| Calendar |
< January, 2010 >
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
| 03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
| 10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| 24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
| 31 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
05 |
06 |
|
|
| Election Mathematics |
ElectionArchive.org & USCountVotes.org
Support a Federal Requirement for Paper Ballots and Hand Counts to Verify the Machine Counts. 2009 Analysis of US Rep. Rush Holt's H.R. 2894, the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act
Voting News Blogspot Voting News about election integrity issues, voting machines, election fraud, voter access and legislation in United States and sometimes other locations
Please join our email announcement list by clicking here and view prior email announcements here.
NEW! Checking Election Outcome Accuracy -- Post-Election Auditing Sampling This paper makes significant improvements to existing post-election auditing sampling methodology.
An aside: The Four R's of Economic Recovery
The ElectionArchive.org and USCountVotes.org web site server has been taken down and most files moved here. If you need a file that is missing, please email kathy.dopp at gmail.com with the URL/filename you want.
Recent work:
1. a shortened (ten page) version of a model post-election auditing legislative proposal with a new formula that is easy-to-use in a spreadsheet to estimate audit sample sizes that provide at least a 99% chance to detect the smallest amount of vote miscount that could alter an election outcome, and
2. a working draft of an analysis of US House Representative Rush Holt's election audit proposal that also provides a new formula for estimating election audit sample sizes that provide at most a 1% chance of not detecting vote miscount that could alter an election outcome, and
3. an election transparency bill for Utah that is supported by the League of Women Voters of Utah and we had hoped would be considered in the Utah legislature this year. You can read your own state's election statutes to see if it also needs revisions to conform to modern practice, federal statutes, and to allow for ballot reconciliation and public oversight over the electoral process.
---
We are still working on election integrity issues, and need your support to continue operating. U.S. elections remain wide-open to undetected outcome-changing vote fraud and innocent error. Old issues such as the lack of independent scrutiny over election results are still unsolved, and new threats to election integrity, such as instant runoff voting, continue to emerge. Do not be misled by groups like "Fair" Vote which are pushing for Instant Runoff Voting that *sounds* good at first but in reality threatens to eviscerate public transparency, accuracy, and fairness of U.S. elections.
This site contains information on methods to achieve election integrity, including ways to detect vote miscount, measure voter disenfranchisement levels, how to conduct manual election audits, analyze exit poll discrepancies, and how the public could oversee the integrity of the election process by examining election records and data; plus links to reports analyzing various voting systems and their costs.
ElectionArchive.org & USCountVotes.org
Support a Federal Requirement for Paper Ballots and Hand Counts to Verify the Machine Counts. 2009 Analysis of US Rep. Rush Holt's H.R. 2894, the Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act
Voting News Blogspot Voting News about election integrity issues, voting machines, election fraud, voter access and legislation in United States and sometimes other locations
Please join our email announcement list by clicking here and view prior email announcements here.
NEW! Checking Election Outcome Accuracy -- Post-Election Auditing Sampling This paper makes significant improvements to existing post-election auditing sampling methodology.
An aside: The Four R's of Economic Recovery
The ElectionArchive.org and USCountVotes.org web site server has been taken down and most files moved here. If you need a file that is missing, please email kathy.dopp at gmail.com with the URL/filename you want.
Recent work:
1. a shortened (ten page) version of a model post-election auditing legislative proposal with a new formula that is easy-to-use in a spreadsheet to estimate audit sample sizes that provide at least a 99% chance to detect the smallest amount of vote miscount that could alter an election outcome, and
2. a working draft of an analysis of US House Representative Rush Holt's election audit proposal that also provides a new formula for estimating election audit sample sizes that provide at most a 1% chance of not detecting vote miscount that could alter an election outcome, and
3. an election transparency bill for Utah that is supported by the League of Women Voters of Utah and we had hoped would be considered in the Utah legislature this year. You can read your own state's election statutes to see if it also needs revisions to conform to modern practice, federal statutes, and to allow for ballot reconciliation and public oversight over the electoral process.
---
We are still working on election integrity issues, and need your support to continue operating. U.S. elections remain wide-open to undetected outcome-changing vote fraud and innocent error. Old issues such as the lack of independent scrutiny over election results are still unsolved, and new threats to election integrity, such as instant runoff voting, continue to emerge. Do not be misled by groups like "Fair" Vote which are pushing for Instant Runoff Voting that *sounds* good at first but in reality threatens to eviscerate public transparency, accuracy, and fairness of U.S. elections.
This site contains information on methods to achieve election integrity, including ways to detect vote miscount, measure voter disenfranchisement levels, how to conduct manual election audits, analyze exit poll discrepancies, and how the public could oversee the integrity of the election process by examining election records and data; plus links to reports analyzing various voting systems and their costs.
Created on 02/04/2003 10:24 AM by admin
Updated on 08/09/2009 04:59 PM by admin
|
|
|
|
