Robert Bork Supreme Court Nomination Process Hearings Day 1 Part 1 (1987)
The
Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination refers to the
1987 nomination by
President Ronald Reagan of
Judge Robert Bork to serve as an
Associate Justice of the
United States Supreme Court.
The U.S. Senate rejected his nomination.
Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell was considered a moderate, often referred to as a "swing vote" in close decisions. Even before his expected retirement on June 27, 1987,
Senate Democrats had asked liberal leaders to form "a solid phalanx" to oppose whomever President Ronald Reagan nominated to replace
Powell, assuming that it would tilt the court rightward.
Democrats warned
Reagan there would be a fight over the nomination.[1]
Reagan nominated Bork for the seat on July 1, 1987. Bork had long been interested in the position; in
1973,
President Nixon promised him the next seat on the
Supreme Court following Bork's compliance in the controversial
Saturday Night Massacre.
Nixon was unable to carry out the promise after his resignation. [2]
Within 45 minutes of Bork's nomination to the
Court,
Senator Ted Kennedy (
D-MA) took to the Senate floor with a strong condemnation of Bork in a nationally televised speech, declaring,
Robert Bork's
America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in
midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the
Government, and the doors of the
Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens.[3]
A brief was prepared for
Joe Biden, head of the
Senate Judiciary Committee, called the
Biden Report. Bork later said in his best-selling[4] book
The Tempting of America that the report "so thoroughly misrepresented a plain record that it easily qualifies as world class in the category of scurrility".[5] TV ads narrated by
Gregory Peck attacked Bork as an extremist, and
Kennedy's speech successfully fueled widespread public skepticism of Bork's nomination. The rapid response of Kennedy's "Robert Bork's America" speech stunned the
Reagan White House; though conservatives considered Kennedy's accusations slanderous,[1] the attacks went unanswered for two and a half months.[6]
A hotly contested
United States Senate debate over Bork's nomination ensued, partly fueled by strong opposition by civil and women's rights groups concerned with Bork's stated desire to roll back civil rights decisions of the
Warren and Burger courts, and his opposition to the right of the
Federal government to impose standards of voting fairness upon the states. Bork is one of only three Supreme Court nominees to ever be opposed by the
ACLU.[7] Bork was also criticized for being an "advocate of disproportionate powers for the executive branch of Government, almost executive supremacy",[8] as demonstrated by his role in the Saturday Night Massacre.
During debate over his nomination, Bork's video rental history was leaked to the press, which led to the enactment of the
1988 Video Privacy Protection Act. His video rental history was unremarkable, and included such harmless titles as
A Day at the Races,
Ruthless People, and
The Man Who Knew Too Much.
The list of rentals was originally printed by
Washington D.C.'s
City Paper.[9]
To pro-choice legal groups, Bork's originalist views and his belief that the
Constitution does not contain a general "right to privacy" were viewed as a clear signal that, should he become a
Justice on the Supreme Court, he would vote to reverse the Court's 1973 decision in
Roe v. Wade. These groups also claimed that Bork's second marriage to a former
Roman Catholic nun would allow her to influence his decisions on the abortion issue.
Mary Ellen Bork is now known as a "
New Feminist" activist. Accordingly, a large number of left-wing groups mobilized to press for Bork's rejection, and the resulting 1987
Senate confirmation hearings became an intensely partisan battle. Ironically Bork himself became a
Catholic in
2003, and his replacement (
Justice Kennedy) was a Catholic (as well as 4 of the next 6 Justices to join the court including
Thomas who returned to the faith of his boyhood thanks to
Justice Scalia). Bork was faulted for his bluntness before the committee, including his criticism of the reasoning underlying Roe v. Wade. Simultaneously, however, his supporters expressed frustration that some of Bork's most controversial and conservative views, including those on the scope of the
First Amendment and the
Equal Protection clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, as expressed in his writings and past opinions, had been suddenly moderated for his testimony before the Committee.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Bork_Supreme_Court_nomination