-
Stephen Holmes: Illiberal Democracy
Stephen Holmes:
Illiberal Democracy
June 26, 2015
Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), Vienna
Keynote Speech at the Conference
HUNGARY 2015 – Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”
June 26-27, 2015
Jointly organized by the Central European University, Pasts, Inc. Center for Historical Studies and the IWM. Generously supported by Grüne Bildungswerkstatt, Green European Foundation and The Gr
-
Illiberal democracy
An illiberal democracy, also called a partial democracy, low intensity democracy, empty democracy, or hybrid regime, is a governing system in which, although elections take place, citizens are cut off from knowledge about the activities of those who exercise real power because of the lack of civil liberties. It is not an "open society". There are many countries "that are categorized as neither 'fr
-
The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism
In 1989, there was hope that democracy, open society, and globalization would advance together – that liberty was indivisible. Professor Michael Ignatieff of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government discussed how these propositions turned out instead in his talk “Is Liberty Divisible? The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism” at CEU March 16. The lecture was part of the F
-
Fareed Zakaria: The Future of Freedom and Democracy | 14th Forum 2000 Conference
Speech by Fareed Zakaria during the panel discussion on "The Future of Freedom and Democracy" at the 14th Forum 2000 Conference entitled "The World We Want t...
-
Illiberal Democracy in the Muslim World
Using Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan as an example, Brookings Institution fellow Shadi Hamid explains how and why Islamist political leaders sometimes move ...
-
Shadi Hamid on Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
Live from Oxford University Press New York: Dr. Shadi Hamid, a fellow at the Project on U.S.-Islamic World Relations at the Brookings Institution, will discuss his new book, Temptations of...
-
Illiberal Democracy หรือเเนวคิดไม่ไว้วางใจการเลือกตั้งของ Zakaria
- 'Clinton Cash' เขียนโดย Schweizer เพื่อทำลายภาพพจน์ Hillary
- จีนสั่งห้ามสร้างสนามกอล์ฟใหม่...อ้างคอร์รัปชั่น
- Kochs หนุน Scott Walker ผู้ว่า Wisc เป็นตัวเเทนพรรค
- อาหารสุนัข 5 คอร์สในกรุงลอนดอนราคา $29
ชมคลิปทั้งรายการได้ที่ shows.voicetv.co.th/the-daily-dose/196851.html
-
Global Ethics Forum: Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin...
-
Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
On May 22nd, IPI hosted a Distinguished Author Series event, featuring Shadi Hamid, author of Temptations of Power: Islamists & Illiberal Democracy in a New ...
-
Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
Apr. 30, 2014 Shadi Hamid provides a timely and provocative account of where the region's Islamist groups have come from and where they might be headed.
-
Comparing Turkey and Hungary on their path to illiberal democracy-Pelin Ayan Musil
Comparing Turkey and Hungary on their path to illiberal democracy-Pelin Ayan Musil
-
Global Ethics Forum Promo: Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin...
-
One Size Doesn't Fit All: Democracy is Not Always the Best Form of Government
Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. So said Winston Churchill and who would disagree? One man, one vote, th...
-
Rise of Illiberal Democracies and the Not-So-Moderate Muslim Brotherhood (Egypt)
Bret Stephens - Neocon.
-
Kati Piri-Do we have successful illiberal democracies?
Kati Piri_Do we have successful illiberal democracies?
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
-
Illiberal democracies in the world
Kati Piri (Member of the European Parliament-Socialist and Democrats Group, Member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Brussels):Illiberal democracies in the world
Illiberal democracies in the world
-
Jeremy Druker-Illiberal democracies
Jeremy Druker-Illiberal democracies
An authoritartian's bag of tricks for influencing the traditional and social media-Jeremy Druker
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
-
Illiberal (A Video Submission From Singapore)
From Singapore: In Participation of 2009 Democracy Is... Video Challenge. Fareed Zakaria in a landmark 1997 article coined the term "Illiberal Democracy". An...
-
Fareed Zakaria Defense of True Democracy
-
Shadi Hamid "Temptations of Power"
http://www.politics-prose.com/event/book/shadi-hamid-temptations-of-power-islamists-and-illiberal-democracy-new-middle-east Shadi Hamid discusses his new boo...
-
Michael Ignatieff: Is Liberty Divisible?
Is Liberty Divisible?: The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism
A lecture by Michael Ignatieff (Professor, Harvard University, 2009-2011 Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada)
The new authoritarians in Russia and Eastern Europe have gambled that market freedoms and political freedoms, private and public liberty, are divisible, and that authoritarian rule can be stab
-
ISIS and Radicalization - Shadi Hamid
Shadi Hamid is a contributing writer for The Atlantic, a fellow at the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World at the Brookings Institution's Center for Middle East Policy, and the author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East.
Political scientists, including myself, have tended to see religion, ideology, and identity as epiphenomenal—products of a
-
11 Aspects of a Liberal Democracy
Stock photos are good.
Project for Social Studies 30-1
Stephen Holmes: Illiberal Democracy
Stephen Holmes:
Illiberal Democracy
June 26, 2015
Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), Vienna
Keynote Speech at the Conference
HUNGARY 2015 – Mapping the “Syst...
Stephen Holmes:
Illiberal Democracy
June 26, 2015
Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), Vienna
Keynote Speech at the Conference
HUNGARY 2015 – Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”
June 26-27, 2015
Jointly organized by the Central European University, Pasts, Inc. Center for Historical Studies and the IWM. Generously supported by Grüne Bildungswerkstatt, Green European Foundation and The Greens/EFA.
===================================================
Stephen Holmes will give the keynote speech of the conference HUNGARY 2015: Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”, jointly organized by the Central European University (CEU), Pasts, Inc. Center for Historical Studies and the IWM.
Putting aside for the moment questions of electoral opportunism, rhetorical posturing, and redistributive cronyism, the lecture will provide a historical and comparative context for evaluating Orban’s attempt to frame his way of ruling Hungary as “illiberal democracy.” How should we understand the relation between Orban’s audaciously frontal assault on the liberal state and the virulent anti-liberalism of the 1930s? To what extent is Orban’s illiberalism unique to Hungary and to what extent is it a reflection of wider, even global, trends today? The perennial and widespread charge that liberalism is a hypocritical philosophy that masks the decision of political elites to favor the strong over the weak behind a façade of abstract rights, anonymous procedures, and neutral rules needs to be faced head-on. Does liberalism, understood as the governing philosophy of Western democracies, really ignore the need for political leadership, the importance of national identity, and the value of public patrimony? Is Orban right to claim that liberalism provides no resources for dealing with the challenge of mass immigration? Is liberalism really a threat to the sovereignty of nation-states struggling to manage the uncertainties produced by globalization and economic crisis?
Stephen Holmes is Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law and Faculty CO-director of the Center on Law and Security at New York University.
The main focus of his current research are: Defense Against Transnational Terrorism Within the Bounds of Liberal Constitutionalism, Emergency Powers, The Disappointments of Democracy and Economic Liberalization After Communism and The History of European Liberalism.
http://www.iwm.at/events/event/illiberal-democracy-2/
wn.com/Stephen Holmes Illiberal Democracy
Stephen Holmes:
Illiberal Democracy
June 26, 2015
Institute for Human Sciences (IWM), Vienna
Keynote Speech at the Conference
HUNGARY 2015 – Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”
June 26-27, 2015
Jointly organized by the Central European University, Pasts, Inc. Center for Historical Studies and the IWM. Generously supported by Grüne Bildungswerkstatt, Green European Foundation and The Greens/EFA.
===================================================
Stephen Holmes will give the keynote speech of the conference HUNGARY 2015: Mapping the “System of National Cooperation”, jointly organized by the Central European University (CEU), Pasts, Inc. Center for Historical Studies and the IWM.
Putting aside for the moment questions of electoral opportunism, rhetorical posturing, and redistributive cronyism, the lecture will provide a historical and comparative context for evaluating Orban’s attempt to frame his way of ruling Hungary as “illiberal democracy.” How should we understand the relation between Orban’s audaciously frontal assault on the liberal state and the virulent anti-liberalism of the 1930s? To what extent is Orban’s illiberalism unique to Hungary and to what extent is it a reflection of wider, even global, trends today? The perennial and widespread charge that liberalism is a hypocritical philosophy that masks the decision of political elites to favor the strong over the weak behind a façade of abstract rights, anonymous procedures, and neutral rules needs to be faced head-on. Does liberalism, understood as the governing philosophy of Western democracies, really ignore the need for political leadership, the importance of national identity, and the value of public patrimony? Is Orban right to claim that liberalism provides no resources for dealing with the challenge of mass immigration? Is liberalism really a threat to the sovereignty of nation-states struggling to manage the uncertainties produced by globalization and economic crisis?
Stephen Holmes is Walter E. Meyer Professor of Law and Faculty CO-director of the Center on Law and Security at New York University.
The main focus of his current research are: Defense Against Transnational Terrorism Within the Bounds of Liberal Constitutionalism, Emergency Powers, The Disappointments of Democracy and Economic Liberalization After Communism and The History of European Liberalism.
http://www.iwm.at/events/event/illiberal-democracy-2/
- published: 28 Jun 2015
- views: 21
Illiberal democracy
An illiberal democracy, also called a partial democracy, low intensity democracy, empty democracy, or hybrid regime, is a governing system in which, although el...
An illiberal democracy, also called a partial democracy, low intensity democracy, empty democracy, or hybrid regime, is a governing system in which, although elections take place, citizens are cut off from knowledge about the activities of those who exercise real power because of the lack of civil liberties. It is not an "open society". There are many countries "that are categorized as neither 'free' nor 'not free', but as 'probably free', falling somewhere between democratic and nondemocratic regimes". This may be because a constitution limiting government powers exists, but its liberties are ignored, or because an adequate legal constitutional framework of liberties does not exist.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
wn.com/Illiberal Democracy
An illiberal democracy, also called a partial democracy, low intensity democracy, empty democracy, or hybrid regime, is a governing system in which, although elections take place, citizens are cut off from knowledge about the activities of those who exercise real power because of the lack of civil liberties. It is not an "open society". There are many countries "that are categorized as neither 'free' nor 'not free', but as 'probably free', falling somewhere between democratic and nondemocratic regimes". This may be because a constitution limiting government powers exists, but its liberties are ignored, or because an adequate legal constitutional framework of liberties does not exist.
This video is targeted to blind users.
Attribution:
Article text available under CC-BY-SA
Creative Commons image source in video
- published: 23 Oct 2015
- views: 4
The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism
In 1989, there was hope that democracy, open society, and globalization would advance together – that liberty was indivisible. Professor Michael Ignatieff of Ha...
In 1989, there was hope that democracy, open society, and globalization would advance together – that liberty was indivisible. Professor Michael Ignatieff of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government discussed how these propositions turned out instead in his talk “Is Liberty Divisible? The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism” at CEU March 16. The lecture was part of the Frontiers of Democracy series.
wn.com/The Challenge Of Illiberal Democracy And Capitalist Authoritarianism
In 1989, there was hope that democracy, open society, and globalization would advance together – that liberty was indivisible. Professor Michael Ignatieff of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government discussed how these propositions turned out instead in his talk “Is Liberty Divisible? The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism” at CEU March 16. The lecture was part of the Frontiers of Democracy series.
- published: 07 Apr 2015
- views: 55
Fareed Zakaria: The Future of Freedom and Democracy | 14th Forum 2000 Conference
Speech by Fareed Zakaria during the panel discussion on "The Future of Freedom and Democracy" at the 14th Forum 2000 Conference entitled "The World We Want t......
Speech by Fareed Zakaria during the panel discussion on "The Future of Freedom and Democracy" at the 14th Forum 2000 Conference entitled "The World We Want t...
wn.com/Fareed Zakaria The Future Of Freedom And Democracy | 14Th Forum 2000 Conference
Speech by Fareed Zakaria during the panel discussion on "The Future of Freedom and Democracy" at the 14th Forum 2000 Conference entitled "The World We Want t...
Illiberal Democracy in the Muslim World
Using Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan as an example, Brookings Institution fellow Shadi Hamid explains how and why Islamist political leaders sometimes move ......
Using Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan as an example, Brookings Institution fellow Shadi Hamid explains how and why Islamist political leaders sometimes move ...
wn.com/Illiberal Democracy In The Muslim World
Using Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan as an example, Brookings Institution fellow Shadi Hamid explains how and why Islamist political leaders sometimes move ...
Shadi Hamid on Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
Live from Oxford University Press New York: Dr. Shadi Hamid, a fellow at the Project on U.S.-Islamic World Relations at the Brookings Institution, will discuss ...
Live from Oxford University Press New York: Dr. Shadi Hamid, a fellow at the Project on U.S.-Islamic World Relations at the Brookings Institution, will discuss his new book, Temptations of...
wn.com/Shadi Hamid On Illiberal Democracy In A New Middle East
Live from Oxford University Press New York: Dr. Shadi Hamid, a fellow at the Project on U.S.-Islamic World Relations at the Brookings Institution, will discuss his new book, Temptations of...
Illiberal Democracy หรือเเนวคิดไม่ไว้วางใจการเลือกตั้งของ Zakaria
- 'Clinton Cash' เขียนโดย Schweizer เพื่อทำลายภาพพจน์ Hillary
- จีนสั่งห้ามสร้างสนามกอล์ฟใหม่...อ้างคอร์รัปชั่น
- Kochs หนุน Scott Walker ผู้ว่า Wisc เป็นตัว...
- 'Clinton Cash' เขียนโดย Schweizer เพื่อทำลายภาพพจน์ Hillary
- จีนสั่งห้ามสร้างสนามกอล์ฟใหม่...อ้างคอร์รัปชั่น
- Kochs หนุน Scott Walker ผู้ว่า Wisc เป็นตัวเเทนพรรค
- อาหารสุนัข 5 คอร์สในกรุงลอนดอนราคา $29
ชมคลิปทั้งรายการได้ที่ shows.voicetv.co.th/the-daily-dose/196851.html
wn.com/Illiberal Democracy หรือเเนวคิดไม่ไว้วางใจการเลือกตั้งของ Zakaria
- 'Clinton Cash' เขียนโดย Schweizer เพื่อทำลายภาพพจน์ Hillary
- จีนสั่งห้ามสร้างสนามกอล์ฟใหม่...อ้างคอร์รัปชั่น
- Kochs หนุน Scott Walker ผู้ว่า Wisc เป็นตัวเเทนพรรค
- อาหารสุนัข 5 คอร์สในกรุงลอนดอนราคา $29
ชมคลิปทั้งรายการได้ที่ shows.voicetv.co.th/the-daily-dose/196851.html
- published: 24 Apr 2015
- views: 144
Global Ethics Forum: Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin......
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin...
wn.com/Global Ethics Forum Temptations Of Power Islamists And Illiberal Democracy In A New Middle East
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin...
Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
On May 22nd, IPI hosted a Distinguished Author Series event, featuring Shadi Hamid, author of Temptations of Power: Islamists & Illiberal Democracy in a New ......
On May 22nd, IPI hosted a Distinguished Author Series event, featuring Shadi Hamid, author of Temptations of Power: Islamists & Illiberal Democracy in a New ...
wn.com/Illiberal Democracy In A New Middle East
On May 22nd, IPI hosted a Distinguished Author Series event, featuring Shadi Hamid, author of Temptations of Power: Islamists & Illiberal Democracy in a New ...
Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East
Apr. 30, 2014 Shadi Hamid provides a timely and provocative account of where the region's Islamist groups have come from and where they might be headed....
Apr. 30, 2014 Shadi Hamid provides a timely and provocative account of where the region's Islamist groups have come from and where they might be headed.
wn.com/Temptations Of Power Islamists And Illiberal Democracy In A New Middle East
Apr. 30, 2014 Shadi Hamid provides a timely and provocative account of where the region's Islamist groups have come from and where they might be headed.
Comparing Turkey and Hungary on their path to illiberal democracy-Pelin Ayan Musil
Comparing Turkey and Hungary on their path to illiberal democracy-Pelin Ayan Musil...
Comparing Turkey and Hungary on their path to illiberal democracy-Pelin Ayan Musil
wn.com/Comparing Turkey And Hungary On Their Path To Illiberal Democracy Pelin Ayan Musil
Comparing Turkey and Hungary on their path to illiberal democracy-Pelin Ayan Musil
- published: 03 May 2015
- views: 2
Global Ethics Forum Promo: Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin......
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin...
wn.com/Global Ethics Forum Promo Temptations Of Power Islamists And Illiberal Democracy
What if a group decides democratically that they don't want to be liberal--that they want an "illiberal democracy"? Shadi Hamid argues that repression origin...
One Size Doesn't Fit All: Democracy is Not Always the Best Form of Government
Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. So said Winston Churchill and who would disagree? One man, one vote, th......
Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. So said Winston Churchill and who would disagree? One man, one vote, th...
wn.com/One Size Doesn't Fit All Democracy Is Not Always The Best Form Of Government
Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried. So said Winston Churchill and who would disagree? One man, one vote, th...
- published: 16 Mar 2014
- views: 8565
-
author: iqsquared
Kati Piri-Do we have successful illiberal democracies?
Kati Piri_Do we have successful illiberal democracies?
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and syst...
Kati Piri_Do we have successful illiberal democracies?
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
wn.com/Kati Piri Do We Have Successful Illiberal Democracies
Kati Piri_Do we have successful illiberal democracies?
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
- published: 21 Jun 2015
- views: 0
Illiberal democracies in the world
Kati Piri (Member of the European Parliament-Socialist and Democrats Group, Member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Brussels):Illiberal democracies in the w...
Kati Piri (Member of the European Parliament-Socialist and Democrats Group, Member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Brussels):Illiberal democracies in the world
Illiberal democracies in the world
wn.com/Illiberal Democracies In The World
Kati Piri (Member of the European Parliament-Socialist and Democrats Group, Member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Brussels):Illiberal democracies in the world
Illiberal democracies in the world
- published: 08 May 2015
- views: 0
Jeremy Druker-Illiberal democracies
Jeremy Druker-Illiberal democracies
An authoritartian's bag of tricks for influencing the traditional and social media-Jeremy Druker
I. Session
Illiberal democr...
Jeremy Druker-Illiberal democracies
An authoritartian's bag of tricks for influencing the traditional and social media-Jeremy Druker
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
wn.com/Jeremy Druker Illiberal Democracies
Jeremy Druker-Illiberal democracies
An authoritartian's bag of tricks for influencing the traditional and social media-Jeremy Druker
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
- published: 21 Jun 2015
- views: 0
Illiberal (A Video Submission From Singapore)
From Singapore: In Participation of 2009 Democracy Is... Video Challenge. Fareed Zakaria in a landmark 1997 article coined the term "Illiberal Democracy". An......
From Singapore: In Participation of 2009 Democracy Is... Video Challenge. Fareed Zakaria in a landmark 1997 article coined the term "Illiberal Democracy". An...
wn.com/Illiberal (A Video Submission From Singapore)
From Singapore: In Participation of 2009 Democracy Is... Video Challenge. Fareed Zakaria in a landmark 1997 article coined the term "Illiberal Democracy". An...
Shadi Hamid "Temptations of Power"
http://www.politics-prose.com/event/book/shadi-hamid-temptations-of-power-islamists-and-illiberal-democracy-new-middle-east Shadi Hamid discusses his new boo......
http://www.politics-prose.com/event/book/shadi-hamid-temptations-of-power-islamists-and-illiberal-democracy-new-middle-east Shadi Hamid discusses his new boo...
wn.com/Shadi Hamid Temptations Of Power
http://www.politics-prose.com/event/book/shadi-hamid-temptations-of-power-islamists-and-illiberal-democracy-new-middle-east Shadi Hamid discusses his new boo...
Michael Ignatieff: Is Liberty Divisible?
Is Liberty Divisible?: The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism
A lecture by Michael Ignatieff (Professor, Harvard University, 200...
Is Liberty Divisible?: The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism
A lecture by Michael Ignatieff (Professor, Harvard University, 2009-2011 Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada)
The new authoritarians in Russia and Eastern Europe have gambled that market freedoms and political freedoms, private and public liberty, are divisible, and that authoritarian rule can be stable so long as it allows citizens private liberty alone. Are they right?
wn.com/Michael Ignatieff Is Liberty Divisible
Is Liberty Divisible?: The Challenge of Illiberal Democracy and Capitalist Authoritarianism
A lecture by Michael Ignatieff (Professor, Harvard University, 2009-2011 Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada)
The new authoritarians in Russia and Eastern Europe have gambled that market freedoms and political freedoms, private and public liberty, are divisible, and that authoritarian rule can be stable so long as it allows citizens private liberty alone. Are they right?
- published: 19 Mar 2015
- views: 32
ISIS and Radicalization - Shadi Hamid
Shadi Hamid is a contributing writer for The Atlantic, a fellow at the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World at the Brookings Institution's Center fo...
Shadi Hamid is a contributing writer for The Atlantic, a fellow at the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World at the Brookings Institution's Center for Middle East Policy, and the author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East.
Political scientists, including myself, have tended to see religion, ideology, and identity as epiphenomenal—products of a given set of material factors. We are trained to believe in the primacy of “politics.” This isn’t necessarily incorrect, but it can sometimes obscure the independent power of ideas that seem, to much of the Western world, quaint and archaic. As Robert Kagan recently wrote, “For a quarter-century, Americans have been told that at the end of history lies boredom rather than great conflict.” The rise of ISIS is only the most extreme example of the way in which liberal determinism—the notion that history moves with intent toward a more reasonable, secular future—has failed to explain the realities of the Middle East. It should by now go without saying that the overwhelming majority of Muslims do not share ISIS’s view of religion, but that’s not really the most interesting or relevant question. ISIS’s rise to prominence has something to do with Islam, but what is that something?ISIS draws on, and draws strength from, ideas that have broad resonance among Muslim-majority populations. They may not agree with ISIS’s interpretation of the caliphate, but the notion of a caliphate—the historical political entity governed by Islamic law and tradition—is a powerful one, even among more secular-minded Muslims. The caliphate, something that hasn’t existed since 1924, is a reminder of how one of the world’s great civilizations endured one of the more precipitous declines in human history. The gap between what Muslims once were and where they now find themselves is at the center of the anger and humiliation that drive political violence in the Middle East. But there is also a sense of loss and longing for an organic legal and political order that succeeded for centuries before its slow but decisive dismantling. Ever since, Muslims, and particularly Arab Muslims, have been struggling to define the contours of an appropriate post-caliphate political model.
Andrew Bacevich writes, “No single explanation exists for why the War for the Greater Middle East began and why it persists. But religion figures as a central element. Secularized American elites either cannot grasp or are unwilling to accept this.” Indeed, the divide between Islamists and what we might call “anti-Islamists” cannot be reduced to the single-minded pursuit of power. As I argue in my new book, it is just as much about real ideological divides over the role of religion in public life and the nature, meaning, and purpose of the nation-state.History, Kaplan wrote, “has demonstrated that there is no final triumph of reason.”There was a difference between realism—recognizing that religious and ethnic hatreds are real and resonant—and resignation, where the powerful say nothing can be done and look away.
wn.com/Isis And Radicalization Shadi Hamid
Shadi Hamid is a contributing writer for The Atlantic, a fellow at the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World at the Brookings Institution's Center for Middle East Policy, and the author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East.
Political scientists, including myself, have tended to see religion, ideology, and identity as epiphenomenal—products of a given set of material factors. We are trained to believe in the primacy of “politics.” This isn’t necessarily incorrect, but it can sometimes obscure the independent power of ideas that seem, to much of the Western world, quaint and archaic. As Robert Kagan recently wrote, “For a quarter-century, Americans have been told that at the end of history lies boredom rather than great conflict.” The rise of ISIS is only the most extreme example of the way in which liberal determinism—the notion that history moves with intent toward a more reasonable, secular future—has failed to explain the realities of the Middle East. It should by now go without saying that the overwhelming majority of Muslims do not share ISIS’s view of religion, but that’s not really the most interesting or relevant question. ISIS’s rise to prominence has something to do with Islam, but what is that something?ISIS draws on, and draws strength from, ideas that have broad resonance among Muslim-majority populations. They may not agree with ISIS’s interpretation of the caliphate, but the notion of a caliphate—the historical political entity governed by Islamic law and tradition—is a powerful one, even among more secular-minded Muslims. The caliphate, something that hasn’t existed since 1924, is a reminder of how one of the world’s great civilizations endured one of the more precipitous declines in human history. The gap between what Muslims once were and where they now find themselves is at the center of the anger and humiliation that drive political violence in the Middle East. But there is also a sense of loss and longing for an organic legal and political order that succeeded for centuries before its slow but decisive dismantling. Ever since, Muslims, and particularly Arab Muslims, have been struggling to define the contours of an appropriate post-caliphate political model.
Andrew Bacevich writes, “No single explanation exists for why the War for the Greater Middle East began and why it persists. But religion figures as a central element. Secularized American elites either cannot grasp or are unwilling to accept this.” Indeed, the divide between Islamists and what we might call “anti-Islamists” cannot be reduced to the single-minded pursuit of power. As I argue in my new book, it is just as much about real ideological divides over the role of religion in public life and the nature, meaning, and purpose of the nation-state.History, Kaplan wrote, “has demonstrated that there is no final triumph of reason.”There was a difference between realism—recognizing that religious and ethnic hatreds are real and resonant—and resignation, where the powerful say nothing can be done and look away.
- published: 15 Nov 2014
- views: 194
11 Aspects of a Liberal Democracy
Stock photos are good.
Project for Social Studies 30-1...
Stock photos are good.
Project for Social Studies 30-1
wn.com/11 Aspects Of A Liberal Democracy
Stock photos are good.
Project for Social Studies 30-1
- published: 26 Feb 2014
- views: 43
-
Takis Pappas-Left wing populism: a threat to liberal democracy?
Left wing populism: a threat to liberal democracy?-Takis Pappas
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
-
Democracy in Latin America: Political Change in Comparative Perspective — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/pnllebb
Thoroughly updated in its second edition, Democracy in Latin America provides an in-depth and accessible survey of processes of democratization in Latin America from 1900 to the present. In clear and jargon-free prose, acclaimed author Peter H. Smith examines the origins and evolution of democracy in Latin America; the adoption and reform of el
Takis Pappas-Left wing populism: a threat to liberal democracy?
Left wing populism: a threat to liberal democracy?-Takis Pappas
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly...
Left wing populism: a threat to liberal democracy?-Takis Pappas
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
wn.com/Takis Pappas Left Wing Populism A Threat To Liberal Democracy
Left wing populism: a threat to liberal democracy?-Takis Pappas
I. Session
Illiberal democracies-what can the European Union do in case a member state regularly and systematically breaches European values and regulations?
-workshop-
- published: 21 Jun 2015
- views: 6
Democracy in Latin America: Political Change in Comparative Perspective — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/pnllebb
Thoroughly updated in its second edition, Democracy in Latin America provides an in-depth and accessible s...
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/pnllebb
Thoroughly updated in its second edition, Democracy in Latin America provides an in-depth and accessible survey of processes of democratization in Latin America from 1900 to the present. In clear and jargon-free prose, acclaimed author Peter H. Smith examines the origins and evolution of democracy in Latin America; the adoption and reform of electoral institutions; the policy performance of contemporary democracies; the political representation of women, workers, and indigenous peoples; and trends in public opinion. Adroitly blending qualitative and quantitative approaches, Democracy in Latin America, Second Edition, offers an innovative perspective on democratic change in Latin America. Enhanced by photos and text boxes featuring portraits of personalities, explanations about methodology, and comments on conceptual approaches, it is ideal for undergraduate and graduate courses in political science, history, Latin American studies, and history.FEATURES OF THE SECOND EDITION:* Updates empirical information on present-day developments, such as women's representation, the empowerment of indigenous peoples, and anti-poverty policies* Interprets the emergence of the "new Left" as part of a recurring dialectic within Latin American democracy* Analyzes the changing roles of the judiciary* Considers the relationship between social status and satisfaction with democracy* Reassesses the relative balance between "liberal" and "illiberal" democracy throughout the region* Provides a completely new analysis of public opinion on the basis of raw survey data* Takes into account the contemporary international environment, inlcuding the rise of China
wn.com/Democracy In Latin America Political Change In Comparative Perspective — Download
Download Here: http://tinyurl.com/pnllebb
Thoroughly updated in its second edition, Democracy in Latin America provides an in-depth and accessible survey of processes of democratization in Latin America from 1900 to the present. In clear and jargon-free prose, acclaimed author Peter H. Smith examines the origins and evolution of democracy in Latin America; the adoption and reform of electoral institutions; the policy performance of contemporary democracies; the political representation of women, workers, and indigenous peoples; and trends in public opinion. Adroitly blending qualitative and quantitative approaches, Democracy in Latin America, Second Edition, offers an innovative perspective on democratic change in Latin America. Enhanced by photos and text boxes featuring portraits of personalities, explanations about methodology, and comments on conceptual approaches, it is ideal for undergraduate and graduate courses in political science, history, Latin American studies, and history.FEATURES OF THE SECOND EDITION:* Updates empirical information on present-day developments, such as women's representation, the empowerment of indigenous peoples, and anti-poverty policies* Interprets the emergence of the "new Left" as part of a recurring dialectic within Latin American democracy* Analyzes the changing roles of the judiciary* Considers the relationship between social status and satisfaction with democracy* Reassesses the relative balance between "liberal" and "illiberal" democracy throughout the region* Provides a completely new analysis of public opinion on the basis of raw survey data* Takes into account the contemporary international environment, inlcuding the rise of China
- published: 19 Jun 2015
- views: 0
-
Joseph Stiglitz Says Liberal Democracy Key to Shared Prosperity
The conscious development of a learning society, essential for shared prosperity, can only be achieved in a liberal democracy, according to Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, who spoke at CEU on Nov. 10 as part of CEU’s Frontiers of Democracy initiative.
-
World Affairs TODAY Season 8 Episode 10 "Exploring ISIL: Response and Repercussions"
The World Affairs Council – Washington, DC hosts a discussion about ISIL; one of the most momentous and imposing insurgent groups facing America today. What is it? What is the United States’ response, and how will this impact the security of the region? The expert panel includes the knowledgeable and versed voices of Dr. Shadi Hamid, fellow at Brookings Institution and author of Temptations of Pow
-
Illiberal Progressives
The modern progressive movement is, in most ways, directly opposed to the classical liberalism of the Enlightenment.
Despite this, progressives are happy to allow people to call them liberals because of the fine reputation of liberalism.
Cultural Libertarians: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/24/rise-of-the-cultural-libertarians/
Sources: http://pastebin.com/aZExEEEP
Lives
-
What Turns Rich Nations into Great Powers? Wealth, Economics, Foreign Policy (1998)
Zakaria's books include The Future of Freedom and The Post-American World. The Future of Freedom argues that what is defined as democracy in the Western world is actually "liberal democracy", a combination of constitutional liberalism and participatory politics. Zakaria points out that protection of liberty and the rule of law actually preceded popular elections by centuries in Western Europe, and
-
World Affairs TODAY Season 7 Episode 13 "The Temptations of Power"
The last few years have seen dramatic changes in the political landscape of several Arab countries. Political entities, in some cases, are operating in the o...
-
Populism, Euro-Scepticism and Nationalism in Europe: Rising Tides?
Populism, euro-scepticism and nationalism are three sleeping demons undermining the European integration project and the very stability of peaceful co-existence of European nations. Nationalistic and illiberal movements are on the rise, and the very idea of European integration is now vehemently opposed by far right and other parties elected to the European and national parliaments. What are the c
-
Mad in India - Interactive Session with Alaine Willaume - Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi
Published on 22 Jun 2012 A Unique Photography Show of 11 French photographers Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi, The French Embassy in India and "Alliance França...
-
In conversation: Russia
Russia's 'managed democracy', with the all-powerful president, Vladimir Putin, dominating an allegedly emasculated parliament and obsequious media, and overr...
-
Disturbing the Peace Intellectuals and Universities in an Illiberal Age
-
The Future of the Middle East and America's Role
he Middle East is currently brimming with violence – bringing into question the future of the region and the role of the United States.
The panel of experts will discuss the possible outcomes of the present turbulence in the Middle East. They will also discuss what options the United States has, and if it should be engaged in the region in the first place.
The panel is moderated by Fadi Elsalame
-
Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings
The Arab uprisings of 2011 created unexpected opportunities for religious radicals. Although many inside and outside the region initially saw the uprisings as liberal triumphs, illiberal forces have benefited disproportionately.
In Tunisia, formally marginalized jihadi-salafi groups appealed for mainstream support, and in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood triumphed in elections. Even in Saudi Arabia,
-
The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement
A seminar with Carrie Rosefsky Wickham, Emory University
In the wake of the Arab Spring, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt reached the heights of state power, but its triumph was short-lived. Since the military intervention of July 2013, the Brotherhood has found itself once again a target of state repression. What does the Brotherhood stand for, and how have its goals and strategies changed ov
-
Fascism in America? Controlled Mass Media?
A must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk] Number 6 on Dr. Lawrence Britt's list of defining characteristics common to fascist regimes is "Cont...
-
Georg Sørensen. Democracy and Democratization
Distinguished professor of International Politics and Economics speaks on the subject of "Democracy and Democratization". Prof. Sørensen currently works as a...
Joseph Stiglitz Says Liberal Democracy Key to Shared Prosperity
The conscious development of a learning society, essential for shared prosperity, can only be achieved in a liberal democracy, according to Nobel prize-winning ...
The conscious development of a learning society, essential for shared prosperity, can only be achieved in a liberal democracy, according to Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, who spoke at CEU on Nov. 10 as part of CEU’s Frontiers of Democracy initiative.
wn.com/Joseph Stiglitz Says Liberal Democracy Key To Shared Prosperity
The conscious development of a learning society, essential for shared prosperity, can only be achieved in a liberal democracy, according to Nobel prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, who spoke at CEU on Nov. 10 as part of CEU’s Frontiers of Democracy initiative.
- published: 14 Nov 2014
- views: 184
World Affairs TODAY Season 8 Episode 10 "Exploring ISIL: Response and Repercussions"
The World Affairs Council – Washington, DC hosts a discussion about ISIL; one of the most momentous and imposing insurgent groups facing America today. What is ...
The World Affairs Council – Washington, DC hosts a discussion about ISIL; one of the most momentous and imposing insurgent groups facing America today. What is it? What is the United States’ response, and how will this impact the security of the region? The expert panel includes the knowledgeable and versed voices of Dr. Shadi Hamid, fellow at Brookings Institution and author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East; Thomas Sanderson, the co-director and senior fellow in the Center for Strategic International Studies Transnational Threats Project; and Kate Brannen, a senior reporter at Foreign Policy covering the defense industry and influence on Capitol Hill who will be moderating the event.
wn.com/World Affairs Today Season 8 Episode 10 Exploring ISIL Response And Repercussions
The World Affairs Council – Washington, DC hosts a discussion about ISIL; one of the most momentous and imposing insurgent groups facing America today. What is it? What is the United States’ response, and how will this impact the security of the region? The expert panel includes the knowledgeable and versed voices of Dr. Shadi Hamid, fellow at Brookings Institution and author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East; Thomas Sanderson, the co-director and senior fellow in the Center for Strategic International Studies Transnational Threats Project; and Kate Brannen, a senior reporter at Foreign Policy covering the defense industry and influence on Capitol Hill who will be moderating the event.
- published: 14 Oct 2014
- views: 10
Illiberal Progressives
The modern progressive movement is, in most ways, directly opposed to the classical liberalism of the Enlightenment.
Despite this, progressives are happy to al...
The modern progressive movement is, in most ways, directly opposed to the classical liberalism of the Enlightenment.
Despite this, progressives are happy to allow people to call them liberals because of the fine reputation of liberalism.
Cultural Libertarians: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/24/rise-of-the-cultural-libertarians/
Sources: http://pastebin.com/aZExEEEP
Livestream Channel:
http://tinyurl.com/pnss243
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SargonofAkkad/
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/Sargon_of_Akkad
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/therationalistsyt
Outro Music: Ken's Theme by FamilyJules7x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etDon1LH1vA
wn.com/Illiberal Progressives
The modern progressive movement is, in most ways, directly opposed to the classical liberalism of the Enlightenment.
Despite this, progressives are happy to allow people to call them liberals because of the fine reputation of liberalism.
Cultural Libertarians: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/24/rise-of-the-cultural-libertarians/
Sources: http://pastebin.com/aZExEEEP
Livestream Channel:
http://tinyurl.com/pnss243
Reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SargonofAkkad/
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/Sargon_of_Akkad
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/therationalistsyt
Outro Music: Ken's Theme by FamilyJules7x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etDon1LH1vA
- published: 04 Sep 2015
- views: 25547
What Turns Rich Nations into Great Powers? Wealth, Economics, Foreign Policy (1998)
Zakaria's books include The Future of Freedom and The Post-American World. The Future of Freedom argues that what is defined as democracy in the Western world i...
Zakaria's books include The Future of Freedom and The Post-American World. The Future of Freedom argues that what is defined as democracy in the Western world is actually "liberal democracy", a combination of constitutional liberalism and participatory politics. Zakaria points out that protection of liberty and the rule of law actually preceded popular elections by centuries in Western Europe, and that when countries only adopt elections without the protection of liberty, they create "illiberal democracy". The Post-American World, published in 2008 before the financial crisis, argued that the most important trend of modern times is the "rise of the rest," the economic emergence of China, India, Brazil, and other countries.[34]
From 2006, Zakaria has also criticized what he views as "fear-based" American policies employed not only in combating terrorism, but also in enforcing immigration and drug smuggling laws, and has argued in favor of decriminalization of drugs and citizenship for presently illegal immigrants to the United States of all backgrounds.[35][36][37] Referring to his views on Iran, Leon Wieseltier described Zakaria as a "consummate spokesman for the shibboleths of the White House and for the smooth new worldliness, the at-the-highest-levels impatience with democracy and human rights as central objectives of our foreign policy, that now characterize advanced liberal thinking about America's role in the world."[38]
Before the 2008 US Presidential election, Zakaria endorsed Barack Obama on his CNN program.[39] In May 2011 The New York Times reported that President Obama has "sounded out prominent journalists like Fareed Zakaria ... and Thomas L. Friedman" concerning Middle East issues.[40]
After the 9/11 attacks, in a Newsweek cover essay, "Why They Hate Us," Zakaria argued that Islamic extremism was not fundamentally rooted in Islam, nor could it be claimed a reaction to American foreign policy. He located the problem in the political/social/economic stagnation of Arab societies, which then bred an extreme, religious opposition. He portrayed Osama bin Laden as one in a long line of extremists who used religion to justify mass murder. Zakaria argued for an inter-generational effort to create more open and dynamic societies in Arab countries, and thereby helping Islam enter the modern world.[41]
Zakaria initially supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[28] He said at the time, "The place is so dysfunctional... any stirring of the pot is good. America's involvement in the region is for the good."[28] He argued for a United Nations-sanctioned operation with a much larger force—approximately 400,000 troops—than was actually employed by the administration of President George W. Bush. In his 2006 book State of Denial, Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward described a 29 November 2001, meeting of Middle East analysts, including Zakaria, that was convened at the request of the then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. According to a New York Times story on Woodward's book, the Wolfowitz meeting ultimately produced a report for President George W. Bush that supported the subsequent invasion of Iraq. Zakaria, however, later told The New York Times that he had briefly attended what he thought was "a brainstorming session".[42] He was not told that a report would be prepared for the President, and in fact, the report did not have his name on it. The Times issued a correction.[43]
In addition to objecting to the war plan, he frequently criticized the way the Bush administration was running the occupation of Iraq.[44] He argued against the disbanding of the army and bureaucracy yet supported the "de-Baathification" programs.[45] He continued to argue that a functioning democracy in Iraq would be a powerful new model for Arab politics, but suggested that an honest accounting would have to say that the costs of the invasion had been much higher than the benefits. He opposed the Iraq surge in March 2007, writing that it would work militarily but not politically, still leaving Iraq divided among its three communities. Instead he advocated that Washington push hard for a political settlement between the Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, and Kurds, and begin a reduction in forces to only 60,000 troops.[44] He later wrote that the surge "succeeded" militarily but that it did not produce a political compact and that Iraq remains divided along sectarian lines, undermining its unity, democracy, and legacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fareed_Zakaria
wn.com/What Turns Rich Nations Into Great Powers Wealth, Economics, Foreign Policy (1998)
Zakaria's books include The Future of Freedom and The Post-American World. The Future of Freedom argues that what is defined as democracy in the Western world is actually "liberal democracy", a combination of constitutional liberalism and participatory politics. Zakaria points out that protection of liberty and the rule of law actually preceded popular elections by centuries in Western Europe, and that when countries only adopt elections without the protection of liberty, they create "illiberal democracy". The Post-American World, published in 2008 before the financial crisis, argued that the most important trend of modern times is the "rise of the rest," the economic emergence of China, India, Brazil, and other countries.[34]
From 2006, Zakaria has also criticized what he views as "fear-based" American policies employed not only in combating terrorism, but also in enforcing immigration and drug smuggling laws, and has argued in favor of decriminalization of drugs and citizenship for presently illegal immigrants to the United States of all backgrounds.[35][36][37] Referring to his views on Iran, Leon Wieseltier described Zakaria as a "consummate spokesman for the shibboleths of the White House and for the smooth new worldliness, the at-the-highest-levels impatience with democracy and human rights as central objectives of our foreign policy, that now characterize advanced liberal thinking about America's role in the world."[38]
Before the 2008 US Presidential election, Zakaria endorsed Barack Obama on his CNN program.[39] In May 2011 The New York Times reported that President Obama has "sounded out prominent journalists like Fareed Zakaria ... and Thomas L. Friedman" concerning Middle East issues.[40]
After the 9/11 attacks, in a Newsweek cover essay, "Why They Hate Us," Zakaria argued that Islamic extremism was not fundamentally rooted in Islam, nor could it be claimed a reaction to American foreign policy. He located the problem in the political/social/economic stagnation of Arab societies, which then bred an extreme, religious opposition. He portrayed Osama bin Laden as one in a long line of extremists who used religion to justify mass murder. Zakaria argued for an inter-generational effort to create more open and dynamic societies in Arab countries, and thereby helping Islam enter the modern world.[41]
Zakaria initially supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[28] He said at the time, "The place is so dysfunctional... any stirring of the pot is good. America's involvement in the region is for the good."[28] He argued for a United Nations-sanctioned operation with a much larger force—approximately 400,000 troops—than was actually employed by the administration of President George W. Bush. In his 2006 book State of Denial, Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward described a 29 November 2001, meeting of Middle East analysts, including Zakaria, that was convened at the request of the then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. According to a New York Times story on Woodward's book, the Wolfowitz meeting ultimately produced a report for President George W. Bush that supported the subsequent invasion of Iraq. Zakaria, however, later told The New York Times that he had briefly attended what he thought was "a brainstorming session".[42] He was not told that a report would be prepared for the President, and in fact, the report did not have his name on it. The Times issued a correction.[43]
In addition to objecting to the war plan, he frequently criticized the way the Bush administration was running the occupation of Iraq.[44] He argued against the disbanding of the army and bureaucracy yet supported the "de-Baathification" programs.[45] He continued to argue that a functioning democracy in Iraq would be a powerful new model for Arab politics, but suggested that an honest accounting would have to say that the costs of the invasion had been much higher than the benefits. He opposed the Iraq surge in March 2007, writing that it would work militarily but not politically, still leaving Iraq divided among its three communities. Instead he advocated that Washington push hard for a political settlement between the Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, and Kurds, and begin a reduction in forces to only 60,000 troops.[44] He later wrote that the surge "succeeded" militarily but that it did not produce a political compact and that Iraq remains divided along sectarian lines, undermining its unity, democracy, and legacy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fareed_Zakaria
- published: 27 Feb 2015
- views: 13
World Affairs TODAY Season 7 Episode 13 "The Temptations of Power"
The last few years have seen dramatic changes in the political landscape of several Arab countries. Political entities, in some cases, are operating in the o......
The last few years have seen dramatic changes in the political landscape of several Arab countries. Political entities, in some cases, are operating in the o...
wn.com/World Affairs Today Season 7 Episode 13 The Temptations Of Power
The last few years have seen dramatic changes in the political landscape of several Arab countries. Political entities, in some cases, are operating in the o...
Populism, Euro-Scepticism and Nationalism in Europe: Rising Tides?
Populism, euro-scepticism and nationalism are three sleeping demons undermining the European integration project and the very stability of peaceful co-existence...
Populism, euro-scepticism and nationalism are three sleeping demons undermining the European integration project and the very stability of peaceful co-existence of European nations. Nationalistic and illiberal movements are on the rise, and the very idea of European integration is now vehemently opposed by far right and other parties elected to the European and national parliaments. What are the causes for the electoral support to these parties? How can we prevent our democracies being overtaken by nationalistic fever and illiberal trends?
Speakers:
Dr. Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga, President of the Club de Madrid and Former President of Latvia
Wojciech Przybylski, Editor in Chief of Res Publica Nowa and the Visegrad Insight, Poland
Dr. Erkka Railo, Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Political Science and Contemporary History in the University of Turku, Finland
Amb. Jerzy Pomianowski, Director of European Endowment for Democracy
Moderator: Andris Aukmanis, Former Executive Director of the Soros Foundation – Latvia
wn.com/Populism, Euro Scepticism And Nationalism In Europe Rising Tides
Populism, euro-scepticism and nationalism are three sleeping demons undermining the European integration project and the very stability of peaceful co-existence of European nations. Nationalistic and illiberal movements are on the rise, and the very idea of European integration is now vehemently opposed by far right and other parties elected to the European and national parliaments. What are the causes for the electoral support to these parties? How can we prevent our democracies being overtaken by nationalistic fever and illiberal trends?
Speakers:
Dr. Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga, President of the Club de Madrid and Former President of Latvia
Wojciech Przybylski, Editor in Chief of Res Publica Nowa and the Visegrad Insight, Poland
Dr. Erkka Railo, Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Political Science and Contemporary History in the University of Turku, Finland
Amb. Jerzy Pomianowski, Director of European Endowment for Democracy
Moderator: Andris Aukmanis, Former Executive Director of the Soros Foundation – Latvia
- published: 13 Sep 2014
- views: 21
Mad in India - Interactive Session with Alaine Willaume - Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi
Published on 22 Jun 2012 A Unique Photography Show of 11 French photographers Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi, The French Embassy in India and "Alliance França......
Published on 22 Jun 2012 A Unique Photography Show of 11 French photographers Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi, The French Embassy in India and "Alliance França...
wn.com/Mad In India Interactive Session With Alaine Willaume Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi
Published on 22 Jun 2012 A Unique Photography Show of 11 French photographers Chandigarh Lalit Kala Akademi, The French Embassy in India and "Alliance França...
In conversation: Russia
Russia's 'managed democracy', with the all-powerful president, Vladimir Putin, dominating an allegedly emasculated parliament and obsequious media, and overr......
Russia's 'managed democracy', with the all-powerful president, Vladimir Putin, dominating an allegedly emasculated parliament and obsequious media, and overr...
wn.com/In Conversation Russia
Russia's 'managed democracy', with the all-powerful president, Vladimir Putin, dominating an allegedly emasculated parliament and obsequious media, and overr...
The Future of the Middle East and America's Role
he Middle East is currently brimming with violence – bringing into question the future of the region and the role of the United States.
The panel of experts wi...
he Middle East is currently brimming with violence – bringing into question the future of the region and the role of the United States.
The panel of experts will discuss the possible outcomes of the present turbulence in the Middle East. They will also discuss what options the United States has, and if it should be engaged in the region in the first place.
The panel is moderated by Fadi Elsalameen.
Shadi Hamid
Dr. Shadi Hamid is a fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Center for Middle East Policy and the author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East (Oxford University Press, 2014). He served as director of research at the Brookings Doha Center until January 2014. Prior to joining Brookings, Hamid was director of research at the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) and a Hewlett Fellow at Stanford University’s Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law.
He is currently vice-chair of POMED’s board of directors, a member of the World Bank’s MENA Advisory Panel, and a contributing writer to The Atlantic. His articles have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, The New Republic, Foreign Policy, The National Interest, and many other publications. His writing has been featured on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” and the Washington Post named him one of the top 23 Twitter accounts “you must follow to understand Egypt.”
Hamid received his B.S. and M.A. from Georgetown University and Ph.D. in political science from Oxford University.
Tara D. Sonenshine
Tara D. Sonenshine is the former Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs for the Department of State and previously served as the Executive Vice President of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). She is an adjunct faculty member and former Distinguished Fellow at George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs.
Prior to joining USIP, she was a strategic communications adviser to many international organizations including USIP, the International Crisis Group, Internews, CARE, The American Academy of Diplomacy, and the International Women’s Media Foundation. Ms. Sonenshine served in various capacities at the White House during the Clinton Administration, including Transition Director, Director of Foreign Policy Planning for the National Security Council, and Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Communications.
Prior to serving in the Clinton Administration, Ms. Sonenshine was an Editorial Producer of ABC News’ Nightline, where she worked for more than a decade. She was also an off-air reporter at the Pentagon for ABC’s World News Tonight and is the recipient of 10 News Emmy Awards for coverage of international affairs.
She holds a B.A. in Political Science from Tufts University.
Fadi Elsalameen
Fadi Elsalameen is a Principal of YCF Group LLC, a private international investment firm.
Elsalameen is actively involved in several of YCF Group’s portfolio investments that address global food and maritime security issues including YCF Maritime, a leading global shipping services company and YCF Agriculture, a large-scale international agribusiness company.
Previously, Elsalameen served as the Director General of two internet newspapers in English and Arabic covering the United States and the Middle East. He holds a BS in Biochemistry from Earlham College and a Master’s degree in International Relations and Economics from The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) with a specialization in China studies.
Elsalameen has been a member of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) and is a Fellow with the New America Foundation’s American Strategy Program, a nonpartisan public policy institute that invests in new thinkers and new ideas to address the next generation of challenges facing the United States.
Paul Hamill
Paul Hamill is the Chief Operating Officer and Director of External Affairs for the American Security Project (ASP), and a leading political and national security communications strategist.
Paul has advised major clients on strategic narratives, communications planning, influence operations and approaches, political campaigning, media engagements, as well as detailed communications research and analysis.
As Director of External Affairs for ASP, Paul develops and implements public policy campaigns on key national security issues. At ASP, Paul also works on national security strategy issues and information/influence campaign policies.
Paul has provided advice to a number of high-level foreign policy officials regarding National Security Strategic Communications; these include officials within the NSC, DOD, CENTCOM, Congressional staff, and officials from a number of other countries.
wn.com/The Future Of The Middle East And America's Role
he Middle East is currently brimming with violence – bringing into question the future of the region and the role of the United States.
The panel of experts will discuss the possible outcomes of the present turbulence in the Middle East. They will also discuss what options the United States has, and if it should be engaged in the region in the first place.
The panel is moderated by Fadi Elsalameen.
Shadi Hamid
Dr. Shadi Hamid is a fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Center for Middle East Policy and the author of Temptations of Power: Islamists and Illiberal Democracy in a New Middle East (Oxford University Press, 2014). He served as director of research at the Brookings Doha Center until January 2014. Prior to joining Brookings, Hamid was director of research at the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) and a Hewlett Fellow at Stanford University’s Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law.
He is currently vice-chair of POMED’s board of directors, a member of the World Bank’s MENA Advisory Panel, and a contributing writer to The Atlantic. His articles have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Foreign Affairs, The New Republic, Foreign Policy, The National Interest, and many other publications. His writing has been featured on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” and the Washington Post named him one of the top 23 Twitter accounts “you must follow to understand Egypt.”
Hamid received his B.S. and M.A. from Georgetown University and Ph.D. in political science from Oxford University.
Tara D. Sonenshine
Tara D. Sonenshine is the former Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs for the Department of State and previously served as the Executive Vice President of the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). She is an adjunct faculty member and former Distinguished Fellow at George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs.
Prior to joining USIP, she was a strategic communications adviser to many international organizations including USIP, the International Crisis Group, Internews, CARE, The American Academy of Diplomacy, and the International Women’s Media Foundation. Ms. Sonenshine served in various capacities at the White House during the Clinton Administration, including Transition Director, Director of Foreign Policy Planning for the National Security Council, and Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Communications.
Prior to serving in the Clinton Administration, Ms. Sonenshine was an Editorial Producer of ABC News’ Nightline, where she worked for more than a decade. She was also an off-air reporter at the Pentagon for ABC’s World News Tonight and is the recipient of 10 News Emmy Awards for coverage of international affairs.
She holds a B.A. in Political Science from Tufts University.
Fadi Elsalameen
Fadi Elsalameen is a Principal of YCF Group LLC, a private international investment firm.
Elsalameen is actively involved in several of YCF Group’s portfolio investments that address global food and maritime security issues including YCF Maritime, a leading global shipping services company and YCF Agriculture, a large-scale international agribusiness company.
Previously, Elsalameen served as the Director General of two internet newspapers in English and Arabic covering the United States and the Middle East. He holds a BS in Biochemistry from Earlham College and a Master’s degree in International Relations and Economics from The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) with a specialization in China studies.
Elsalameen has been a member of the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) and is a Fellow with the New America Foundation’s American Strategy Program, a nonpartisan public policy institute that invests in new thinkers and new ideas to address the next generation of challenges facing the United States.
Paul Hamill
Paul Hamill is the Chief Operating Officer and Director of External Affairs for the American Security Project (ASP), and a leading political and national security communications strategist.
Paul has advised major clients on strategic narratives, communications planning, influence operations and approaches, political campaigning, media engagements, as well as detailed communications research and analysis.
As Director of External Affairs for ASP, Paul develops and implements public policy campaigns on key national security issues. At ASP, Paul also works on national security strategy issues and information/influence campaign policies.
Paul has provided advice to a number of high-level foreign policy officials regarding National Security Strategic Communications; these include officials within the NSC, DOD, CENTCOM, Congressional staff, and officials from a number of other countries.
- published: 19 Sep 2014
- views: 19
Religious Radicalism after the Arab Uprisings
The Arab uprisings of 2011 created unexpected opportunities for religious radicals. Although many inside and outside the region initially saw the uprisings as l...
The Arab uprisings of 2011 created unexpected opportunities for religious radicals. Although many inside and outside the region initially saw the uprisings as liberal triumphs, illiberal forces have benefited disproportionately.
In Tunisia, formally marginalized jihadi-salafi groups appealed for mainstream support, and in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood triumphed in elections. Even in Saudi Arabia, not known for either lively politics or for political entrepreneurship, a surprising array of forces praised the rise of “Islamic democracy” under a Muslim Brotherhood banner.
Yet, at the same time, the Arab uprisings reinforced regional governments’ advantages. The chaos engulfing parts of the region convinced some citizens that they were better off with the governments they had, and many governments successfully employed old and new tools of repression to reinforce the status quo.
In the Middle East, conflicts that many thought were coming to an end will continue, as will the dynamism and innovation that have emerged among radical and opposition groups. To face the current threats, governments will need to use many of their existing tools skillfully, but they will also need to judge what tools will no longer work, and what new tools they have at their disposal. The stakes could not be higher.
For over a year the CSIS Middle East Program and Transnational Threats Project have examined how changing political contexts across the Middle East and North Africa are affecting the capabilities and evolution of extremist group and analyzed the strategic impact of these developments. This event will discuss the project's key findings.
Featuring:
Dr. Jon B. Alterman
Senior Vice President, Zbigniew Brzezinski Chair in Global Security and Geostrategy, and Director, CSIS Middle East Program
Haim Malka
Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, CSIS Middle East Program
Thomas M. Sanderson
Codirector and Senior Fellow, CSIS Transnational Threats Project
Moderated by:
Dr. Abderrahim Foukara
Washington, D.C. Bureau Chief, Al Jazeera
Monday, December 15, 2014
9:00 to 10:30 a.m.
1616 Rhode Island Ave. NW / First Floor Conference Room
RSVP required, please email middleeastprogram@csis.org.
We are grateful to the government of Singapore and the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency for their generous support of this study. The report will be available at the launch event and on the CSIS website on December 15, 2014.
http://csis.org/event/religious-radicalism-after-arab-uprisings
wn.com/Religious Radicalism After The Arab Uprisings
The Arab uprisings of 2011 created unexpected opportunities for religious radicals. Although many inside and outside the region initially saw the uprisings as liberal triumphs, illiberal forces have benefited disproportionately.
In Tunisia, formally marginalized jihadi-salafi groups appealed for mainstream support, and in Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood triumphed in elections. Even in Saudi Arabia, not known for either lively politics or for political entrepreneurship, a surprising array of forces praised the rise of “Islamic democracy” under a Muslim Brotherhood banner.
Yet, at the same time, the Arab uprisings reinforced regional governments’ advantages. The chaos engulfing parts of the region convinced some citizens that they were better off with the governments they had, and many governments successfully employed old and new tools of repression to reinforce the status quo.
In the Middle East, conflicts that many thought were coming to an end will continue, as will the dynamism and innovation that have emerged among radical and opposition groups. To face the current threats, governments will need to use many of their existing tools skillfully, but they will also need to judge what tools will no longer work, and what new tools they have at their disposal. The stakes could not be higher.
For over a year the CSIS Middle East Program and Transnational Threats Project have examined how changing political contexts across the Middle East and North Africa are affecting the capabilities and evolution of extremist group and analyzed the strategic impact of these developments. This event will discuss the project's key findings.
Featuring:
Dr. Jon B. Alterman
Senior Vice President, Zbigniew Brzezinski Chair in Global Security and Geostrategy, and Director, CSIS Middle East Program
Haim Malka
Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, CSIS Middle East Program
Thomas M. Sanderson
Codirector and Senior Fellow, CSIS Transnational Threats Project
Moderated by:
Dr. Abderrahim Foukara
Washington, D.C. Bureau Chief, Al Jazeera
Monday, December 15, 2014
9:00 to 10:30 a.m.
1616 Rhode Island Ave. NW / First Floor Conference Room
RSVP required, please email middleeastprogram@csis.org.
We are grateful to the government of Singapore and the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency for their generous support of this study. The report will be available at the launch event and on the CSIS website on December 15, 2014.
http://csis.org/event/religious-radicalism-after-arab-uprisings
- published: 15 Dec 2014
- views: 74
The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement
A seminar with Carrie Rosefsky Wickham, Emory University
In the wake of the Arab Spring, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt reached the heights of state power...
A seminar with Carrie Rosefsky Wickham, Emory University
In the wake of the Arab Spring, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt reached the heights of state power, but its triumph was short-lived. Since the military intervention of July 2013, the Brotherhood has found itself once again a target of state repression. What does the Brotherhood stand for, and how have its goals and strategies changed over time? Tracing the Brotherhood’s evolution from 1928 to the present, Wickham demonstrates that it has gravitated toward global themes of freedom and democracy without fully abandoning illiberal concepts of Shari’a carried over from the past. Yet what Shari’a rule would mean in practice and how it should be pursued have become hotly contested within the Brotherhood itself. And the collapse of Egypt’s brief experiment in Islamist governance has prompted a new wave of learning in Brotherhood circles, raising the prospects of deeper movement change in the future.
Carrie Rosefsky Wickham is a Professor of Political Science at Emory University. Her research investigates the dynamics of social movements and contentious politics in authoritarian settings, with a regional focus on the Middle East. She is the author of Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism and Political Change in Egypt (Columbia University Press, 2002), and The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement (Princeton University Press, 2013). Her articles have appeared in a variety of academic journals. Wickham has presented her research findings at many universities in the United States, Canada and Europe, as well as to the State Department, the National Intelligence Council, the National Security Council, the Supreme NATO Command, and staff members in the U.S. Congress.
wn.com/The Muslim Brotherhood Evolution Of An Islamist Movement
A seminar with Carrie Rosefsky Wickham, Emory University
In the wake of the Arab Spring, Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt reached the heights of state power, but its triumph was short-lived. Since the military intervention of July 2013, the Brotherhood has found itself once again a target of state repression. What does the Brotherhood stand for, and how have its goals and strategies changed over time? Tracing the Brotherhood’s evolution from 1928 to the present, Wickham demonstrates that it has gravitated toward global themes of freedom and democracy without fully abandoning illiberal concepts of Shari’a carried over from the past. Yet what Shari’a rule would mean in practice and how it should be pursued have become hotly contested within the Brotherhood itself. And the collapse of Egypt’s brief experiment in Islamist governance has prompted a new wave of learning in Brotherhood circles, raising the prospects of deeper movement change in the future.
Carrie Rosefsky Wickham is a Professor of Political Science at Emory University. Her research investigates the dynamics of social movements and contentious politics in authoritarian settings, with a regional focus on the Middle East. She is the author of Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism and Political Change in Egypt (Columbia University Press, 2002), and The Muslim Brotherhood: Evolution of an Islamist Movement (Princeton University Press, 2013). Her articles have appeared in a variety of academic journals. Wickham has presented her research findings at many universities in the United States, Canada and Europe, as well as to the State Department, the National Intelligence Council, the National Security Council, the Supreme NATO Command, and staff members in the U.S. Congress.
- published: 16 Dec 2014
- views: 3
Fascism in America? Controlled Mass Media?
A must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk] Number 6 on Dr. Lawrence Britt's list of defining characteristics common to fascist regimes is "Cont......
A must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk] Number 6 on Dr. Lawrence Britt's list of defining characteristics common to fascist regimes is "Cont...
wn.com/Fascism In America Controlled Mass Media
A must-see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fvJ8nFa5Qk] Number 6 on Dr. Lawrence Britt's list of defining characteristics common to fascist regimes is "Cont...
- published: 17 Aug 2012
- views: 788
-
author: NRUN65
Georg Sørensen. Democracy and Democratization
Distinguished professor of International Politics and Economics speaks on the subject of "Democracy and Democratization". Prof. Sørensen currently works as a......
Distinguished professor of International Politics and Economics speaks on the subject of "Democracy and Democratization". Prof. Sørensen currently works as a...
wn.com/Georg Sørensen. Democracy And Democratization
Distinguished professor of International Politics and Economics speaks on the subject of "Democracy and Democratization". Prof. Sørensen currently works as a...
- published: 23 Mar 2011
- views: 2398
-
author: VU TSPMI