The End of Faith:
Religion,
Terror, and the
Future of
Reason (2004) is a book by
Sam Harris, concerning organized religion, the clash between religious faith and rational thought, and the problems of tolerance towards religious fundamentalism.
Harris began writing the book in what he described as a period of "collective grief and stupefaction" following the
September 11, 2001 attacks. The book comprises a wide-ranging criticism of all styles of religious belief.
The book was first published in
August 2004, and it was awarded the
PEN/
Martha Albrand Award for
First Nonfiction the following year. The paperback edition was published in
October 2005. In the same month it entered the
New York Times Best Seller list at number four, and remained on the list for a total of 33 weeks.
The End of Faith opens with a literary account of a day in the life of a suicide bomber -- his last day. In an introductory chapter, Harris calls for an end to respect and tolerance for the competing belief systems of religion, which he describes as being "all equally uncontaminated by evidence". While focusing on the dangers posed by religious extremist groups now armed with weapons of mass destruction, Harris is equally critical of religious moderation, which he describes as "the context in which religious violence can never be adequately opposed."
Harris continues by examining the nature of belief itself, challenging the notion that we can in any sense enjoy freedom of belief, and arguing that "belief is a fount of action in potentia."
Instead he posits that in order to be useful, beliefs must be both logically coherent, and truly representative of the real world. Insofar as religious belief fails to ground itself in empirical evidence, Harris likens religion to a form of mental illness which, he says, "allows otherwise normal human beings to reap the fruits of madness and consider them holy." He argues that there may be "sanity in numbers", but that it is "merely an accident of history that it is considered normal in our society to believe that the
Creator of the universe can hear your prayers, while it is demonstrative of mental illness to believe that he is communicating with you by having the rain tap in
Morse code on your bedroom window."
Harris follows this with a brief survey of
Christianity down the ages, examining the
Inquisition and persecutions of witches and
Jews. He contends that, far from being an aberration, the torture of heretics was a logical expression of
Christian doctrine -- one which, he says, was clearly justified by men such as
Saint Augustine.
Going still further, Harris sees the
Holocaust as essentially drawing its inspiration from historical
Christian anti-Semitism. "Knowingly or not," he says, "the Nazis were agents of religion."
Among the controversial aspects of The End of Faith is an uncompromising assessment and criticism of
Islam, which Harris describes as being a "cult of death." He infers a clear link between Islamic teaching and terrorist atrocities such as
9/11, a notion he supports with quotations from the Koran that call for the use of violence.
He also presents data from the
Pew Research Center, purporting to show that significant percentages of Muslims worldwide would justify suicide bombing as a legitimate tactic.[
4][5] In an attack on what he terms "leftist unreason," Harris criticises
Noam Chomsky among others for, in his view, displaying an illogical willingness to lay the entire blame for such attitudes upon
U.S. foreign policy.
However, Harris also critiques the role of the
Christian right in the
United States, in influencing such areas as drug policies, embryonic stem cell research, and
AIDS prevention in the developing world. In what he sees as a steady drift towards theocracy, Harris strongly criticises leading figures from both the legislature and the judiciary for what he perceives as an unabashed failure to separate church and state in their various domains. "Not only do we still eat the offal of the ancient world," he asserts, "we are positively smug about it."
Next, Harris goes on to outline what he terms a "science of good and evil" -- a rational approach to ethics, which he claims must necessarily be predicated upon questions of human happiness and suffering. He talks about the need to sustain "moral communities," a venture in which he feels that the separate religious moral identities of the "saved" and the "damned" can play no part. But Harris is critical of the stance of moral relativism, and also of what he calls "the false choice of pacifism." In another controversial passage, he compares the ethical questions raised by collateral damage and judicial torture during war. He concludes that collateral damage is more ethically troublesome. "If we are unwilling to torture, we should be unwilling to wage modern war," Harris concludes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_end_of_faith
- published: 22 Dec 2013
- views: 82544