http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/slavetra
.html
1117:
Slavery abolished in
Iceland. 1214: The Statute of the
Town of Korčula (today in
Croatia) abolishes slavery. 1335:
Sweden (including
Finland at the time) makes slavery illegal. In 1807
Britain outlawed slavery. In 1820 the king of the
African kingdom of
Ashanti inquired why the Christians did not want to trade slaves with him anymore, since they worshipped the same god as the Muslims and the Muslims were continuing the trade like before.
What these records show is that the modern slave trade flourished in the early middle ages, as early as 869, especially between Muslim traders and western
African kingdoms. For moralists, the most important aspect of that trade should be that Muslims were selling goods to the African kingdoms and the African kingdoms were paying with their own people. In most instances, no violence was necessary to obtain those slaves.
Contrary to legends and novels and
Hollywood movies, the white traders did not need to savagely kill entire tribes in order to exact their tribute in slaves. All they needed to do is bring goods that appealed to the kings of those tribes. The kings would gladly sell their own subjects. (Of course, this neither condones the white traders who bought the slaves nor deny that many white traders still committed atrocities to maximize their business).
This explains why slavery became "black".
Ancient slavery, e.g. under the
Roman empire, would not discriminate: slaves were both white and black (so were Emperors and Popes)
. In the middle ages, all
European countries outlawed slavery (of course,
Western powers retained countless "civilized" ways to enslave their citizens, but that's another story), whereas the African kingdoms happily continued in their trade. Therefore, only colored people could be slaves, and that is how the stereotype for African-American slavery was born. It was not based on an ancestral hatred of blacks by whites, but simply on the fact that blacks were the only ones selling slaves, and they were selling people of their own race. (
To be precise, Christians were also selling
Muslim slaves captured in war, and Muslims were selling
Christian slaves captured in war, but neither the Christians of
Europe nor the Muslims of
Africa and the
Middle East were selling their own people).
Then the Muslim trade of
African slaves declined rapidly when
Arab domination was reduced by the emerging
European powers. (
Note:
Arabs continued to capture and sell slaves, but mostly in the
Mediterranean. In fact,
Robert Davis estimates that 1.25 million
European Christians were enslaved by the "
Barbary States" of northern Africa. As late as 1801 the
USA bombed
Morocco,
Algiers,
Tunis and
Tripoli precisely to stop that
Arab slave trade of Christians. The rate of mortality of those Christian slaves in the
Islamic world was roughly the same as the mortality rate in the
Atlantic slave trade of the same period.)
Christians took over in black Africa, though. The first ones were the
Portuguese, who, applying an idea that originally developed in
Italian seatrading cities, and often using Italian venture capital, started exploiting sub-Saharan slaves in the 1440s to support the economy of the sugar plantations (mainly for their own
African colonies of
Sao Tome and
Madeira).
The Dutch were the first, apparently, to import black slaves into
North America, but black slaves had already been employed all over the world, including
South and
Central America. We tend to focus on what happened in North America because the
United States would eventually fight a war over slavery (and it's in the
U.S. that large sectors of the population would start condemning slavery, contrary to the indifference that Muslims and most
Europeans showed for it).
Even after Europeans began transporting black slaves to
America, most trade was just that: "trade". In most instances, the Europeans did not need to use any force to get those slaves. The slaves were "sold" more or less legally by their (black) owners.
Scholars estimate that about 12,
000,000 Africans were sold by Africans to Europeans (most of them before
1776, when the USA wasn't yet born) and 17,000,000 were sold to Arabs. The legends of European mercenaries capturing free people in the jungle are mostly just that: legends. A few mercenaries certainly stormed peaceful tribes and committed terrible crimes, but that was not the norm. There was no need to risk their lives, so most of them didn't: they simply purchased people.
As an
African-American scholar (
Nathan Huggins) has written, the "identity" of black Africans is largely a white invention: sub-Saharan Africans never felt like they were one people, they felt (and still feel) that they belonged to different tribes. The distinctions of tribe were far stronger than the distinctions of race.
- published: 11 Sep 2015
- views: 10675