ClimateGate PaleoClimatology 2001BC an Email Odyssey

• Report rights infringement
• published: 06 Dec 2009
• views: 1784

CRU searchable database of the leaked info http://www.eastangliaemails.com/index.php Bishop Hills compendium of CRU email http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/22/bishop-hills-compendium-of-cru-email-issues/ CRU Data-Cooking: Recipe Exposed! http://joannenova.com.au/2009/11/cru-data-cooking-recipe-exposed/ Smoking Guns Across Australia: Wheres the warming? http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/smoking-guns-across-australia-wheres-the-warming/ This, people, is blatant data-cooking, with no pretense otherwise. It flattens a period of warm temperatures in the 1940s 1930s — see those negative coefficients? Then, later on, it applies a positive multiplier so you get a nice dramatic hockey stick at the end of the century. http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1447 Funkhouser says hes pulled every trick up his sleeve to milk his Kyrgistan series. Doesnt think its productive to juggle the chronology statistics any more than he has.(0843161829) Wigley discusses fixing an issue with sea surface temperatures in the context of making the results look both warmer but still plausible. (1254108338) Jones tells Mann that he is sending station data. Says that if McIntyre requests it under FoI he will delete it rather than hand it over. Says he will hide behind data protection laws. Says Rutherford screwed up big time by creating an FTP directory for Osborn. Says Wigley worried he will have to release his model code. Also discuss AR4 draft. Mann says paleoclimate chapter will be contentious but that the author team has the right personalities to deal with sceptics.(1107454306) CRU searchable database of the leaked info at eastangliaemails Tom Wigley tells Mann that a figure Schmidt put together to refute Monckton is deceptive and that the match it shows of instrumental to model predictions is a fluke. Says there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model output by authors and IPCC.(1255553034) Reaction to McIntyres 2005 paper in GRL. Mann has challenged GRL editor-in-chief over the publication. Mann is concerned about the connections of the papers editor James Saiers with U Virginia [does he mean Pat Michaels?]. Tom Wigley says that if Saiers is a sceptic they should go through official GRL channels to get him ousted. (1106322460) [Note to readers - Saiers was subsequently ousted] Santer says he will no longer publish in Royal Met Soc journals if they enforce intermediate data being made available. Jones has complained to head of Royal Met Soc about new editor of Weather [why?data?] and has threatened to resign from RMS.(1237496573) Tom Wigley discusses how to deal with the advent of FoI law in UK. Jones says use IPR argument to hold onto code. Says data is covered by agreements with outsiders and that CRU will be hiding behind them.(1106338806) # Mann tells Jones that it would be nice to contain the putative Medieval Warm Period. (1054736277) # Tom Wigley tells Jones that the land warming since 1980 has been twice the ocean warming and that this might be used by sceptics as evidence for urban heat islands.(1257546975) Tom Wigley says that von Storch is partly to blame for sceptic papers getting published at Climate Research. Says he encourages the publication of crap science. Says they should tell publisher that the journal is being used for misinformation. Says that whether this is true or not doesnt matter. Says they need to get editorial board to resign. Says they need to get rid of von Storch too. (1051190249) # Michael Mann discusses how to destroy a journal that has published sceptic papers.(1047388489) # Tim Osborn discusses how data are truncated to stop an apparent cooling trend showing up in the results (0939154709). Who's Who Climate-gate-cru-anglia-uea-data