Imaginary unit

or cartesian plane; real numbers fall on the horizontal axis, and imaginary numbers fall on the vertical axis]] In mathematics, the imaginary unit allows the real number system $\backslash mathbb\{R\}$ to be extended to the complex number system $\backslash mathbb\{C\}$ , which in turn provides at least one root for every polynomial P(x) (see algebraic closure and fundamental theorem of algebra). The imaginary unit is denoted by i, j, or the Greek ι (see alternative notations). Although its precise definition varies, the imaginary unit's core property is that .

There are in fact two square roots of −1, namely i and −i, just as there are two square roots of every non-zero real number.

For a history of the imaginary unit, see Complex number: History.

Definition

The imaginary number i is defined solely by the property that its square is −1:

:$i^2\; =\; -1\; \backslash \; .$

With i defined this way, it follows directly from algebra that i and −i are both square roots of −1.

Although the construction is called "imaginary", and although the concept of an imaginary number may be intuitively more difficult to grasp than that of a real number, the construction is perfectly valid from a mathematical standpoint. Real number operations can be extended to imaginary and complex numbers by treating i as an unknown quantity while manipulating an expression, and then using the definition to replace any occurrence of i ² with −1. Higher integral powers of i can also be replaced with −i, 1, i, or −1:

:$i^3\; =\; i^2\; i\; =\; (-1)\; i\; =\; -i\; \backslash ,$ :$i^4\; =\; i^3\; i\; =\; (-i)\; i\; =\; -(i^2)\; =\; -(-1)\; =\; 1\; \backslash ,$ :$i^5\; =\; i^4\; i\; =\; (1)\; i\; =\; i.\; \backslash ,$

i and −i

Being a quadratic polynomial with no multiple root, the defining equation x² = −1 has two distinct solutions, which are equally valid and which happen to be additive and multiplicative inverses of each other. More precisely, once a solution i of the equation has been fixed, the value −i, which is distinct from i, is also a solution. Since the equation is the only definition of i, it appears that the definition is ambiguous (more precisely, not well-defined). However, no ambiguity results as long as one of the solutions is chosen and fixed as the "positive i". This is because, although −i and i are not quantitatively equivalent (they are negatives of each other), there is no algebraic difference between i and −i. Both imaginary numbers have equal claim to being the number whose square is −1. If all mathematical textbooks and published literature referring to imaginary or complex numbers were rewritten with −i replacing every occurrence of +i (and therefore every occurrence of −i replaced by all facts and theorems would continue to be equivalently valid. The distinction between the two roots x of with one of them as "positive" is purely a notational relic; neither root can be said to be more primary or fundamental than the other.

The issue can be a subtle one. The most precise explanation is to say that although the complex field, defined as (see complex number) is unique up to isomorphism, it is not unique up to a unique isomorphism — there are exactly 2 field automorphisms of which keep each real number fixed: the identity and the automorphism sending X to −X. See also complex conjugation and Galois group.

A similar issue arises if the complex numbers are interpreted as 2 × 2 real matrices (see matrix representation of complex numbers), because then both

:     and    

are solutions to the matrix equation

:

In this case, the ambiguity results from the geometric choice of which "direction" around the unit circle is "positive" rotation. A more precise explanation is to say that the automorphism group of the special orthogonal group SO (2, R) has exactly 2 elements — the identity and the automorphism which exchanges "CW" (clockwise) and "CCW" (counter-clockwise) rotations. See orthogonal group.

All these ambiguities can be solved by adopting a more rigorous definition of complex number, and explicitly choosing one of the solutions to the equation to be the imaginary unit. For example, the ordered pair (0, 1), in the usual construction of the complex numbers with two-dimensional vectors.

Proper use

The imaginary unit is sometimes written $\backslash sqrt\{-1\}$ in advanced mathematics contexts (as well as in less advanced popular texts). However, great care needs to be taken when manipulating formulas involving radicals. The notation is reserved either for the principal square root function, which is only defined for real x ≥ 0, or for the principal branch of the complex square root function. Attempting to apply the calculation rules of the principal (real) square root function to manipulate the principal branch of the complex square root function will produce false results:

:$-1\; =\; i\; \backslash cdot\; i\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{-1\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash sqrt\{-1\}\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{(-1)\; \backslash cdot\; (-1)\}\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{1\}\; =\; 1$    (incorrect).

Attempting to correct the calculation by specifying both the positive and negative roots only produces ambiguous results: :$-1\; =\; i\; \backslash cdot\; i\; =\; \backslash pm\; \backslash sqrt\{-1\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash pm\; \backslash sqrt\{-1\}\; =\; \backslash pm\; \backslash sqrt\{(-1)\; \backslash cdot\; (-1)\}\; =\; \backslash pm\; \backslash sqrt\{1\}\; =\; \backslash pm\; 1$   (ambiguous).

The calculation rule :$\backslash sqrt\{a\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash sqrt\{b\}\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{a\; \backslash cdot\; b\}$ is only valid for real, non-negative values of $a$ and $b$.

These problems are avoided by writing and manipulating $i\backslash sqrt\{7\}$, rather than expressions like $\backslash sqrt\{-7\}$. For a more thorough discussion, see Square root and Branch point.

Properties

Square root

The square root of i can be expressed as either of two complex numbers

:$\backslash pm\; \backslash sqrt\{i\}\; =\; \backslash pm\; \backslash left(\; \backslash frac\{\backslash sqrt\{2\}\}\{2\}\; +\; \backslash frac\{\backslash sqrt\{2\}\}\{2\}i\; \backslash right)\; =\; \backslash pm\; \backslash frac\{\backslash sqrt\{2\}\}2\; (1\; +\; i).$

Indeed, squaring the right-hand side gives

:

The result can be derived with Euler's formula

:$e^\{ix\}\; =\; \backslash cos(x)\; +\; i\backslash sin(x)\; \backslash ,$

by substituting x = π/2, giving

:$e^\{i(\backslash pi/2)\}\; =\; \backslash cos(\backslash pi/2)\; +\; i\backslash sin(\backslash pi/2)\; =\; i\backslash ,\backslash !\; .$

Taking the square root of both sides gives

:$\backslash pm\; \backslash sqrt\{i\}\; =\; e^\{i(\backslash pi/4)\}\; \backslash ,\backslash !\; ,$

which, through application of Euler's formula to x = π/4, gives

:

Multiplication and division

Multiplying a complex number by i gives: :$i\backslash ,(a\; +\; bi)\; =\; ai\; +\; bi^2\; =\; -b\; +\; ai.$

Dividing by i implies the reciprocal of i: :$\backslash frac\{1\}\{i\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{1\}\{i\}\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash frac\{i\}\{i\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{i\}\{i^2\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{i\}\{-1\}\; =\; -i.$

Using this identity to generalize division by i to all complex numbers gives: :$\backslash frac\{a\; +\; bi\}\{i\}\; =\; -i\backslash ,(a\; +\; bi)\; =\; -ai\; -\; bi^2\; =\; b\; -\; ai.$

Powers

The powers of i repeat in a cycle expressible with the following pattern, where n is any integer:

:$i^\{4n\}\; =\; 1\backslash ,$ :$i^\{4n+1\}\; =\; i\backslash ,$ :$i^\{4n+2\}\; =\; -1\backslash ,$ :$i^\{4n+3\}\; =\; -i.\backslash ,$

This leads to the conclusion that :$i^n\; =\; i^\{n\; \backslash bmod\; 4\}\backslash ,$

where mod 4 represents arithmetic modulo 4.

i raised to the i power

One definition of iⁱ is :$i^i\; =\; \backslash left(\; e^\{i\; \backslash pi/2\}\; \backslash right)^i\; =\; e^\{i^2\; \backslash pi/2\}\; =\; e^\{-\; \backslash pi/2\}$

or approximately 0.207879576350761908546955...

Factorial

The factorial of the imaginary unit i is most often given in terms of the gamma function evaluated at 1+i: :$i!\; =\; \backslash Gamma(1+i)\; \backslash approx\; 0.4980\; -\; 0.1549i.$

Other operations

Many mathematical operations that can be carried out with real numbers can also be carried out with i, such as exponentiation, roots, logarithms, and trigonometric functions.

A number raised to the ni power is: :$\backslash !\backslash \; x^\{ni\}\; =\; \backslash cos(\backslash ln(x^n))\; +\; i\; \backslash sin(\backslash ln(x^n)).$

The ni^th root of a number is: :$\backslash !\backslash \; \backslash sqrt[ni]\{x\}\; =\; \backslash cos(\backslash ln(\backslash sqrt[n]\{x\}))\; -\; i\; \backslash sin(\backslash ln(\backslash sqrt[n]\{x\})).$

The imaginary-base logarithm of a number is: :$\backslash log\_i(x)\; =\; \{\{2\; \backslash ln(x)\}\; \backslash over\; i\backslash pi\}.$ As with any complex logarithm, the log base i is not uniquely defined.

The cosine of i is a real number: :$\backslash cos(i)\; =\; \backslash cosh(1)\; =\; \{\{e\; +\; 1/e\}\; \backslash over\; 2\}\; =\; \{\{e^2\; +\; 1\}\; \backslash over\; 2e\}\; =\; 1.54308064.$

And the sine of i is imaginary: :$\backslash sin(i)\; =\; \backslash sinh(1)\; \backslash ,\; i\; =\; \{\{e\; -\; 1/e\}\; \backslash over\; 2\}\; \backslash ,\; i\; =\; \{\{e^2\; -\; 1\}\; \backslash over\; 2e\}\; \backslash ,\; i\; =\; 1.17520119\; \backslash ,\; i.$

Euler's formula

Euler's formula is

:$e^\{ix\}\; =\; \backslash cos(x)\; +\; i\backslash sin(x),\; \backslash ,$ where x is a real number. The formula can also be analytically extended for complex x.

Substituting x = π yields

:$e^\{i\backslash pi\}\; =\; \backslash cos(\backslash pi)\; +\; i\backslash sin(\backslash pi)\; =\; -1\; +\; i0\; \backslash ,$

and one arrives at Euler's identity:

:$e^\{i\backslash pi\}\; +\; 1\; =\; 0.\; \backslash ,$

Euler's identity is noted for its elegance, in that it relates five of the most significant mathematical quantities under three of the most basic operations.

Example

Substitution of x = π/2 − 2πN, where N is an arbitrary integer, produces

:$e^\{i(\backslash pi/2\; -\; 2N\backslash pi)\}\; =\; i.\backslash ,$

Or, raising each side to the power i,

:$e^\{i\; i(\backslash pi/2\; -\; 2N\backslash pi)\}\; =\; i^i\; \backslash ,$

or

:$e^\{-(\backslash pi/2\; -\; 2N\backslash pi)\}\; =\; i^i\; \backslash ,$,

which shows that iⁱ has an infinite number of elements in the form of

:$i^i\; =\; e^\{-\backslash pi/2\; +\; 2\backslash pi\; N\}\backslash ,$

where N is any integer. This value is real, but it is not uniquely determined, since the complex logarithm is a multivalued function.

Taking N = 0 provides the principal value :$i^i\; =\; e^\{-\backslash pi/2\}\; =\; 0.207879576....\backslash ,$

Alternative notations

In electrical engineering and related fields, the imaginary unit is often denoted by j to avoid confusion with electrical current as a function of time, traditionally denoted by i(t) or just i. The Python programming language also uses j to denote the imaginary unit. MATLAB associates both i and j with the imaginary unit.

Some sources define j = −i, in particular with regard to travelling waves (e.g., a right travelling plane wave in the x direction $e^\{\; i\; (kx\; -\; \backslash omega\; t)\}\; =\; e^\{\; j\; (\backslash omega\; t-kx)\}\; \backslash ,$).

Some texts use the Greek letter iota ( ι ) for the imaginary unit, to avoid confusion. See Biquaternion.

See also

Imaginary number

Complex plane

Root of unity

Notes

References

Paul J. Nahin, An Imaginary Tale, The Story of √−1, Princeton University Press, 1998

External links

Euler's work on Imaginary Roots of Polynomials at Convergence

Category:Complex numbers Category:Algebraic numbers