before it can capture our thoughts, words or private behavior.
"Those hoops are the requirement of a search warrant issued by a judge and based on evidence — called probable cause — demonstrating that it is more likely than not that the government will find what it is looking for from the person or place it is targeting. Only then may a judge issue a warrant, which must specifically describe the place to be searched or specifically identify the person or thing to be seized.
"None of this is new. It has been at the core of our system of government since the 1790s. It is embodied in the Fourth Amendment, which is at the heart of the Bill of Rights. It is quintessentially American."
Wow! If we can only get our politicians to embrace constitutional chat like this, we might just get back our Constitutional Republic!
Napolitano went on the explain that The Patriot Act makes an unconstitutional end run around the search warrant requirement by employing language left intentionally vague so that the feds can interpret it any way it wants and to add insult to injury they used a secret court called a FISA court to legitimize their illegitimate actions, far from the prying and probing eyes of We the People and what's left of the Free Press, resulting in their ability to spy on anyone and everyone whenever they choose--and they chose to spy on everyone all the time--including having the Draconian ability to actually turn on our cell phones remotely, using them as listening devices--in real time!
This is the end of our video but if you still are leaning toward replacing the Patriot Act with the Freedom Act, consider this: The NSA supports the Freedom Act!
To read Judge Napolitano's column on this subject, visit the web page of LewRockwell.com. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 11:17
- Updated: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
wn.com/Assembling The Clerk's Record For Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how to assemble the clerk's record for submission to the appellate court.
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
Appealing a Court Decision
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 8:15
- Updated: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 2950
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a...
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision.
Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge.
Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law."
You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on the law and application of the law by a judge. an appeal is when you have a situation where you think the judge has ruled incorrectly. If you go to the law library there are literally thousands of books of cases and everyone of those is an appeal.
So there’s plenty of cases being appealed. There’s plenty of cases where someone believes fervently that the judge has made a mistake. And when he has it should be appealed.
What kinds of cases are appealed? All kinds of cases are appealed. There are different types of appeals. If you have questions about your case, call the Lanigans for an appointment 407-733-2292. (Winter Park, Florida)
wn.com/Appealing A Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals attorney Eric Lanigan talks about the appellate process and appealing a court decision.
Most people you know when you watch courtroom drama on TV it’s always at the trial level. The witnesses are on the witness stand, the jury’s there. It's exciting, right? Well, appeals are written and very rarely heard before a judge.
Who wants to watch a TV show about somebody making a legal argument in front of a panel of judges. That’s what an appeal is. An appeal is nothing more than, “I think this trial judge made a mistake. I want another judge to review it and here is the legal basis for my argument, based on this application of the law."
You may not enter new evidence, new witnesses. An appeal is based on the law and application of the law by a judge. an appeal is when you have a situation where you think the judge has ruled incorrectly. If you go to the law library there are literally thousands of books of cases and everyone of those is an appeal.
So there’s plenty of cases being appealed. There’s plenty of cases where someone believes fervently that the judge has made a mistake. And when he has it should be appealed.
What kinds of cases are appealed? All kinds of cases are appealed. There are different types of appeals. If you have questions about your case, call the Lanigans for an appointment 407-733-2292. (Winter Park, Florida)
- published: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 2950
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:26
- Updated: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the Se...
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
wn.com/Appellate Court Upholds Timamy Election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's election null has been successful. Timamy had appealed against the September ruling that had stripped him of his title and position as Governor. A by election had been set for the 2nd of December but due to the successful appeal, it may not take place after all. The by election had attracted competition from immediate former Lamu west MP Fahim Twaha of TNA, who was one of the petitioners in the election dispute.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:04
- Updated: 07 May 2015
- views: 4261
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn:...
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/
American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee
Script:
The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday.
A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215."
The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection.
The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed.
This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal.
The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.
wn.com/Appellate Court Rules Nsa's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practice of collecting Americans' phone metadata.
Follow Elizabeth Hagedorn: http://www.twitter.com/ElizHagedorn
See more at http://www.newsy.com
Sources:
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/NSA_ca2_20150507.pdf
Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/03/white-house-confirms-if-section-215-expires-so-does-bulk-phone-records-collection
CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/27/justice/nsa-ruling/
American Civil Liberties Union https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
Image via: Getty Images / Win McNamee
Script:
The National Security Agency's practice of collecting Americans' information from telephone calls is illegal, according to a court ruling Thursday.
A federal court ruled, "The telephone metadata program exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized and therefore violates Section 215."
The NSA uses Section 215 of the Patriot Act to justify its collection of Americans' phone metadata. Thursday's court ruling determined the NSA went too far with its information collection.
The timing of the ruling is especially crucial as the Patriot Act is set to expire June 1, unless Congress acts. If it does expire, NSA officials said they would not collect phone metadata unless it was renewed.
This appellate federal court ruling comes after a December 2013 ruling from a judge who decided the NSA's metadata collection was legal.
The lawsuit was brought on by the American Civil Liberties Union. Listed defendants include Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA Director Michael Rogers, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, new Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey.
- published: 07 May 2015
- views: 4261
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:14
- Updated: 27 Mar 2016
- views: 27
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
CHARLOTTE COUNTY ,FLORIDA ,SHERIFF, CORRUPTION
http://charlott...
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
CHARLOTTE COUNTY ,FLORIDA ,SHERIFF, CORRUPTION
http://charlottecountyflcorruption.info
www.youtube.com/channel/UCaLx8YHxza3Jfoa-q9HIUZw
www.youtube.com/user/LIVEFREEORDIEPEOPLE
www.facebook.com/Charlottecountyflcopwatch
www.facebook.com/CHARLOTTECOUNTYSHERIFFFREESPEECHPAGE
sheriff,corruption,charlotte County,
florida,cop,police,pastor,stalking,COPWATCH,COPBLOCK,
COP WATCH,COP BLOCK,#COPWATCH,#COPBLOCK,
BILL PRUMMELL, KENNETH HILL,ken hill
I AM WHITE AND HAVE PERSONALY EXPERIENCED THE CHARLOTTE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, SHERIFFS, CORRUPTION,IT WOKE ME UP BIG
TIME.
NOW THAT IM TELING OTHERS ABOUT THE CORUPTION .,
SHERIFF KENNETH HILL AND BILL PRUMMELL KNOWS THE SHERIFF
THAT COMITED PERJURY IN COURT AND GOT THE CASE THROWN
OUT,AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS DID NOTHING.SINCE U R
SUCH A SUPORTER CAN YOU HELP ME DEAL WITH THIS SITUATION
AND CONTACT THEM AND TELL THEM TO FIRE AREST THIS
CORRUPT SHERIFF THAT DID IT,THX
wn.com/Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
CHARLOTTE COUNTY ,FLORIDA ,SHERIFF, CORRUPTION
http://charlottecountyflcorruption.info
www.youtube.com/channel/UCaLx8YHxza3Jfoa-q9HIUZw
www.youtube.com/user/LIVEFREEORDIEPEOPLE
www.facebook.com/Charlottecountyflcopwatch
www.facebook.com/CHARLOTTECOUNTYSHERIFFFREESPEECHPAGE
sheriff,corruption,charlotte County,
florida,cop,police,pastor,stalking,COPWATCH,COPBLOCK,
COP WATCH,COP BLOCK,#COPWATCH,#COPBLOCK,
BILL PRUMMELL, KENNETH HILL,ken hill
I AM WHITE AND HAVE PERSONALY EXPERIENCED THE CHARLOTTE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, SHERIFFS, CORRUPTION,IT WOKE ME UP BIG
TIME.
NOW THAT IM TELING OTHERS ABOUT THE CORUPTION .,
SHERIFF KENNETH HILL AND BILL PRUMMELL KNOWS THE SHERIFF
THAT COMITED PERJURY IN COURT AND GOT THE CASE THROWN
OUT,AND INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS DID NOTHING.SINCE U R
SUCH A SUPORTER CAN YOU HELP ME DEAL WITH THIS SITUATION
AND CONTACT THEM AND TELL THEM TO FIRE AREST THIS
CORRUPT SHERIFF THAT DID IT,THX
- published: 27 Mar 2016
- views: 27
Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:24
- Updated: 05 Nov 2014
- views: 364
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after ...
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service.
wn.com/Supreme Court Overturns Appellate Court Decision Stopping Dismissal Of 11 Judges
11 court of appeal and high court judges who had been found unsuitable to serve by the judges and magistrate vetting board are finally on their way home after the supreme court overturned a ruling by the court of appeal stopping their removal from office and upheld their dismissal. Wednesday's ruling will be a major victory for the Sharad Rao led judges and magistrates vetting board which had voiced concern over the continued stay in office of the dismissed judges even after they had been found unfit to continue in service.
- published: 05 Nov 2014
- views: 364
Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:40
- Updated: 18 Apr 2014
- views: 833
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhelmi...
A three-judge appellate panel in Denver heard oral arguments in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage. Oklahoma voters overwhelmingly approved that state's gay marriage ban in 2004.
wn.com/Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 6:59
- Updated: 05 Jun 2015
- views: 131635
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk abo...
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
wn.com/Structure Of The Court System Crash Course Government And Politics 19
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there.
Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios
Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org
All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode
Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse
Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse
Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com
Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse
CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
- published: 05 Jun 2015
- views: 131635
Allegations of Document Fraud In Foreclosure- Will The Appellate Court Speak
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 13:59
- Updated: 11 Jun 2015
- views: 250
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate com...
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
wn.com/Allegations Of Document Fraud In Foreclosure Will The Appellate Court Speak
The homeowner's attorney does a very good job of presenting the issues...Regrettably the appellate court does not seem moved at all.
This is an unfortunate commentary on what is occurring in courts across this state.
At the 9:00 minute mark, you see how the panel just isn't engaged with these arguments at all.
Weidner Law Appeal Video
This oral argument video is on the case: 3DCA 12-0259 - Ricardo Sanchez vs Bank of New York etc et al
Weidner Law represents consumers in legal actions and provides within a wide range of legal actions. Practice areas include consumer law, bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, veteran and servicemember claims and estate planning. The law firm also represents litigants in state and federal court appeals. Matt Weidner and the attorneys of Weidner Law practice only in the state of Florida.
Visit our Website: http://mattweidnerlaw.com
Visit our Youtube Channel: Matthew Weidner
Weidner Law
250 Mirror Lake North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
727-954-8752
- published: 11 Jun 2015
- views: 250
David Allen - Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:19
- Updated: 13 Feb 2014
- views: 227
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was f...
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was fired and was entitled to unemployment compensation. Her employer argued she quit and was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The case was heard by The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The decision was appealed. Attorney David Allen talks about the evidence the court was able to consider on appeal.
David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years.
We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims.
Visit our offices for a free initial consultation.
In California:
5230 Folsom Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95819
(916) 455-4800
7400 Shoreline Drive, Ste. 1
Stockton, CA 95219
(916) 473-4800
1300 Clay Street, Ste. 600
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 663-4600
Fremont Office Center
39899 Balentine Drive
Suite 200
Newark, CA 94560
(510) 663-4600
In Nevada:
200 S. Virginia St.
Wells Fargo Building
Reno, NV 89501
(775) 786-1020
Call us Toll Free (877) 876-4800
www.DavidAllenLaw.com
www.legalvideoblog.com
wn.com/David Allen Appellate Court Considers Unemployment Compensation Claim
Dorsey Stern worked as a dental assistant in Missouri. Following a series of heated exchanges with her employer she was no longer employed. She argued she was fired and was entitled to unemployment compensation. Her employer argued she quit and was not entitled to unemployment compensation. The case was heard by The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The decision was appealed. Attorney David Allen talks about the evidence the court was able to consider on appeal.
David Allen & Associates helping injured and disabled people throughout the west for 30 years.
We offer successful representation in Personal Injury, Social Security Disability and Insurance Disability claims.
Visit our offices for a free initial consultation.
In California:
5230 Folsom Blvd.
Sacramento, CA 95819
(916) 455-4800
7400 Shoreline Drive, Ste. 1
Stockton, CA 95219
(916) 473-4800
1300 Clay Street, Ste. 600
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 663-4600
Fremont Office Center
39899 Balentine Drive
Suite 200
Newark, CA 94560
(510) 663-4600
In Nevada:
200 S. Virginia St.
Wells Fargo Building
Reno, NV 89501
(775) 786-1020
Call us Toll Free (877) 876-4800
www.DavidAllenLaw.com
www.legalvideoblog.com
- published: 13 Feb 2014
- views: 227
Sonnet 71 - Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:17
- Updated: 12 Jun 2013
- views: 839
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT
Sonnet #71
Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves
Actor: Kristi Da...
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT
Sonnet #71
Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves
Actor: Kristi Dana
See more videos at www.SonnetProjectNYC.com
wn.com/Sonnet 71 Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
NY Shakespeare Exchange presents THE SONNET PROJECT
Sonnet #71
Holocaust Memorial, Appellate Court, Manhattan
Director: Noemi Charlotte Thieves
Actor: Kristi Dana
See more videos at www.SonnetProjectNYC.com
- published: 12 Jun 2013
- views: 839
High Court can't rule on conversion cases, Appellate Court finds
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 4:19
- Updated: 30 Dec 2015
- views: 796
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to...
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
wn.com/High Court Can't Rule On Conversion Cases, Appellate Court Finds
The Court of Appeal today reversed a lower court’s order quashing the unilateral conversion of M. Indira Gandhi’s three children to Islam, in a critical blow to the Hindu mother’s battle against her Muslim ex-spouse. - See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/appellate-court-reinstates-unilateral-conversion-of-hindu-mums-kids-defers#sthash.kEUmip3g.dpuf
- published: 30 Dec 2015
- views: 796
Not Yet Teachers! TSC to challenge award to teachers in Appellate court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:36
- Updated: 01 Jul 2015
- views: 199
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists t...
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists that the pay increase can only be awarded after a job evaluation, remember Justice Ndumba Nderi in his ruling stated that the evaluation falls under the TSC and not SRC….Take a look....
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
wn.com/Not Yet Teachers Tsc To Challenge Award To Teachers In Appellate Court
Just a day after a landmark ruling over teachers’ pay increase TSC has vowed to appeal the decision. Trevor Ombija was in studio with the details. TSC insists that the pay increase can only be awarded after a job evaluation, remember Justice Ndumba Nderi in his ruling stated that the evaluation falls under the TSC and not SRC….Take a look....
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
- published: 01 Jul 2015
- views: 199
Order Blocking Mississippi Executions Reversed By Appellate Court
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:44
- Updated: 11 Feb 2016
- views: 6
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that...
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that an August lower court ruling blocking the state from executing prisoners was incorrect. The opinion, by Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, rejects death row prisoner arguments stating that Mississippi's failure to administer a 3-drug combination previously used for lethal injection violates their rights. Mississippi and other states can no longer attain the drugs because manufacturers have stopped selling them, due to fear of public protest.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/appeals-court-throws-out-order-blocking-mississippi-executions/
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
wn.com/Order Blocking Mississippi Executions Reversed By Appellate Court
On Wednesday a federal appeals court reversed a stay that blocked the state of Mississippi from carrying out further executions. The Court of Appeals ruled that an August lower court ruling blocking the state from executing prisoners was incorrect. The opinion, by Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, rejects death row prisoner arguments stating that Mississippi's failure to administer a 3-drug combination previously used for lethal injection violates their rights. Mississippi and other states can no longer attain the drugs because manufacturers have stopped selling them, due to fear of public protest.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/appeals-court-throws-out-order-blocking-mississippi-executions/
http://www.wochit.com
This video was produced by YT Wochit News using http://wochit.com
- published: 11 Feb 2016
- views: 6
-
14-35147 David Picray v. Christopher Duffitt
Benton County Deputies Christopher Duffitt and Greg Ridler appeal from the district court's order on summary judgment denying their motion for qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by David Picray arising from his arrest. -
Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal | Short News
Summary of news on 'Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal' Source: BBC Two men who served long sentences before their convictions were overturned have lost the latest round of their legal fight for compensation Sam Hallam, from London, served more than seven years for murder, while Victor Nealon, from Worcestershire, served 17 years for attempted rape Both men were released after appeal judges ruled that fresh evidence made their convictions unsafe But the Court of Appeal dismissed their compensation cases Both of the men had applications for compensation for miscarriage of justice rejected by the Ministry of Justice. -
PNG JUDICIARY TO HAVE A NEW COURT OF APPEALS WITH 7 JUDGES
Opposition Leader Don Polye says the Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's move to set up a new Court of Appeal is for himself to buy time to remain in power and not for the best interest of the country. -
Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal under the Constitution of India, the highest constitutional court, with the power of constitutional review.[1] It comprises the Chief Justice of India and 30 other judges. It has original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions. As the final court of appeal of the country, it takes up appeals primarily against verdicts of the High Courts of various States of the Union and other courts and tribunals. The Supreme Court has extensive original jurisdiction for the protection of fundamental rights of citizens. It also acts as the court to settle disputes between various governments in the country. As an advisory court, it hears matters which may specifically be referred to it under the Constitution by the Presid... -
The Murder Of Rachel O'reilly : Crime Documentary
In July 2007, O’Reilly was found guilty by a Central Criminal Court jury and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife at their home in the Naul, Co Dublin. Rachel O’Reilly’s badly beaten body was found in the bedroom of her home by her mother on October 4th, 2004 and in the intervening period O’Reilly had appeared as a guest on the topic of her death on RTÉ’s Late Late Show. Speaking on behalf of the Court of Appeal, Mr Justice George Birmingham said it was an “unacceptable strategy” to raise the arguments O’Reilly had raised at this point. O’Reilly’s application was based on events that occurred on the third day of his Central Criminal Court trial when a portion of the book of evidence was found in the jury room, the judge said. It was clear, from the way in which the iss... -
5392: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
Description -
5393: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
Description -
DA's Maimane snubs Government's leave to appeal Al-Bashir ruling
DA leader Mmusi Maimane has criticised the government for filing an application for leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal ruling on the Omar Al-Bashir case at the constitutional court. Bashir was in South Africa for the AU summit in June in 2015 .The court ruled that South Africa should have executed the ICC warrant of arrest for the Sudanese leader as a signatory to the Rome Statute. He is wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. Maimane was speaking in Port Elizabeth addressing party members and residents on service delivery issues. Government's leave to appeal Bashir ruling For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news -
Court Of Appeal, Benin Strikes Out Case Seeking To Commit EDHA Speaker And Clerk To Prison
The court of Appeal sitting in Benin has stuck out as application seeking to commit the speaker of Edo state House of Assembly victor Edoror and Clerk of the House, Barrister Lawson Ugiagbe to jail for failure to swear in Sylvanus Eruaga as member of the House in line with court of Appeal judgment. -
Tribunal to hear appeal court's ruling on Tunoi status as a judge
The Justice Tunoi tribunal adjourned to allow for the conclusion of an appeal court case where the judge is challenging the decision of the Judicial Service Commission to retire him and two other Supreme court Judges. The public session also heard from one of the lawyers who stated that he had information touching on one of the witnesses that he wanted to give to the tribunal. Lawyer Paul Lilan asked for time to put together the documents …Fred Ngatia representing the accused judge was also absent. The judge asked the tribunal to allow him time to finish the case before the court of appeal before the sittings can resume. The judge reversed his earlier decision to be heard in private and asked the tribunal to include the public in the hearing. For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke Fol... -
Sir Salamo on Court of Appeal
Chief Justice, Sir Salamo Injia, clarified that the Court of Appeal, a bill that was presented in a recent parliamentary sitting, is not a new court. Sir Salamo said the Court of Appeal would fill the gap in the court structure, making it a three-tier court system. Once it is passed, the National Court will be the trial court, before all cases will go to the Court of Appeal, and then finally to the Supreme Court, which will be the final court of appeal. Permanent judges will also service each court. Currently, all judges are servicing both the National and Supreme Courts. visit us at http://www.emtv.com.pg/ for the latest news... -
April 6th 2016 Court Of Appeal Rules Against Guy Joseph - AK
The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Castries south east MP Guy Joseph to have Anthony Astaphan removed as counsel for the constituency boundaries commission. The written reasons for the dismissal of the appeal were delivered on Wednesday April 6th, 2016. -
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31105)
-
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31114)
-
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31128)
-
JSC interview of Judge Pillay for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge D Pillay for the Supreme Court of Appeal. Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za -
JSC interview of Judge Mocumie for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge BC Mocumie for the Supreme Court of Appeal. Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za -
JSC interview of Judge Meyer for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge PA Meyer for the Supreme Court of Appeal. Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za -
JSC interview of Judge Baartman for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge ED Baartman for the Supreme Court of Appeal. Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za -
JSC Interview of Judge T R Gorven for the Supreme Court of Appeal position
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge T R Gorven for the Supreme Court of Appeal. -
Interviews held for aspiring Supreme Court of Appeal Judges
The Judicial services commission is deliberating on the future of the Supreme Court, it held interviews in Cape Town. Our contributing Editor, Vuyo Mvoko is in Cape Town and sat in on the interview process. Hopes, fears and aspirations. The possible future of SA Courts, seen through exchanges between Judicial Services Commissioners and aspiring Supreme Court of Appeal Judges. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news -
Edo: Appeal Court orders speaker, clerk to appear before it
The Court of Appeal sitting in Benin today ordered the Speaker of Edo State House of Assembly, Victor Edoror and the Clerk of the House, Lawson Ugiagbe to appear before it following the refusal of the House to swear-in the member-elect for Etsako West Constituency Two, Sylvanus Peter Eruaga. Best Mbiere reports that the resumed hearing of the case witnessed heated argument between Counsel to the petitioner and the respondents. -
Collier v Sope Supreme Court of Student Governance Appeal Hearing
14-35147 David Picray v. Christopher Duffitt
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 33:17
- Updated: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 0
Benton County Deputies Christopher Duffitt and Greg Ridler appeal from the district court's order on summary judgment denying their motion for qualified immunit...
Benton County Deputies Christopher Duffitt and Greg Ridler appeal from the district court's order on summary judgment denying their motion for qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by David Picray arising from his arrest.
wn.com/14 35147 David Picray V. Christopher Duffitt
Benton County Deputies Christopher Duffitt and Greg Ridler appeal from the district court's order on summary judgment denying their motion for qualified immunity in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by David Picray arising from his arrest.
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 0
Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal | Short News
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:05
- Updated: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
Summary of news on 'Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal'
Source: BBC
Two men who served long sentences before their convictions were overturned have lost ...
Summary of news on 'Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal'
Source: BBC
Two men who served long sentences before their convictions were overturned have lost the latest round of their legal fight for compensation
Sam Hallam, from London, served more than seven years for murder, while Victor Nealon, from Worcestershire, served 17 years for attempted rape
Both men were released after appeal judges ruled that fresh evidence made their convictions unsafe
But the Court of Appeal dismissed their compensation cases
Both of the men had applications for compensation for miscarriage of justice rejected by the Ministry of Justice.
wn.com/Wrongly Jailed Men Lose Payout Appeal | Short News
Summary of news on 'Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal'
Source: BBC
Two men who served long sentences before their convictions were overturned have lost the latest round of their legal fight for compensation
Sam Hallam, from London, served more than seven years for murder, while Victor Nealon, from Worcestershire, served 17 years for attempted rape
Both men were released after appeal judges ruled that fresh evidence made their convictions unsafe
But the Court of Appeal dismissed their compensation cases
Both of the men had applications for compensation for miscarriage of justice rejected by the Ministry of Justice.
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
PNG JUDICIARY TO HAVE A NEW COURT OF APPEALS WITH 7 JUDGES
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:36
- Updated: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
Opposition Leader Don Polye says the Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's move to set up a new Court of Appeal is for himself to buy time to remain in power and not ...
Opposition Leader Don Polye says the Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's move to set up a new Court of Appeal is for himself to buy time to remain in power and not for the best interest of the country.
wn.com/Png Judiciary To Have A New Court Of Appeals With 7 Judges
Opposition Leader Don Polye says the Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's move to set up a new Court of Appeal is for himself to buy time to remain in power and not for the best interest of the country.
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
Supreme Court of India
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:42
- Updated: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal under the Constitution of India, the highest constitutional court, with the p...
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal under the Constitution of India, the highest constitutional court, with the power of constitutional review.[1]
It comprises the Chief Justice of India and 30 other judges. It has original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions.
As the final court of appeal of the country, it takes up appeals primarily against verdicts of the High Courts of various States of the Union and other courts and tribunals.
The Supreme Court has extensive original jurisdiction for the protection of fundamental rights of citizens. It also acts as the court to settle disputes between various governments in the country. As an advisory court, it hears matters which may specifically be referred to it under the Constitution by the President of India. It also may take cognisance of matters on its own (or 'suo moto'), without anyone drawing its attention. It was first set up in Calcutta for administration of justice.
The law declared by the Supreme Court becomes binding on all courts within India.
for more details call us on +91-9833604902 , 022-23892325
the above data is for information / educational purpose and not for any sort of advertisement.
Source :- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_India
wn.com/Supreme Court Of India
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal under the Constitution of India, the highest constitutional court, with the power of constitutional review.[1]
It comprises the Chief Justice of India and 30 other judges. It has original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions.
As the final court of appeal of the country, it takes up appeals primarily against verdicts of the High Courts of various States of the Union and other courts and tribunals.
The Supreme Court has extensive original jurisdiction for the protection of fundamental rights of citizens. It also acts as the court to settle disputes between various governments in the country. As an advisory court, it hears matters which may specifically be referred to it under the Constitution by the President of India. It also may take cognisance of matters on its own (or 'suo moto'), without anyone drawing its attention. It was first set up in Calcutta for administration of justice.
The law declared by the Supreme Court becomes binding on all courts within India.
for more details call us on +91-9833604902 , 022-23892325
the above data is for information / educational purpose and not for any sort of advertisement.
Source :- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_India
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
The Murder Of Rachel O'reilly : Crime Documentary
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 44:26
- Updated: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 125
In July 2007, O’Reilly was found guilty by a Central Criminal Court jury and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife at their home in the Naul...
In July 2007, O’Reilly was found guilty by a Central Criminal Court jury and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife at their home in the Naul, Co Dublin.
Rachel O’Reilly’s badly beaten body was found in the bedroom of her home by her mother on October 4th, 2004 and in the intervening period O’Reilly had appeared as a guest on the topic of her death on RTÉ’s Late Late Show.
Speaking on behalf of the Court of Appeal, Mr Justice George Birmingham said it was an “unacceptable strategy” to raise the arguments O’Reilly had raised at this point.
O’Reilly’s application was based on events that occurred on the third day of his Central Criminal Court trial when a portion of the book of evidence was found in the jury room, the judge said.
It was clear, from the way in which the issue was approached by the trial judge and counsel at the time, that O’Reilly was fully informed and fully engaged with what was happening at the time, he said.
Having been so aware and so engaged, to raise the argument now after the trial and after his earlier appeal, was an “unacceptable strategy,” Mr Justice Birmingham said.
Accordingly, Mr Justice Birmingham, who sat with President of the Court of Appeal Mr Justice Sean Ryan and Mr Justice John Edwards, dismissed the appeal.
As a result, O’Reilly’s application under section 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act will not now proceed to full hearing.
Counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions, Brendan Grehan SC, had asked the Court of Appeal to dismiss O’Reilly’s application as an “abuse of process” because it was not based on any new or newly discovered facts as required under the Act.
On day four of O’Reilly’s trial for murder the court registrar was advised that a portion of the book of evidence had been left in the jury room.
Trial judge Mr Justice Barry White had made it clear, Mr Grehan said, that he would discharge the jury if any of them had read any portion of the book of evidence, otherwise the trial would continue.
The foreman of the jury was then asked whether any juror had read any portion of the book of evidence and his reply was: “not to my knowledge, no”.
Mr Grehan said that exchange took place with 11 jurors, the trial judge, O’Reilly and all counsel present in court.
The suggestion that one of the jurors simply sat there and stayed dumb did not arise because the “eyes of everybody in court” would have been looking at their reactions.
Mr Grehan said O’Reilly met with his legal team before the court sat, he was informed of what had transpired and informed that if any of the jurors had read any part of the book of evidence the jury would be discharged.
Not only was no application made to discharge the jury but those were O’Reilly’s instructions to his legal team - that if nobody had read any portion of the book of evidence the trial could proceed, Mr Grehan said.
It was “impossible to contemplate how the significance could not have been appreciated” by O’Reilly at the time and his case was “simply unstateable” and “bound to fail,” Mr Grehan said.
Counsel said the “very experienced” Mr Justice White had rigorously assessed the evidence in the trial and O’Reilly had enjoyed favourable rulings up until that point. Mr Justice White had also ruled inadmissible O’Reilly’s appearance on the Late Late Show, Mr Grehan said.
There should be finality to criminal trials, Mr Grehan said, not just for the director or the accused but for victims and their families also.
wn.com/The Murder Of Rachel O'Reilly Crime Documentary
In July 2007, O’Reilly was found guilty by a Central Criminal Court jury and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife at their home in the Naul, Co Dublin.
Rachel O’Reilly’s badly beaten body was found in the bedroom of her home by her mother on October 4th, 2004 and in the intervening period O’Reilly had appeared as a guest on the topic of her death on RTÉ’s Late Late Show.
Speaking on behalf of the Court of Appeal, Mr Justice George Birmingham said it was an “unacceptable strategy” to raise the arguments O’Reilly had raised at this point.
O’Reilly’s application was based on events that occurred on the third day of his Central Criminal Court trial when a portion of the book of evidence was found in the jury room, the judge said.
It was clear, from the way in which the issue was approached by the trial judge and counsel at the time, that O’Reilly was fully informed and fully engaged with what was happening at the time, he said.
Having been so aware and so engaged, to raise the argument now after the trial and after his earlier appeal, was an “unacceptable strategy,” Mr Justice Birmingham said.
Accordingly, Mr Justice Birmingham, who sat with President of the Court of Appeal Mr Justice Sean Ryan and Mr Justice John Edwards, dismissed the appeal.
As a result, O’Reilly’s application under section 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act will not now proceed to full hearing.
Counsel for the Director of Public Prosecutions, Brendan Grehan SC, had asked the Court of Appeal to dismiss O’Reilly’s application as an “abuse of process” because it was not based on any new or newly discovered facts as required under the Act.
On day four of O’Reilly’s trial for murder the court registrar was advised that a portion of the book of evidence had been left in the jury room.
Trial judge Mr Justice Barry White had made it clear, Mr Grehan said, that he would discharge the jury if any of them had read any portion of the book of evidence, otherwise the trial would continue.
The foreman of the jury was then asked whether any juror had read any portion of the book of evidence and his reply was: “not to my knowledge, no”.
Mr Grehan said that exchange took place with 11 jurors, the trial judge, O’Reilly and all counsel present in court.
The suggestion that one of the jurors simply sat there and stayed dumb did not arise because the “eyes of everybody in court” would have been looking at their reactions.
Mr Grehan said O’Reilly met with his legal team before the court sat, he was informed of what had transpired and informed that if any of the jurors had read any part of the book of evidence the jury would be discharged.
Not only was no application made to discharge the jury but those were O’Reilly’s instructions to his legal team - that if nobody had read any portion of the book of evidence the trial could proceed, Mr Grehan said.
It was “impossible to contemplate how the significance could not have been appreciated” by O’Reilly at the time and his case was “simply unstateable” and “bound to fail,” Mr Grehan said.
Counsel said the “very experienced” Mr Justice White had rigorously assessed the evidence in the trial and O’Reilly had enjoyed favourable rulings up until that point. Mr Justice White had also ruled inadmissible O’Reilly’s appearance on the Late Late Show, Mr Grehan said.
There should be finality to criminal trials, Mr Grehan said, not just for the director or the accused but for victims and their families also.
- published: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 125
5392: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:31
- Updated: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 59
5393: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:12
- Updated: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 26
DA's Maimane snubs Government's leave to appeal Al-Bashir ruling
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:45
- Updated: 09 Apr 2016
- views: 58
DA leader Mmusi Maimane has criticised the government for filing an application for leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal ruling on the Omar Al-Bashir cas...
DA leader Mmusi Maimane has criticised the government for filing an application for leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal ruling on the Omar Al-Bashir case at the constitutional court. Bashir was in South Africa for the AU summit in June in 2015 .The court ruled that South Africa should have executed the ICC warrant of arrest for the Sudanese leader as a signatory to the Rome Statute. He is wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. Maimane was speaking in Port Elizabeth addressing party members and residents on service delivery issues. Government's leave to appeal Bashir ruling
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
wn.com/Da's Maimane Snubs Government's Leave To Appeal Al Bashir Ruling
DA leader Mmusi Maimane has criticised the government for filing an application for leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal ruling on the Omar Al-Bashir case at the constitutional court. Bashir was in South Africa for the AU summit in June in 2015 .The court ruled that South Africa should have executed the ICC warrant of arrest for the Sudanese leader as a signatory to the Rome Statute. He is wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. Maimane was speaking in Port Elizabeth addressing party members and residents on service delivery issues. Government's leave to appeal Bashir ruling
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
- published: 09 Apr 2016
- views: 58
Court Of Appeal, Benin Strikes Out Case Seeking To Commit EDHA Speaker And Clerk To Prison
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:14
- Updated: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 22
The court of Appeal sitting in Benin has stuck out as application seeking to commit the speaker of Edo state House of Assembly victor Edoror and Clerk of the Ho...
The court of Appeal sitting in Benin has stuck out as application seeking to commit the speaker of Edo state House of Assembly victor Edoror and Clerk of the House, Barrister Lawson Ugiagbe to jail for failure to swear in Sylvanus Eruaga as member of the House in line with court of Appeal judgment.
wn.com/Court Of Appeal, Benin Strikes Out Case Seeking To Commit Edha Speaker And Clerk To Prison
The court of Appeal sitting in Benin has stuck out as application seeking to commit the speaker of Edo state House of Assembly victor Edoror and Clerk of the House, Barrister Lawson Ugiagbe to jail for failure to swear in Sylvanus Eruaga as member of the House in line with court of Appeal judgment.
- published: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 22
Tribunal to hear appeal court's ruling on Tunoi status as a judge
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:44
- Updated: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 14
The Justice Tunoi tribunal adjourned to allow for the conclusion of an appeal court case where the judge is challenging the decision of the Judicial Service Com...
The Justice Tunoi tribunal adjourned to allow for the conclusion of an appeal court case where the judge is challenging the decision of the Judicial Service Commission to retire him and two other Supreme court Judges.
The public session also heard from one of the lawyers who stated that he had information touching on one of the witnesses that he wanted to give to the tribunal. Lawyer Paul Lilan asked for time to put together the documents …Fred Ngatia representing the accused judge was also absent. The judge asked the tribunal to allow him time to finish the case before the court of appeal before the sittings can resume. The judge reversed his earlier decision to be heard in private and asked the tribunal to include the public in the hearing.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
Like us on Instagram http://www.instagram.com/ntvkenya
wn.com/Tribunal To Hear Appeal Court's Ruling On Tunoi Status As A Judge
The Justice Tunoi tribunal adjourned to allow for the conclusion of an appeal court case where the judge is challenging the decision of the Judicial Service Commission to retire him and two other Supreme court Judges.
The public session also heard from one of the lawyers who stated that he had information touching on one of the witnesses that he wanted to give to the tribunal. Lawyer Paul Lilan asked for time to put together the documents …Fred Ngatia representing the accused judge was also absent. The judge asked the tribunal to allow him time to finish the case before the court of appeal before the sittings can resume. The judge reversed his earlier decision to be heard in private and asked the tribunal to include the public in the hearing.
For more news visit http://www.ntv.co.ke
Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/ntvkenya
Like our FaceBook page http://www.facebook.com/NtvKenya
Like us on Instagram http://www.instagram.com/ntvkenya
- published: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 14
Sir Salamo on Court of Appeal
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 1:07
- Updated: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 4
Chief Justice, Sir Salamo Injia, clarified that the Court of Appeal, a bill that was presented in a recent parliamentary sitting, is not a new court.
Sir Salam...
Chief Justice, Sir Salamo Injia, clarified that the Court of Appeal, a bill that was presented in a recent parliamentary sitting, is not a new court.
Sir Salamo said the Court of Appeal would fill the gap in the court structure, making it a three-tier court system.
Once it is passed, the National Court will be the trial court, before all cases will go to the Court of Appeal, and then finally to the Supreme Court, which will be the final court of appeal.
Permanent judges will also service each court. Currently, all judges are servicing both the National and Supreme Courts.
visit us at http://www.emtv.com.pg/ for the latest news...
wn.com/Sir Salamo On Court Of Appeal
Chief Justice, Sir Salamo Injia, clarified that the Court of Appeal, a bill that was presented in a recent parliamentary sitting, is not a new court.
Sir Salamo said the Court of Appeal would fill the gap in the court structure, making it a three-tier court system.
Once it is passed, the National Court will be the trial court, before all cases will go to the Court of Appeal, and then finally to the Supreme Court, which will be the final court of appeal.
Permanent judges will also service each court. Currently, all judges are servicing both the National and Supreme Courts.
visit us at http://www.emtv.com.pg/ for the latest news...
- published: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 4
April 6th 2016 Court Of Appeal Rules Against Guy Joseph - AK
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 2:57
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 67
The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Castries south east MP Guy Joseph to have Anthony Astaphan removed as counsel for the constituenc...
The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Castries south east MP Guy Joseph to have Anthony Astaphan removed as counsel for the constituency boundaries commission.
The written reasons for the dismissal of the appeal were delivered on Wednesday April 6th, 2016.
wn.com/April 6Th 2016 Court Of Appeal Rules Against Guy Joseph Ak
The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Castries south east MP Guy Joseph to have Anthony Astaphan removed as counsel for the constituency boundaries commission.
The written reasons for the dismissal of the appeal were delivered on Wednesday April 6th, 2016.
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 67
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31105)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:08
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31114)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:17
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31128)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:13
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
JSC interview of Judge Pillay for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 46:15
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 1
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge D Pillay for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging ...
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge D Pillay for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
wn.com/Jsc Interview Of Judge Pillay For The Supreme Court Of Appeal Position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge D Pillay for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 1
JSC interview of Judge Mocumie for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 43:08
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 1
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge BC Mocumie for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouragin...
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge BC Mocumie for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
wn.com/Jsc Interview Of Judge Mocumie For The Supreme Court Of Appeal Position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge BC Mocumie for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 1
JSC interview of Judge Meyer for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 41:05
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge PA Meyer for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging b...
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge PA Meyer for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
wn.com/Jsc Interview Of Judge Meyer For The Supreme Court Of Appeal Position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge PA Meyer for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
JSC interview of Judge Baartman for the Supreme Court of Appeal position (Judges Matter)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 32:50
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 2
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge ED Baartman for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouragi...
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge ED Baartman for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
wn.com/Jsc Interview Of Judge Baartman For The Supreme Court Of Appeal Position (Judges Matter)
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge ED Baartman for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
Judges Matter is a South African non-profit organisation dedicated to encouraging broad-based public engagement with the important process of selecting the judges of the land. For more info: http://www.judgesmatter.co.za
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 2
JSC Interview of Judge T R Gorven for the Supreme Court of Appeal position
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 27:53
- Updated: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 7
JSC April 2016 interview of Judge T R Gorven for the Supreme Court of Appeal.
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 7
Interviews held for aspiring Supreme Court of Appeal Judges
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 22:57
- Updated: 05 Apr 2016
- views: 75
The Judicial services commission is deliberating on the future of the Supreme Court, it held interviews in Cape Town. Our contributing Editor, Vuyo Mvoko is in...
The Judicial services commission is deliberating on the future of the Supreme Court, it held interviews in Cape Town. Our contributing Editor, Vuyo Mvoko is in Cape Town and sat in on the interview process. Hopes, fears and aspirations. The possible future of SA Courts, seen through exchanges between Judicial Services Commissioners and aspiring Supreme Court of Appeal Judges.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
wn.com/Interviews Held For Aspiring Supreme Court Of Appeal Judges
The Judicial services commission is deliberating on the future of the Supreme Court, it held interviews in Cape Town. Our contributing Editor, Vuyo Mvoko is in Cape Town and sat in on the interview process. Hopes, fears and aspirations. The possible future of SA Courts, seen through exchanges between Judicial Services Commissioners and aspiring Supreme Court of Appeal Judges.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
- published: 05 Apr 2016
- views: 75
Edo: Appeal Court orders speaker, clerk to appear before it
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 3:11
- Updated: 04 Apr 2016
- views: 0
The Court of Appeal sitting in Benin today ordered the Speaker of Edo State House of Assembly, Victor Edoror and the Clerk of the House, Lawson Ugiagbe to appea...
The Court of Appeal sitting in Benin today ordered the Speaker of Edo State House of Assembly, Victor Edoror and the Clerk of the House, Lawson Ugiagbe to appear before it following the refusal of the House to swear-in the member-elect for Etsako West Constituency Two, Sylvanus Peter Eruaga.
Best Mbiere reports that the resumed hearing of the case witnessed heated argument between Counsel to the petitioner and the respondents.
wn.com/Edo Appeal Court Orders Speaker, Clerk To Appear Before It
The Court of Appeal sitting in Benin today ordered the Speaker of Edo State House of Assembly, Victor Edoror and the Clerk of the House, Lawson Ugiagbe to appear before it following the refusal of the House to swear-in the member-elect for Etsako West Constituency Two, Sylvanus Peter Eruaga.
Best Mbiere reports that the resumed hearing of the case witnessed heated argument between Counsel to the petitioner and the respondents.
- published: 04 Apr 2016
- views: 0
Collier v Sope Supreme Court of Student Governance Appeal Hearing
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 43:06
- Updated: 03 Apr 2016
- views: 4
- published: 03 Apr 2016
- views: 4
-
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial. Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1 From C-SPAN's Description: Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to p... -
SCA hears state appeal against Pistorius conviction
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein hear an application by the National Prosecuting Authority to challenge Oscar Pistorius's culpable homicide conviction. In 2014, the Blade-runner was convicted of shooting dead Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013. The state believes Judge Thokozile Masipa erred in her application of the law when handing down judgment. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline -
Omar al-Bashir case hearing in SCA, 12 February 2016
Government's decision not to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein on Friday. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news -
SABC COO court appeal
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein will hear an appeal on Friday by Motsoeneng against a Western Cape High Court judgment ordering his suspension as the broadcaster's chief operating officer. The DA approached the high court to enforce remedial action proposed by Public Protector Thuli Madonsela. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline -
Judgement in Oscar Pistorius appeal court case
Oscar Pistorius will Thursday find out if he will return to jail or not for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline -
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded that We conclude that the statutory safe harbor provisions of Surrogate's Court Procedure Act § 1404 and Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 3-3.5 are not exhaustive and that, under the circumstances of this case, the in terrorem clauses of the decedent's probated will was not violated. Gary B. Freidman, Esq. of Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP argued for the successful appellant. -
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014. Note: to view the 28J letter requested by the court, and Rynearson's response to the letter, please click here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/240396489/28J-Letter-in-Rynearson-v-United-States-of-America-et-al For complete information on this lawsuit to include the complete video of the thirty-four minute detention and this encounter discussed on the Fox News Channel, please visit http://www.veteransagainstpoliceabuse.org/BorderPatrolAppeal.aspx -
SABC COO court appeal Part 2
The Supreme Court of Appeal hear arguments in the case between the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA) and others. For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline -
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more ... -
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 1
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our specialized knowledge and experience in U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law will ease the prospective clients' concerns as they navigate through the ever complex and changing immigration law. The attorneys and staffs will personally and actively work with the clients in the area of immigration benefits, compliance, or enforcement. We are bilingual in Vietnamese and Spanish. Huy Tuan Nguyen is a shareholder in the law firm of Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. in Houston, Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Akron College of Law (J.D. in 1996) and College of Business (Master in Taxation, 1996). He is a member of the State Bar of Tex... -
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 2
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our specialized knowledge and experience in U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law will ease the prospective clients' concerns as they navigate through the ever complex and changing immigration law. The attorneys and staffs will personally and actively work with the clients in the area of immigration benefits, compliance, or enforcement. We are bilingual in Vietnamese and Spanish. Huy Tuan Nguyen is a shareholder in the law firm of Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. in Houston, Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Akron College of Law (J.D. in 1996) and College of Business (Master in Taxation, 1996). He is a member of the State Bar of Tex... -
Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court of Appeal
The following interview is a part of the California Legacy Project, recounting the stories and preserving the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century. More Information: http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm Bio: http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/ComptonL.pdf -
Oral Argument before Second District Court of Appeal for Florida
The Defendant in a personal injury auto accident case took an appeal following a jury verdict, asking the appellate court to reverse the trial court's decision. The Defendant's attorney presented his argument first. Attorney Jason Herman, of Herman & Wells, presented his arguments next, arguing that the trial court should be affirmed. Ten days after this argument, the Second District issued an opinion affirming the trial court, resulting in a full recovery for Mr. Herman's client, the Plaintiff. -
Florida First District Court of Appeal - Nassau County Clerk - Chief Judge Moran
Nassau County Florida Clerk John Crawford seeks opinion on $4,500 court costs. -
Nicholas Mermiges, Esq. - Oral Argument Before FL 3rd District Court of Appeals
Eileen Diaz v. Home Depot et. al. -
John Michael Guidry, 1st Circuit Court of Appeal Judge discusses his personal & professional history
http://www.LockeMeredithLaw.com (225) 272-5300 (800) 479-9223 Hello, I'm Locke Meredith. I'd like to invite you to join me on the next Legal Lines where we are pleased to have on the show Judge John Michael Guidry. He's a First Circuit Court of Appeal Judge, and Judge Guidry is going to talk to us about being a legislator both in the House and the Senate. Also being a judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeal for 16 years. He's also going to talk to us about crime and how his own personal life experience and how important education was in his climb from being a fellow or young kid in a broken family in South Baton Rouge to be First Circuit Court of Appeal Judge. Join us on the next Legal Lines with Judge John Michael Guidry. Epi 162 -
R v Mernagh at Ontario Court of Appeal (Pre-&-post hearing)
R v Mernagh Coverage of the historic medical marijuana appeal by Health Canada CROWN team 'R' vs Matt Mernagh team Mernahuana, with pre-hearing Monday post-hearing Tuesday words on the court, access system, patient accesss, doctors as gatekeepers, plus thoughts on the verdict (expected this summer) More info: http://www.mernagh.ca/ Cannabis Culture: Still Waiting On Legal Weed Ruling http://www.cannabisculture.com/blogs/2012/06/09/Still-Waiting-Legal-Weed-Ruling -
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/p... -
Hearing in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand
Koyama v New Zealand Law Society CA772/2012 The hearing started around 3:30 pm and ended around 4:10 pm on 8 April 2013 (Monday) in Wellington. The hearing was attended by the following: The Court of Appeal (O'Regan P, Wild and White JJ) Mr Paul Collins for the New Zealand Law Society, and Tatsuhiko Koyama (Appellant) For more information https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/koyama-v-new-zealand-law-society https://newzealandjustice.com/showthread.php?118-Koyama-v-New-Zealand-Law-Society-Violation-of-some-constitutional-principles&p;=1890#post1890
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 62:09
- Updated: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9774
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and ...
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
wn.com/Fox Television V. Federal Communications Commission 2Nd Circuit Court Of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the YouTube rating system. There is an audio warning, a visual warning, and a YouTube warning. If you don't want to hear swear words, do not listen to this trial.
Courtesy C-SPAN, courts.gov
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals
12/20/2006, C-SPAN Program ID: 195903-1
From C-SPAN's Description:
Oral arguments were heard by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission. Fox Television was challenging the FCC's indecency standards and the way it punished broadcasters for airing shows that contain profanity. The network argued that the government violated the First Amendment by embarking on a "radical reinterpretation and expansion" of its power to punish broadcasters for indecent speech. The network contended that the FCC sharply changed its standards for profanity, that the standards were vague and made little sense in the face of industry changes. The FCC fined Fox for language used by Cher and Nicole Richie on the live broadcasts of the 2002 and 2003 Billboard Music Awards, respectively.
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9774
SCA hears state appeal against Pistorius conviction
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 181:29
- Updated: 03 Nov 2015
- views: 88575
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein hear an application by the National Prosecuting Authority to challenge Oscar Pistorius's culpable homicide convictio...
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein hear an application by the National Prosecuting Authority to challenge Oscar Pistorius's culpable homicide conviction. In 2014, the Blade-runner was convicted of shooting dead Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013. The state believes Judge Thokozile Masipa erred in her application of the law when handing down judgment.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
wn.com/Sca Hears State Appeal Against Pistorius Conviction
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein hear an application by the National Prosecuting Authority to challenge Oscar Pistorius's culpable homicide conviction. In 2014, the Blade-runner was convicted of shooting dead Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013. The state believes Judge Thokozile Masipa erred in her application of the law when handing down judgment.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
- published: 03 Nov 2015
- views: 88575
Omar al-Bashir case hearing in SCA, 12 February 2016
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 0:00
- Updated: 12 Feb 2016
- views: 23
Government's decision not to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein on Friday.
For more News vi...
Government's decision not to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein on Friday.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
wn.com/Omar Al Bashir Case Hearing In Sca, 12 February 2016
Government's decision not to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is heard in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein on Friday.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
- published: 12 Feb 2016
- views: 23
SABC COO court appeal
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 40:07
- Updated: 18 Sep 2015
- views: 1253
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein will hear an appeal on Friday by Motsoeneng against a Western Cape High Court judgment ordering his suspension as th...
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein will hear an appeal on Friday by Motsoeneng against a Western Cape High Court judgment ordering his suspension as the broadcaster's chief operating officer. The DA approached the high court to enforce remedial action proposed by Public Protector Thuli Madonsela.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
wn.com/Sabc Coo Court Appeal
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein will hear an appeal on Friday by Motsoeneng against a Western Cape High Court judgment ordering his suspension as the broadcaster's chief operating officer. The DA approached the high court to enforce remedial action proposed by Public Protector Thuli Madonsela.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
- published: 18 Sep 2015
- views: 1253
Judgement in Oscar Pistorius appeal court case
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 56:11
- Updated: 03 Dec 2015
- views: 33385
Oscar Pistorius will Thursday find out if he will return to jail or not for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013.
For more News vi...
Oscar Pistorius will Thursday find out if he will return to jail or not for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
wn.com/Judgement In Oscar Pistorius Appeal Court Case
Oscar Pistorius will Thursday find out if he will return to jail or not for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp on Valentine's Day in 2013.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
- published: 03 Dec 2015
- views: 33385
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 29:33
- Updated: 15 Apr 2012
- views: 1344
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded that...
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded that We conclude that the statutory safe harbor provisions of Surrogate's Court Procedure Act § 1404 and Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 3-3.5 are not exhaustive and that, under the circumstances of this case, the in terrorem clauses of the decedent's probated will was not violated. Gary B. Freidman, Esq. of Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP argued for the successful appellant.
wn.com/Oral Argument Matter Of Singer New York Court Of Appeals Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, 13 N.Y.3d 447, 892 N.Y.S.2d 836 (2009), where the Court concluded that We conclude that the statutory safe harbor provisions of Surrogate's Court Procedure Act § 1404 and Estates, Powers and Trusts Law § 3-3.5 are not exhaustive and that, under the circumstances of this case, the in terrorem clauses of the decedent's probated will was not violated. Gary B. Freidman, Esq. of Greenfield Stein & Senior, LLP argued for the successful appellant.
- published: 15 Apr 2012
- views: 1344
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 41:09
- Updated: 03 Sep 2014
- views: 5873
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and So...
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014. Note: to view the 28J letter requested by the court, and Rynearson's response to the letter, please click here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/240396489/28J-Letter-in-Rynearson-v-United-States-of-America-et-al
For complete information on this lawsuit to include the complete video of the thirty-four minute detention and this encounter discussed on the Fox News Channel, please visit http://www.veteransagainstpoliceabuse.org/BorderPatrolAppeal.aspx
wn.com/Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before The Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in Uvalde, TX delivered before the Honorable Judges Elrod, Reavely, and Southwick on 2 September 2014. Note: to view the 28J letter requested by the court, and Rynearson's response to the letter, please click here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/240396489/28J-Letter-in-Rynearson-v-United-States-of-America-et-al
For complete information on this lawsuit to include the complete video of the thirty-four minute detention and this encounter discussed on the Fox News Channel, please visit http://www.veteransagainstpoliceabuse.org/BorderPatrolAppeal.aspx
- published: 03 Sep 2014
- views: 5873
SABC COO court appeal Part 2
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 97:19
- Updated: 18 Sep 2015
- views: 2120
The Supreme Court of Appeal hear arguments in the case between the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA) and others.
F...
The Supreme Court of Appeal hear arguments in the case between the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA) and others.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
wn.com/Sabc Coo Court Appeal Part 2
The Supreme Court of Appeal hear arguments in the case between the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA) and others.
For more News visit: http://www.sabc.co.za/news
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SABCNewsOnline?lang=en
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SABCNewsOnline
- published: 18 Sep 2015
- views: 2120
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 42:25
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1437
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard o...
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
wn.com/Ricci V. Destefano Court Of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD - 2007-12-09 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in the case of Ricci v. Destefano. The Court would decide if city officials in New Haven, Connecticut discriminated against white firefighters by throwing out a promotions exam that no African Americans and only two Hispanics passed. The firefighters argued that city officials violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against them because of their race. Judge Sotomayor was one of the judges in this case. This program contains a portion of the audio recording released by the court. Still images of participants were shown on the screen as they spoke. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/287320-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1437
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 1
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 21:15
- Updated: 19 Nov 2015
- views: 693
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our...
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our specialized knowledge and experience in U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law will ease the prospective clients' concerns as they navigate through the ever complex and changing immigration law. The attorneys and staffs will personally and actively work with the clients in the area of immigration benefits, compliance, or enforcement. We are bilingual in Vietnamese and Spanish.
Huy Tuan Nguyen is a shareholder in the law firm of Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. in Houston, Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Akron College of Law (J.D. in 1996) and College of Business (Master in Taxation, 1996). He is a member of the State Bar of Texas and American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). He is originally from Vietnam and is fluent in Vietnamese. He has published several articles in English and Vietnamese regarding changes in immigration law. He is the regular host for the radio talk show on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law on 900 AM Saigon-Houston. In addition, he is frequently quoted by leading newspaper and television stations.
Hector Segura
Practicing as a lawyer since 1997, Hector Segura has focused primarily on immigration law providing strong representation to individuals, families, employers, and employees with immigration law needs. Immigration attorney Hector Segura counsels clients in our practice areas of employment-based immigration, family-based immigration, deportation and removal proceedings, and citizenship, naturalization, and other immigration-related matters. Hector Segura was born in Colombia, South America, grew up in Chicago, Illinois, and graduated from the University of Houston and from South Texas College of Law. He is fully bilingual in Spanish.
Copyright Vietface, Nguyen Legal Group
wn.com/196 5Th District Court Of Appeal's Decision Part 1
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our specialized knowledge and experience in U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law will ease the prospective clients' concerns as they navigate through the ever complex and changing immigration law. The attorneys and staffs will personally and actively work with the clients in the area of immigration benefits, compliance, or enforcement. We are bilingual in Vietnamese and Spanish.
Huy Tuan Nguyen is a shareholder in the law firm of Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. in Houston, Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Akron College of Law (J.D. in 1996) and College of Business (Master in Taxation, 1996). He is a member of the State Bar of Texas and American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). He is originally from Vietnam and is fluent in Vietnamese. He has published several articles in English and Vietnamese regarding changes in immigration law. He is the regular host for the radio talk show on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law on 900 AM Saigon-Houston. In addition, he is frequently quoted by leading newspaper and television stations.
Hector Segura
Practicing as a lawyer since 1997, Hector Segura has focused primarily on immigration law providing strong representation to individuals, families, employers, and employees with immigration law needs. Immigration attorney Hector Segura counsels clients in our practice areas of employment-based immigration, family-based immigration, deportation and removal proceedings, and citizenship, naturalization, and other immigration-related matters. Hector Segura was born in Colombia, South America, grew up in Chicago, Illinois, and graduated from the University of Houston and from South Texas College of Law. He is fully bilingual in Spanish.
Copyright Vietface, Nguyen Legal Group
- published: 19 Nov 2015
- views: 693
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 2
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 21:56
- Updated: 19 Nov 2015
- views: 728
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our...
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our specialized knowledge and experience in U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law will ease the prospective clients' concerns as they navigate through the ever complex and changing immigration law. The attorneys and staffs will personally and actively work with the clients in the area of immigration benefits, compliance, or enforcement. We are bilingual in Vietnamese and Spanish.
Huy Tuan Nguyen is a shareholder in the law firm of Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. in Houston, Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Akron College of Law (J.D. in 1996) and College of Business (Master in Taxation, 1996). He is a member of the State Bar of Texas and American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). He is originally from Vietnam and is fluent in Vietnamese. He has published several articles in English and Vietnamese regarding changes in immigration law. He is the regular host for the radio talk show on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law on 900 AM Saigon-Houston. In addition, he is frequently quoted by leading newspaper and television stations.
Hector Segura
Practicing as a lawyer since 1997, Hector Segura has focused primarily on immigration law providing strong representation to individuals, families, employers, and employees with immigration law needs. Immigration attorney Hector Segura counsels clients in our practice areas of employment-based immigration, family-based immigration, deportation and removal proceedings, and citizenship, naturalization, and other immigration-related matters. Hector Segura was born in Colombia, South America, grew up in Chicago, Illinois, and graduated from the University of Houston and from South Texas College of Law. He is fully bilingual in Spanish.
Copyright Vietface, Nguyen Legal Group
wn.com/196 5Th District Court Of Appeal's Decision Part 2
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 1997 with the intention to assists the community in all immigration. Our specialized knowledge and experience in U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law will ease the prospective clients' concerns as they navigate through the ever complex and changing immigration law. The attorneys and staffs will personally and actively work with the clients in the area of immigration benefits, compliance, or enforcement. We are bilingual in Vietnamese and Spanish.
Huy Tuan Nguyen is a shareholder in the law firm of Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. in Houston, Texas. He is a graduate of the University of Akron College of Law (J.D. in 1996) and College of Business (Master in Taxation, 1996). He is a member of the State Bar of Texas and American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). He is originally from Vietnam and is fluent in Vietnamese. He has published several articles in English and Vietnamese regarding changes in immigration law. He is the regular host for the radio talk show on U.S. Immigration and Nationality Law on 900 AM Saigon-Houston. In addition, he is frequently quoted by leading newspaper and television stations.
Hector Segura
Practicing as a lawyer since 1997, Hector Segura has focused primarily on immigration law providing strong representation to individuals, families, employers, and employees with immigration law needs. Immigration attorney Hector Segura counsels clients in our practice areas of employment-based immigration, family-based immigration, deportation and removal proceedings, and citizenship, naturalization, and other immigration-related matters. Hector Segura was born in Colombia, South America, grew up in Chicago, Illinois, and graduated from the University of Houston and from South Texas College of Law. He is fully bilingual in Spanish.
Copyright Vietface, Nguyen Legal Group
- published: 19 Nov 2015
- views: 728
Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court of Appeal
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 178:06
- Updated: 08 Jun 2012
- views: 2164
The following interview is a part of the California Legacy Project, recounting the stories and preserving the rich judicial history of California judges, courts...
The following interview is a part of the California Legacy Project, recounting the stories and preserving the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century.
More Information: http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm
Bio: http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/ComptonL.pdf
wn.com/Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court Of Appeal
The following interview is a part of the California Legacy Project, recounting the stories and preserving the rich judicial history of California judges, courts, and law through the voices of the justices who helped shape the development of California law in the 20th century.
More Information: http://www.courts.ca.gov/4199.htm
Bio: http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/ComptonL.pdf
- published: 08 Jun 2012
- views: 2164
Oral Argument before Second District Court of Appeal for Florida
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 20:19
- Updated: 03 Jun 2015
- views: 121
The Defendant in a personal injury auto accident case took an appeal following a jury verdict, asking the appellate court to reverse the trial court's decision....
The Defendant in a personal injury auto accident case took an appeal following a jury verdict, asking the appellate court to reverse the trial court's decision. The Defendant's attorney presented his argument first. Attorney Jason Herman, of Herman & Wells, presented his arguments next, arguing that the trial court should be affirmed. Ten days after this argument, the Second District issued an opinion affirming the trial court, resulting in a full recovery for Mr. Herman's client, the Plaintiff.
wn.com/Oral Argument Before Second District Court Of Appeal For Florida
The Defendant in a personal injury auto accident case took an appeal following a jury verdict, asking the appellate court to reverse the trial court's decision. The Defendant's attorney presented his argument first. Attorney Jason Herman, of Herman & Wells, presented his arguments next, arguing that the trial court should be affirmed. Ten days after this argument, the Second District issued an opinion affirming the trial court, resulting in a full recovery for Mr. Herman's client, the Plaintiff.
- published: 03 Jun 2015
- views: 121
Florida First District Court of Appeal - Nassau County Clerk - Chief Judge Moran
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 23:03
- Updated: 22 Nov 2013
- views: 316
Nassau County Florida Clerk John Crawford seeks opinion on $4,500 court costs.
- published: 22 Nov 2013
- views: 316
Nicholas Mermiges, Esq. - Oral Argument Before FL 3rd District Court of Appeals
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:17
- Updated: 26 Mar 2014
- views: 414
Eileen Diaz v. Home Depot et. al.
Eileen Diaz v. Home Depot et. al.
wn.com/Nicholas Mermiges, Esq. Oral Argument Before Fl 3Rd District Court Of Appeals
John Michael Guidry, 1st Circuit Court of Appeal Judge discusses his personal & professional history
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 28:31
- Updated: 18 Jun 2013
- views: 251
http://www.LockeMeredithLaw.com
(225) 272-5300
(800) 479-9223
Hello, I'm Locke Meredith. I'd like to invite you to join me on the next Legal Lines where we are...
http://www.LockeMeredithLaw.com
(225) 272-5300
(800) 479-9223
Hello, I'm Locke Meredith. I'd like to invite you to join me on the next Legal Lines where we are pleased to have on the show Judge John Michael Guidry. He's a First Circuit Court of Appeal Judge, and Judge Guidry is going to talk to us about being a legislator both in the House and the Senate. Also being a judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeal for 16 years. He's also going to talk to us about crime and how his own personal life experience and how important education was in his climb from being a fellow or young kid in a broken family in South Baton Rouge to be First Circuit Court of Appeal Judge. Join us on the next Legal Lines with Judge John Michael Guidry.
Epi 162
wn.com/John Michael Guidry, 1St Circuit Court Of Appeal Judge Discusses His Personal Professional History
http://www.LockeMeredithLaw.com
(225) 272-5300
(800) 479-9223
Hello, I'm Locke Meredith. I'd like to invite you to join me on the next Legal Lines where we are pleased to have on the show Judge John Michael Guidry. He's a First Circuit Court of Appeal Judge, and Judge Guidry is going to talk to us about being a legislator both in the House and the Senate. Also being a judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeal for 16 years. He's also going to talk to us about crime and how his own personal life experience and how important education was in his climb from being a fellow or young kid in a broken family in South Baton Rouge to be First Circuit Court of Appeal Judge. Join us on the next Legal Lines with Judge John Michael Guidry.
Epi 162
- published: 18 Jun 2013
- views: 251
R v Mernagh at Ontario Court of Appeal (Pre-&-post hearing)
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 36:30
- Updated: 15 Jun 2012
- views: 677
R v Mernagh Coverage of the historic medical marijuana appeal by Health Canada CROWN team 'R' vs Matt Mernagh team Mernahuana, with pre-hearing Monday post-hear...
R v Mernagh Coverage of the historic medical marijuana appeal by Health Canada CROWN team 'R' vs Matt Mernagh team Mernahuana, with pre-hearing Monday post-hearing Tuesday words on the court, access system, patient accesss, doctors as gatekeepers, plus thoughts on the verdict (expected this summer)
More info: http://www.mernagh.ca/
Cannabis Culture: Still Waiting On Legal Weed Ruling http://www.cannabisculture.com/blogs/2012/06/09/Still-Waiting-Legal-Weed-Ruling
wn.com/R V Mernagh At Ontario Court Of Appeal (Pre Post Hearing)
R v Mernagh Coverage of the historic medical marijuana appeal by Health Canada CROWN team 'R' vs Matt Mernagh team Mernahuana, with pre-hearing Monday post-hearing Tuesday words on the court, access system, patient accesss, doctors as gatekeepers, plus thoughts on the verdict (expected this summer)
More info: http://www.mernagh.ca/
Cannabis Culture: Still Waiting On Legal Weed Ruling http://www.cannabisculture.com/blogs/2012/06/09/Still-Waiting-Legal-Weed-Ruling
- published: 15 Jun 2012
- views: 677
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 153:18
- Updated: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 9614
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three feder...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
wn.com/Perry V. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments - U.S. Court of Appeals - 296911-1-DVD - 2010-12-06 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. A panel of three federal judges heard arguments in the Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the Proposition 8 (or the California Marriage Protection Act) case. The 9th Circuit heard an appeal of an August ruling by U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who presided over a trial that found the ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional. The first hour of the hearing lawyers addressed issues of legal authority, or standing. The second hour addressed the merits of the appeal. There is a brief break in the live programming in which the opening testimony was replayed. Filmed by C-SPAN. Non-commercial use only. For more information, see http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/296911-1
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 9614
Hearing in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand
- Order: Reorder
- Duration: 37:01
- Updated: 18 Apr 2013
- views: 232
Koyama v New Zealand Law Society CA772/2012
The hearing started around 3:30 pm and ended around 4:10 pm on 8 April 2013 (Monday) in Wellington.
The hearing wa...
Koyama v New Zealand Law Society CA772/2012
The hearing started around 3:30 pm and ended around 4:10 pm on 8 April 2013 (Monday) in Wellington.
The hearing was attended by the following:
The Court of Appeal (O'Regan P, Wild and White JJ)
Mr Paul Collins for the New Zealand Law Society, and
Tatsuhiko Koyama (Appellant)
For more information
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/koyama-v-new-zealand-law-society
https://newzealandjustice.com/showthread.php?118-Koyama-v-New-Zealand-Law-Society-Violation-of-some-constitutional-principles&p;=1890#post1890
wn.com/Hearing In The Court Of Appeal Of New Zealand
Koyama v New Zealand Law Society CA772/2012
The hearing started around 3:30 pm and ended around 4:10 pm on 8 April 2013 (Monday) in Wellington.
The hearing was attended by the following:
The Court of Appeal (O'Regan P, Wild and White JJ)
Mr Paul Collins for the New Zealand Law Society, and
Tatsuhiko Koyama (Appellant)
For more information
https://sites.google.com/site/tatsuhikokoyama/koyama-v-new-zealand-law-society
https://newzealandjustice.com/showthread.php?118-Koyama-v-New-Zealand-Law-Society-Violation-of-some-constitutional-principles&p;=1890#post1890
- published: 18 Apr 2013
- views: 232
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
8:59
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
An explanation of the circuit court's role in the federal court system.
published: 11 Apr 2013
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
10. Circuit Court (Appellate Court)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2013
- views: 7052
1:23
What is an Appellate Court?
The end of the first trial is not necessarily the end of the case. Our courts system allow...
published: 02 Sep 2014
What is an Appellate Court?
What is an Appellate Court?
- Report rights infringement
- published: 02 Sep 2014
- views: 620
1:36
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
Kay Nord Hunt
published: 22 Apr 2013
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
The Difference in How an Appellate Court Views the Case
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Apr 2013
- views: 698
20:15
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arthur Shartsis - Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Ci...
published: 15 Jul 2014
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Oral Argument before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Jul 2014
- views: 2442
15:01
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
published: 25 Feb 2011
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
People v. Abney: Oral Argument in N.Y. Court of Appeals - Part 1
- Report rights infringement
- published: 25 Feb 2011
- views: 9641
4:33
Appellate court
An appellate court, commonly called an appeals court or court of appeals (American English...
published: 04 Nov 2014
Appellate court
Appellate court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 04 Nov 2014
- views: 712
15:52
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
Victoria Corder won the 2008 John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition.
published: 23 Oct 2008
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
2008 Davis Moot Court Winning Oral Argument
- Report rights infringement
- published: 23 Oct 2008
- views: 151218
6:52
Appellate court ruling
What can I say
published: 18 Jun 2015
Appellate court ruling
Appellate court ruling
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Jun 2015
- views: 994
5:11
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Mayday, Mayday! A New York federal court just nailed the NSA for spying on Americans. In a...
published: 15 May 2015
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
Appellate Court Nails NSA Spying and Patriot Act
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 May 2015
- views: 350
11:17
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
This is a short video from the Clerk of the 3rd Court of Appeals (Austin) describing how t...
published: 13 Feb 2012
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
Assembling the Clerk's Record for Appellate Court
- Report rights infringement
- published: 13 Feb 2012
- views: 2547
8:15
Appealing a Court Decision
http://laniganpl.com/2015/05/07/appealing-a-court-decision/(Winter Park Florida) Appeals a...
published: 29 Apr 2015
Appealing a Court Decision
Appealing a Court Decision
- Report rights infringement
- published: 29 Apr 2015
- views: 2950
0:26
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
An appeal against the Malindi high court ruling that rendered Lamu governor Issa Timamy's ...
published: 21 Nov 2013
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
Appellate Court upholds Timamy election
- Report rights infringement
- published: 21 Nov 2013
- views: 173
1:04
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
A federal appellate court ruled Thursday the NSA overstepped its boundaries in its practic...
published: 07 May 2015
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
Appellate Court Rules NSA's Phone Data Collection Is Illegal
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 May 2015
- views: 4261
1:14
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The I...
published: 27 Mar 2016
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
Florida Appellate Court Strikes Order Barring Man From Criticizing Police Officer On The Internet
- Report rights infringement
- published: 27 Mar 2016
- views: 27
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
33:17
14-35147 David Picray v. Christopher Duffitt
Benton County Deputies Christopher Duffitt and Greg Ridler appeal from the district court'...
published: 11 Apr 2016
14-35147 David Picray v. Christopher Duffitt
14-35147 David Picray v. Christopher Duffitt
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 0
1:05
Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal | Short News
Summary of news on 'Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal'
Source: BBC
Two men who ser...
published: 11 Apr 2016
Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal | Short News
Wrongly jailed men lose payout appeal | Short News
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
2:36
PNG JUDICIARY TO HAVE A NEW COURT OF APPEALS WITH 7 JUDGES
Opposition Leader Don Polye says the Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's move to set up a new C...
published: 11 Apr 2016
PNG JUDICIARY TO HAVE A NEW COURT OF APPEALS WITH 7 JUDGES
PNG JUDICIARY TO HAVE A NEW COURT OF APPEALS WITH 7 JUDGES
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
0:42
Supreme Court of India
The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial forum and final court of appeal under t...
published: 11 Apr 2016
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
- Report rights infringement
- published: 11 Apr 2016
- views: 1
44:26
The Murder Of Rachel O'reilly : Crime Documentary
In July 2007, O’Reilly was found guilty by a Central Criminal Court jury and sentenced to ...
published: 10 Apr 2016
The Murder Of Rachel O'reilly : Crime Documentary
The Murder Of Rachel O'reilly : Crime Documentary
- Report rights infringement
- published: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 125
0:31
5392: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
Description
published: 10 Apr 2016
5392: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
5392: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
- Report rights infringement
- published: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 59
0:12
5393: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
Description
published: 10 Apr 2016
5393: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
5393: Court of Appeal in Sacramento, California.
- Report rights infringement
- published: 10 Apr 2016
- views: 26
1:45
DA's Maimane snubs Government's leave to appeal Al-Bashir ruling
DA leader Mmusi Maimane has criticised the government for filing an application for leave ...
published: 09 Apr 2016
DA's Maimane snubs Government's leave to appeal Al-Bashir ruling
DA's Maimane snubs Government's leave to appeal Al-Bashir ruling
- Report rights infringement
- published: 09 Apr 2016
- views: 58
2:14
Court Of Appeal, Benin Strikes Out Case Seeking To Commit EDHA Speaker And Clerk To Prison
The court of Appeal sitting in Benin has stuck out as application seeking to commit the sp...
published: 07 Apr 2016
Court Of Appeal, Benin Strikes Out Case Seeking To Commit EDHA Speaker And Clerk To Prison
Court Of Appeal, Benin Strikes Out Case Seeking To Commit EDHA Speaker And Clerk To Prison
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 22
0:44
Tribunal to hear appeal court's ruling on Tunoi status as a judge
The Justice Tunoi tribunal adjourned to allow for the conclusion of an appeal court case w...
published: 07 Apr 2016
Tribunal to hear appeal court's ruling on Tunoi status as a judge
Tribunal to hear appeal court's ruling on Tunoi status as a judge
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 14
1:07
Sir Salamo on Court of Appeal
Chief Justice, Sir Salamo Injia, clarified that the Court of Appeal, a bill that was prese...
published: 07 Apr 2016
Sir Salamo on Court of Appeal
Sir Salamo on Court of Appeal
- Report rights infringement
- published: 07 Apr 2016
- views: 4
2:57
April 6th 2016 Court Of Appeal Rules Against Guy Joseph - AK
The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal by Castries south east MP Guy ...
published: 06 Apr 2016
April 6th 2016 Court Of Appeal Rules Against Guy Joseph - AK
April 6th 2016 Court Of Appeal Rules Against Guy Joseph - AK
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 67
0:08
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31105)
published: 06 Apr 2016
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31105)
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31105)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
0:17
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31114)
published: 06 Apr 2016
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31114)
Court of Appeal. Warsaw. Krasinski Square (CE#31114)
- Report rights infringement
- published: 06 Apr 2016
- views: 0
close fullscreen
- Playlist
- Chat
62:09
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
This is an indecency trial and this video has been marked "L Strong Language" using the Yo...
published: 30 Jan 2010
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commission 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 2006
- Report rights infringement
- published: 30 Jan 2010
- views: 9774
181:29
SCA hears state appeal against Pistorius conviction
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein hear an application by the National Prosecutin...
published: 03 Nov 2015
SCA hears state appeal against Pistorius conviction
SCA hears state appeal against Pistorius conviction
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Nov 2015
- views: 88575
0:00
Omar al-Bashir case hearing in SCA, 12 February 2016
Government's decision not to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is heard in the Supr...
published: 12 Feb 2016
Omar al-Bashir case hearing in SCA, 12 February 2016
Omar al-Bashir case hearing in SCA, 12 February 2016
- Report rights infringement
- published: 12 Feb 2016
- views: 23
40:07
SABC COO court appeal
The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein will hear an appeal on Friday by Motsoeneng ag...
published: 18 Sep 2015
SABC COO court appeal
SABC COO court appeal
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Sep 2015
- views: 1253
56:11
Judgement in Oscar Pistorius appeal court case
Oscar Pistorius will Thursday find out if he will return to jail or not for killing his gi...
published: 03 Dec 2015
Judgement in Oscar Pistorius appeal court case
Judgement in Oscar Pistorius appeal court case
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Dec 2015
- views: 33385
29:33
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
The oral argument before the New York Court of Appeals of the appeal in Matter of Singer, ...
published: 15 Apr 2012
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court of Appeals - Gary B. Freidman, Esq.
- Report rights infringement
- published: 15 Apr 2012
- views: 1344
41:09
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Argument concerning unconstitutional activity at an interior suspicionless checkpoint in U...
published: 03 Sep 2014
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Sep 2014
- views: 5873
97:19
SABC COO court appeal Part 2
The Supreme Court of Appeal hear arguments in the case between the South African Broadcast...
published: 18 Sep 2015
SABC COO court appeal Part 2
SABC COO court appeal Part 2
- Report rights infringement
- published: 18 Sep 2015
- views: 2120
42:25
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument - U.S. Court of Appeals - 287320-1-DVD -...
published: 08 Apr 2011
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Apr 2011
- views: 1437
21:15
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 1
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 19...
published: 19 Nov 2015
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 1
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 1
- Report rights infringement
- published: 19 Nov 2015
- views: 693
21:56
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 2
Nguyen Legal Group, P.C. is a full service immigration law firm that was established in 19...
published: 19 Nov 2015
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 2
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part 2
- Report rights infringement
- published: 19 Nov 2015
- views: 728
178:06
Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court of Appeal
The following interview is a part of the California Legacy Project, recounting the stories...
published: 08 Jun 2012
Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court of Appeal
Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court of Appeal
- Report rights infringement
- published: 08 Jun 2012
- views: 2164
20:19
Oral Argument before Second District Court of Appeal for Florida
The Defendant in a personal injury auto accident case took an appeal following a jury verd...
published: 03 Jun 2015
Oral Argument before Second District Court of Appeal for Florida
Oral Argument before Second District Court of Appeal for Florida
- Report rights infringement
- published: 03 Jun 2015
- views: 121
23:03
Florida First District Court of Appeal - Nassau County Clerk - Chief Judge Moran
Nassau County Florida Clerk John Crawford seeks opinion on $4,500 court costs.
published: 22 Nov 2013
Florida First District Court of Appeal - Nassau County Clerk - Chief Judge Moran
Florida First District Court of Appeal - Nassau County Clerk - Chief Judge Moran
- Report rights infringement
- published: 22 Nov 2013
- views: 316
Fox Television v. Federal Communications Commissio...
SCA hears state appeal against Pistorius convictio...
Omar al-Bashir case hearing in SCA, 12 February 20...
SABC COO court appeal...
Judgement in Oscar Pistorius appeal court case...
Oral Argument - Matter of Singer - New York Court ...
Richard Rynearson's Oral Argument Before the Fifth...
SABC COO court appeal Part 2...
Ricci v. DeStefano Court of Appeals Oral Argument...
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part...
196 - 5th District Court of Appeal's Decision Part...
Justice Lynn D. Compton, Second District Court of ...
Oral Argument before Second District Court of Appe...
Florida First District Court of Appeal - Nassau Co...
Nicholas Mermiges, Esq. - Oral Argument Before FL ...
John Michael Guidry, 1st Circuit Court of Appeal J...
R v Mernagh at Ontario Court of Appeal (Pre-&-post...
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Oral Arguments...
Hearing in the Court of Appeal of New Zealand...
photo: AP / File Photo
Torture Is Never Forgotten, Neither Should It Be
Edit WorldNews.com 13 Apr 2016
Article by WN.com Correspondent Dallas Darling“Anyone who has been tortured remains tortured” wrote Holocaust survivor Primo Levi in “The Drowned and The Saved.” What‘s more, he knew all too well that in the shadowy, bureaucratic, and dehumanizing places like Auschwitz, “Anyone who has suffered torture never again will be able to be at ease in the world,” and “the abomination of the annihilation is never extinguished.”1U.S....
photo: instagram /chloe_c_ciesla
Lincoln Lewis' girlfriend Chloe Ciesla goes topless as she poses for a holiday snap by ...
Edit The Daily Mail 13 Apr 2016
Lincoln Lewis' girlfriend Chloe Ciesla shared a topless image of herself on social media on Tuesday as she posed for a holiday snap while standing along the beach side ... ....
photo: US Navy / U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Scott B. Boyle
USS Donald Cook reports ‘simulated attack’ by Russian jets
Edit Press TV 13 Apr 2016
The incident took place on April 11, when USS Donald Cook was confronted by two Sukhoi SU-24 warplanes in international waters off Russia, a senior military official told CBS News on Wednesday, speaking on condition of anonymity ... A similar incident happened the next day when two Russian KA-27 Helix helicopter made several circles around the US warship, taking pictures of it, according to the official....
photo: AP / Wally Santana
Strong Earthquake Strikes Northern Myanmar
Edit WorldNews.com 13 Apr 2016
A strong earthquake has struck Myanmar, the US Geological Survey reports, with shaking felt across the region, BBC News reports.The 6.9 magnitude quake took place at a depth of around 140 kilometers (87 miles), northwest of Mandalay. There were no initial reports of any fatalities.The tremor could be felt in the northeast Indian state of Assam, where the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are staying....
photo: AP / Susan Walsh
FBI Employed Hackers To Break Into San Bernardino Cell Phone, Report Says
Edit WorldNews.com 13 Apr 2016
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) engaged the help of professional hackers to find at least one software flaw to break into an iPhone used by one of the terrorists responsible for the Dec ... Two other phones linked to the pair were found destroyed after the attack.The government filed suit seeking Apple’s help breaking into a phone used by one of the shooters....
« back to news headlines
AG Schimel Urges Trial Court to Stay Right-to-Work Decision During Appeal (DOJ - Wisconsin Department of Justice)
Edit Public Technologies 14 Apr 2016
MADISON- Today, Attorney General Brad Schimel objected to a proposed final order prepared by the unions in the Right-to-Work litigation, and further notified the Court that he will seek a stay of any final ruling pending appeal ... 'And so I will ask Judge Foust stay any final decision until the conclusion of all appeals.' ... https.//www.doj.state.wi.us/news-releases/ag-schimel-urges-trial-court-stay-right-work-decision-during-appeal....
Court sides with Argentina, speeding along bond settlements
Edit Business Insider 14 Apr 2016
Circuit Court of Appeals turned away creditors who wanted to keep in place court-ordered protections, though Circuit Judge Christopher Droney said a lower-court judge should take steps to determine whether Argentina has met conditions he required be fulfilled before court orders against the republic are permanently lifted ... court-appointed mediator....
Thompson: Black GOP unhappy with Obama’s SCOTUS pick
Edit Detroit news 14 Apr 2016
He added that “the absence of ... Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, to replace Scalia, told students and faculty on April 7 at the University of Chicago Law School that his nominee is qualified to get a hearing ... Court of Appeals for the D.C ... Court of Appeals in the district, calling her an activist who happens to be a judge....
11 years later, main accused held guilty
Edit Indian Express 14 Apr 2016
Court to announce quantum of punishment todayRape accused gets another chance to prove himself minorHC rejects bail plea of five accused in Bijal Joshi gangrape case ... While he did not get relief from any court, the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court had recently ordered the trial court to pronounce the judgment on the next date of hearing....
The Honorable Shirley M. Hufstedler, 1925–2016 (California Institute of Technology)
Edit Public Technologies 14 Apr 2016
California Institute of Technology) ... Hufstedler-a former federal judge, the nation's first secretary of education, and a Caltech senior trustee-passed away on Wednesday, March 30, 2016, in Glendale, California ... In 1966, she was appointed associate justice of the California Court of Appeal ... Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, where she served for 11 years before President Jimmy Carter appointed her secretary of education....
POLYGAMY Feldman: Polygamy is the next marriage-rights frontier
Edit Richmond Times Dispatch 14 Apr 2016
After the Supreme Court’s landmark gay marriage decision, can a ... But on Monday a federal appeals court reversed the decision ... Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit declared that the Browns’ case was moot before the district court decided it, because the announced policy didn’t cover the Browns and the prosecutor had said he wouldn’t charge them....
Almost at sanctum, but not close enough
Edit The Times of India 14 Apr 2016
The Bombay high court's ruling granting equal rights to enter temples has not helped women gain access to the sanctum sanctorum of the ancient Trimbakeshwar temple yet ... The trustees were reluctant to change their stand and allow entry to women claiming that the trust has already filed an appeal in the Supreme Court ... We appealed to the women activists ......
Cairns man Christopher Lavery to be extradited to Melbourne to face charge of murdering school friend James Russouw
Edit Sydney Morning Herald 14 Apr 2016
Cairns man to be extradited & face Melb court tomorrow over cold case murder of James Russouw @7NewsMelbourne pic.twitter.com/x0f97nR5eN— James Van Leeuwen (@jamesvanleeuwe1) April 14, 2016 ... It is believed this fresh appeal - and particularly the release of grainy CCTV vision from a public phone box - prompted someone to come forward....
Teacher 'retired' after winning case against less pay after 22 years
Edit The Times of India 14 Apr 2016
The high court rejected the management's stand in 2008 and observed that the teacher was jobless for 10 years without any fault of his. The school filed an appeal, which too was dismissed in 2012 with observation that Patel's was a "clear case of victimization by the school management for raising his voice against exploitation" ... The apex court also upheld the HC observation that it was a case of victimization....
Journalist sentenced to 2 years in LA Times hacking case
Edit Tampa Bay Online 14 Apr 2016
– A well-known social media journalist was sentenced to two years in federal prison today after he was convicted of conspiring with the hacking group Anonymous to break into the Los Angeles Times’ website and alter a story ... District Judge Kimberly Mueller sentenced him today after he was convicted in October of providing login credentials to The Tribune Co.’s computer system ... Circuit Court of Appeals....
David Eastman loses bid to prevent retrial for alleged murder of Colin Winchester
Edit Sydney Morning Herald 14 Apr 2016
A court has ruled that David Eastman should face a retrial for the alleged murder of ACT police chief Colin Stanley Winchester in 1989 ... Much of the stay application was suppressed, and parts were heard in closed court ... "It would defeat the purpose of the court's reasons being provided only to the parties if this summary was to set out the court's extensive findings of fact and analysis of principles," he wrote....
Alumnus confirmed to seat on U.S. District Court for Middle Tennessee April 13, 2016 (Vanderbilt University)
Edit Public Technologies 14 Apr 2016
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee by a 92-0 Senate vote April 11 ... Supreme Court, the Courts of Appeal for the Fifth, Sixth, Eight and Eleventh districts, and numerous federal district courts, including all districts in Tennessee and Arkansas ... District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee for two years and then served as an assistant attorney general for Tennessee's Middle District from 1984 to 1987....
Affco granted leave to appeal seasonal workers ruling
Edit Scoop 14 Apr 2016
April 14 (BusinessDesk) - Affco New Zealand, the Talleys Group-controlled meat processor, has been granted leave to appeal an Employment Court ruling that the rights of seasonal workers were preserved in the off-season as if they were in continuous employment ... ....
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next page »
