Editors' Blog

Stuff Gets Ugly at Trump Tucson Rally

There was an apparent replay of the escalating Trump rally violence at a rally in Tucson this afternoon. We're still trying to piece together what happened. But one incident seems oddly reminiscent of the incident in Fayetteville, North Carolina where a Trump supporter sucker punched a protestor as he was being escorted out of the arena. This time another protestor was being escorted out of the arena when a Trump supporter punched him, knocking him to the ground, and then repeatedly kicked him before being restrained by police and himself being escorted out of the arena.

Read More →

Why NeverTrump is Doomed, Doomed, Doomed

As you've seen from our reporting, there have been a number of groups of Republicans, generally fairly sad sack, who've met to plot a third party candidacy on the assumption that Trump either cannot or should not be denied the nomination in Cleveland. In the nature of things almost all these embryonic efforts have proceeded on the belief that the independent candidate must be a "movement conservative." But this exposes a key problem with the whole concept - indeed, a key driver of the crisis itself.

Read More →

The Achilles Heel

As we've noted, endangered Senate Republicans, especially in the northern tier of the country from Wisconsin over to New Hampshire, are the Achilles Heel of the GOP 'three nos' SCOTUS blockade strategy. Now Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), facing a tough reelection battle, has gone from dissenting from the McConnell strategy to going on the attack against his own colleagues, telling a local radio station Friday that GOP senators need to "just man up and cast a vote."

Without Comment

New video from inside the truck/SUV, during the getaway attempt and eventual shooting of LaVoy Finicum at the end of the Oregon stand off. Watch.

The Importance of 'The Three Nos'

I wanted to follow up on David's point from yesterday about the first few hours of the Merrick Garland nomination. Last month, not long after Justice Scalia's death, we discussed the importance of 'the three nos' and the way they suggested not the strength of the Senate Republican position but rather its brittleness. Just to review, 'the three nos' are the veritable catechism Senate Republicans devised and adopted in the days just after Justice Scalia's death: no vote, no hearings, no meetings. Republicans could have adopted a posture of outward good faith, hold hearings but find deal-breaker problems with any nominee Obama sent up and simply run out the clock. But once they opted for denying Obama another nomination outright, something like 'the three nos' became essential because it was important to end the discussion, end the debate as soon as possible, especially before it dragged into the heart of the election season.

Read More →

Don't Buy It

The outside conservative legal groups who are the hired gun enforcers of the Senate GOP stonewall against considering any Obama SCOTUS nominee are saying they're cool with Republican senators meeting with Merrick Garland. They're even cool with discussions of confirming him in a lame duck session if a Democrats wins the White House in November. I think that's just putting a good face on things after the fact because this is not in the script they had in mind. The script was an absolute no. The whole point was avoiding getting into the particulars on the nominee. Just no. It's why Mitch McConnell made his unseemly play almost as soon as Scalia's death was confirmed to shut it all down before it started.

Real Crack In Senate GOP Stonewall

Alright, I want to be clear that this disagreement among Senate Republicans is over a minor subplot in the Merrick Garland confirmation saga: Would they confirm him in a lame duck session after the November election if Hillary Clinton wins? The idea is that Garland would be a better (and probably older) choice than anyone Hillary would nominate, especially if Republicans have lost the Senate.

But as I noted below that idea really undercuts the GOP's rationale for a united opposition to even considering Obama's nominee now. And several GOP senators already see why that is problematic.

"We can't have it both ways," Lindsey Graham said. "We cannot say 'let the people speak,' and then say 'no, you can't.' If you are going to let the people speak, let 'em speak and honor their choice."

More from Lauren Fox on The Hill here.

The Importance of Scheduling

I've hinted at this before. But a little-discussed aspect of the Trump insurgency and drive to become First Citizen is that the GOP has been remarkably successful in recent years in scheduling its collective freakouts in non-election years: debt default crisis (2011), Cruz Obamacare government shutdown (2013). There are numerous examples. Obviously by its nature, a meltdown or freakout in a primary contest and nomination fight is by definition during an election. But managing the schedule so that the freakouts and elections don't overlap is a pretty big thing - especially presidential elections. The last time there was a scheduling breakdown was during the 1998 Clinton impeachment freakout. And, as you'll remember, a predicted GOP wave election turned into an almost unprecedented, if still modest, Democratic pick up in the House in the sixth year of a two term president's tenure in office.

Keep An Eye On Orrin Hatch

Orrin Hatch is obviously a big fan of Merrick Garland. Not just in the sense that he voted to confirm him to the appeals court nearly two decades ago and now Dems want to use that against him. But in a real, this-is-my-kind-of-Democrat kind of way.

Here's Hatch in 1997 singing Garland's praises. But even as recently as last week Hatch was like, yeah, right, Obama will never nominate someone like Garland when he can pander to the liberal base. Oops.

And now you've got Hatch undercutting the GOP stonewall by saying he'd consider confirming Garland in a lame duck session if Hillary Clinton wins in November.

Hard To Figure

This idea that Senate Republicans will roll over if Hillary Clinton wins in November and go ahead and confirm Merrick Garland in a lame duck session really undercuts their whole argument about why they can't even consider his nomination now. Nina Totenberg reports this lame duck thing was signaled to the White House via back channels. Sen. Orrin Hatch is on board with it. Lauren Fox has other GOP senators expressing irritation with the idea. And you can understand why. Her report coming soon.

Slight Cracks In Senate GOP Facade

I want to be careful not to over-interpret this, but a few more Republican senators have said today they would be willing to meet with Merrick Garland. That is at odds with what Senate GOP leadership and conservative outside groups have been calling for, mainly because they want to avoid going down a slippery slope where it becomes about the nominee rather than their blanket opposition to Obama naming the next Supreme Court justice.

Read More →

Don't Miss

Mini Blogs

TPM DC