Article-147 of Constitution says that Supreme judges have to obey British Court & Solutions - H142

• Report rights infringement
• published: 03 Feb 2013
• views: 11826

अधिक चर्चा के लिए www.forum.righttorecall.info या http://www.facebook.com/groups/rrgindia/ पर जाकर रजिस्टर करें और पोस्ट करें | रजिस्टर किया हुआ यूसर आई.डी. info@righttorecall.info पर भेजें | For more information, register at www.forum.righttorecall.info or http://www.facebook.com/groups/rrgindia/ and post.After registering, please send your registered user id. to info@righttorecall.info Article 147. Interpretation In this Chapter and in Chapter V of Part VI references to any substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution shall be construed as including references to any substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Government of India Act, 1935 (including any enactment amending or supplementing that Act), or of any Order in Council or order made thereunder, or of the Indian Independence Act, 1947 , or of any order made thereunder CHAPTER V COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR === GENERAL OF INDIA (The aforesaid provisions has laid downs the conditions upon the Supreme Court and High Courts not to interpret anything beyond the scope of the interpretation of the Government of India Act, 1935). (The Government of India Act, 1935 was enacted by the British parliament, so amendment in it, obviously can be made by the British Parliament only, which means Article 147 is imposing a condition upon the Indian Judiciary to recognise any subsequent amendment, if passed by the British Parliament, thus virtually the sovereignty of Indian Judiciary with regards to interpretations are concerned, was tagged with the right of the British Parliament to amend the said Act). (On the other hand provision does not provide any provision for amendment in Indian Independence Act 1947). (The word "Council" is denotes to British Privy Council. Otherwise what is justification in Judgments pronounced by the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court based on references from the Judgments of the British Privy Council)? === Indian Independence Act 1947 The Indian Independence Act 1947 (10 & 11 Geo 6 c. 30) was as an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that partitioned British India into the two new independent dominions of India and Pakistan. The Act received the royal assent on 18 July 1947, and Pakistan came into being on August 14, and India on August 15, as two new countries.[1] The legislation was formulated by the government of Prime Minister Clement Attlee, after representatives of the Indian National Congress,[2] the Muslim League,[3] and the Sikh community[4] came to an agreement with the Viceroy of India, Lord Mountbatten of Burma, on what has come to be known as the 3 June Plan or Mountbatten Plan. === Government of India Act 1935 The Government of India Act 1935 was originally passed in August 1935 (25 & 26 Geo. 5 c. 42), and is said to have been the longest (British) Act of Parliament ever enacted by that time. Because of its length[citation needed], the Act was retroactively split by the Government of India (Reprinting) Act 1935 (26 Geo. 5 & 1 Edw. 8 c. 1) into two separate Acts: ==== Solution - TCP, Right to recall over PM, judges Please see these solution-drafts in chapter 1,6,7, www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf ============== Article 147 Hindi Translation निर्वचन--इस अध्याय में और भाग 6 के अध्याय 5 में इस संविधान के निर्वचन के बारे में विधि के किसी सारवान्‌ प्रश्न के प्रति निर्देशों का यह अर्थ लगाया जाएगा कि उनके अतंर्गत भारत शासन अधिनियम, 1935 के (जिसके अंतर्गत उस अधिनियम की संशोधक या अनुपूरक कोई अधिनियमिति है) अथवा किसी सपरिषद आदेश या उसके अधीन बनाए गए किसी आदेश के अथवा भारतीय स्वतंत्रता अधिनियम, 1947 के या उसके अधीन बनाए गए किसी आदेश के निर्वचन के बारे में विधि के किसी सारवान्‌ प्रश्न के प्रति निर्देश हैं। ======= समाधान - पारदर्शी शिकायत / प्रस्ताव प्रणाली (टी.सी.पी), राईट टू रिकाल-प्रधानमंत्री, राईट टू रिकाल-जज | कृपया ये समाधान-ड्राफ्ट चैप्टर 1,6,7 www.righttorecall.info/301.h.pdf में देखें |