The Federalist (later known as
The Federalist Papers) is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by
Alexander Hamilton,
James Madison, and
John Jay promoting the ratification of the
United States Constitution. Seventy-seven were published serially in
The Independent Journal and
The New York Packet between October 1787 and August 1788. A compilation of these and eight others, called The Federalist; or, The New
Constitution, was published in two volumes in 1788 by J. and A. McLean.[1] The collection's original title was The Federalist; the title The Federalist Papers did not emerge until the
20th century.
Though the authors of The Federalist Papers foremost wished to influence the vote in favor of ratifying the Constitution, in
Federalist No. 1 they explicitly set that debate in broader political terms:
It has been frequently remarked, that it seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not, of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend, for their political constitutions, on accident and force.[2]
There are many highlights among the essays of The Federalist.
Federalist No. 10, in which
Madison discusses the means of preventing rule by majority faction and advocates a large, commercial republic, is generally regarded as the most important of the 85 articles from a philosophical perspective; it is complemented by
Federalist No. 14, in which Madison takes the measure of the
United States, declares it appropriate for an extended republic, and concludes with a memorable defense of the constitutional and political creativity of the
Federal Convention.[3] In
Federalist No. 84,
Hamilton makes the case that there is no need to amend the Constitution by adding a
Bill of Rights, insisting that the various provisions in the proposed Constitution protecting liberty amount to a "bill of rights".
Federalist No. 78, also written by Hamilton, lays the groundwork for the doctrine of judicial review by federal courts of federal legislation or executive acts.
Federalist No. 70 presents
Hamilton's case for a one-man chief executive. In
Federalist No. 39, Madison presents the clearest exposition of what has come to be called "
Federalism". In
Federalist No. 51, Madison distills arguments for checks and balances in an essay often quoted for its justification of government as "the greatest of all reflections on human nature."
According to historian
Richard B. Morris, they are an "incomparable exposition of the Constitution, a classic in political science unsurpassed in both breadth and depth by the product of any later
American writer."
Federal judges, when interpreting the Constitution, frequently use The Federalist Papers as a contemporary account of the intentions of the framers and ratifiers.[31] They have been applied on issues ranging from the power of the federal government in foreign affairs (in
Hines v. Davidowitz) to the validity of ex post facto laws (in the 1798 decision
Calder v. Bull, apparently the first decision to mention The Federalist).[32] By
2000, The Federalist had been quoted
291 times in
Supreme Court decisions.[33]
The amount of deference that should be given to The Federalist Papers in constitutional interpretation has always been somewhat controversial. As early as 1819,
Chief Justice John Marshall noted in the famous case
McCulloch v. Maryland, that "the opinions expressed by the authors of that work have been justly supposed to be entitled to great respect in expounding the Constitution. No tribute can be paid to them which exceeds their merit; but in applying their opinions to the cases which may arise in the progress of our government, a right to judge of their correctness must be retained."[34] Madison believed The Federalist Papers were the ideas of the
Founders and not just mere expressions. In a letter to
Thomas Ritchie in 1821, he stated that "the legitimate meaning of the
Instrument must be derived from the text itself; or if a key is to be sought elsewhere, it must be not in the opinions or intentions of the
Body which planned & proposed the Constitution, but in the sense attached to it by the people in their respective
State Conventions where it recd. all the authority which it possesses."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Federalist_Papers
- published: 06 Jul 2015
- views: 315